[QUOTE=MonkeyMagik;5000818]I'm biased, but I think it's great. I will say it took a few visits for her to really warm up to me. I've seen her many many times LOL.[/QUOTE]I'm looking for a looker. Need something to remind me of Socal kgirls back when I lived in OC. I'm kicking my self for not seeing Jazmin or Connie when they were up NorCal so I got give purple a try.
Any one have intel on new girl J from princess garden? Her pics look familiar and I believe she was there before.
[QUOTE=Winger537;5002332]Any one have intel on new girl J from princess garden? Her pics look familiar and I believe she was there before.[/QUOTE]She's JayDD / Jay up north looks more like pic 1 although definitely heavy PSing and she looks a little older. Age mid to late 30's.
Ok time but not repeatable, as there are better options. Recall being a little sensitive with DATY.
Hi Everyone, is Jane from PG all that? I'm trying to schedule an appointment, but she has been booked up the last couple of days.
[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5002637]Hi Everyone, is Jane from PG all that? I'm trying to schedule an appointment, but she has been booked up the last couple of days.[/QUOTE]Close to Flynn if not in that category IMO. Very demure, very cute face, good height (not short), nice ass, B natural tits I think, very GFE, sweet, great service. Definitely a looker with very smooth excellent skin and a seemingly natural body.
Not going to be a body like SexyShannon if you're looking for something that's eye popping in the "Hot" sense. Have to emphasize her face.
Pink belt first pic, her back showing in the 2nd pic with the white sheer thing is also good representation. Red dress isn't helpful for her face.
[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5002637]Hi Everyone, is Jane from PG all that? I'm trying to schedule an appointment, but she has been booked up the last couple of days.[/QUOTE]As a prior poster mentioned, she has more than 100 reviews elsewhere, going back to 2015. Still the same ride, but I personally think the mileage is starting to show.
Yes, Jane is all that. Camsv222 said Jane is in same tier as Flynn and Bonnie [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4264784&highlight=Jane#post4264784](here)[/URL]. I would rank them like this: Jane, Bonnie, Flynn.
I seek young cute girl under 30 but Jane can still compete with the best Korean hotties in looks. IMHO, both her service and looks are better than many current SoCal Kgirls. She averaged 9 in both looks and performance prior to TER removing her reviews after FOSTA. Some PLEASER reviews: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4242939&highlight=Jane#post4242939](Best review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4402042&highlight=Jane#post4402042](Review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4400238&highlight=Jane#post4400238](Review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4241681&highlight=Jane#post4241681](Wow, I have been saying the same thing for over a year)[/URL].
The pic showing her back is her real and recent pic. The other photoshopped glamour pic might be her when she was younger. She may not stay longer than a few weeks.
[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5002637]Hi Everyone, is Jane from PG all that? I'm trying to schedule an appointment, but she has been booked up the last couple of days.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5002881]Yes, Jane is all that. Camsv222 said Jane is in same tier as Flynn and Bonnie [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4264784&highlight=Jane#post4264784](here)[/URL]. I would rank them like this: Jane, Bonnie, Flynn.
I seek young cute girl under 30 but Jane can still compete with the best Korean hotties in looks. IMHO, both her service and looks are better than many current SoCal Kgirls. She averaged 9 in both looks and performance prior to TER removing her reviews after FOSTA. Some PLEASER reviews: [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4242939&highlight=Jane#post4242939](Best review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4402042&highlight=Jane#post4402042](Review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4400238&highlight=Jane#post4400238](Review)[/URL], [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only&p=4241681&highlight=Jane#post4241681](Wow, I have been saying the same thing for over a year)[/URL].
The pic showing her back is her real and recent pic. The other photoshopped glamour pic might be her when she was younger. She may not stay longer than a few weeks.[/QUOTE]Jane sounds intriguing. Is she hotter than Ravi at TopGirls?
[QUOTE=TerrificEnigma;5003240]Jane sounds intriguing. Is she hotter than Ravi at TopGirls?[/QUOTE]I find both attractive. Jane has a more natural (less work done) look than Ravi. It's always a difficult task to recommend based on looks as I have no idea what others like or even if they align with my own personal preferences. At the end of the day, if I had to choose only one to see between the two, it's easily Jane for sure.
Any intel on Meeju from kakao-girls? She's listed as BBFS.
Has anyone seen Mandy or Alexis from CaKdolls?
[QUOTE=Winger537;5004407]Any intel on Meeju from kakao-girls? She's listed as BBFS.[/QUOTE]I saw Meeju. She's cute, I'd say 7/10 on face. She has a decent body with man made C's that look and feel pretty natural and an Ok ass. No belly for the most part.
She smiles well and has a cute personality but you have to direct the action. She doesn't really do anything unless you have her do it. You kiss, you motion her for the BJ and you do most things. At least that was my experience. Yes BBFS. Not much english from what I recall.
If you have any intel on Yu-Na with Kupcake or Mandy, Susan or Angela with Ca Kdolls let me know. Thanks.
[QUOTE=RecentCo673;5004819]I saw Meeju. She's cute, I'd say 7/10 on face. She has a decent body with man made C's that look and feel pretty natural and an Ok ass. No belly for the most part.
She smiles well and has a cute personality but you have to direct the action. She doesn't really do anything unless you have her do it. You kiss, you motion her for the BJ and you do most things. At least that was my experience. Yes BBFS. Not much english from what I recall.
If you have any intel on Yu-Na with Kupcake or Mandy, Susan or Angela with Ca Kdolls let me know. Thanks[/QUOTE]What was the up sell for that?
[QUOTE=CamsV;5002680]Close to Flynn if not in that category IMO. Very demure, very cute face, good height (not short), nice ass, B natural tits I think, very GFE, sweet, great service. Definitely a looker with very smooth excellent skin and a seemingly natural body.
Not going to be a body like SexyShannon if you're looking for something that's eye popping in the "Hot" sense. Have to emphasize her face.
Pink belt first pic, her back showing in the 2nd pic with the white sheer thing is also good representation. Red dress isn't helpful for her face.[/QUOTE]I was able to see Jane finally. Cam’s description is pretty spot on, I do love that she is all natural and and unbelievably sensual. She's a little heavier than I expected, especially around her hips and midsection, not bad, but I prefer spinners. I may repeat, but definitely scratched that itch.
[QUOTE=HiroSlammer7;5005273]I was able to see Jane finally. Cams description is pretty spot on, I do love that she is all natural and and unbelievably sensual. She's a little heavier than I expected, especially around her hips and midsection, not bad, but I prefer spinners. I may repeat, but definitely scratched that itch.[/QUOTE]When did you see her? Just curious. I had booked her for 8 pm today but they canceled on me saying she had some sort of emergency. I wonder if a regular took my spot.