1 photos
SA has a low threshold for reporting and blocking women
So I didn't realize this until today, after I went to report littlou, but there are a shit-ton of reasons that SA accepts for kicking someone from the site (unless their list hasn't been updated). I've attached a screenshot.
Some of the ones I had no idea about are:
- Known escort.
- Using escort terminology.
- Not following through on the arrangement (yup!
- Asking for money up front.
- Online only arrangement.
From now on, I'm reporting every single one. I'd like to keep the streetwalker BP influx to BP, and I hate wading through the online-onlys and money-up-fronters. I don't know if SA takes these seriously or not, but if you all want me to report someone, just say the word. I'm tired of wading through the garbage to get to the gold here.
The "dots connect" somewhere.
Its amazing when they give you a number and its tied to FB.
A little older than the "typical" group. Red Haired Angel I plug her into FB review pics and then on to her friends. Parker (stage name) and about 3 other girls I have seen on SA.
[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/b5f7223b-e470-84b7-7c31-5606868dbdc9[/URL]
[QUOTE=LuvBoobies;3574215]I am sure some noticed already but another SA from the southside half-way house gang has made it to BP last week.
[URL]http://stlouis.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/kaylee-nicole-cumming-to-you/32602577[/URL]
You could already snag her off of CL before at any rate or just FB message you if you knew her. If guys do not know, a good chunk of the ladies she is in the half-way house in last year were all on SA. As usual once one girl goes HO she takes her friends with her (just ask how all the Anastasialovesstl ladies come from. One friend turns ***** and many of the rest follow).[/QUOTE]