[QUOTE=Mr Horney]I just saw this on BP and wanted to share with you all in case you missed it.
[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful-22/4264414[/url]
Drugs are bad, mkay.
And is it me or does Tammy look like Frodo?[/QUOTE]That would be very useful information IF IT WERE TRUE, but how do we know if any of it really IS true? There is nothing in it that is really verifiable (no names or links to booking reports citing IV drug use or criminal transmission of HIV or even dates that the photos were taken) and it actually seems to me to have a very questionable tone to it. Why was it even posted? Was it really to warn us OR, as it seems to me, was it just written by someone who has some personal vendetta against these provider(s) and would resort to making things up. The 2nd photo is clearly a different person from all the rest (Tammy, I guess). The girl in the 3rd photo actually appears quite hot to me. I suppose she might or might not be the girl in the 1st mug shot (not nearly so hot), but how many ever really look that good right after they've been arrested? And the posting itself was very poorly written (e.g. addressed to us guys and then says "to earn your guy's money", as if written to our wives and girlfriends). The fact that Somer allegedly is involved with drugs is entirely credible (how many of these girls aren't to one degree or another?) but shared IV needles and HIV+? MAYBE yes, but IMHO it is AT LEAST just as possibly no.
Then there is also this OTHER posting on BP: [url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/re-caution-brand-new-and-ready-to-play-claiming-to-be-chloe-really-strung-out-beautiful/4271316[/url]. According to THIS posting, the posting you linked to was actually posted by another provider and her pimp, who are really the ones who are bad news, and the info they provided about Somer/Beautiful/Chloe was all made up because this provider had the audacity to try and break away from that pimp and keep all the money she earns. And THAT posting at least provides FULL names that you can actually look up.
When reading ANYTHING, whether on this board or elsewhere, but particularly if you have no idea of who is posting it and why (which is particularly a problem on BP), one should always read it with a healthy dose of skepticism and a very critical mind. Does it make sense? Is it believable? Could something else be going on here? What seems more plausible? One can keep those postings in mind due to their POSSIBLE veracity, but should also put less stock in those postings to the degree they don't seem entirely credible. And, in my view at least, the posting about Chloe doesn't, at least not entirely. But who knows? Maybe BOTH postings have elements of truth in them along with a few embellishments.
