General Reports

Some of you may have noticed over the weekend coverage of Senator Rob Portman's speech at the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center about "human trafficking. " It sure looks like the feds timed to coincide with it new federal indictments charges against those guys in Price Hill who were busted for operating a "brothel. " The federal charges are for the same thing basically, though it was made to look in the media like new charges, just in time for Senator Rob's speech.

And I see that he and Senator Diane Feinstein of California introduced a Combat Human Trafficking bill into the US Senate on Nov. 19, the day after the Cincinnati police originally made those arrests here. There may well be some similar arrests and such that have gone on in California for show trial purposes. The bill aims to increase penalties on mongers who are involved in "human trafficking. " So far, however, I've yet to see any mongers charged in connection with these activities.

In the case of those Price Hill guys, it looks like there were actually four providers arrested in connection with that house, only two on hobby-related activities. The federal charges appear to owe to the fact that two of them lived in Northern Kentucky, so probably the guys involved drove them up I-75 to Price Hill. For this reason, Portman sees I-75 as a major conduit for human trafficking.

One of the two providers nabbed on soliciting charges at that house in November I see was also arrested again on Jan. 16, with the charge unsealed on Jan. 24, the same day as the federal indictments of the Price Hill guys. This was on a Cincinnati city charge -- Operating a Sexually Oriented Business Without a License -- 899-5 in the city code. Basically, they can make an arrest here if there's anything sexual at all going on -- without the need for you to offer sex for cash or perform any sex for cash. It turns out she was one of six arrests on these charges on Jan. 16. And there were another five arrested on the same charges in mid December. Mostly women, but some men who were likely the handlers. It's a crime under this statute both to operate a sexually oriented business and to be an employee of one, without a license, which has to be granted by the Cinicnnati city treasurer, and which, of course, no providers actually have. I think these were separate operations from the Price Hill bust, though given the lag between arrest and unsealing, they were again probably trying to pressure these folks to snitch on someone.

Other than the provider who was arrested both in Price Hill for soliciting and on the operating without a license, who I know to have worked as an escort in the past in Northern Kentucky, I don't recognize most of the providers busted in this "operating without a license" thing. The one other one out of eight or nine I do recognize was a BP advertiser operating out of the east side whose pictures I always figured were fake but turn out to be real. But I suspect that these busts were pretty much targeting the typical BP ripoff dance and self-service operations, which almost makes me happy, but not really. It would make sense though, since these are charges LEO could make on those girls, who wouldn't be doing any touching anyway.

But, lessons that might apply more broadly here are that doing outcall into Cincinnati or operating in the city limits in general may be getting more dangerous, since they can use this even more bogus city statute, along with the bogus operating a massage business without a license, which is also a city statute. It looks like charges brought under these statutes have been tossed as unconstitutional by courts in the past. But probably because they're getting extra federal money right now for this human-trafficking operation, the Cincinnati police will do just about anything, regardless of its likelihood of sticking. How much of the money may find its way into the suburban jurisdictions, I don't know.

Of course, LEO is also helping these women who are "victims" of "human trafficking" by prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law on every trumped-up charge they can find.

Just a tip for the providers out there. I've heard that the cops in Dayton, in doing prostitution arrests, have been asking women first where they can find various drugs, on the theory that the women will be able to find them drugs. This is probably a valid theory in most cases. Then, if they do, they'll tack on possession and / or trafficking charges.

Since these things, like "human trafficking," may make their way down I-75, obviously don't get snared by this. It should go without saying, but if a monger starts talking about drugs, stop talking to the monger and get yourself or him out of there. Then backchannel to your fellow providers all the info you possibly can about this potential cop or likely creep so he doesn't victimize anyone else.

[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2345158]Some of you may have noticed over the weekend coverage of Senator Rob Portman's speech at the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center about "human trafficking. " It sure looks like the feds timed to coincide with it new federal indictments charges against those guys in Price Hill who were busted for operating a "brothel. " The federal charges are for the same thing basically, though it was made to look in the media like new charges, just in time for Senator Rob's speech.

And I see that he and Senator Diane Feinstein of California introduced a Combat Human Trafficking bill into the US Senate on Nov. 19, the day after the Cincinnati police originally made those arrests here. There may well be some similar arrests and such that have gone on in California for show trial purposes. The bill aims to increase penalties on mongers who are involved in "human trafficking. " So far, however, I've yet to see any mongers charged in connection with these activities.

In the case of those Price Hill guys, it looks like there were actually four providers arrested in connection with that house, only two on hobby-related activities. The federal charges appear to owe to the fact that two of them lived in Northern Kentucky, so probably the guys involved drove them up I-75 to Price Hill. For this reason, Portman sees I-75 as a major conduit for human trafficking.

One of the two providers nabbed on soliciting charges at that house in November I see was also arrested again on Jan. 16, with the charge unsealed on Jan. 24, the same day as the federal indictments of the Price Hill guys. This was on a Cincinnati city charge -- Operating a Sexually Oriented Business Without a License -- 899-5 in the city code. Basically, they can make an arrest here if there's anything sexual at all going on -- without the need for you to offer sex for cash or perform any sex for cash. It turns out she was one of six arrests on these charges on Jan. 16. And there were another five arrested on the same charges in mid December. Mostly women, but some men who were likely the handlers. It's a crime under this statute both to operate a sexually oriented business and to be an employee of one, without a license, which has to be granted by the Cinicnnati city treasurer, and which, of course, no providers actually have. I think these were separate operations from the Price Hill bust, though given the lag between arrest and unsealing, they were again probably trying to pressure these folks to snitch on someone.

Other than the provider who was arrested both in Price Hill for soliciting and on the operating without a license, who I know to have worked as an escort in the past in Northern Kentucky, I don't recognize most of the providers busted in this "operating without a license" thing. The one other one out of eight or nine I do recognize was a BP advertiser operating out of the east side whose pictures I always figured were fake but turn out to be real. But I suspect that these busts were pretty much targeting the typical BP ripoff dance and self-service operations, which almost makes me happy, but not really. It would make sense though, since these are charges LEO could make on those girls, who wouldn't be doing any touching anyway.

But, lessons that might apply more broadly here are that doing outcall into Cincinnati or operating in the city limits in general may be getting more dangerous, since they can use this even more bogus city statute, along with the bogus operating a massage business without a license, which is also a city statute. It looks like charges brought under these statutes have been tossed as unconstitutional by courts in the past. But probably because they're getting extra federal money right now for this human-trafficking operation, the Cincinnati police will do just about anything, regardless of its likelihood of sticking. How much of the money may find its way into the suburban jurisdictions, I don't know.

Of course, LEO is also helping these women who are "victims" of "human trafficking" by prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law on every trumped-up charge they can find.[/QUOTE]Staying safe should be of everyone's concern, it is mine. The fact is, that what we do is illegal. One of my priorities when seeing a provider is her location. There are parts of town I will absolutely not go, no matter the provider, Price Hill being one of them. Who can honestly say that nothing of good will come out of going there. Yea, you may get away with a singular visit, but sooner or later trouble will surely come into your life if you make Price Hill a regular destination. Another well know fact is that LEO knows that drugs, theft and other illegal activities go hand in hand with providers, not all mind you, but many. Not to mention, not all men in this business are the most upstanding people either. There is and always will be a relatively high risk in this lifestyle, but with careful thought about WHO you are going to see, as well as WHERE you are going to see them, will reduce the risks significantly. I personally stick with higher priced women, and stay within a small circle of providers who have proven to me to be safe and reliable. When I do seek a new companion, I do as much homework as I need to be comfortable as well as safe. That is why I also post reviews on known providers after I have seen them for the first time, to remind everyone they are still to be trusted. After all, there have been more than a few who were once safe and reliable, only to have flew the coup. Nobody is clean as newly fallen snow in this business and I have been burnt by some who are rather well known. ExoticNadia coaxed out of $$ because she sold me on the idea that she has a reputation to maintain, and I bought that line, only to never see her or my $$ again. I am not singling her out, at the end of the day I made the decision to "lend" her money, but to make the point that trusting anyone in this business can be foolish. Isn't that the real purpose of this site, to help each other stay as safe as possible? And for the newbies, listening to people who have been around the block will be wise, for your safety, pocketbook and even your life.

[QUOTE=Lugnutz;2345158]Some of you may have noticed over the weekend coverage of Senator Rob Portman's speech at the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center about "human trafficking. " It sure looks like the feds timed to coincide with it new federal indictments charges against those guys in Price Hill who were busted for operating a "brothel. " The federal charges are for the same thing basically, though it was made to look in the media like new charges, just in time for Senator Rob's speech.

And I see that he and Senator Diane Feinstein of California introduced a Combat Human Trafficking bill into the US Senate on Nov. 19, the day after the Cincinnati police originally made those arrests here. There may well be some similar arrests and such that have gone on in California for show trial purposes. The bill aims to increase penalties on mongers who are involved in "human trafficking. " So far, however, I've yet to see any mongers charged in connection with these activities.

In the case of those Price Hill guys, it looks like there were actually four providers arrested in connection with that house, only two on hobby-related activities. The federal charges appear to owe to the fact that two of them lived in Northern Kentucky, so probably the guys involved drove them up I-75 to Price Hill. For this reason, Portman sees I-75 as a major conduit for human trafficking.

One of the two providers nabbed on soliciting charges at that house in November I see was also arrested again on Jan. 16, with the charge unsealed on Jan. 24, the same day as the federal indictments of the Price Hill guys. This was on a Cincinnati city charge -- Operating a Sexually Oriented Business Without a License -- 899-5 in the city code. Basically, they can make an arrest here if there's anything sexual at all going on -- without the need for you to offer sex for cash or perform any sex for cash. It turns out she was one of six arrests on these charges on Jan. 16. And there were another five arrested on the same charges in mid December. Mostly women, but some men who were likely the handlers. It's a crime under this statute both to operate a sexually oriented business and to be an employee of one, without a license, which has to be granted by the Cinicnnati city treasurer, and which, of course, no providers actually have. I think these were separate operations from the Price Hill bust, though given the lag between arrest and unsealing, they were again probably trying to pressure these folks to snitch on someone.

Other than the provider who was arrested both in Price Hill for soliciting and on the operating without a license, who I know to have worked as an escort in the past in Northern Kentucky, I don't recognize most of the providers busted in this "operating without a license" thing. The one other one out of eight or nine I do recognize was a BP advertiser operating out of the east side whose pictures I always figured were fake but turn out to be real. But I suspect that these busts were pretty much targeting the typical BP ripoff dance and self-service operations, which almost makes me happy, but not really. It would make sense though, since these are charges LEO could make on those girls, who wouldn't be doing any touching anyway.

But, lessons that might apply more broadly here are that doing outcall into Cincinnati or operating in the city limits in general may be getting more dangerous, since they can use this even more bogus city statute, along with the bogus operating a massage business without a license, which is also a city statute. It looks like charges brought under these statutes have been tossed as unconstitutional by courts in the past. But probably because they're getting extra federal money right now for this human-trafficking operation, the Cincinnati police will do just about anything, regardless of its likelihood of sticking. How much of the money may find its way into the suburban jurisdictions, I don't know.

Of course, LEO is also helping these women who are "victims" of "human trafficking" by prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law on every trumped-up charge they can find.[/QUOTE]Depending on the charge LEO can hold off filing charges for whatever the time period is for that particular classification.

[QUOTE=Twisted69;2345842]Depending on the charge LEO can hold off filing charges for whatever the time period is for that particular classification.[/QUOTE]Without getting into specifics, that's a current theme of Columbus right now -- they'll "shelve" the charges until you screw up again, and then smack you with two charges when the time comes. Since Cincinnati's current police chief came from Columbus. I wouldn't begin to guess if that's what they're planning on doing, but it's been done and passed an appeal.

MM.

Has anyone been getting texts from Jen, last 4 digits 3639? I don't know how I started getting her messages, but it's annoying and costs me minutes on my burner. Who is she? My cheap phone can't block her.

Ladies, I know it's competitive out there, but it's NEVER ok to blindly text a previous client randomly unless that client specifically tells you it's ok! I will occasionally receive messages out of the blue like "Want to come over?" or "Hey, What's up?" when I'm in a situation or in the company of someone I don't want to know I'm receiving texts from hookers! Advertise often, advertise truthfully, give excellent service, and business will come!

[QUOTE=PussyLuver57;2346839]Ladies, I know it's competitive out there, but it's NEVER ok to blindly text a previous client randomly unless that client specifically tells you it's ok! I will occasionally receive messages out of the blue like "Want to come over?" or "Hey, What's up?" when I'm in a situation or in the company of someone I don't want to know I'm receiving texts from hookers! Advertise often, advertise truthfully, give excellent service, and business will come![/QUOTE]I have been receiving them also, I had one girl I texted to see if she was free for an early morning romp she didn't text me back until 6: am the next day my s / o saw the text saying I'm available I have a lot of employees that I managed and was able to get out of it but I immediately blocked her phone number. Alexis formally with Buddah has been texting me a lot asking for help with her room, I have blocked 2 phone numbers she uses I don't dislike her I think she is in a bad way and desperate for business but I'm not going to help her or go bang anybody just because they call when I get tired I just block their phone number. I did get an unsolicited text from a certain hottie on this board I'm going to see tomorrow morning and I will explain my situation when I see her and I'm sure it won't be a problem, but I'm glad she texted because I'm going to try and bang that pussy into submission tomorrow. HL29.

[QUOTE=PussyLuver57;2346839]Ladies, I know it's competitive out there, but it's NEVER ok to blindly text a previous client randomly unless that client specifically tells you it's ok! I will occasionally receive messages out of the blue like "Want to come over?" or "Hey, What's up?" when I'm in a situation or in the company of someone I don't want to know I'm receiving texts from hookers! Advertise often, advertise truthfully, give excellent service, and business will come![/QUOTE]I addressed this situation a little over a year ago. Lately I have been getting text from girls I have and have not seen. One girl, Felicia from BP, (not Fantasy Fancy) who I have never seen, but must have at some point contacted, will text me almost every day. I usually ignor it but on occasion I will say no and explain why. For example yesterday I said " I have time but no extra money, I am buying a house so I won't have any pay for play cash for a while". Well guess who texted me today? Yep Felicia from BP. I asked her are you on drugs. Do you even read what responses you get from people. She got pissy as said "screw you dude I don't do drugs I have three kids to support" what a dumb fucking broad!

I love it when they ask if I have time to see them but exspect me to pay their normal prices. It's been a while, so if any of them read the forums, maybe they will read my post from a while ago. There are reasons we are not texting them for appointments.

[QUOTE=BuyingSmiles;1961318]Every so often I get unsolicited text from providers. Since I don't have a SI at this point in my life it doesn't bother like it does some mongers. I get the same thing from a couple of men's clothing stores in the form of emails. You spend a couple grand with them and they want you to come back and spend more money. Now they know there is or are reasons I am not back shopping. I don't have the money for more clothes, I don't need any more clothes, I am happy with my clothes or I have been getting my clothes from another provider. When they send me emails begging for my business they do so with some really good offers in the form of X% off or buy x and get xyz free or buy x and get 50% off. What ever the offer is, they do it because they know I may be more inclined to buy more clothes from them (even if I don't have the funds to pay their full prices, I don't need any more, I am happy with the ones I have or I am buying from another clothes provider) if they offer me a great deal. I can never, ever remember getting an unsolicited anything that offered me anything for full price.

I think I can be relatively safe assume that these ladies are not texting my cause they can not get enough of my body, mind and soul. Even though I did warn them all, once you go fat you never go back. So I can only think that they are lacking in the amount of business there are generating and they are simply using a cheep method of marketing. Now I would never expect a SP to drops her rates because I texted her and asked her to do so. But if you are so slow that you are trying to drum up business via unsolicited marketing text I would think a discounted price would not be out of order. There is obviously a reason that I am not contacting you. It's most likely not because I don't want to get you naked and play. So you got to make me think to my self how the hell do I refuse that offer. You got to make me think damn, even though I have been banging this gal from the bar the past week, how can I pass on this deal. You got to make me decide that even though I have found my ATF that I can't not see you because the deal is so good. You make your money with your body, it's paid for already. Some money is better than no money I would think. And remember when I do go to buy a new suit or dress pants or shoes at the discounted offer, the products are still top quality. That's why I go back to the same places when I do need or want new clothes at full price.

Maybe I am out of line in my thinking.

BuyingSmiles.[/QUOTE]BuyingSmiles!

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;2346994]I have been receiving them also, I had one girl I texted to see if she was free for an early morning romp she didn't text me back until 6: am the next day my s / o saw the text saying I'm available I have a lot of employees that I managed and was able to get out of it but I immediately blocked her phone number. Alexis formally with Buddah has been texting me a lot asking for help with her room, I have blocked 2 phone numbers she uses I don't dislike her I think she is in a bad way and desperate for business but I'm not going to help her or go bang anybody just because they call when I get tired I just block their phone number. I did get an unsolicited text from a certain hottie on this board I'm going to see tomorrow morning and I will explain my situation when I see her and I'm sure it won't be a problem, but I'm glad she texted because I'm going to try and bang that pussy into submission tomorrow. HL29.[/QUOTE]If you have an Android phone (not sure if they have this for iPhone). You can install Handcent Messenger to replace the stock messaging app. I like it better anyway. Once you install it, you can create a private box. Anytime you text a girl, move it to the privatebox (password protected). Then if they ever reply, it goes to the private box, and never appears with all your other messages.

[QUOTE=HuntLadys29;2346994]I have been receiving them also, I had one girl I texted to see if she was free for an early morning romp she didn't text me back until 6: am the next day my s / o saw the text saying I'm available I have a lot of employees that I managed and was able to get out of it but I immediately blocked her phone number. Alexis formally with Buddah has been texting me a lot asking for help with her room, I have blocked 2 phone numbers she uses I don't dislike her I think she is in a bad way and desperate for business but I'm not going to help her or go bang anybody just because they call when I get tired I just block their phone number. I did get an unsolicited text from a certain hottie on this board I'm going to see tomorrow morning and I will explain my situation when I see her and I'm sure it won't be a problem, but I'm glad she texted because I'm going to try and bang that pussy into submission tomorrow. HL29.[/QUOTE]So I am a little confused. Do you like unsolicited texts or not? From the first half of your post, I would say no, like most guys. But then you say "a certain hottie" sent you an unsolicited text and you were glad because now you are going to see her. So it seemed the unsolicited text from the provider worked, she got business. I am not for unsolicited texts but I am unsure on where you stand. Good luck and have fun.

[QUOTE=Bigbuck73;2347202]So I am a little confused. Do you like unsolicited texts or not? From the first half of your post, I would say no, like most guys. But then you say "a certain hottie" sent you an unsolicited text and you were glad because now you are going to see her. So it seemed the unsolicited text from the provider worked, she got business. I am not for unsolicited texts but I am unsure on where you stand. Good luck and have fun.[/QUOTE]Only when they get unreasonable the numbers I blocked I was getting a text every other day, this particular text was the first time she did this but I will explain about unsolicited text when I see her today. I also got a special rate.HL29

[QUOTE=Copacetic;2347020]If you have an Android phone (not sure if they have this for iPhone). You can install Handcent Messenger to replace the stock messaging app. I like it better anyway. Once you install it, you can create a private box. Anytime you text a girl, move it to the privatebox (password protected). Then if they ever reply, it goes to the private box, and never appears with all your other messages.[/QUOTE]I have an iPhone I use umail I have it set up where when a call comes in that I blocked it will say my phone is disconnected, but I like your app also I will see if I can install Handcent. Thanks for the info. HL29.

[QUOTE=Selective69;2345331]Staying safe should be of everyone's concern, it is mine. The fact is, that what we do is illegal. One of my priorities when seeing a provider is her location. There are parts of town I will absolutely not go, no matter the provider, Price Hill being one of them. Who can honestly say that nothing of good will come out of going there. Yea, you may get away with a singular visit, but sooner or later trouble will surely come into your life if you make Price Hill a regular destination. Another well know fact is that LEO knows that drugs, theft and other illegal activities go hand in hand with providers, not all mind you, but many. Not to mention, not all men in this business are the most upstanding people either. There is and always will be a relatively high risk in this lifestyle, but with careful thought about WHO you are going to see, as well as WHERE you are going to see them, will reduce the risks significantly. I personally stick with higher priced women, and stay within a small circle of providers who have proven to me to be safe and reliable. When I do seek a new companion, I do as much homework as I need to be comfortable as well as safe. That is why I also post reviews on known providers after I have seen them for the first time, to remind everyone they are still to be trusted. After all, there have been more than a few who were once safe and reliable, only to have flew the coup. Nobody is clean as newly fallen snow in this business and I have been burnt by some who are rather well known. ExoticNadia coaxed out of $$ because she sold me on the idea that she has a reputation to maintain, and I bought that line, only to never see her or my $$ again. I am not singling her out, at the end of the day I made the decision to "lend" her money, but to make the point that trusting anyone in this business can be foolish. Isn't that the real purpose of this site, to help each other stay as safe as possible? And for the newbies, listening to people who have been around the block will be wise, for your safety, pocketbook and even your life.[/QUOTE]Location is important, but I've got to say I've been to Price Hill many many times without incident. Lower Price Hill is a different story -- small space, heaviest police scrutiny, people at neighboring businesses giving you the eye because they know what you're up to. It just gives me the creeps. I wouldn't pick up a SW anywhere in Price Hill just because the police presence is heavy. Yet it obviously happens -- a lot. Then again, I wouldn't pick up a SW anywhere these days. I gave it up for my health and wellbeing. There are worse places though, OTR being one, and the Picadilly Apartments on Beechmont being another. Parts of Covington being yet another.

Does anyone know if this is a legitimate ad? Not sure if it's really a local thing or just another national tease? Looks interesting, but not much contact info? I sent an email but didn't get a reply? [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/?view=showad&adid=3570&cityid=350&&mailed=y&mailerr=[/URL].

[QUOTE=SlapHappy2000;2350274]Does anyone know if this is a legitimate ad? Not sure if it's really a local thing or just another national tease? Looks interesting, but not much contact info? I sent an email but didn't get a reply? [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/?view=showad&adid=3570&cityid=350&&mailed=y&mailerr=[/URL].[/QUOTE]Looks like an ad to sell photos / videos, and not a provider.

Why anyone would pay for these types of photos / videos is beyond me.

It's a legit ad. She runs it on CL often, in fact it's there right now but will prob be gone soon. She wants a pic of Ben Franklin in return. No I did not purchase.

[QUOTE=SlapHappy2000;2350274]Does anyone know if this is a legitimate ad? Not sure if it's really a local thing or just another national tease? Looks interesting, but not much contact info? I sent an email but didn't get a reply? [URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.info/classifieds/?view=showad&adid=3570&cityid=350&&mailed=y&mailerr=[/URL].[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Gatty23;2346482]Has anyone been getting texts from Jen, last 4 digits 3639? I don't know how I started getting her messages, but it's annoying and costs me minutes on my burner. Who is she? My cheap phone can't block her.[/QUOTE]That is Hamilton Jenn's new number.

Anyone have problems setting something up. I had something set up twice but got canceled last minute both times. And other times nobody is available. I usually try to set up 2-3 hours ahead. Are they usually fully booked by than or something? You have to book much more advanced than that?

[QUOTE=Rumbln;2351174]That is Hamilton Jenn's new number.[/QUOTE]I got a couple of messages pleading for help and providing a new location. Seemed possibly suspicious to me. Didn't respond.

The one time I attempted to see her, she stood me up after a long drive and an even longer drive back with wood in hand. Guessing it was a double booking deal.

[QUOTE=Sugimura513;2351754]Anyone have problems setting something up. I had something set up twice but got canceled last minute both times. And other times nobody is available. I usually try to set up 2-3 hours ahead. Are they usually fully booked by than or something? You have to book much more advanced than that?[/QUOTE]Well, I would think it would depend on who you were trying to see andat what time? Very doubtful that if you had several girls in mind that they all were busy. More likely is that the booker was busy or just otherwise not responding. While normally pretty good about replying, he has been known to be lax at times. Don't know who you were trying to see but keep trying. If you don't hear back from him, keep texting him if his girls are the definite ones that you want to see. Good luck.

[QUOTE=Sugimura513;2351754]Anyone have problems setting something up. I had something set up twice but got canceled last minute both times. And other times nobody is available. I usually try to set up 2-3 hours ahead. Are they usually fully booked by than or something? You have to book much more advanced than that?[/QUOTE]Some of the popular girls are hard to schedule. I tried Taylor 3-4 times (She was always booked the times I wanted to see her), never got to see her.

Just keep trying. EE is top notch in my book.

I have always found him to be very reliable. I think he faces the same problems that we all do on cancellations. I have scheduled before only for him not to have the girl show up for work (and another time not come back after lunch).

I like doing business with him.

[QUOTE=Bigbuck73;2352143]Well, I would think it would depend on who you were trying to see andat what time? Very doubtful that if you had several girls in mind that they all were busy. More likely is that the booker was busy or just otherwise not responding. While normally pretty good about replying, he has been known to be lax at times. Don't know who you were trying to see but keep trying. If you don't hear back from him, keep texting him if his girls are the definite ones that you want to see. Good luck.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Whooptedoo;2352526]

I like doing business with him.[/QUOTE]I wasn't saying whether I like doing business with him or not, just that it was unlikely that if the guy had several girls in mind that they all were busy. There have been reviews in the past, either here or other sites, that have commented on EE not always responding quickly. Good luck to everyone.

Without naming names or assuming anything, I have a word of caution for anyone partaking in a duo.

If the second person you dip your stick into pulls off the first cover and replaces it with a fresh one, she's only doing it because she KNOWS her partner has something she doesn't want her to share with her. Just saying. Be careful, men!

EE has always been great with me. A lot of the girls are booked days in advance. I have experienced nothing but perfect service from EE, even on short notice! Either you did something to make him or the girls nervous, or your expectations are to high. My advice is to plan a few days ahead of time. Good luck.

Never had a problem. If you are safe and reliable, EE will take care of you.

[QUOTE=JayMalibu;2353435]Never had a problem. If you are safe and reliable, EE will take care of you.[/QUOTE]Ditto brother.

Lookr.

I've been trying to see Gabrielle. It's been a mission LOL.

[QUOTE=Copacetic;2352460]Some of the popular girls are hard to schedule. I tried Taylor 3-4 times (She was always booked the times I wanted to see her), never got to see her.

Just keep trying. EE is top notch in my book.[/QUOTE]

Nice brunette with gorgeous body. Not budget type or value plan but all abbreviations were covered and had a great time. She is in the Dayton area. Rates within reason. As always YMMV. Digits for trusted seniors.

[QUOTE=PussyLuver57;2353398]Without naming names or assuming anything, I have a word of caution for anyone partaking in a duo.

If the second person you dip your stick into pulls off the first cover and replaces it with a fresh one, she's only doing it because she KNOWS her partner has something she doesn't want her to share with her. Just saying. Be careful, men![/QUOTE]This is me, the guy not the admin. I wouldn't agree with you here brother. I do fucking tons of duos, (lifetime, is around 50 or 60) it's kind of my thing, and in every instance the chicks have required an equipment change when bouncing back and forth. IMHO it's a reasonable precaution.

Last week I did these two, they are sisters, (7th time with sisters) and we changed condoms along with pussies.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]364070[/ATTACH]

[blue]Editors Note: For those of you guys that wrote me wanting the contact info for the sisters. Both they, and I, live in Argentina. If you find yourself here, you're not a douchbag, and you find our local forum maybe I'll ship you the link.

For everybody asking what they cost; it was 40 bucks a piece.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=Admin2;2354013]This is me, the guy not the admin. I wouldn't agree with you here brother. I do fucking tons of duos, (lifetime, is around 50 or 60) it's kind of my thing, and in every instance the chicks have required an equipment change when bouncing back and forth. IMHO it's a reasonable precaution.

Last week I did these two, they are sisters, (7th time with sisters) and we changed condoms along with pussies.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]364070[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]It is not so alarming to me either. Why would a woman #1 protect her self from all the random men she fucks and not protect her self from woman#2. Especially when woman#2 happens to be fucking the same random men that woman#1 protecting herself from to begin with. Also if I were either woman #1 or #2 and I could still become pregnant, I'd want brand new condom to protect myself from having a baby that looked like any of you a mongers.

Just saying.

BuyingSmiles!

[QUOTE=SinfulDreams;2354208]Sorry babe, I would have to strongly disagree with you. It's simply a matter of safety, and precaution for all of us. That is just downright disgusting to come out of one female with the same condom, going into another one. I mean seriously think about that. It has nothing to with either one of us thinking the other has something. I would caution the girls that allow the same condom for a duo. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]I did a duo last year where no condom change was required. The ladies were INTIMATELY familiar with each others conchitas. My changing, or not changing, a condom did not expose them to anything more than they already had been by burying their faces in each other crotches.

Sadly they declined my offer of matrimony.

Sigh.

A2.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2354013]This is me, the guy not the admin. I wouldn't agree with you here brother. I do fucking tons of duos, (lifetime, is around 50 or 60) it's kind of my thing, and in every instance the chicks have required an equipment change when bouncing back and forth. IMHO it's a reasonable precaution.

Last week I did these two, they are sisters, (7th time with sisters) and we changed condoms along with pussies.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]364070[/ATTACH]

[blue]Editors Note: For those of you guys that wrote me wanting the contact info for the sisters. Both they, and I, live in Argentina. If you find yourself here, you're not a douchbag, and you find our local forum maybe I'll ship you the link.

For everybody asking what they cost; it was 40 bucks a piece.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]$40 - Is that at the normal exchange rate, or the Blue Dollar rate?

[QUOTE=SinfulDreams;2354208]Sorry babe, I would have to strongly disagree with you. It's simply a matter of safety, and precaution for all of us. That is just downright disgusting to come out of one female with the same condom, going into another one. I mean seriously think about that. It has nothing to with either one of us thinking the other has something. I would caution the girls that allow the same condom for a duo. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]Looks like I'm concerned about nothing. It's just that with every duo before this one, both women were orally entwined at some point and didn't change in between penetrations. It just seemed odd to me at the time.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2354371]I did a duo last year where no condom change was required. The ladies were INTIMATELY familiar with each others conchitas. My changing, or not changing, a condom did not expose them to anything more than they already had been by burying their faces in each other crotches.

Sadly they declined my offer of matrimony.

Sigh.

A2.[/QUOTE]I have only partaken of 3 duos, though I plan to do it more often as funds and circumstances allow. Changes were required once, but were not required the other two times. All 3 sessions were completely different ladies, and each time there was plenty of g / g pussy eating, so I don't think any of them were concerned about catching something from the other girl. Changing was not an issue, as far as I was concerned, and the times it wasn't required, I asked first.

A2, if I could find them at the Argentine rates, I would do my best to catch with you on the numbers. LOL.

[QUOTE=PussyLuver57;2353398]Without naming names or assuming anything, I have a word of caution for anyone partaking in a duo.

If the second person you dip your stick into pulls off the first cover and replaces it with a fresh one, she's only doing it because she KNOWS her partner has something she doesn't want her to share with her. Just saying. Be careful, men![/QUOTE]If you have read the instructions for condom use. It says to change condoms after each intercourse. To me that means once you pull out of one position even with the same lady you should change condoms. It has to do with lubrication and the condom tearing. Also when putting on a condom you are suppose to pinch the top to prevent that air bubble making it air tight.

[QUOTE=PussyLuver57;2353398]Without naming names or assuming anything, I have a word of caution for anyone partaking in a duo.

If the second person you dip your stick into pulls off the first cover and replaces it with a fresh one, she's only doing it because she KNOWS her partner has something she doesn't want her to share with her. Just saying. Be careful, men![/QUOTE]I have provided this link for your benefit. They say to change a condom after each sex act and to withdraw quickly after orgasm.

[URL]http://www.trojancondoms.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleId=10[/URL]

[QUOTE=NdayGuy;2354471]$40 - Is that at the normal exchange rate, or the Blue Dollar rate?[/QUOTE]Blue, 600 P each.