Printable View
[QUOTE=Freessi;3189512]Do you know if the results can also be downloaded electronically? In case I want to use them as proof of cleanliness.[/QUOTE]Only an idiot would accept that as "proof of cleanliness". It is only a snapshot of that particular moment in time, the first time you have sex after the test you could have possibly been exposed and might be no longer "clean". And the risks are exponentially higher when playing in a high risk group such as the ones who are discussed here.
[QUOTE=Blackfire;3189862]Only an idiot would accept that as "proof of cleanliness". It is only a snapshot of that particular moment in time, the first time you have sex after the test you could have possibly been exposed and might be no longer "clean". And the risks are exponentially higher when playing in a high risk group such as the ones who are discussed here.[/QUOTE]Agreed. But it wouldn't be for girls usually found on this forum. More like sa girls or other civilians. And I was thinking of it the other way where I would like to see the proof and even after that it will still always be protected sex.
Not sure where to put this but I have a trip to Vegas in a month and need to start my homework now. What are the good review sites for Vegas? USASG Vegas is just a bunch of guys asking about providers with no answers. Or are there any provider links you have that would be helpful too! Thanks!
[QUOTE=Bronco6566;3196346]Not sure where to put this but I have a trip to Vegas in a month and need to start my homework now. What are the good review sites for Vegas? USASG Vegas is just a bunch of guys asking about providers with no answers. Or are there any provider links you have that would be helpful too! Thanks![/QUOTE]I have been doing this lately for both Vegas and Florida. If you want MPs go on the massage page and at the top of the threads hit the search button, type in something like BBBJCIM and see what comes up, I found several providers that might be good. Check Craiglist and Backpage ads, if they are intriguing, search for the provider name.
I'm back in Grand Rapids after being gone for the past five years. Used to very active with micompanions and I see that's gone. Where is the best and safest place to go now? I see strip clubs are worse than ever and the street doesn't look to promising. I know about back page but wondered if anything took over for micompanions. Thanks.
[QUOTE=NewLove24;3202483]I'm back in Grand Rapids after being gone for the past five years. Used to very active with micompanions and I see that's gone. Where is the best and safest place to go now? I see strip clubs are worse than ever and the street doesn't look to promising. I know about back page but wondered if anything took over for micompanions. Thanks.[/QUOTE]No board has filled the role that they did. The only board out there right now is filled with more discussion and few reviews. IMO you will more info here than on any other board.
There is midwestcompanions and miadultdestination. Neither is what the boards used to be. There are rarely any ladies posting in west michigan. This board has way more activity and usefull information than the other two boards combined.
[QUOTE=NewLove24;3202483]I'm back in Grand Rapids after being gone for the past five years. Used to very active with micompanions and I see that's gone. Where is the best and safest place to go now? I see strip clubs are worse than ever and the street doesn't look to promising. I know about back page but wondered if anything took over for micompanions. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NewLove24;3202483]I'm back in Grand Rapids after being gone for the past five years. Used to very active with micompanions and I see that's gone. Where is the best and safest place to go now? I see strip clubs are worse than ever and the street doesn't look to promising. I know about back page but wondered if anything took over for micompanions. Thanks.[/QUOTE]I agree with what the others have said here. There is no better source of information out there for grand rapids / west michigan than you will find here.
Background – why they came into existence and their intended purpose.
Probably like many of you, I have been in searching for a quality, reliable, sustainable GFE with a provider that I can trust and connect with for recreational fun. I have been searching for several years now. Close a couple of times, but no cigar. I haven't found it, yet. My read? I won't find it.
In the absence of finding my ATF GFE provider (not even a single one), I went in search of outstanding dreams of great head, a decent assf__k, and of a tasty kitty that enjoyed being eaten and attended to, all in the form of a single person. A reasonably attractive, enthusiastic playmate with decent skills, and who was able to abide by boundary protocol.
I've articulated as much in an earlier post herein. A well-respected member gently chastised me / my naiveté, suggesting that what I was looking for might be found in Middle Earth.
Ouch. Yet, they were right. Sometime back I concluded that it wasn't in the cards, but I noticed that certain SP's had their respective "sweet spots" – areas of distinctly superior service. But the process of reliably finding them was, and largely still is, an expensive, hit or miss crap shoot, even with me monitoring this forum rather closely.
I figured there had to be a better way. What to do? My homework, right? I set out to do two things. First. I am sufficiently technically capable that I designed and began building a computer model to help me find the services that I am looking for. My thinking? Sufficient public domain data exists. It's a puzzle. Figure it out. I've described it conceptually in an earlier post in this forum. Second – On the possibility that a computer model didn't pan out, I set about creating and refining a set of ranking indexes, publicly shared with the membership herein. They are: head / oral sex. The Head To Head Comparison, Backdoor fun / anal sex – Feeling Cheeky, and a third one is under serious consideration; "dining" and the art of eating and entertaining an accommodating kitty – Diners Club. There are two more under conceptual scrutiny; duos. Birds Of A Feather, and SPs that are camera friendly – Lensed.
These two initial indexes are stack rankings of the providers as experienced by yours truly. The dreams that these rankings are based on are as recent as earlier this week to the summer of 2014 (certain backdoor alumni). The ranking is specifically about and solely based on the SPs artistry, talent, and enthusiasm in those specific interest areas. That's it.
My Criteria.
A decent series of dreams in the interest area (two or more) that ranked 7 out of 10 or better for me. Why two or more? The need for ranking accuracy and likely repeatability. There is a curious phenomenon that tends to surface after marginal first dreams. Most of us, especially the less experienced hobbyists, tend to idealize that first dream. Our perception of a marginal first dream is notoriously unreliable as a predictive indicator of subsequent sessions. However, our memory of the second and subsequent dreams is much less stilted. The rose-colored glasses are off, and the memory of the experience is much closer to reality. As a result, to be listed in the Results section of the ranking, it's at least two or more dreams at a 7/10 rating.
You may have noticed that there are lots of SPs that post and only about 2 dozen or so of them mentioned in the HTHC, and fewer still Feeling Cheeky. That means something. Intentionally. The intent of this listing is to accurately and fairly enumerate (and in so doing, recognize) those SPs (those that I know of) that, assuming excellent manners and hygiene on your part, tend to reliably deliver a satisfactory experience in the particular service area. My goal is to do so in an objective, independent manner. How, you ask, is one "objective" about something that is inherently highly subjective? In part, by being thorough, doing one's homework, and paying attention.
Independence. For these ranking to be of any value, they need to be accurate and unbiased. On a number of occasions, other members have encouraged me to consider an SP for inclusion. For those that have happened, I do my homework, seek confirmation from others or from the strength of reviews, and if warranted, include them for subsequent consideration. Some have been legit, and have gone on to make the grade so to speak. Others not. Still others have been an apparent shill recommendations that didn't pass muster. Insofar as I am aware, thus far, I have not ever been contacted by an SP directly for purposes of consideration. No matter though, as my approach would be the same; private, independent homework seeking verification / confirmation for possible subsequent consideration.
I am mindful that recognition herein may not always be wanted. Hence, I discreetly monitor whether an SP wants to be so recognized. It's all about respect. Yes, my comments are a wee bit salacious at times, but overall, decidedly tasteful and hopefully noticeably deferential. Some members have asked about publishing the ranking of all, including those that have not been ranked 7/10 or better. Respectfully, I feel it best to refrain from doing so.
Done thoughtfully, carefully (with deference to the ranked SPs), and fairly, these ranking will hopefully 1) recognize those providers that excel in certain areas and who desire said recognition; and 2) provide the readership, particularly the non-member viewers, and the newbies a guide to a decent experience.
Think about it in the broader perspective. The term "Kandiland" is a de facto brand now, and highly sought after I might add. The effect of decent skills, pleasant, enthusiastic SPs, coupled with unbiased, fair, accurate rankings and the private, word of mouth referrals? It improves the overall quality of the experience, and incrementally brings a better class of client to the ranked SPs. One of the SPs already "gets it", and has incorporated certain aspects into her recent BP ads. Envision the concept taking hold in other cities?
I started the indexed rankings as a way of being able to find (and share) info on those SPs that excel. I think that there is value in doing this. Your thoughts? The Diners Club ranking is close to publication. Shall I continue? I'd really love to get some feedback / input from female members or SPs.
Talk to me. If there is value in this, please help me improve it?
Thanks.
Yes there is value in this. I am anxious to see the diner list.
[QUOTE=ShaginKabay;3218785]Background why they came into existence and their intended purpose.
Probably like many of you, I have been in searching for a quality, reliable, sustainable GFE with a provider that I can trust and connect with for recreational fun. I have been searching for several years now. Close a couple of times, but no cigar. I haven't found it, yet. My read? I won't find it.
In the absence of finding my ATF GFE provider (not even a single one), I went in search of outstanding dreams of great head, a decent assf__k, and of a tasty kitty that enjoyed being eaten and attended to, all in the form of a single person. A reasonably attractive, enthusiastic playmate with decent skills, and who was able to abide by boundary protocol.
I've articulated as much in an earlier post herein. A well-respected member gently chastised me / my naivet, suggesting that what I was looking for might be found in Middle Earth.
Ouch. Yet, they were right. Sometime back I concluded that it wasn't in the cards, but I noticed that certain SP's had their respective "sweet spots" areas of distinctly superior service. But the process of reliably finding them was, and largely still is, an expensive, hit or miss crap shoot, even with me monitoring this forum rather closely.
I figured there had to be a better way. What to do? My homework, right? I set out to do two things. First. I am sufficiently technically capable that I designed and began building a computer model to help me find the services that I am looking for. My thinking? Sufficient public domain data exists. It's a puzzle. Figure it out. I've described it conceptually in an earlier post in this forum. Second On the possibility that a computer model didn't pan out, I set about creating and refining a set of ranking indexes, publicly shared with the membership herein. They are: head / oral sex. The Head To Head Comparison, Backdoor fun / anal sex Feeling Cheeky, and a third one is under serious consideration; "dining" and the art of eating and entertaining an accommodating kitty Diners Club. There are two more under conceptual scrutiny; duos. Birds Of A Feather, and SPs that are camera friendly Lensed.
These two initial indexes are stack rankings of the providers as experienced by yours truly. The dreams that these rankings are based on are as recent as earlier this week to the summer of 2014 (certain backdoor alumni). The ranking is specifically about and solely based on the SPs artistry, talent, and enthusiasm in those specific interest areas. That's it.
My Criteria.
A decent series of dreams in the interest area (two or more) that ranked 7 out of 10 or better for me. Why two or more? The need for ranking accuracy and likely repeatability. There is a curious phenomenon that tends to surface after marginal first dreams. Most of us, especially the less experienced hobbyists, tend to idealize that first dream. Our perception of a marginal first dream is notoriously unreliable as a predictive indicator of subsequent sessions. However, our memory of the second and subsequent dreams is much less stilted. The rose-colored glasses are off, and the memory of the experience is much closer to reality. As a result, to be listed in the Results section of the ranking, it's at least two or more dreams at a 7/10 rating.
You may have noticed that there are lots of SPs that post and only about 2 dozen or so of them mentioned in the HTHC, and fewer still Feeling Cheeky. That means something. Intentionally. The intent of this listing is to accurately and fairly enumerate (and in so doing, recognize) those SPs (those that I know of) that, assuming excellent manners and hygiene on your part, tend to reliably deliver a satisfactory experience in the particular service area. My goal is to do so in an objective, independent manner. How, you ask, is one "objective" about something that is inherently highly subjective? In part, by being thorough, doing one's homework, and paying attention.
Independence. For these ranking to be of any value, they need to be accurate and unbiased. On a number of occasions, other members have encouraged me to consider an SP for inclusion. For those that have happened, I do my homework, seek confirmation from others or from the strength of reviews, and if warranted, include them for subsequent consideration. Some have been legit, and have gone on to make the grade so to speak. Others not. Still others have been an apparent shill recommendations that didn't pass muster. Insofar as I am aware, thus far, I have not ever been contacted by an SP directly for purposes of consideration. No matter though, as my approach would be the same; private, independent homework seeking verification / confirmation for possible subsequent consideration.
I am mindful that recognition herein may not always be wanted. Hence, I discreetly monitor whether an SP wants to be so recognized. It's all about respect. Yes, my comments are a wee bit salacious at times, but overall, decidedly tasteful and hopefully noticeably deferential. Some members have asked about publishing the ranking of all, including those that have not been ranked 7/10 or better. Respectfully, I feel it best to refrain from doing so.
Done thoughtfully, carefully (with deference to the ranked SPs), and fairly, these ranking will hopefully 1) recognize those providers that excel in certain areas and who desire said recognition; and 2) provide the readership, particularly the non-member viewers, and the newbies a guide to a decent experience.
Think about it in the broader perspective. The term "Kandiland" is a de facto brand now, and highly sought after I might add. The effect of decent skills, pleasant, enthusiastic SPs, coupled with unbiased, fair, accurate rankings and the private, word of mouth referrals? It improves the overall quality of the experience, and incrementally brings a better class of client to the ranked SPs. One of the SPs already "gets it", and has incorporated certain aspects into her recent BP ads. Envision the concept taking hold in other cities?
I started the indexed rankings as a way of being able to find (and share) info on those SPs that excel. I think that there is value in doing this. Your thoughts? The Diners Club ranking is close to publication. Shall I continue? I'd really love to get some feedback / input from female members or SPs.
Talk to me. If there is value in this, please help me improve it?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ShaginKabay;3218785]Background why they came into existence and their intended purpose.
Probably like many of you, I have been in searching for a quality, reliable, sustainable GFE with a provider that I can trust and connect with for recreational fun. I have been searching for several years now. Close a couple of times, but no cigar. I haven't found it, yet. My read? I won't find it.
In the absence of finding my ATF GFE provider (not even a single one), I went in search of outstanding dreams of great head, a decent assf__k, and of a tasty kitty that enjoyed being eaten and attended to, all in the form of a single person. A reasonably attractive, enthusiastic playmate with decent skills, and who was able to abide by boundary protocol.
I've articulated as much in an earlier post herein. A well-respected member gently chastised me / my naivet, suggesting that what I was looking for might be found in Middle Earth.
Ouch. Yet, they were right. Sometime back I concluded that it wasn't in the cards, but I noticed that certain SP's had their respective "sweet spots" areas of distinctly superior service. But the process of reliably finding them was, and largely still is, an expensive, hit or miss crap shoot, even with me monitoring this forum rather closely.
I figured there had to be a better way. What to do? My homework, right? I set out to do two things. First. I am sufficiently technically capable that I designed and began building a computer model to help me find the services that I am looking for. My thinking? Sufficient public domain data exists. It's a puzzle. Figure it out. I've described it conceptually in an earlier post in this forum. Second On the possibility that a computer model didn't pan out, I set about creating and refining a set of ranking indexes, publicly shared with the membership herein. They are: head / oral sex. The Head To Head Comparison, Backdoor fun / anal sex Feeling Cheeky, and a third one is under serious consideration; "dining" and the art of eating and entertaining an accommodating kitty Diners Club. There are two more under conceptual scrutiny; duos. Birds Of A Feather, and SPs that are camera friendly Lensed.
These two initial indexes are stack rankings of the providers as experienced by yours truly. The dreams that these rankings are based on are as recent as earlier this week to the summer of 2014 (certain backdoor alumni). The ranking is specifically about and solely based on the SPs artistry, talent, and enthusiasm in those specific interest areas. That's it.
My Criteria.
A decent series of dreams in the interest area (two or more) that ranked 7 out of 10 or better for me. Why two or more? The need for ranking accuracy and likely repeatability. There is a curious phenomenon that tends to surface after marginal first dreams. Most of us, especially the less experienced hobbyists, tend to idealize that first dream. Our perception of a marginal first dream is notoriously unreliable as a predictive indicator of subsequent sessions. However, our memory of the second and subsequent dreams is much less stilted. The rose-colored glasses are off, and the memory of the experience is much closer to reality. As a result, to be listed in the Results section of the ranking, it's at least two or more dreams at a 7/10 rating.
You may have noticed that there are lots of SPs that post and only about 2 dozen or so of them mentioned in the HTHC, and fewer still Feeling Cheeky. That means something. Intentionally. The intent of this listing is to accurately and fairly enumerate (and in so doing, recognize) those SPs (those that I know of) that, assuming excellent manners and hygiene on your part, tend to reliably deliver a satisfactory experience in the particular service area. My goal is to do so in an objective, independent manner. How, you ask, is one "objective" about something that is inherently highly subjective? In part, by being thorough, doing one's homework, and paying attention.
Independence. For these ranking to be of any value, they need to be accurate and unbiased. On a number of occasions, other members have encouraged me to consider an SP for inclusion. For those that have happened, I do my homework, seek confirmation from others or from the strength of reviews, and if warranted, include them for subsequent consideration. Some have been legit, and have gone on to make the grade so to speak. Others not. Still others have been an apparent shill recommendations that didn't pass muster. Insofar as I am aware, thus far, I have not ever been contacted by an SP directly for purposes of consideration. No matter though, as my approach would be the same; private, independent homework seeking verification / confirmation for possible subsequent consideration.
I am mindful that recognition herein may not always be wanted. Hence, I discreetly monitor whether an SP wants to be so recognized. It's all about respect. Yes, my comments are a wee bit salacious at times, but overall, decidedly tasteful and hopefully noticeably deferential. Some members have asked about publishing the ranking of all, including those that have not been ranked 7/10 or better. Respectfully, I feel it best to refrain from doing so.
Done thoughtfully, carefully (with deference to the ranked SPs), and fairly, these ranking will hopefully 1) recognize those providers that excel in certain areas and who desire said recognition; and 2) provide the readership, particularly the non-member viewers, and the newbies a guide to a decent experience.
Think about it in the broader perspective. The term "Kandiland" is a de facto brand now, and highly sought after I might add. The effect of decent skills, pleasant, enthusiastic SPs, coupled with unbiased, fair, accurate rankings and the private, word of mouth referrals? It improves the overall quality of the experience, and incrementally brings a better class of client to the ranked SPs. One of the SPs already "gets it", and has incorporated certain aspects into her recent BP ads. Envision the concept taking hold in other cities?
I started the indexed rankings as a way of being able to find (and share) info on those SPs that excel. I think that there is value in doing this. Your thoughts? The Diners Club ranking is close to publication. Shall I continue? I'd really love to get some feedback / input from female members or SPs.
Talk to me. If there is value in this, please help me improve it?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]I must ask, do you devote so much time and effort to all areas of your life? It is merely my opinion, but you are making this far too complex for the many. As a wise man once said, "This is a simple game. You throw the ball. You hit the ball. You catch the ball". Just remember the KISS principle.
[QUOTE=BadBoyFourU;3219213]I must ask, do you devote so much time and effort to all areas of your life? It is merely my opinion, but you are making this far too complex for the many. As a wise man once said, "This is a simple game. You throw the ball. You hit the ball. You catch the ball". Just remember the KISS principle.[/QUOTE]Empathic metamorph? Big ouch. Nah, not so much, but, point taken.
Yeah, I tend to be kinda thorough. But, hobby-wise, just a Dutchman who tends to want to find a decent experience in a more methodical, repeatable (and less expensive) fashion, Given what I do in the world, I know how to harvest social media data from numerous sources, including this one, correlate it with other data sources, pipe it off to cloud-based third heuristics and analytics engine providers and put it to use. Oh, and I can write fairly decent copy. Whether we are comfortable with it or not, both USA and BP are social media sites. The member driven fusion of them and FB is driving the biggest change in human sexuality since the hippie / Free Love movement of the late 60's. The gist of the dialog contained in USG is / tends to be by and for an older generation. Kids 35+ years our junior have long since successfully moved this conversation into FB.
Dunno if you have access to the demographic analytics of the viewership as compared to the membership. Scary, especially given the implications regarding the projected longevity of USA. The head of BP wasn't arrested and extradited because a prosecutor gives a rats ass about BP and its ads. Hell, he's paying to have his cock sucked, just like the rest of us, but by a different class of SP. AM-based! Just wait til ET or NYT decides to pop that one. It's all about the $. Pay attention to the RSI feeds and who is subscribing to them. Why do you suppose Google sucks in TBs of daily data from both USA and FB? It's all about the ability to harvest, use and target certain demographics. Cue Pink Floyd's Money.
Selfless motives here? Nope, mostly selfish, but willing to share. I am and have been training my model for a while now. These rankings are the SQL result sets from some of the model's major queries using just my own dreams as input, packaged in copy that I write. I am evaluating the model's accuracy by comparing them to the reporting and responding membership, or at least attempting to.
There you have it, from soup to nuts. Yeah, I'm a bit old school in certain things, especially about seeking interest and permission versus forgiveness. I though I'd better ask first about introducing Diners Club.
This kind of dialog is essential and absolutely needed. Why? If the idea cannot withstand member scrutiny and cannot stand on it's own merit, it aint viable.
SK.
[QUOTE=ShaginKabay;3219782]Empathic metamorph? Big ouch. Nah, not so much, but, point taken.
Yeah, I tend to be kinda thorough. But, hobby-wise, just a Dutchman who tends to want to find a decent experience in a more methodical, repeatable (and less expensive) fashion, Given what I do in the world, I know how to harvest social media data from numerous sources, including this one, correlate it with other data sources, pipe it off to cloud-based third heuristics and analytics engine providers and put it to use. Oh, and I can write fairly decent copy. Whether we are comfortable with it or not, both USA and BP are social media sites. The member driven fusion of them and FB is driving the biggest change in human sexuality since the hippie / Free Love movement of the late 60's. The gist of the dialog contained in USG is / tends to be by and for an older generation. Kids 35+ years our junior have long since successfully moved this conversation into FB.
Dunno if you have access to the demographic analytics of the viewership as compared to the membership. Scary, especially given the implications regarding the projected longevity of USA. The head of BP wasn't arrested and extradited because a prosecutor gives a rats ass about BP and its ads. Hell, he's paying to have his cock sucked, just like the rest of us, but by a different class of SP. AM-based! Just wait til ET or NYT decides to pop that one. It's all about the $. Pay attention to the RSI feeds and who is subscribing to them. Why do you suppose Google sucks in TBs of daily data from both USA and FB? It's all about the ability to harvest, use and target certain demographics. Cue Pink Floyd's Money.
Selfless motives here? Nope, mostly selfish, but willing to share. I am and have been training my model for a while now. These rankings are the SQL result sets from some of the model's major queries using just my own dreams as input, packaged in copy that I write. I am evaluating the model's accuracy by comparing them to the reporting and responding membership, or at least attempting to.
There you have it, from soup to nuts. Yeah, I'm a bit old school in certain things, especially about seeking interest and permission versus forgiveness. I though I'd better ask first about introducing Diners Club.
This kind of dialog is essential and absolutely needed. Why? If the idea cannot withstand member scrutiny and cannot stand on it's own merit, it aint viable.
SK.[/QUOTE]Not sure what you're implying about the projected longevity of the USA though. It's not a US site, none of us create any content beyond calling some of you guys knuckleheads, Google and Facebook will make sure that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act never go away, so I'd say whatever projections you're making should be revised, we aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Sooner or later (way sooner than you think) you will be on that +35 demographic and will be a player for us as well.
The major difference between us and FB is this conversation is allowed here, it's 100% against FB's terms of service and gets shut down all the time, yes even in secret groups.
A2.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3220100]Not sure what you're implying about the projected longevity of the USA though. It's not a US site, none of us create any content beyond calling some of you guys knuckleheads, Google and Facebook will make sure that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act never go away, so I'd say whatever projections you're making should be revised, we aren't going anywhere anytime soon. Sooner or later (way sooner than you think) you will be on that +35 demographic and will be a player for us as well.
The major difference between us and FB is this conversation is allowed here, it's 100% against FB's terms of service and gets shut down all the time, yes even in secret groups.
A2.[/QUOTE]No implication intended about USA as a whole. However the BP forum is likely to significantly morph, probably to the downside. We will see.
The single biggest growth area in new numbers (providers only) is and continues to be in the casual, 18-24 college student space. Yet the corresponding new growth numbers in BP, CL, and the various SB sites don't correlate to that estimated annual growth numbers. Not even close.
There was a pronounced transient surge in "supply" that seemed to parallel the ITT Tech decertification.
The supply is finding its demand somehow. As you noted, this kind of conversation isn't sustainable in FB, yet. But a disorganized, losely knit grouping of federated members has formed a virtual marketplace. It comes and goes and they pop up on college campuses all over the US. The commodity is pics on FB, but the conversation is partially in Twiitter.
I am actively researching it and how sellers find buyers.
And I promoted to knucklehead? I like!
Do I change my username ShaginKnucklehead?
[blue]I didn't call you a knucklehead but I am struggling to see how the decertification of ITT Tech. Are you trying to posit that there were a bunch of young honeys that were going to ITT Tech and started selling pussy when it announced it was closing or perhaps they worked there. You lost me on that one. I'm thinking that was some technobabble designed to sound good.
As to the rest Twitter is a source and we should probably add that as a thread.
We cover the casuals in the SD threads.
A2[/blue]
[blue][Deleted by Admin]
Don't tell me to relax when I'm not excited. We both know why you do that. If you wish to have discourse then have discourse don't resort to playground stuff.
A2[/blue]