Rants and Raves

[QUOTE=HeavyHitter12;5289225]So this bill does not allow for food and water to be provided in voting lines, and requires identification for absentee voting. But exactly how does this bill discriminate based on race? It's possible for any US citizen to obtain proper identification. It seems to me a bit racist to assume minorities aren't able to vote based on these "regulations. ".[/QUOTE]Just to be clear, the bill does not forbid anyone from providing food and water, it only forbids them from doing it on behalf of a candidate or party. If democrats love people that much they can go and give out all the water etc. they want, they just can't say where it comes from or who is paying for it, they won't though because they won't get credit for doing it because they can't attach their brand to it.

Oldti, mamasans and one of the girls gofundme accounts are a hair under $100 k each. Fight that asian hate racism and donate to push all over 100 k.

[QUOTE=AaronHamlet;5290119]Oldti, mamasans and one of the girls gofundme accounts are a hair under $100 k each. Fight that asian hate racism and donate to push all over 100 k.[/QUOTE]That is awesome. Hopefully the money goes to a good cause.

[QUOTE=SkyWookie;5290032]Just to be clear, the bill does not forbid anyone from providing food and water, it only forbids them from doing it on behalf of a candidate or party. If democrats love people that much they can go and give out all the water etc. they want, they just can't say where it comes from or who is paying for it, they won't though because they won't get credit for doing it because they can't attach their brand to it.[/QUOTE]The voters may also bring a bottle of water with them along with a snack. The polling stations are also allowed to provide water fountains. If that still doesn't work you can step out of line (get someone to hold your spot) and purchase a bottle of water and a snack. Scratching my head as to how the water bottle is a lightening rod for racism. For the absentee ballot they now require a form of I D. OK, pick from five choices one of which is to write down the last 4 digits of your SS#. Is this voter suppression? I guess so but it does apply to all races. The do nothing alternative is to rely on "Signature Matches". I think a some form of I D is an extremely low hurdle for any registered voter to cross to vote absentee.

[QUOTE=JMAbacus;5290246]The voters may also bring a bottle of water with them along with a snack. The polling stations are also allowed to provide water fountains. If that still doesn't work you can step out of line (get someone to hold your spot) and purchase a bottle of water and a snack. Scratching my head as to how the water bottle is a lightening rod for racism. For the absentee ballot they now require a form of I D. OK, pick from five choices one of which is to write down the last 4 digits of your SS#. Is this voter suppression? I guess so but it does apply to all races. The do nothing alternative is to rely on "Signature Matches". I think a some form of I D is an extremely low hurdle for any registered voter to cross to vote absentee.[/QUOTE]It's less about the water and more about making the process time-consuming and unpleasant enough to get people to give up and go home in the less-nice (black / ethnic / poor) areas of town.

For instance: I live in an upper-class area of town. There are three voting precincts within two miles of me. There was no line when I went, it took all of 5 minutes. I didn't think about bringing snacks, water, or anything. Just stopped by, voted, and left. Probably 15-20 voting machines inside.

I also accompanied two friends to vote. One in East Point, one in Norcross, both poorer and more diverse areas. Waiting times were well over an hour. No shade for people to wait in. Lines wrapped around the buildings (church and library), but there were only 3 voting machines at each location.

Signature matching, on the other hand, is a whole different ballgame. I know I don't have a consistent signature. I rarely have to sign shit. If someone were supposed to verify my signature against my drivers license? My vote would 100% be thrown out. As would everyone else without a practiced, consistent signature. Think about the kinds of people who have one, think about the kinds of people who don't.

Either way, we're still only seeing 50% turnout for elections. The question should be how can we get more voters, rather than how can we add extra steps to the process. Something something taxation without representation. Because the IRS misses NOBODY.

[QUOTE=Vx333;5290314]It's less about the water and more about making the process time-consuming and unpleasant enough to get people to give up and go home in the less-nice (black / ethnic / poor) areas of town.

For instance: I live in an upper-class area of town. There are three voting precincts within two miles of me. There was no line when I went, it took all of 5 minutes. I didn't think about bringing snacks, water, or anything. Just stopped by, voted, and left. Probably 15-20 voting machines inside.

I also accompanied two friends to vote. One in East Point, one in Norcross, both poorer and more diverse areas. Waiting times were well over an hour. No shade for people to wait in. Lines wrapped around the buildings (church and library), but there were only 3 voting machines at each location.

Signature matching, on the other hand, is a whole different ballgame. I know I don't have a consistent signature. I rarely have to sign shit. If someone were supposed to verify my signature against my drivers license? My vote would 100% be thrown out. As would everyone else without a practiced, consistent signature. Think about the kinds of people who have one, think about the kinds of people who don't.[/QUOTE]If you wish to see the devil behind every Bush and tree then that is what you will see. You act like only white people have to wait for five minutes under shady trees to vote. I'm a white guy who waited in line for up to two hours in the last two elections along with the other ethnic representations. In fact, there were a lot of white people standing in line as well. Of course we were all outraged that no one from the slave class came to hold palm fronds over our white heads to shield us from the boiling sun overhead. In November and January no less. You say we are only seeing 50% turnout for elections. Where did you get that figure? Seems quite low to me. Blacks are voting in record numbers and yet somehow they are being suppressed and prevented from voting? Think about the people out there (Stacy Abrams, for example) who are using people like you to advocate voter fraud. She is all about that, by the way. Can the system be improved? Yes, of course, and it always should be to include as many people as possible, but the one thing that should never be compromised is the rule of identification. Get rid of that and you might as well not have elections anymore, which is part of the woke plan, by the way. I don't know why you don't know how to sign your name anymore but it is becoming clearer to me why cursive writing skills are being abandoned as part of the educational process. Fits right in with Fat Stacy and her mob's agenda. Create chaos, divide, and then conquer.

[QUOTE=Vx333;5290314]

Signature matching, on the other hand, is a whole different ballgame. I know I don't have a consistent signature. I rarely have to sign shit. If someone were supposed to verify my signature against my drivers license? My vote would 100% be thrown out. As would everyone else without a practiced, consistent signature. Think about the kinds of people who have one, think about the kinds of people who don't.

[/QUOTE]'Think about the kinds of people who have one, think about the kinds of people who don't.' Ok. Been thinking about it. Which 'kinds' of people do and which don't?


New law does away w / signature matching. You don't even have to know last 4 of SSN, 'they can provide one of several alternative forms of identification, such as a copy of a utility bill, bank statement or government check. '.

Good woke virtue signaling tho, dude.

[QUOTE=SkyWookie;5290032]Just to be clear, the bill does not forbid anyone from providing food and water, it only forbids them from doing it on behalf of a candidate or party. If democrats love people that much they can go and give out all the water etc. they want, they just can't say where it comes from or who is paying for it, they won't though because they won't get credit for doing it because they can't attach their brand to it.[/QUOTE]To clarify the whole water deal.

The law forbids water and food distribution within 150 ft of the polls, which I will have to guess they mean the door to the building. If you can't stand in a line for 150 ft for the short amount of time it'd take to push a straight democratic ticket, you might need to go ahead and order a casket. Personally I don't care how hot it is outside, how thirsty I may be at the time, no bottle of water or pack of crackers is going to sway my vote. There's so much misinformation going around about this bill that unless you actually sit down and spend 30-45 minutes reading it, you have no idea what is factual. My personal opinion is, if you think it's racist then try explaining why I can't walk onto a plane with a bottle of liquid that wasn't purchased after I had to provide ID to get past the TSA checkpoint. This new law affects every voter, regardless of party. No suspected fraud will "be tossed out" by anyone without a thorough review by a bi-partisan committee of state officials. It's not 100% in the hands of some republican committee.

[QUOTE=SkyWookie;5290032]Just to be clear, the bill does not forbid anyone from providing food and water, it only forbids them from doing it on behalf of a candidate or party. If democrats love people that much they can go and give out all the water etc. they want, they just can't say where it comes from or who is paying for it, they won't though because they won't get credit for doing it because they can't attach their brand to it.[/QUOTE]No one, but no one, can distribute food or water within the 150 foot (or whatever that limit is) rule but can do so before that point and can set up a stand outside that limit. The intent was to prevent campaigning but that was not specified. But realistically, if it is hot and a long line and you told the person behind you that you going to get water and offer to bring them a bottle, would the person behind not let them back in?

[QUOTE=Vx333;5290314]It's less about the water and more about making the process time-consuming and unpleasant enough to get people to give up and go home in the less-nice (black / ethnic / poor) areas of town.
For instance: I live in an upper-class area of town. There are three voting precincts within two miles of me. There was no line when I went, it took all of 5 minutes. I didn't think about bringing snacks, water, or anything. Just stopped by, voted, and left. Probably 15-20 voting machines inside.
I also accompanied two friends to vote. One in East Point, one in Norcross, both poorer and more diverse areas. Waiting times were well over an hour. No shade for people to wait in. Lines wrapped around the buildings (church and library), but there were only 3 voting machines at each location.
Signature matching, on the other hand, is a whole different ballgame. I know I don't have a consistent signature. I rarely have to sign shit. If someone were supposed to verify my signature against my drivers license? My vote would 100% be thrown out. As would everyone else without a practiced, consistent signature. Think about the kinds of people who have one, think about the kinds of people who don't.
Either way, we're still only seeing 50% turnout for elections. The question should be how can we get more voters, rather than how can we add extra steps to the process. Something something taxation without representation. Because the IRS misses NOBODY.[/QUOTE]The state is not responsible for long lines most of the time. That is the responsibility of the County Election Officials the same ones who can be relieved by the state if they consistently have issues. The one exception in my 21 years of voting in GA was last year's primaries with the new machines and I do not who exactly to blame. Many places were having issues getting the machines to recognize the DLs and it turns out they were not trained correctly. When word came down to place the DLs upside down and they worked, my poll Mgr stated that this was contrary to their training.

Does anyone believe that had the Republicans not suffered 3 embarrassing defeats during the last election that they'd have passed this controversial set of voting laws?. Most of Which negate laws that the Republicans passed in 2008.

[QUOTE=LoveARub69;5290594]Does anyone believe that had the Republicans not suffered 3 embarrassing defeats during the last election that they'd have passed this controversial set of voting laws?. Most of Which negate laws that the Republicans passed in 2008.[/QUOTE]When you move the pendulum, in this case, to make it a bit easier to vote and realize you moved it too far, you move it back. PLUS, since dropboxes were never codified in GA law they now have prescribed their use for the entire state.

[QUOTE=SgtLurker;5290558]No one, but no one, can distribute food or water within the 150 foot (or whatever that limit is) rule but can do so before that point and can set up a stand outside that limit. The intent was to prevent campaigning but that was not specified. But realistically, if it is hot and a long line and you told the person behind you that you going to get water and offer to bring them a bottle, would the person behind not let them back in?[/QUOTE]All this talk about restricting voters here, and yet I read today where New York has much stricter voting laws. And, we all know which political party runs things in New York.

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;5290749]All this talk about restricting voters here, and yet I read today where New York has much stricter voting laws. And, we all know which political party runs things in New York.[/QUOTE]I too just read about the differences in voting laws between GA and leftwing radical NY, and NY is FAR stricter than GA could imagine, but again, if you do anything a democrat doesn't like you must be a racist, or bigot, or sexist or some other evil work just because they don't agree with you.

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;5290749]All this talk about restricting voters here, and yet I read today where New York has much stricter voting laws. And, we all know which political party runs things in New York.[/QUOTE]Even mumbling Joe's home state of Delaware has far stricter rules than here in Georgia.

[QUOTE=CrestWood87;5291343]Even mumbling Joe's home state of Delaware has far stricter rules than here in Georgia.[/QUOTE]Mumblemouth's home state is run by the woke Democrat crowd, disgusting, vile hypocrites that they are and therefore off limits to comparison and criticism. The befuddled, bony-assed, decrepit old fool continues to lie about the GA. Law every day and yet the media traitors offer no push back as they enable the new American Communist Party to turn this nation into a totalitarian nightmare.

[QUOTE=HobbyMan51;5292928]Mumblemouth's home state is run by the woke Democrat crowd, disgusting, vile hypocrites that they are and therefore off limits to comparison and criticism. The befuddled, bony-assed, decrepit old fool continues to lie about the GA. Law every day and yet the media traitors offer no push back as they enable the new American Communist Party to turn this nation into a totalitarian nightmare.[/QUOTE]The most dangerous part of the Georgia voting law is that it removes from the State Election Board the vote of the Secretary of State—even though under Georgia Constitution, the Scty of State oversees elections. It also puts the board under the control of the legislature. And the election board can suspend and replace any local election official basically anytime they want, for just about any reason—like having an honest election. (And I thought Republicans didn't like big government).

If that had been the law in November, a state board controlled by the Republican legislature would have been able to do exactly what President Trump illegally wanted—firing election officials in counties, like Clayton, Dekalb and Fulton, that voted big for Biden. And then sending in carpetbaggers to declare fraud where there was none, and fraudulently throw out thousands of African-American votes.

And yes there are even more ways that the new voter suppression law is designed to make voting harder in Georgia:

- You can still vote absentee for any reason, but now it's illegal for officials to send absentee applications to every voter.

- The law also reduces how much time a voter has to request a ballot, and blocks any organizations that help people get absentee ballots. It also requires every absentee voter to jump through extra hoops that a voter at the polls does NOT have to.

- The new law sets up requirements for early voting—like not allowing it after 5 pm—that make it harder for working people to vote. It also eliminates mobile voting stations, except in an emergency—like hurricanes or alien invasion—and only if the governor says to do it.

- Also puts huge limits on local officials allowing extra "drop boxes" for absentee ballots, another way of increasing the odds of long long lines at the regular polls.

- Altogether, the law's discourage absentee voting and make early voting less effective. The intent seems to be causing much much longer & slower lines at the polls, which, again, will mean large numbers of working class, elderly, and sick voters who just give up and go home.

- And if anybody who comes along to offer a battle of water or a Ritz cracker to a voter getting thirsty or tired? Well, as everyone has heard, now that simple, kind gesture will be a crime, thanks to our state elected officials.

Bottom line: Georgia had an incredibly close & fair election, in which officials—most of them Republicans—did a great job encouraging every legal voter to vote. Almost 5 million people voted—the most ever—and Joe Biden surprisingly won by a tiny <12,000 margin. There was no evidence of voting fraud, and barely even any apparent human error. The only thing that supposedly "went wrong," was that the losing party was sore that it lost the presidential election and two US Senate seats. Why did the Republicans lose the presidential vote in Georgia? And the Senate slots? Primarily because 1000's of women in the suburbs & smaller cities who had been solid GOP voters were disgusted by Donald Trump's lunatic comments, denials, and lack of concern about COVID. The outlawing of water and snacks in voter lines has been the sensational attention-getter — but the usurpation of local control has been way under emphasized.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]The most dangerous part of the Georgia voting law is that it removes from the State Election Board the vote of the Secretary of State even though under Georgia Constitution, the Scty of State oversees elections. It also puts the board under the control of the legislature. And the election board can suspend and replace any local election official basically anytime they want, for just about any reason like having an honest election. (And I thought Republicans didn't like big government). [/QUOTE]Did you get this straight from CNN?

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]If that had been the law in November, a state board controlled by the Republican legislature would have been able to do exactly what President Trump illegally wanted firing election officials in counties, like Clayton, Dekalb and Fulton, that voted big for Biden. And then sending in carpetbaggers to declare fraud where there was none, and fraudulently throw out thousands of African-American votes. [/QUOTE]Read the law. No more than 4 counties at a time, for 4 month stints, extendable to 9 months and only if they receive 3 or more complaints over 2 consecutive elections for a minimum of six complaints without resolution.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]And yes there are even more ways that the new voter suppression law is designed to make voting harder in Georgia: [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- You can still vote absentee for any reason, but now it's illegal for officials to send absentee applications to every voter. [/QUOTE]Was never codified, some counties just up and did it. So did some DNC committee. Absentee ballots should never be sent arbitrarily, only when requested.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- The law also reduces how much time a voter has to request a ballot, and blocks any organizations that help people get absentee ballots. It also requires every absentee voter to jump through extra hoops that a voter at the polls does NOT have to. [/QUOTE]Voters at polls have to present a photo I'd and so do absentee ballots. They actually increase total # in GA and it exceeds NY, CO, and DE.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- The new law sets up requirements for early voting like not allowing it after 5 pm that make it harder for working people to vote. It also eliminates mobile voting stations, except in an emergency like hurricanes or alien invasion and only if the governor says to do it. [/QUOTE]7 PM. Read it.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- Also puts huge limits on local officials allowing extra "drop boxes" for absentee ballots, another way of increasing the odds of long long lines at the regular polls. [/QUOTE]By GA Code, after Gov Kemp's emergency COVID order expires so do the dropboxes. Now they are codified and permanent.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- Altogether, the law's discourage absentee voting and make early voting less effective. The intent seems to be causing much much longer & slower lines at the polls, which, again, will mean large numbers of working class, elderly, and sick voters who just give up and go home. [/QUOTE]Once again, CNN BS. The number of polling places and machines are controlled by counties but each polling place should not exceed 2,000 registered voters. See 21-2-263 (a).

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]- And if anybody who comes along to offer a battle of water or a Ritz cracker to a voter getting thirsty or tired? Well, as everyone has heard, now that simple, kind gesture will be a crime, thanks to our state elected officials. [/QUOTE]Water can be distributed outside the 150 ft ltd of the building and self-serve by poll workers.

[QUOTE=JHype1980;5293475]Bottom line: Georgia had an incredibly close & fair election, in which officials most of them Republicans did a great job encouraging every legal voter to vote. Almost 5 million people voted the most ever and Joe Biden surprisingly won by a tiny <12,000 margin. There was no evidence of voting fraud, and barely even any apparent human error. The only thing that supposedly "went wrong," was that the losing party was sore that it lost the presidential election and two US Senate seats. Why did the Republicans lose the presidential vote in Georgia? And the Senate slots? Primarily because 1000's of women in the suburbs & smaller cities who had been solid GOP voters were disgusted by Donald Trump's lunatic comments, denials, and lack of concern about COVID. The outlawing of water and snacks in voter lines has been the sensational attention-getter but the usurpation of local control has been way under emphasized.[/QUOTE]I think they saw they made the rules too loose several years back so they swung it back some.

Sgt. Lurker: I think we know where he got them. Thank you for rebutting him point by point. I'll add my own post tomorrow. Thanks for continuing the fight.

"You are technically correct, the best kind of correct. " - Number 1. 0, Futurama.

A most excellent rebuttal, sir.

Since this is in the rant and raves, I'm going to rant and rave a little. Why are you people discussing this shit on here? This ain't Meet The Fucking Press. Talk about pussy and tits. I just wish people would stop getting butt hurt over every fucking issue in the world.

[QUOTE=GunsNTitties93;5295611]Since this is in the rant and raves, I'm going to rant and rave a little. Why are you people discussing this shit on here? This ain't Meet The Fucking Press. Talk about pussy and tits. I just wish people would stop getting butt hurt over every fucking issue in the world.[/QUOTE]Because this "shit" was bleeding over into the massage parlor section and the administration created this thread to keep it away from what should be the main purpose of this entire site. I wish what you wish too but it ain't going to happen.

[QUOTE=GunsNTitties93;5295611]Since this is in the rant and raves, I'm going to rant and rave a little. Why are you people discussing this shit on here? This ain't Meet The Fucking Press. Talk about pussy and tits. I just wish people would stop getting butt hurt over every fucking issue in the world.[/QUOTE]Because it's every American's patriotic duty to destroy the Corrupt GOP and drain the Trump Crime Swamp of every last sniveling rat like Matt Gaetz.

Based on the responses in here since Pyongyang Donnie lost the 2020 election so bigly, it appears the Democrats are winning and winning and winning like there is no end in sight.

It's a beautiful thing!

[QUOTE=HobbyMan51;5292928]Mumblemouth's home state is run by the woke Democrat crowd, disgusting, vile hypocrites that they are and therefore off limits to comparison and criticism. The befuddled, bony-assed, decrepit old fool continues to lie about the GA. Law every day and yet the media traitors offer no push back as they enable the new American Communist Party to turn this nation into a totalitarian nightmare.[/QUOTE]Is that why you filthy and corrupt Republicans keep losing elections over and over and over?

You keep calling yourself "patriots" but you Trump scum are nothing but domestic terrorists hell bent on hating and attacking everything that America stands for.

Hillary was spot on about you hillbilly. You are deplorable.

[QUOTE=LoveARub69;5290594]Does anyone believe that had the Republicans not suffered 3 embarrassing defeats during the last election that they'd have passed this controversial set of voting laws?[/QUOTE]It's a clear sign of a Republican Party headed for a very quick and painful extinction.

But that's what happens when they stop voting for reasonable and moderate politicians like John McCain and Mitt Romney and start hitching their shit wagon to a corrupt, pathological scam artist like Trump.

It's funny watching all the uneducated Trumpers in here squeal like frightened swamp rats as the Democrats squash them all like little cockroaches.

[QUOTE=SlamaJama;5295955]It's a clear sign of a Republican Party headed for a very quick and painful extinction.

But that's what happens when they stop voting for reasonable and moderate politicians like John McCain and Mitt Romney and start hitching their shit wagon to a corrupt, pathological scam artist like Trump.

It's funny watching all the uneducated Trumpers in here squeal like frightened swamp rats as the Democrats squash them all like little cockroaches.[/QUOTE]The ebb and flow of political thought in this country is like a giant sine wave. What is up today will be down tomorrow. I happen to agree that Trump was an aberration which will haunt the Republican party for some time to come, but it will pass and more reasonable minds will prevail. Similarly, the Democrats will have to face a mounting spending / tax income inequity that the public will no longer be able to tolerate. Republicans will come; Republicans will go. Democrats will come; Democrats will go. The sad thing is that in either case, nothing of substance will occur until we get past the current atmosphere of party extremism and start to work in a truly bipartisan manner -- actually working FOR the citizens of the country instead of against whatever the opposing party promotes.

[QUOTE=SlamaJama;5295951]Is that why you filthy and corrupt Republicans keep losing elections over and over and over?

You keep calling yourself "patriots" but you Trump scum are nothing but domestic terrorists hell bent on hating and attacking everything that America stands for.

Hillary was spot on about you hillbilly. You are deplorable.[/QUOTE]I'm not a Republican, asshole. Second, please tell us what YOU stand for, other than bashing those of us who are trying to save this country from thick-headed jerks like you. You are real brave behind that keyboard, dinky little white guy. Thanks for all the usual, predictable talking points that we get from ass-tard robots like you who bring nothing to the table except your own vicious hate. We aren't going anywhere, by the way. Get used to it, fool.

[QUOTE=Bullett64;5296297]The ebb and flow of political thought in this country is like a giant sine wave. What is up today will be down tomorrow. I happen to agree that Trump was an aberration which will haunt the Republican party for some time to come, but it will pass and more reasonable minds will prevail. Similarly, the Democrats will have to face a mounting spending / tax income inequity that the public will no longer be able to tolerate. Republicans will come; Republicans will go. Democrats will come; Democrats will go. The sad thing is that in either case, nothing of substance will occur until we get past the current atmosphere of party extremism and start to work in a truly bipartisan manner -- actually working FOR the citizens of the country instead of against whatever the opposing party promotes.[/QUOTE]I mostly agree with you. I've been a lifelong Democrat but always a moderate. I don't believe in "gender neutral bathrooms" and all that stuff, although I always thought the Republicans spent the majority of their miserable lives worrying about what two anonymous people do behind closed doors and that is just creepy and weird, regardless of your religious affiliation. Here's a small hint, the Bible was written by uneducated sheep herders more than 1900 years ago. It's time to stop believing in old fairy tales and live in the modern world where science and technology make our lives easier and wonderful and not fearful and paranoid like the stupid vindictive rambling in a holy book.

The laughable part is that 80% of the GOP is so far lodged up Trump's smelly rectum that they don't realize that a guy like John Kasich would've easily won re-election in 2020 if he was President. He would certainly attract a lot of independent voters in PA, MI, and WI that usually decide the election the past 20 years or so. Kasich is not a batshit crazy extremist so he doesn't appeal to the racist assholes and terrorist wing of the GOP, but if they keep hitching their wagons to fascist kooks like Trump and Cruz then they will just keep on losing election after election, and especially in red states that are turning blue like GA, AZ, and TX. All that winning sure seems like losing bigly to the rest of America who can think objectively.

[QUOTE=SgtLurker;5294087]Did you get this straight from CNN?

Read the law. No more than 4 counties at a time, for 4 month stints, extendable to 9 months and only if they receive 3 or more complaints over 2 consecutive elections for a minimum of six complaints without resolution.

Was never codified, some counties just up and did it. So did some DNC committee. Absentee ballots should never be sent arbitrarily, only when requested.

Voters at polls have to present a photo I'd and so do absentee ballots. They actually increase total # in GA and it exceeds NY, CO, and DE.

7 PM. Read it.

By GA Code, after Gov Kemp's emergency COVID order expires so do the dropboxes. Now they are codified and permanent.

Once again, CNN BS. The number of polling places and machines are controlled by counties but each polling place should not exceed 2,000 registered voters. See 21-2-263 (a).

Water can be distributed outside the 150 ft ltd of the building and self-serve by poll workers.

I think they saw they made the rules too loose several years back so they swung it back some.[/QUOTE]This is a perfect example of reading comprehension and not believing everything the pretty mouth lady on TV tells you. Thank you!

[QUOTE=HobbyMan51;5296328]I'm not a Republican, asshole. Second, please tell us what YOU stand for, other than bashing those of us who are trying to save this country from thick-headed jerks like you. You are real brave behind that keyboard, dinky little white guy. Thanks for all the usual, predictable talking points that we get from ass-tard robots like you who bring nothing to the table except your own vicious hate. We aren't going anywhere, by the way. Get used to it, fool.[/QUOTE]Trying to save this country?? What the fuck you are talking about? Tump lovers like you and nitelovr or whatever his screen name is turning this country a shit hole for any body but racist son of bitches.

I got a new news for you bastards, majority of the people in this country are decent people regardless of their skin colors and they are going to shove your ass back shit holes where you belong. Just wait what happens to you in Georgia in a few years. Stacy Abrams is going to be elected governor in 2022 and I would love to see you faces when she is elected.

Everytime I come to site and see read nonsense like. It seems like his is your life and you are going to die arguing on a fucking sex board, LOL.

[QUOTE=SlamaJama;5295951]Is that why you filthy and corrupt Republicans keep losing elections over and over and over?

You keep calling yourself "patriots" but you Trump scum are nothing but domestic terrorists hell bent on hating and attacking everything that America stands for.

Hillary was spot on about you hillbilly. You are deplorable.[/QUOTE]Uncle Donnie did not call her crooked Hillary for nothing LOL I suppose there's somebody in the world that I despise more than crooked Hillary but I can't think who it will be. Trump 2024 MAGA.

[QUOTE=SlamaJama;5295951]Is that why you filthy and corrupt Republicans keep losing elections over and over and over?

You keep calling yourself "patriots" but you Trump scum are nothing but domestic terrorists hell bent on hating and attacking everything that America stands for.

Hillary was spot on about you hillbilly. You are deplorable.[/QUOTE]Another thing about Hillary is that she will never ever be president. And we can thank Trump for that. Trump 2024.

[blue][Deleted by Admin]

TMeister I told you that you were fucking done here. Sooner or later you always need to come back to Atlanta Rants and Raves.

You should have thought this through before threatening me.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=SlamaJama;5297760]Do you realize how much Hillary and Bill are laughing at you Deplorables?

They are making millions per year from speaking engagements and Trump is going bankrupt hiring criminal defense attorneys LOL.[/QUOTE]Anyone who would pay Hillary Clinton to speak about anything is obviously a big fan of fantasy and fiction.

[QUOTE=Bullett64;5296297]The ebb and flow of political thought in this country is like a giant sine wave. What is up today will be down tomorrow. I happen to agree that Trump was an aberration which will haunt the Republican party for some time to come, but it will pass and more reasonable minds will prevail. Similarly, the Democrats will have to face a mounting spending / tax income inequity that the public will no longer be able to tolerate. Republicans will come; Republicans will go. Democrats will come; Democrats will go. The sad thing is that in either case, nothing of substance will occur until we get past the current atmosphere of party extremism and start to work in a truly bipartisan manner -- actually working FOR the citizens of the country instead of against whatever the opposing party promotes.[/QUOTE]Yes, that political thought ebbs and flows. No, that Trump was an aberration. What Trump was was a result of tens of millions of Americans sick to death of both parties and the crap they both stand for. 2016 was a peaceful revolution that would have continued except for the real aberration, Coviid 19. The next revolution will not be peaceful. Bipartisanship is dead. Neither party give a damn about us. The Democrats are the New Nazi Party of the 21st. Century and the existing Republicans are the same old jerk-offs that they have always been. I appreciate your optimism but I am afraid that history predicts a catastrophe instead of bipartisanship. It's what we humans do.

Imagine coming here wanting to vent about a bad dream or something and being sucked into the meaningless political banter haha.

Its WEIRD seeing how emotional some males get over this stuff. You guys throwing insults back and forth doesn't seem like loser behavior at all.

Anyways, I'll never vote but I will always want to get my end wet. I'm just frustrated at the overall trend of better quality girls moving to subscription and ppv sites.

Hell, even the low quality girls think there's room for them on ppv sites.

Its a tough one for me bc I am completely opposed to internet regulation but I would not be crossed at all if the ppv sites all got shutdown and forced girls back on the street to earn their coins the old fashioned way.

Whether its silly political jousting or the e-***** revolution, I often just feel like we're living in a severely inconvenient time for men like us.

If anyone wants to convince me that quality girls will turn their backs on the easy internet money, please have at it I'm all ears (or eyes LOL).

[QUOTE=Niteluvr;5298024]Anyone who would pay Hillary Clinton to speak about anything is obviously a big fan of fantasy and fiction.[/QUOTE]She hated the US military and especially Senior Enlisted. Far to many E-5,6 and 7's we pushed out under the Clintons. MS Obama was another.

One, but Crooked Hillary remains the daughter of Satan.

[QUOTE=ComTech42;5298499]She hated the US military and especially Senior Enlisted. Far to many E-5,6 and 7's we pushed out under the Clintons. MS Obama was another.

One, but Crooked Hillary remains the daughter of Satan.[/QUOTE]Always thought Bill was OK (shook his hand in Korea in 1998) but how did those NCOs get under fire? FWIW, senior NCOs are E-7's, 8's, and 9's. E-4's (corporals), E-5's and E-6's are junior NCOs.

And no, I did NOT insert the multiple, stupid apostrophes in my post.

[QUOTE=HobbyMan51;5298168]Yes, that political thought ebbs and flows. No, that Trump was an aberration....... Bipartisanship is dead..[/QUOTE]You are welcome to your opinion, but I am confident that the history books will mention Trumpism in the same vein that they now mention McCarthyism.

And you better get on your hands and knees and pray that bipartisonship isn't dead. If it is, so is any hope of this country moving forward in the future. We will have long periods of nothing followed by short bits of time when one party gets in the majority and does whatever it wants. Then the other party will get in power and spend all of its energy undoing what the first party did.

Sound familiar?

[QUOTE=Bullett64;5300624]You are welcome to your opinion, but I am confident that the history books will mention Trumpism in the same vein that they now mention McCarthyism.

And you better get on your hands and knees and pray that bipartisonship isn't dead. If it is, so is any hope of this country moving forward in the future. We will have long periods of nothing followed by short bits of time when one party gets in the majority and does whatever it wants. Then the other party will get in power and spend all of its energy undoing what the first party did.

Sound familiar?[/QUOTE]Don't agree about Trump. Yes, it does sound familiar, only this time we have a party in power that plans to destroy the America that we know. In fact they are doing it right now. You better get on YOUR hands and knees and pray that we stop them before it is too late, if it isn't already. Bipartisanship is dead. The next inevitable step remains.