Bareback Providers

[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5984569]Meiling. Now that is another gal I saw quite often, starting about 20054 or so. I really appreciated that she always had her own private In Calls. And the last few places she had, she actually owned. We definitely did just about everything, and all for $220 an hour. Wish she was still active, although might be somewhat old now.[/QUOTE]Not sure if it's the same person but if you're talking about a tiny Chinese lady with a heavy accent, she was awesome. Gave a message in between sessions. Never let me bareback her but allowed me to rub her pussy bare dick. Liked her tiny tits with big nipples licked rather than sucked. She'd almost go into convulsions when she came. Great times.

[QUOTE=MyNickname;5982306]I saw Spring Martinez too, she was good. I stopped seeing her because last time we met her kids were in the next room and the room we were had big sliding door with glass so it was weird to me that very easily by accident her kids could have seen her mom doing very nasty things with a stranger.[/QUOTE]Damn I miss her. Kids and hubby or at least she told me he was her hubby were always in another room or rooms. Saw her many times.

So reading through the BBFS drama posts like the alerts on the other site, do people just ignore all the behind-the-scenes hypocrisy between the posts there and the providers that give it? It's actually kind of hilarious cross referencing names with the reports on here. Even if there are revenge reports, I imagine they all can't be. I saw a funny post to where a provider was mad, not so much because the guy asked, but because he didn't offer a higher than usual rate, LOL. Same for guys asking for a BBFS list, not to partake, but to "avoid out of safety concerns" as if asking for a cover is impossible. If you look at any ad or thread even hinting about it, there's always has an enormous amount of views, whether through demand or controversy.

Do you guys think it's to prevent a "lower quality" of the board and therefore less paying providers = less money, a segregation of the ones that do and ones that do not, or actually a concern for safety / health?

Feel like it's always a money issue.

[QUOTE=BeaverHunter69;5984972]Not sure if it's the same person but if you're talking about a tiny Chinese lady with a heavy accent, she was awesome. Gave a message in between sessions. Never let me bareback her but allowed me to rub her pussy bare dick. Liked her tiny tits with big nipples licked rather than sucked. She'd almost go into convulsions when she came. Great times.[/QUOTE]Oh I loved how she reacted when I slowly swirled my tongue around those little gumdrops.

[QUOTE=KitWalker1967;5985521]Oh I loved how she reacted when I slowly swirled my tongue around those little gumdrops.[/QUOTE]Yep, that's her. Oh the memories! LOL.

[QUOTE=BeaverHunter69;5984972]Not sure if it's the same person but if you're talking about a tiny Chinese lady with a heavy accent, she was awesome. Gave a message in between sessions. Never let me bareback her but allowed me to rub her pussy bare dick. Liked her tiny tits with big nipples licked rather than sucked. She'd almost go into convulsions when she came. Great times.[/QUOTE]The Meiling I am referring to did have a somewhat "heavy" accent, but she is actually from Singapore. Her In Calls (always at private residences) were typically in the SeaTac area. Two of them, she actually owned the homes she was in. She did allow me to bareback her (after the first 5 visits), and I did her many, many times. She was also into rimming me.

The other thing that distinguished her was that besides escorting, she also had a business dealing with clothes. And I suspect a lot of her income came from that. (She also has 2 kids, a married daughter, and a son).

[QUOTE=HelloThar;5985496]So reading through the BBFS drama posts like the alerts on the other site, do people just ignore all the behind-the-scenes hypocrisy between the posts there and the providers that give it? It's actually kind of hilarious cross referencing names with the reports on here. Even if there are revenge reports, I imagine they all can't be. I saw a funny post to where a provider was mad, not so much because the guy asked, but because he didn't offer a higher than usual rate, LOL. Same for guys asking for a BBFS list, not to partake, but to "avoid out of safety concerns" as if asking for a cover is impossible. If you look at any ad or thread even hinting about it, there's always has an enormous amount of views, whether through demand or controversy.

Do you guys think it's to prevent a "lower quality" of the board and therefore less paying providers = less money, a segregation of the ones that do and ones that do not, or actually a concern for safety / health?

Feel like it's always a money issue.[/QUOTE]It's hilarious reading most of those BBFS alerts when I know the person writing the alert has barebacked the hell out of me more than once. One of them told me that LOTS of girls do bareback but like her, write alerts. Who knows the thinking of a woman? I do believe that it's more of a money issue than safety. I also was a bit taken back that several ladies wrote alerts claiming that they didn't provide BBFS but in their alert, they seemed more ticked off that the guy wanted to low ball them. LOL.

Why? In Washington state abortion is still legal.

[QUOTE=Facials;5984688]Now that it was overturned guys better start pulling out.

The will get nervous.

Unless it is Webbhoes or Nico.

Those guys are going to start blasting away in them more![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MyNickname;5985760]Why? In Washington state abortion is still legal.[/QUOTE]This 💯.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

[QUOTE=HelloThar;5985496]So reading through the BBFS drama posts like the alerts on the other site, do people just ignore all the behind-the-scenes hypocrisy between the posts there and the providers that give it? It's actually kind of hilarious cross referencing names with the reports on here. Even if there are revenge reports, I imagine they all can't be. I saw a funny post to where a provider was mad, not so much because the guy asked, but because he didn't offer a higher than usual rate, LOL. Same for guys asking for a BBFS list, not to partake, but to "avoid out of safety concerns" as if asking for a cover is impossible. If you look at any ad or thread even hinting about it, there's always has an enormous amount of views, whether through demand or controversy.

Do you guys think it's to prevent a "lower quality" of the board and therefore less paying providers = less money, a segregation of the ones that do and ones that do not, or actually a concern for safety / health?

Feel like it's always a money issue.[/QUOTE]I would say it's a self-righteous holier-than-thou issue.

[QUOTE=Facials;5984688]Now that it was overturned guys better start pulling out.

The will get nervous.

Unless it is Webbhoes or Nico.

Those guys are going to start blasting away in them more![/QUOTE]You don't ever need to worry, because if they come to you and say you got them pregnant it is almost certainly not legit.

All you need to do is tell them something like this:

"You're pregnant? That's fantastic! I'm so excited about being a dad. So as soon as the baby is born we can get a paternity test and then we can go to court and get everything set up for child support, parenting plans, and visitation. In the meantime if you need anything call my lawyer at 206-xxx-xxxx".

They will never call your lawyer, or probably ever contact you again.

[QUOTE=Facials;5984688]Now that it was overturned guys better start pulling out.

The will get nervous.

Unless it is Webbhoes or Nico.

Those guys are going to start blasting away in them more![/QUOTE]LOL yeah. I am going to keep blasting away anyway. Most of them are either on the pill or take the morning after pill (I hope) otherwise I would have had thousands of little ones running around calling me daddy already.

Have any of you ever met the girls from Naughty Nymphettes? Just saw one advertised on STG and was looking for input.

[QUOTE=WalterWhite99;5985725]The Meiling I am referring to did have a somewhat "heavy" accent, but she is actually from Singapore. Her In Calls (always at private residences) were typically in the SeaTac area. Two of them, she actually owned the homes she was in. She did allow me to bareback her (after the first 5 visits), and I did her many, many times. She was also into rimming me.

The other thing that distinguished her was that besides escorting, she also had a business dealing with clothes. And I suspect a lot of her income came from that. (She also has 2 kids, a married daughter, and a son).[/QUOTE]Same person. Fat hairy not a Bush pussy. She also live in Kent but played in Seatac / Tukwila area. Very nice attitude. Wish she'd do like boxers, come back for a few rounds. LOL.

[QUOTE=BeaverHunter69;5985728]It's hilarious reading most of those BBFS alerts when I know the person writing the alert has barebacked the hell out of me more than once. One of them told me that LOTS of girls do bareback but like her, write alerts. Who knows the thinking of a woman? I do believe that it's more of a money issue than safety. I also was a bit taken back that several ladies wrote alerts claiming that they didn't provide BBFS but in their alert, they seemed more ticked off that the guy wanted to low ball them. LOL.[/QUOTE]Yeah, it seemed more of a way to get back at those who asked but didn't offer enough rather than any actual attempts at protecting other providers or mongers.

How many of the most stubborn would go against their supposed principles and offer it if given a ridiculous sum? Everyone generally has a price whether they admit to it or not, and at some point, it'd be more irresponsible not to take the money if it's say, a ridiculous amount.

The hypocrisy just makes me wonder why even bother so long as people aren't harassing or crossing stated boundaries. Or just enforce accurate ads and menus.