Comms missteps & min review standards
[QUOTE=Bertil;5153618]I know some of the mongers on here remember the names, faces, and aliases of the majority of providers out there but I have no clue who you are talking about. If she is a UTR girl post there. Otherwise can we see some links or anything else besides a name? Thanks man![/QUOTE]Your post brings up an always important issue. I remember an old professor who hammered home the point that the #1 communications misstep is when a writer (or speaker) assumes that what is obvious or known to them is the same for their audience.
It wasn't so long ago when a very large percentage of providers could be found on Backpage, the Craigslist adult section, or Eros. Fast forward to today and BP is no more, CL has ditched adult ads, and Eros has been joined by a sh*tload of ad sites. While it's true that every area has a number of well-known providers, it's all too easy to assume that a name with which you're familiar is also known to others. But, if that's not the case, searching the many ad sites can be a time consuming and frustrating process.
Reviews and field reports that don't provide an ad link (or screenshot), or other way to clearly identify the woman in question, fall short of what should be a minimum standard for such. What does every monger want when it comes to information about a provider they might consider seeing? 1) They want to know who; 2) They want to know how much, and; 3) They want to know what menu options are offered at that price.
More info is always welcome, of course, but every monger is looking for at least those three things to inform their decisions. Leaving out any one of them makes for an incomplete review, IMHO, and usually results in a bunch of follow-up questions as people try to fill in the gaps.
Just my two-cents worth, of course, but mongering these days is difficult enough and helping each other out with good and timely info is what USASG is all about.
Happy hunting and stay safe!
Christina B aka Kelly Kells
Seems she is posting now.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/florida/orlando/57592619/[/URL]
[QUOTE=ChugALug;5153648]Nice girl, 36 yo, very bright. She walks occasionally but has enough sense not to be out too much. You can find her on the main drag around Landstreet. She does not post.
I'll pm you contact info.[/QUOTE]
Christina B aka Kelly Kells
The link you posted is not Christina B.
[QUOTE=HeyFlint;5155228]Seems she is posting now.
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/florida/orlando/57592619/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Although they do look somewhat alike.
2 photos
Christina B aka Kelly Kells
Is Christina B's number different? Then this one may be may be fake and using Christina's pictures.
[QUOTE=ChugALug;5155248]The link you posted is not Christina B.
Although they do look somewhat alike.[/QUOTE]
Christina B aka Kelly Kells
[QUOTE=HeyFlint;5155258]Is Christina B's number different? Then this one may be may be fake and using Christina's pictures.[/QUOTE]Those are not Christina's pics. I have known her for a few years. I have seen this girl Ryder post before, she kinda looks TGTBT but who knows. Find out who she is and report back.