Picture: Redux Rescind Recommendation
[QUOTE=JaxTantricMan;2396449]In all fairness the lady in question contacted me after a fellow Hobbyist told her about my rescind recommendation post. Go figure.
She told me the picture she sent me was in fact not her but one she downloaded from a website. I can't get the pix attached or you could see for yourself what freaked me out. Will try when I get more satellite bandwidth. Rest assured I had every valid reason to believe that was a pix of her which is why I wrote the rescind post and did not do so lightly.
Question remains. Do I see her again? Guess only time will tell.
To each his own and as always YMMV and each Hobbyist makes his own decisions and lives with the consequences.[/QUOTE]Can't attach the pix that I thought was of her as it is too large. I've sent it to A2 to see if he can add it.
Regardless, it's pretty scary and I wish you could clearly see what I was concerned about.
1 photos
Picture: Redux Rescind Recommendation
[QUOTE=JaxTantricMan;2396826]Can't attach the pix that I thought was of her as it is too large. I've sent it to A2 to see if he can add it.
Regardless, it's pretty scary and I wish you could clearly see what I was concerned about.[/QUOTE]OK, got the pix sized right and attached. Here's my other concern. She said she downloaded the pix on 8 March from a website, but the pix itself is dated 4 March, which matches the story she told me about it happening the week prior. I also got some bandwidth and checked Tineye and Google Image and got zero hits.
To each his own, I'm going to take a permanent pass on this one. Dang, and I thought it was going to be a LTR.
Thanks for looking out. I almost pulled the trigger
[QUOTE=KittyLikker;2396384]She's real but a nut job. Mixed reviews but showed me some fine skills. Was hard to schedule with. Changes nationality from time to time, search for reviews here on "Kati".[/QUOTE]You were right I found it. Thanks buddy.
Its Been Said a Million times but.
[QUOTE=JaxTantricMan;2397028]OK, got the pix sized right and attached. Here's my other concern. She said she downloaded the pix on 8 March from a website, but the pix itself is dated 4 March, which matches the story she told me about it happening the week prior. I also got some bandwidth and checked Tineye and Google Image and got zero hits.
To each his own, I'm going to take a permanent pass on this one. Dang, and I thought it was going to be a LTR.[/QUOTE]They ALL go "glove-less" ALL OF THEM! EVERYONE! At some point with some one they are bare skin on skin, GUARANTEED! No judgement here, just a realist in a real world.