Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Tnhobbydude]Holy crap LOL. I don't foresee us meeting either after that report. There are lots of young and beautiful providers out there that are stringent in their screening, but some of them actually have tact, grace, and finesse to handle this type of situation with humility and rightfully deserve being called a lady. Who wants to pay good $$ to spend time with that holier than thou kind of piss poor attitude? Class is not about your physical beauty, the brand of clothing you wear, or the designer handbags you carry. It's something that permeates from within in the way you carry yourself and interact with others. Don't expect to be treated like a lady if you can't act like a lady.

Providers have every right to demand strict screening, but potential clients have a right to be treated with some respect too and not like some lowlife (because after all, we are on the same boat here, aren't we? ). Someone should take her own advice, stop whining, and move on to the next john.

P. S. Your, you're[/QUOTE]1st of all. All this Wicked MILF bashing needs to stop. Black Hawk showed disrespect by posting personal email communications. He did not have my permission to post my emails. Though he only posted what he wanted you men to read. And NOT the factual part of it all.

Wherein he contacted me and did NOT in any way shape or form provide screening. NONE!

He just listed off Names/emails & #'s of unknown providers?

NO web sites no review links. NO other screening was provided to me from Blackhawk. (none) at all.

So YES, he was turned down because he did NOT read my web site nor my d-c site profile. Wherein my screening is SIMPLY laid out for all to see and EASILY provide. He was also notified that since I had just left Nashville after a WONDERFUL visit. And since I (do NOT) keep hobbyists info. Therefore I would not be needing the proper screening at this time as I do not (pre-screen) for future dates. (when I have no certainty as to when I will be in Nashville again. (I am all about discretion. Pre-screening means I would have to (keep) your info around. I don't do that out of respect for hobbyists privacy.)

This man was spoken to with respect & was notified that whe he did contact me, he did not provide the proper screening. HE (blackhawk) indicated that HE was TOO LAZY to do so. Then comes on this site to complain about my screening. Why complain when it SIMPLY & CLEARLY written in plain view for you to see & provide upon initial contact. Of course your going to get ANY lady in her right mind who puts her safety before the $. To tell you to please provide the proper screening as indicated on her site.

I mean come on now. No man (strangers at that) in this adult lifestyle has any right to fault any lady for looking out for her safety. Nor do you men have the right to complain when it is you who do NOT read & provide what it clearly written in plain view. We make it easy for you. You make more work for yourself. And you cause the lady to have to ask you more than once to provide the proper screening. If you don't read & don't provide the screening. Then you don't have the right to complain.

Now for those of you who complain about my screening & why I DO NOT accept local ladies in any city/state where I visit, outside of TX. It's because of the following. As was CLEARLY & respectfully noted to Blackhawk.

1. It's happened to others & I will prevent it from happening to me. I don't accept local ladies as I do NOT wish to be set up to get busted. 2. It's happened to not only myself but others. I don't accept local ladies because when you seek a vouch from them for one of their local hobbyists. Those local ladies run back to said hobbyist and offer a very low rate for said man to go see them and NOT see the traveling lady. As well as having said local men book dates with said traveling lady/ies and then pull a bs scam and have those said men either cancel at last minute or NC/NS said traveling lady/ies. This is happening more & more when local ladies in various states/cities are contacted for a vouch by traveling ladies.

To prevent being set up or to have the nc/ns/cancellation game pulled on a traveling lady after she has paid her travel expenses to visit said are. Then as I do and others as well. Only other WELL KNOWN/MATURE/Traveling providers are accepted.

The feedback is much more informative & the nc/ns/cancellations are next to none. Makes for a much safer & enjoyable visit.

Also allow me to explain. Why do your ref have to be recent? Well known? Mature? Have personal web sites & reviews?

1: Recent=men in this hobby change over time. From their demeanor to what they desire bcd. The more recently seen ref. Give a better input as to how said hobbyist is at present. How he treats a lady when alone BCD with her.

2. Why well known? Trust factor. Just like guys want to see reviews from well known men & not newbies. It's a trust factor.

I want to know that I can trust that well known providers feedback. Check out her site/reviews & board posts to get a feel for whether or not she screens. How she screens & what type of men she see's. (as I'm very selective as to whom I spend time with. I don't see just anyone).

3. Why mature? Because I'm a mature woman with a womanly body. I want to spend time with a man who enjoys mature women and not young girls.

There is a big difference in how mature women interact with mature men.

As opposed to young girls just looking to make a quick buck.

4. Why reviews & web sites?

Because as 1 &2. Trust & safety. As well as making sure that the info on their site & on their reviews. Match said contact info that said hobbyist provided. As of late too many hobbyists have been spoofing emails when contacting ladies. To make them look like the actual providers email.

Therefore some hobbyists pretend to be the provider on the other end and in turn are vouching for themselves.

It's been happening A LOT lately. This is why I no longer accept emails from providers. I don't accept #'s as I don't call providers. I like to confirm via their web site & reviews their contact email and or board handle and send them the info for a vouch so they can visually SEE who they are vouching and then respond with an informative feedback.

The informative feedback from well known/recently seen/ Mature ladies allows me to make a decision in whether I the right companion for said hobbyist. I don't just see anyone just for sake of $. If I feel I'm the right companion for you. Or that we won't be a good match.

Then I let you know so you can use your hard earned money and see someone more suited for you.

In the end all. I actually give a hoot as to whether or not your going to have an enjoyable time. It starts with screening.

If you rather I treat you like a john and not care about whether you have an enjoyable time. Then just say so. I'm sure I can put on a fake smile & be like most (providers) in this adult lifestyle.

I'm a companion in every sense of the word. I hobby because I actually enjoy the company of gentleman. Therefore I am very selective in who I see & I screen in a simple yet safe manner that not only keeps me safe but allows for a more enjoyable time with said date.

Hard to tell, a lot of hotels are remodeling now as we speak, lots of construction work and new furniture.

Name, ph # and name of two providers with web sites and reviews was given then I received the long essay as the one below and told that you were not in Nashville and did not do pre screening for the future. Then you wanted to know where I saw your info. I gave you the USASG link. You then got upset when you saw others were talking about your screening. That's the facts.
Again your allowed to do what ever screening U want.

Posting this is not complaining: It was meant to be funny!
"Don't feel bad!
I went down also under her standards. LOL
Blackhawk Down!
She looks great!"

Get over yourself. LOL
The screening is NOT SIMPLE! Someone said U have changed it since this started. Your Welcome!
Glad our little banter can help out your business! Have a great weekend!

[QUOTE=Wicked Milf]1st of all. All this Wicked MILF bashing needs to stop. Black Hawk showed disrespect by posting personal email communications.
Wherein he contacted me and did NOT in any way shape or form provide screening. NONE!

He just listed off Names/emails & #'s of unknown providers?

NO web sites no review links. NO other screening was provided to me from Blackhawk. (none) at all.

.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Wicked Milf]All this Wicked MILF bashing needs to stop.[/QUOTE]Wicked, if you've read my last post, I'm sure you understand that I'm not questioning your stringent screening process. In fact, I appreciate the precautions that you and other responsible providers take to keep yourselves and your clients safe. You have every right to demand whatever screening procedures you see necessary, and if we don't meet your criteria, then we don't meet. It should be as simple as that. You may find this shocking, but most of us do value our safety and freedom as much as you do.

In case you didn't realize it, this is an information exchange site, and we're not required to obtain permission to post our personal opinions or experiences regardless of whom or what they may pertain to. When you share your opinions or experiences about a particular client or clients on provider boards, do you actually get your clients' permission to do so? If you do, kudos to you for it makes you a true rarity. I truly, honestly fail to see what's so offensive about us discussing the stringency of your screening. I genuinely don't understand your anger and why you feel the need to lash out when you should be proud of it and stand by it. You put yourself out there for others to critique you by the nature of your occupation. Like all things in life, you take the good with the bad. My advice is, "if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen".

This is just my personal opinion, and I'm not speaking for anyone else. I'm completely perplexed as to why anyone would and should get angry just because someone didn't fill out their contact form exactly the way they wanted them to - when they wanted them to. I'm sure it gets annoying after having to explain the same thing repeatedly, but does that really warrant subjecting anybody through belittlement, deprecation, and accusation of malicious disrespect? As it is apparent that you took my previous post as a personal "bash" against you, I'm assuming that it didn't feel good when you felt someone else did it to you. In addition, you really have no legal claim to what you keep referring to as YOUR emails, but it seems to me that he was gracious enough to respect your wishes and removed it from the board. Most of us wouldn't have even read it until you decided to quote it and re-post it for all to see.

Have you ever read a fable by Aesop called The Wind and The Sun? Well, to make a long story short, the jest of the story is that your chances of achieving your desired outcome is greatly increased (or decreased) by the way you approach a situation. People in general will react much more sympathetically to you and your position/predicament if you exude kindness, understanding, and positivity rather than disdain, severity, and negativity. Things would also run a whole lot smoother if you eliminate the confusion and stop stressing over things you really don't have any control over (like what others will do, won't do, say, don't say, when they do it, how they do it, etc. etc.)

Oh, and I'm sure I speak for most guys when I say that sometimes I'm in the mood for chicken, sometimes I'm in the mood for lamb, sometimes I'm in the mood for pork chops, and sometimes I'm in the mood for aged beef. (Ok, I know that doesn't sound like a compliment, but if you've ever had aged beef, you know that it's hands down the best steak ever!) As inexperienced in this hobby as I am, I'd like to consider myself an equal opportunity hobbyist because I love all beautiful women regardless of their age, race, or shape.

Lastly, I'd like to apologize to everyone that I even mentioned Wicked or provided links to her website here. This could've all been avoided if I hadn't done that. I'm truly regretful and very sorry for causing this mess.

You are allowed to screen however you want, but please understand how difficult it is for the average hobbyist to come up with the references you want. For example, say I see one girl every 2 weeks. That means during the 90 days that I will have seen 6 girls. So two of those would have had to be traveling mature providers for you to be willing to see me. Obviously most of the girls I'm going to see are going to be local, so that makes it almost impossible.

That doesn't even count the fact that if traveling girls weren't willing to take local providers references I could never see a traveling girl. I can understand your concerns and it is definitely your right to screen however you want. I would recommend allowing local providers that are well respected and have a decent amount of reviews. That's just my opinion, ignore it if you want. I just saw this ongoing discussion and can definitely see both sides of it. Everyone should just remember its very easy for someone to seem rude through a medium like email where you can't convey tone.

I said I was too lazy to look up all her requirements. What's funny is everything she wanted was on Date Check. So I don't know who the lazy one is, now that I think of it. Why be a member of these sites if the provider isn't going to use them?

Again screening is great. She just asked for things other providers had not and I was between jobs and didn't have time to research it. Took a shot and this happened.

Really it her choice to screen the way she wants. However to get on here or email us back and lecture us because we say its tough screening is unprofessional.

Be proud of your standards and go on!

[QUOTE=Movielover]You are allowed to screen however you want, but please understand how difficult it is for the average hobbyist to come up with the references you want. For example, say I see one girl every 2 weeks. That means during the 90 days that I will have seen 6 girls. So two of those would have had to be traveling mature providers for you to be willing to see me. Obviously most of the girls I'm going to see are going to be local, so that makes it almost impossible.

That doesn't even count the fact that if traveling girls weren't willing to take local providers references I could never see a traveling girl. I can understand your concerns and it is definitely your right to screen however you want. I would recommend allowing local providers that are well respected and have a decent amount of reviews. That's just my opinion, ignore it if you want. I just saw this ongoing discussion and can definitely see both sides of it. Everyone should just remember its very easy for someone to seem rude through a medium like email where you can't convey tone.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tnhobbydude]As inexperienced in this hobby as I am, I'd like to consider myself an equal opportunity hobbyist because I love all beautiful women regardless of their age, race, or shape.

Lastly, I'd like to apologize to everyone that I even mentioned Wicked or provided links to her website here. This could've all been avoided if I hadn't done that. I'm truly regretful and very sorry for causing this mess.[/QUOTE]
I feel the same way. Providing links is what this site is for. To keep us talking and covering our tails. Thanks for seeing I tried to do as she ask.

I know this is the wrong section for this debate. Hopefully Jackson will meve it or delete it.

[QUOTE=Tnhobbydude]Wicked, I You have every right to demand whatever screening procedures you see necessary, and if we don't meet your criteria, then we don't meet. It should be as simple as that.

In case you didn't realize it, this is an information exchange site, and we're not required to obtain permission to post our personal opinions or experiences regardless of whom or what they may pertain to. When you share your opinions or experiences about a particular client or clients on provider boards, do you actually get your clients' permission to do so? If you do, kudos to you for it makes you a true rarity. I truly, honestly fail to see what's so offensive about us discussing the stringency of your screening. I genuinely don't understand your anger and why you feel the need to lash out when you should just be proud of it.

This is just my personal opinion, and I'm not speaking for anyone else. I'm completely perplexed as to why anyone would and should get angry just because someone didn't fill out their contact form exactly the way they wanted them to. When they wanted them to. I'm sure it gets annoying after having to explain the same thing repeatedly, but does that really warrant subjecting anybody through belittlement, deprecation, and accusation of malicious disrespect?[/QUOTE]1st of all I don't talk about my dates on any sites. I value discretion. The only thing that I may ever state on any site is if I'm responding to one of their posts & showing appreciation or praise toward said gentleman. (directly to him). Otherwise I do not in any fashion speak about my dates. (unless an alert needs to be posted. Very seldom by me)

Openly posting email communications without ones permission is a violation of ones privacy & trust. (he did it more than once) even after he removed the the first one.

Regardless:

There is not one hobbyist in this adult lifestyle (who values his privacy) who would appreciate having his email communications to any lady or other hobbyists, openly posted on any site w/o his permission.

If someone can do that with disregard for the other person. That alone, indicates that said person cannot be trusted with another personal data. IE: I would not trust at this point going through screening & allowing Blackhawk access my private photos nor give him my cell # or any other personal info I might have indicated on my pass worded site. Because if he can show disregard for my private email communications. Then he will show the same disrespect with my private data.

That's the issue that I have at this point. Discussing my screening is fine. But to complain about it and make me out to be an awful person because of how I choose to screen. Is not fine. As that's how some of the comments various posters came across. If I'm wrong in that assessment. I apologize.

As for your comments. They're inaccurate. You were not privy to the actual/factual conversations between me & Blackhawk. As I stated he only posted partial email communications that he wanted you men to see. He failed to post the factual info. You have no bases to state that I was angry, nor did I do the belittlement, deprecation, and accusation of malicious disrespect? . None of which are factual at all.

Sure I'm straightforward in my approach. I don't shy away from being blunt & honest. However, I have not once disrespected nor belittled anyone. Especially not in an accusatory nor malicious way.

Those who know me can attest that while I am straightforward & honest when voicing myself.

I am actually one of the nicest & kindest persons you will ever meet. There is not a malicious nor disrespectful bone in my body. You have to meet me to see for yourself just how 100% opposite I am from the way you characterized me.

Yes, I do know that men have different tastes when it comes to women. I'm an older woman who (gets) men a lot more than one might realize. However, when said hobbyist see's more often (IE: young providers verses older mature providers) it makes a difference in whether or not I see them.

Why? Because someone who tends to see only young providers. Don't normally connect with me BCD or in public.

Because I'm very much a woman with a womanly body. I'm a companion more so than a (provider).

I hobby because as I mentioned before, I (do) enjoy the company of a gentleman. And past experiences with dates who tend to see the young ones. Don't get me as a woman. And failed to make the overall experience memorable. I'm not a wham bam thank you ma'am type of woman. I can't explain it as I would like.

But in the jest of it all. I don't connect with men who tend to see young girls.

Therefore I only accept (mature/older) provider references as we older women have more in common & the feedback is more informative.

I want to spend time with a man who takes time to adore the woman in his presence. To enjoy not only her body. But her mind. I want to spend time with a man who knows what it means to make a woman feel beautiful under his touch & in his presence. So, yes I'm very selective in who I see & my approach to screening allows for this.

[QUOTE=Blackhawk 101]Name, ph # and name of two providers with web sites and reviews was given.[/QUOTE]If your going to put forth to the masses the above statement. Please be honest.

The ONLY email you sent with any form of provider ref. I can 100% attest to the fact that you did not provide the above. What you did provide in the initial email was a list of a few ladies. (name/email # numbers).

Nothing more. No web sites, no review links. Nothing about you. Zilch. (no screening was provided).

I have no idea who it was I was to contact nor who it was that I was to screen besides a (d-check ID)?

That is why I mentioned to you that you needed to refer back to my web site & d-ck profile where you found me. As they both clearly indicated what screening info is required. That's where you told me (you) were too (lazy) to provide them. My telling you that I don't foresee us meeting. Is not disrespectful in the least. In fact it was respectful & honest. One of best approach for any woman who so chooses to decline seeing a guy in this adult lifestyle. I wish you the best in the hobby. But I'm done with this issue where your concerned.

Tnhobbydude,

There's no need to apologize. You didn't stir up a mess nor do anything wrong.

Movielover,

I do understand what your saying. Allow me to expand on that by stating, that if someone wishes to see me. Yet finds my screening to be that of which he cannot provide. Then I would rather he miss out on seeing me. Than to contact me with either no screening, or screening of which I don't accept. I also, understand that there are men who hobby only on occasions. However, I can't nor won't make exceptions when it comes to screening.

That would mean I would have to make exceptions regarding my safety. Something I don't do. If there were local ladies whom I (knew/knew of & trusted 100%) then yes I would accept them. But I don't know the area nor the providers there. My screening form has always been precise. I recently worded it to make it a little more clearer for hobbyists to understand. However, nothing regarding my screening has changed. I put my safety & well being first. I hope that everyone else does the same.

Babee Doll,

Thank you doll for your input & understanding. I too know of you. (don't know you) but know of you & your stellar reputation. You in Nashville?

As I would certainly accept you as a reference.

Now, I would really like to put all this to rest.

I did visit Nashville this past week. I loved the beautiful weather. Brought some of it back to Texas with me. We needed a cooling down.

I thoroughly enjoyed my visit. Those whom I met were some of the sweetest & enjoyable men I've met. I enjoyed my outings in your fair city and I look forward to returning. If it's OK with ya'll.

I apologize if my straight forward approach offended anyone.

My straightforward approach may come across as sharp. But it doesn't change who I am as a person/or as a woman.

There's more to me than meets the eye.

[QUOTE=Blackhawk 101] What's funny is everything she wanted was on Date Check. Why be a member of these sites if the provider isn't going to use them? [/QUOTE]I wanted to expand on your comment about your site ID. As your incorrect with everything being on your d-c profile.

Just because a hobbyist has an ID membership from a paid site. Doesn't mean that he's 100%guaranteed (OK) to be seen. Your ID doesn't tell us ladies anything about you. It doesn't give your name, nor #, nor description. Nor does your ID tells us anything about your demeanor & how you treat ladies when alone BCD with them.

Sure some providers will see you have an ID. Whether you contact them directly through said site or send it to them in an email (of which I feel to be unsafe, when ID is only mentioned in an email & not confirmed).

Many of those particular providers won't even bother to contact the OK's on your profile nor ask for additional info as I noted above. Some accept a paid ID and want to make a quick buck. Only to regret not having done further screening if something bad were to of occurred.

A good example below, that ones paid ID on a sex site, is not good unless additional info is provided.

There was a recent bust in a state that involved 3 or more (WELL KNOWN ladies) from various cities & states. Some of which I knew (of) and had at one point accepted as safe references. (I no longer do).

They all accepted said hobbyists paid ID from a site. None of those providers asked for additional info. Because he had OK's next to his profile.

None of those providers bothered to contact any of the OK's to get informative feedback.

The outcome. They were all busted.

Why? Well said hobbyist, got scared during a previous visit with a provider. He gave up his board handles & said paid site ID to LE.

LE then logged into his account and pretended to be said hobbyist. LE then contacted each of those providers and set up dates. As mentioned. So they could make a quick buck. Not one provider asked for additional info nor contacted the OK's on said hobbyist ID profile.

Had those providers asked for (Number/description & contacted the OK's and asked those references about said hobbyist demeanor & of said description & number matched the paid ID & email) they would have found out upon meeting (hobbyist aka- LE) that (LE) in fact (was NOT) the factual hobbyist behind the paid ID.

A: because (LE) would not match the description, B: the number from which (LE) called from was not the # that belonged to said factual hobbyist. C: the demeanor of (LE) did not match the demeanor of factual hobbyist as informed by the references. Had those providers contacted the OK (references) for informative feedback. So no, BlackHawk. Ones paid site ID. Is not conducive to proper safe screening w/o additional info provided.

I as do other reputable ladies who value our safety. Want to know who we're screening & going to be meeting. We want other well known providers to verify that the info & description you gave us. Matches the person who will be calling & meeting us.

I look at screening being similar to reviews. Hobbiers want reviews to be written with enough info to allow them to be able to contact the lady via her web site, see what she looks like & know the lady is safe/seen by other reputable hobbiers. You want enough info to help you make an informed decision in whether or not you see the lady or pass. Men in this hobby value the feedback & trust from other reputable men in this adult lifestyle.

It's no different with us ladies. We want enough screening info. To allow us to properly screen you with other reputable ladies (that we feel safe contacting) before we risk our lives, and meet with you alone BCD.

Too many bad things as of late have been happening to ladies in this adult lifestyle. We want to make sure it doesn't happen to us.

Those of you who utilize a paid ID from various sites please understand that for safety reasons there's going to be ladies who will want additional info besides your site ID.

Hobby wisely & safely.

[quote]my name is Asia.I will be visting for a couple days I'm new to town and looking to have a little fun give me a call I guarantee you won't regret it.......... You can contact me @ (952) 288-9413[/quote]Has anyone seen these one?

Thise ads kill me. I wish they were real. They have some of the best rear ends that I have seen on any site.

[url]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ok_guys_im_here_for_one_week_real_pics/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1378391[/url]

Anyone seen?

Never mind!
[QUOTE=Chuck G]
I have several favorites and now even more in Canada while I am out of Nashville that realize we are the customer not them.

Flame on Wicked Milf!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

She said massage only.
[QUOTE=Commodore][url]http://nashville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ok_guys_im_here_for_one_week_real_pics/classifieds/ViewAd?oid=1378391[/url]

Anyone seen?[/QUOTE]

Thought I would say thanks for the post. You provided some great answers to a few questions I had. Also, you made me realize I'm doing a few things 'wrong' right now that I will probably change.

It's nice to see such a useful post in the middle of all the other talk that has been going on lately.

Be safe all!