"Sugarbabies" / "Arrangements" Amateurs or Not?

[QUOTE=GeechieDan;4936978]She told me she typically gets between 700-1000 per date. From my communication with her it seems she may go as low as 500, maybe. I declined and kept on moving. I don't know who's shelling out that kinda money, but god bless them.[/QUOTE]She told me $1 k per week allowance. And that she isn't like the others on this site -- she is educated and can have intelligent conversations in addition to having a hot ass.

Like my last RVA SB didn't have a masters nor was she incredibly delightful on every level, nor did she let me do whatever I wanted to that ridiculous body of hers for $300 a visit, no commitments.

Guess I'm missing out.

[QUOTE=ErnestLl;4938412]She told me $1 k per week allowance. And that she isn't like the others on this site -- she is educated and can have intelligent conversations in addition to having a hot ass.

Like my last RVA SB didn't have a masters nor was she incredibly delightful on every level, nor did she let me do whatever I wanted to that ridiculous body of hers for $300 a visit, no commitments.

Guess I'm missing out.[/QUOTE]This is actually what she told me: " My average allowance is 700-1000/ week for one intimate date a week. " I just got out of a 1-1/2 year arrangement with a SB that was just as hot and let me do almost everything I wanted to her. That arrangement was for 300 ppm. I still see a MILF that I met on SA and she will let me do everything for 200 ppm, and she's very attractive.

She's hot, but no one is that hot.

Why is it that the women with the highest GPS are the least deserving? I wouldn't date this one for free, let alone pay 700-1000 per week!

I sugar date to date women I can't vanilla date. I wouldn't even vanilla date this one.

[QUOTE=GeechieDan;4938512]This is actually what she told me: " My average allowance is 700-1000/ week for one intimate date a week. " I just got out of a 1-1/2 year arrangement with a SB that was just as hot and let me do almost everything I wanted to her. That arrangement was for 300 ppm. I still see a MILF that I met on SA and she will let me do everything for 200 ppm, and she's very attractive.

She's hot, but no one is that hot.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ebac0c25-da16-40e2-ae09-f61980611e94[/URL]

Not her first rodeo. WFH. Can't get too many specifics off her so far.

Love her look, though.

Just texted her, see what happens. Says marriage minded though.

[QUOTE=ErnestLl;4939756][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/ebac0c25-da16-40e2-ae09-f61980611e94[/URL]

Not her first rodeo. WFH. Can't get too many specifics off her so far.

Love her look, though.[/QUOTE].

Another scammer. Says she can host downtown, but will only do google pay since she pays all bills online. Offered cash and said she can deposit in account to pay online.

[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/7c69f25b-f30e-4665-9f19-c2190e1ac0da[/URL]

General question for you. I always see you guys reviewing gals on SA, but never see anything about SB. Is that site no good? Inquiring minds.

[QUOTE=LightUUp;4943986]General question for you. I always see you guys reviewing gals on SA, but never see anything about SB. Is that site no good? Inquiring minds.[/QUOTE]People have talked about it. Seems to be mostly bots. Also SA is the only one that gets any mainstream media coverage that pulls in the new curious girls.

[QUOTE=LightUUp;4943986]General question for you. I always see you guys reviewing gals on SA, but never see anything about SB. Is that site no good? Inquiring minds.[/QUOTE]Personally, I have not had much luck on SB. You pay for credits and have to spend credits to unlock convos with girls. I had plenty of girls message me, but strangely enough, they went silent after I spent the credits to unlock the conversation (even after the message supposedly being read). Feels rather scammy.

[QUOTE=Kurrozava;4944009]Personally, I have not had much luck on SB. You pay for credits and have to spend credits to unlock convos with girls. I had plenty of girls message me, but strangely enough, they went silent after I spent the credits to unlock the conversation (even after the message supposedly being read). Feels rather scammy.[/QUOTE]Exactly!! Two different types of business model for those sites! SA has a high per month fee and is selling access to its large pool of girls. SB charges you 'credits' to start or respond to a message. So in essence all SB has to sell is "credits. " No indication of how large its pool is. There is another site that operates like that and by the default settings they send you emails highlighting who is new, who viewed you and who might be interested. Their whole goal is to get you to spend your credits so you'll buy more!

So there is nothing stopping a "pay for credits" site operator from creating fake profiles and emailing you. Again, to get you to spend credits so they can sell more. It is a flawed system as dudes become suspicious and stingy on who they reply to. Fewer replies, fewer opportunities for the girls and this leads to less girls. Any girl signing up on SA gets a deluge of email replies so she knows the site 'works', she just has to sort through the idiots. An SB girl likely gets fewer replies so is more inclined to spend her time elsewhere.

Yes, one can have success on SB, just have different expectations.

If you are going to use SB I would setup a free account with SA. If you see the same girl on both SA and SB, you know they aren't bots.

[QUOTE=LightUUp;4943986]General question for you. I always see you guys reviewing gals on SA, but never see anything about SB. Is that site no good? Inquiring minds.[/QUOTE]

I wonder what kind of replies they get. Since we are the ones paying $90 a month while it's free for women I wish the site would vet them at least a little bit!

I am going to respectfully disagree with the view given below. It has been a few years since I did any real research on SB or SD4 Me but I once tracked profiles on the various sites. I still have the SD4 Me data squirreled away somewhere. Of the new profiles on SD4 Me, a huge percent were duplicates of profiles on SA. Of those profiles, something like 85% signed on once and never signed on again. I only tracked it across an eight week period but it certainly appeared to me that someone was identifying new profiles on SA and copying them over to SD4 Me and other sites. I recall also reading that one of the sites had some boilerplate saying that some profiles were created "for entertainment purposes only. ".

I would not be surprised to learn that sites competing with SA were hiring contractors to create "entertainment profiles. " It would then make sense to me that it would be easier for those contractors to copy new SA profiles than to continually invent new ones from whole cloth. Including finding unsearchable photos to use with them. I could also be completely delusional. All I know is my results on SA are vastly superior to what I found elsewhere.

BAM.

[QUOTE=Lobsid;4944162]If you are going to use SB I would setup a free account with SA. If you see the same girl on both SA and SB, you know they aren't bots.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BamBam;4944824]I am going to respectfully disagree with the view given below. It has been a few years since I did any real research on SB or SD4 Me but I once tracked profiles on the various sites. I still have the SD4 Me data squirreled away somewhere. Of the new profiles on SD4 Me, a huge percent were duplicates of profiles on SA. Of those profiles, something like 85% signed on once and never signed on again. I only tracked it across an eight week period but it certainly appeared to me that someone was identifying new profiles on SA and copying them over to SD4 Me and other sites. I recall also reading that one of the sites had some boilerplate saying that some profiles were created "for entertainment purposes only. ".

I would not be surprised to learn that sites competing with SA were hiring contractors to create "entertainment profiles. " It would then make sense to me that it would be easier for those contractors to copy new SA profiles than to continually invent new ones from whole cloth. Including finding unsearchable photos to use with them. I could also be completely delusional. All I know is my results on SA are vastly superior to what I found elsewhere.

BAM.[/QUOTE]I made an acct on SB for the first time about 2 weeks ago. Totally useless. The profiles are like "worst of" SA. I get these messages 'so-and-so invited you to message them' or such. So I spend 10 credits ($6. 00) to message them. Never a response; not one. And I have great success on SA; these are not off-putting messages. I getting the idea that much of SB is not legit. I wasted $59 on 10 credits.

[QUOTE=CrimsonMan;4944303]I wonder what kind of replies they get. Since we are the ones paying $90 a month while it's free for women I wish the site would vet them at least a little bit![/QUOTE]They probably get their fair share of rude replies from ill-mannered men. If you don't like a profile, just hide it. It's not a big deal.