"Canada is NOT necessarily beyond the jurisdiction of the Feds."?
[QUOTE=DanDNashMan;1426542][b]Canada is not necessarily beyond the jurisdiction of the Feds.[/b][/quote]Unless I missed the most astounding historical news since 2001 the USA has not either annexed or invaded_&_occupied Canada: it is still a [b]sovereign foreign[/b] Nation. Thus, while Canadian authorities & Canadian Courts might voluntarily cooperate occasionally with US authorities or US Courts, no US Federal or any US State Court has any [b]jurisdiction over[/b] Canadian citizens (except while they are physically present on US territory, naturally) to compel them, by subpeona or otherwise, to release confidential documents or info [b]in their possession in Canada. [/b]
[quote=DanDNashMan;1426542]However, Canada has some of the strictest internet privacy laws in the world. ISPs are not required to keep a log of who connected to a particular server. Some countries differ in this regard and the Feds have gotten records from ISPs from other countries (often required to bust child porn rings here in the USA).[/quote]Many nations have signed onto treaties or international-agreements to combat child-sexual-exploitation / child-porn & sex-slave-trafficking but, depending on the country, they might not be so easily convinced to release records of communications strictly between consening adults.
[quote=DanDNashMan;1426542]So yes as you point out. Dealing with a server in Canada you are pretty safe. Solicitation is a misdemeanor in Tennessee so I don't think too many resources would be spent in court trying to get subpoenas for info anyway.[/QUOTE]If you are simply corresponding with someone to say, in effect, that: "I'm not not either some psycho-stalker or a law-enforcement-officer, & I would like to make a date to meet you" & you NEVER refer to money or sex or sexual-activities in your communication then the charge of "Solicitation for Prostitution" (or similar) would be mighty difficult to prove in Court even to get a subpeona issued.
But all this paranoia about having your real identity on an ISP-server or in business-client-records in Canada (or in Europe) while at the same time rationalizing being willing to expose yourself to the all the risks of going to incall locations seems to me to be ludicrous! Being either detained_&_questioned by leo's if you're stopped approaching or leaving an incall location, [b]or being questioned by police while you're in the ER after you've been attacked & beaten unconcious or knifed or shot by robbers while going to or leaving an incall[/b], is hardly going to keep your identity secret from your employer or your family or your friends or your girlfriend or your wife! [b]Does anyone really want to risk all his security on some anonymous-username reviews of incall providers with fake names[/b] (on this, or other, free-bulletin-board sites)? Just so he can save a few dollars by not renting a secure motel-room & having a verified provider come OUTcall to him? How illogical & irrational is that?
Knowledge is advantage; sincerely: A K
