Hi, I was trying to help a girl but did not work out.
Anyways, I was reading your reviews these day during my lunch, lot of info amd same experience as well, if you remember CGE, they are back, tried to book one of them but they told me girls not available, one will available on Saturday, I think I'm going to try it, I like the one with big booty, hope she is cute at least. Link is [URL]cgechicago.com[/URL]. Price same like others.
CGE is a fake agency using stolen pics.
[QUOTE=LaCoyote;3687488]Anyways, I was reading your reviews these day during my lunch, lot of info amd same experience as well, if you remember CGE, they are back, tried to book one of them but they told me girls not available, one will available on Saturday, I think I'm going to try it, I like the one with big booty, hope she is cute at least. Link is [URL]cgechicago.com[/URL]. Price same like others.[/QUOTE]If you look at several post on the other board it is the same and only person shilling up this agency.
CGE. Is not a fake agency, I'm not defending'them but have some points to consider
Yes, looks like the sin is the only reviewer but if you click on his account you will see lot of reviews given to other agencies and Indy girls that I have seen as well, (probably I will open an account there).
Second, I had booked before with them, there was cutest girl she was new to business long ago.
Last Saturday I booked again but the girl with big booty did not show up, but they let me know ahead time and apologize for that inconvenience and promised a super discount next time, we will c. They said girls make crazy excuses just in order not to show up. I got this one, it was like this when CEC or EEC started business, girl did not show up all o the big excuse she is already fully booked ok in some cases it was true.
IF this agency were fake then why use an HTTPS / on their website and membership form, that means that their link are SSL or encrypted, comparing to other site and Indies.
Probably their pics were form girls working other agencies you know and I do not need to explain that.
Their pics have been locked so you have to become a member, but they not post naked ones on it just girls in lingerie, it is just to protect girls privacy a little and to avoid getting kick out of the web hosting, you know these day LEO is cracking down site, you know already EROS still on investigation, BP,. Anyway who knows. I texted with them a little so I know a little about them.
Screening is a joke w / some those those agency, they do not screen at all, just gave certain info you are in, Try you will c.
Fake Agency Using Stolen picsl
[QUOTE=LaCoyote;3693099]Yes, looks like the sin is the only reviewer but if you click on his account you will see lot of reviews given to other agencies and Indy girls that I have seen as well, (probably I will open an account there).
Second, I had booked before with them, there was cutest girl she was new to business long ago.
Last Saturday I booked again but the girl with big booty did not show up, but they let me know ahead time and apologize for that inconvenience and promised a super discount next time, we will c. They said girls make crazy excuses just in order not to show up. I got this one, it was like this when CEC or EEC started business, girl did not show up all o the big excuse she is already fully booked ok in some cases it was true.
IF this agency were fake then why use an HTTPS / on their website and membership form, that means that their link are SSL or encrypted, comparing to other site and Indies.
Probably their pics were form girls working other agencies you know and I do not need to explain that.
Their pics have been locked so you have to become a member, but they not post naked ones on it just girls in lingerie, it is just to protect girls privacy a little and to avoid getting kick out of the web hosting, you know these day LEO is cracking down site, you know already EROS still on investigation, BP,. Anyway who knows. I texted with them a little so I know a little about them.
Screening is a joke w / some those those agency, they do not screen at all, just gave certain info you are in, Try you will c.[/QUOTE]I know who "the sin" is in real life. I know he also stole pics from girls that haven't worked in the business since 2015. What I am wondering is if Lacoyote and The Sin are the same person. I am 99.99999% they are.
EEC has no "usual"
[QUOTE=Beast42;3694991]Who was the provider? That's unusual for this angency.[/QUOTE]I'm not surprised by the poster that said he only got 25 minutes. I had the same experience with Cate (no longer on site) but I can be very persuasive so I managed to convince her. But if I had just taken it when she said that a second round "was not included for $300" I would have been out of there within half an hour with only one shot on goal too. It's really par for the course.
One of the girls refused to give me a BJ (covered or uncovered), a different time there was no DFK.
These girls are brand new, most of the time you're going to be seeing them with no reviews or at best a couple. So bottom line is you're going in there blind and getting what you get. If you don't like it. Too bad.
You won't really get anything if you complain so I don't even bother. I'm probably batting 50/50 with this agency so I wouldn't say that the usual service is great. It really depends on who you get. You could get a great GFE experience with a young hot girl. Or you could leave feeling like you lit your $325 on fire.
Some agencies are more decent than others
[QUOTE=MoneyT;3695981]So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.[/QUOTE]This is a really bad business practice. You cannot have it both ways. If you want to use these lingos for marketing, at least you need to set your providers' expectation straight, and let your providers know what type of service they need to do as standard package.
Or if you want to avoid the explicit questions about lingos / services, then STOP using these lingos. You don't even need to say GFE since most clients expects BBBJ when they pay $350+ per hour.
A better practice is to do what ChicagoCoverGirls does, not mentioning anything about greek or pse and let the girls and clients figuring out themselves. Agency just arranged the appointment for companions. All reviews on girls from CCC indicated BBBJ and kissing. And that's the consistency clients would appreciate.
Another better practice is to do what EliteSecret does, just be specific about who are willing to speak Greek in the implicit way that everyone understands. Whether the girl or agency want to add upcharge is a different question. But at least the information is clear. Sandra hardly used PSE, I knew she used it to described Linda Muse before, but Linda does provide a decent PSE by its definition regarding the style of interaction and intercourse, and Linda does anal as default. So when Sandra uses the term, she set clients' expectation correctly. And again, all reviews on her girls indicate the same kind of consistency: girls provides what Sandra advertise they do. There are at least one girl on Sandra's bullpen that do CBJ mostly, but the reviews do reveal that fact, while only a handful indicating bbbj.
You may find the appearance of girls from these two agencies less attractive than MCE/CEC, EEC, or the 262. But you are unlikely to run into a surprising disappointment with their girls. There are reasons why they stay long in this business with lower turnover.
Angelis started to include additional details as "PSEWA" and "PSE no A" on profiles, so at least I know for those with these notes, whether they speak greek. Yet, I still wish they can clarify what the heck their PSE is because I want to know if upcharge is fair. But I'm not going to ask them straight up. I may book Chloe and ask her 'in person' about this. But meanwhile, I have my eyes on enough girls besides Chloe. So...not anytime soon.
Sidenote: if agency providers insist on CBJ, not just for a client showing up sweaty and filthy, but for every one, then the agency has a problem of talent management. And if an agency advertise vaguely and its girls provides YMMV services on these rather standard expectations, I am just less inclined to use the agency even if it represents my ATF. There are better agencies and more girls out there. I appreciate how hard it is to run an escort agency, but like any other business, there are always successes and failures. Market will work it out. Some agencies don't really care about business practice because there are always johns out there. Why would they care about a few customers wanting more clarity of their advertisement?
WNW at least did not upcharge PSE
[QUOTE=MoneyT;3695981]So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.[/QUOTE]If you didn't ask them that, at least you can try the girl out and see how open she is and how far you can go with the same rate. With AA, you may need to indicate the choice of PSE upfront and pay more. People will feel worse about the letdown if they are underwhelmed by AA girls in this sense.
Clarification On The Menu.
[QUOTE=Chicago41;3696339]It's ridiculous that agencies, indys, or whomever will go to the trouble of verifying you, then if you ask them to clarify their offerings they get mad. They get just as mad if you assume, and "PSE" means something different to every escort, it seems.[/QUOTE]I find it's best to ask what's on the Menu in person rather than asking on the phone or text. By asking over the phone the agency might have suspected you were the police. Just my guess.
And you need to respect their communication
[QUOTE=MoneyT;3695992]One of the reasons why I continue to use EEC is that whenever I have had a bad experience with a girl, they always made it up to me. I would reach out to the handler again. I'm sure they will give you a credit of some sort. They have never let me down.[/QUOTE]EEC just emailed to their client list explaining and telling their side of the story in response to the comments going around here. Two recent complaints about Cate come from one senior member and one regular member. Other than the minor error, their explanation falls in my expectation. It's the tradeoff between different business practices. Regardless, I respect the fact that EEC would engage and response to customers' feedback, rather than just block people out from inquiries.
Angellis Angels new agency.
It seems AA has a new spin off. The question is why. Paying to maintain two websites and grow them doesn't make sense financially. Same price point for the most part. Who knows.
[URL]http://askashley.provider-sites.com/models[/URL]