The Raleigh area "Sugar Bowl" (SA, WYP, SD4 ME)

I have no experience with Secret Benefits so I can't speak for that. In general though I would just remind you that there are all types on these sites. You'll figure out who is who after a few convos with those that interest you. On SA though there are a lot of legit girls. Because of that some will state in their profiles 'No Married Men' while most others don't care. IMO the selection is so great that you can put it in your profile and just move on if it matters to the girl. Beware though that if you find the wrong type of girl she MAY use that info against you for $. Just use your common sense and you should be fine. Good luck!

Yaya.

[QUOTE=Robert1744;3588166] ...As I do that, I am also perusing Secret Benefits in addition to SA. Here's the thing, my SB profile is literally empty. There's no pic, no blurb, nothing. And yet, I get a bunch of messages from various young women initiating contact. Can I surmise that if the SB women are initiating things with nothing to go on, they're a little more experienced in the game, perhaps even semi-pro? When my SA profile was empty at first, this never happened over there. I was curious if there were any general differences between the women on the two sites.

Also, since I last dabbled in the arrangement world, I got married. It's great, but I just can't stop that young pussy. Do any other of you married guys find that listing your marital status hurts your chances or decreases the opportunities? If I do proceed with another arrangement, I am going to pursue it in another town, as I firmly believe you don't shit where you eat.

Any thoughts on doing this stuff while married (apart from judgement and psychoanalysis) would be welcomed. Thanks![/QUOTE]

By the second or third 'message', I always point out the fact that my profile indicates that I'm married. One cared, a couple went silent, the rest indicated that they were good with that, and some also promised discretion. I was pleased to see that several of the girls also indicated they were married (and one was involved with a 'girlfriend') - situations that made me a little more comfortable that they wouldn't turn around and try to blackmail me.

But that last item kept me from going forward with any of the new talent on SA, despite the wonderful pictures. I ended up back at AM, where the women are often less nubile (though often more interesting) - and are just as concerned with keeping everything on the QT as I am. That I don't have to 'buy' them, makes the relationship just that more comfortable for me; not to mention economical.

[QUOTE=Robert1744;3588166]Hey ya'll -.

I have dabbled in the SD world with both good and bad experiences, but I've been out of it for about a year and thinking of jumping back in.

As I do that, I am also perusing Secret Benefits in addition to SA. Here's the thing, my SB profile is literally empty. There's no pic, no blurb, nothing. And yet, I get a bunch of messages from various young women initiating contact. Can I surmise that if the SB women are initiating things with nothing to go on, they're a little more experienced in the game, perhaps even semi-pro? When my SA profile was empty at first, this never happened over there. I was curious if there were any general differences between the women on the two sites.

Also, since I last dabbled in the arrangement world, I got married. It's great, but I just can't stop that young pussy. Do any other of you married guys find that listing your marital status hurts your chances or decreases the opportunities? If I do proceed with another arrangement, I am going to pursue it in another town, as I firmly believe you don't shit where you eat.

Any thoughts on doing this stuff while married (apart from judgement and psychoanalysis) would be welcomed. Thanks![/QUOTE]

Coffee _lover 6.

Sweet, fun to talk to, and cute girl, but she prob won't meet you. I got some nudes out of her tho, and they're 100% legit. I know bc I found her socials. On her twitter, back in 2016, she posts a pic about "scamming sugar daddies," up until the point they want to meet.

If you find a girl's socials, I highly suggest doing a search for "sugar" on their profile. Lots of these girls come from the tum blr landscape I've found, where there's a lot of info about how to scam us.
So just beware what you're getting into.

Edit: I removed the screen cap of that twitter post. If anyone would like to see it, just PM me.

[QUOTE=Robert1744;3588166]Hey ya'll -.

I have dabbled in the SD world with both good and bad experiences, but I've been out of it for about a year and thinking of jumping back in.

As I do that, I am also perusing Secret Benefits in addition to SA. Here's the thing, my SB profile is literally empty. There's no pic, no blurb, nothing. And yet, I get a bunch of messages from various young women initiating contact. Can I surmise that if the SB women are initiating things with nothing to go on, they're a little more experienced in the game, perhaps even semi-pro? When my SA profile was empty at first, this never happened over there. I was curious if there were any general differences between the women on the two sites.

Also, since I last dabbled in the arrangement world, I got married. It's great, but I just can't stop that young pussy. Do any other of you married guys find that listing your marital status hurts your chances or decreases the opportunities? If I do proceed with another arrangement, I am going to pursue it in another town, as I firmly believe you don't shit where you eat.

Any thoughts on doing this stuff while married (apart from judgement and psychoanalysis) would be welcomed. Thanks![/QUOTE]Google the review s on SB. Post your status and the girls who don't see married men won't contact you. Most don't really care if the arrangement is good.

I am going to be very upfront about my marital status. But I am going to play MUCH tighter with my identity. If I practice in totally different city, use Google voice, no last names, etc, I should be able to have some more fun.

Here's a tip on protecting your identity. A couple of years ago, I met a gal on Craigslist. I forgot that the pic I sent her was also on my LinkedIn, so she was able to do an image search and scope me out before I divulged anything. It was fine, she wasn't trying to scam me and was just being curious. But definitely don't ever send anything that stands even a remote chance of pinging back in a web search.

By the same token, I've found that most girls on SA will not want to give any information for the first couple of rounds. But 9 times out of 10, once you get the digits, it's to their real phone tied to their social media. I have gone on M&Gs several times with a wealth of information on the girl I was meeting, including intel about their likes and dislikes that I'd drop to my advantage.

Hey gents, so I've kinda thought about taking a dip into the sugar bowl for about 6 months now and for the last few weeks I've been doing some serious research on it. I've read this forum from post 1 and am now working on the Richmond forum. I find the idea of being able to take a smoking hot coed out for a night on the town and an overnight of GFE for about the same cost (allowance, not counting entertainment cost) of an hour with an agency, or even a high-end BP girl, to be quite exciting.

Any how I kinda stumbled on this trick I thought I would share. I've had my SA profile for a couple months (unpaid) and only just recently completed it, only then did the hits, messages, and favorites start coming in. Once completed though, pots could see if I was checking them out too. With all the new girls showing up and all the ones I'm interested in, I can barely keep them all straight, and I don't want to favorite a bunch of them since I'm not quite ready to pull the trigger on the paid membership. In order to surf and lurk stealthily I made a second profile that I have left incomplete. Now I can check out and compare pots as much as I want without them ever getting a hit.

Hope this helps, and thanks to all you brothers for opening my eyes to the sugar bowl.

[QUOTE=ArmyNiceGuy;3589717]Hey gents, so I've kinda thought about taking a dip into the sugar bowl for about 6 months now and for the last few weeks I've been doing some serious research on it. I've read this forum from post 1 and am now working on the Richmond forum. I find the idea of being able to take a smoking hot coed out for a night on the town and an overnight of GFE for about the same cost (allowance, not counting entertainment cost) of an hour with an agency, or even a high-end BP girl, to be quite exciting.

Any how I kinda stumbled on this trick I thought I would share. I've had my SA profile for a couple months (unpaid) and only just recently completed it, only then did the hits, messages, and favorites start coming in. Once completed though, pots could see if I was checking them out too. With all the new girls showing up and all the ones I'm interested in, I can barely keep them all straight, and I don't want to favorite a bunch of them since I'm not quite ready to pull the trigger on the paid membership. In order to surf and lurk stealthily I made a second profile that I have left incomplete. Now I can check out and compare pots as much as I want without them ever getting a hit.

Hope this helps, and thanks to all you brothers for opening my eyes to the sugar bowl.[/QUOTE]If I'm not mistaken only paid membership can hide the viewing, favoring info and not be seen. I also think those options only work while your a paid member. If membership lapses then the ones you favored will see you have favored them. If your not a paid member the site is pretty useless.

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3589777]If I'm not mistaken only paid membership can hide the viewing, favoring info and not be seen. I also think those options only work while your a paid member. If membership lapses then the ones you favored will see you have favored them. If your not a paid member the site is pretty useless.[/QUOTE]Well my lurking profile doesn't even have a user name yet, so it's still useful to separate my lurking from my real profile. I only use it for lurking and taking paper notes on pots that I may contact later if and when I pull the trigger on getting a paid membership on my real profile. Also I did try to favorite a pot from my lurking profile and got an error message stating others can't "discover" me, until I complete the basic information on it.

Welp, after 18 months of free SA, paying the $80 for only a single month, they finally fixed the bug.

I rejoined LOL.

Can't believe I never saw this blog before now. * Been in and out of the SB game for a year. * A few short terms,* but back in the market after my baby gor overwhelmed at UNC. *.

Some of my experiences over the last few months, and wondering if anyone else has experience with Hotlibrarian20 (think she was sexylibrarian a month ago). * I always check government I'd due to age, but anyone have experience with this one?*.

Lickmylillypad from Ral. * Asked for a lot, settled for smaller amt. * Met at room amd had a good time. * Just in it for the money and not what I was looking for. * Good time though. * Currently not actively logging in, but she'll be back.

Babylove95 from WS. * Met me halfway in Greensboro* at a room. * Very petite,* and she sure can sing. * One time, but will repeat as we can align schedules. * Just too far for regular.

Kitttkatchell from Goldsboro. ** Met at room and had a good time. * Not as classy as the first two. * One time meet, but may reoeat when in her area.

Summertimesea from Ral. * Not petite like the first several, but not BBW. * Met at room, but she is looking for regular as her current SD "got too busy at work". * Good time and loves K9. * I just like them petite. ** She can host once comfortable.

Stoneykitty from Ral. Warning! Wanted $. 4 for M&G. * After 2 months, willing to meet for much less. * Confirmed a few hours before, but sat in lot for 15 minutes with no word, so left. * 25 minutes after meet she calls and text. * When finds out I left and nit comimg back,* potty mouth with a bunch of idle threats. * Stay far away.

Callmeadreamer from Ral. * Current profile inactive, but beware. * She was off before and came back after awhile. * Wanted me ti get a room, but I meet in lot before getting one. * She confirmed hiur before, then no show, no more text, and disabled her profile. * Big time waster.

Stay Safe,

Gibbs.

Avoid this one, waste of time. Not from Durham and wants money via PayPal first. Most likely some dude. LOL.

[URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/messages/28fb1b17-1e46-4c12-be65-069531e5e7f6?mailbox=inbox[/URL]

Lhillxoxo.

[QUOTE=JMonger;3588279]...I ended up back at AM, where the women are often less nubile (though often more interesting) - and are just as concerned with keeping everything on the QT as I am. That I don't have to 'buy' them, makes the relationship just that more comfortable for me; not to mention economical.[/QUOTE]How has AM in the Triangle area been for you?

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3600294]How has AM in the Triangle area been for you?[/QUOTE]It has been a while since I was on there, but I had some great times.

You have to learn to spot the bots, and it helps a lot if you like fat, middle-aged women.

I had one woman from AM turn into an ongoing affair that lasted nearly two years. I got careless and my wife found out. If not for that, I'd still be banging her weekly.

[QUOTE=SailorSam;3600330]It has been a while since I was on there, but I had some great times.

You have to learn to spot the bots, and it helps a lot if you like fat, middle-aged women.

I had one woman from AM turn into an ongoing affair that lasted nearly two years. I got careless and my wife found out. If not for that, I'd still be banging her weekly.[/QUOTE]I have been around the block too many times, sorry but what is AM?

[URL]https://seekingarrangement.com/member/d770f9c9-0dd9-4cf9-8d66-9c5f8b2287bb[/URL]

I have had pretty good luck with AM. I'm am currently in my fourth relationship. A couple of which have gone on for multiple years.

What I like is that I get a true GFE experience, we text, we phone, we occasionally meet for lunch, and then every week or so get away for a 3-4 hour session that includes GFE, DATY, MSOG, and anything else we feel like trying (It is the only way I will go bareback). All for the cost of a hotel room (though, my current lady often has her house available, so it is the cost of a trip across town).

All this is under the radar as we both have families. This means it is understood when I'm not available, I don't have to buy gifts, etc. There are a lot of advantages to the situation.

I understand that there used to be a large number of fake profiles, though I that seems to have been reduced since they were caught at it. When I get on, I recognize many of the same profiles I saw a year ago. In a couple cases, ones that I have met. Not sure if it is because I filter to the ones that are active, or because I prefer more mature women, but it is rare that I get a reply that doesn't lead to details that someone in the area would have to write. Sadly, it is even rarer that I get a reply at all. But that is part of the deal.

To my surprise, while the women I have talked to admit to being inundated with emails, they indicate the vast majority are not attractive (for instance, being overtly sexual or sending provocative pictures seems to be an instant fail for the women I have talked with). I have been told that while we have a lot of competition, the competition isn't very competitive when it comes to identifying what most women are looking for.

Though I budgeted about the cost of an low-end incall ($150), I normally run about $20-50 in AM costs and a few hours composing text (but most content is recyclable. I send the same material largely unchanged to everyone). It usually includes a lunch meeting or two to make sure we are compatible, then the fun starts.

The one negative is the lead time. I'm finding it takes a while, and some false starts, to get a relationship started (but then, at my age, I'm not that hot a property). YMMV.

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3600294]How has AM in the Triangle area been for you?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Raltime;3600793]I have been around the block too many times, sorry but what is AM?[/QUOTE]

A and M are the first letters of popular female names. A what is left after something burns and M the fourth president

[QUOTE=JMonger;3601087]I have had pretty good luck with AM. I'm am currently in my fourth relationship. A couple of which have gone on for multiple years.
...
To my surprise, while the women I have talked to admit to being inundated with emails, they indicate the vast majority are not attractive (for instance, being overtly sexual or sending provocative pictures seems to be an instant fail for the women I have talked with). I have been told that while we have a lot of competition, the competition isn't very competitive when it comes to identifying what most women are looking for.
...
The one negative is the lead time. I'm finding it takes a while, and some false starts, to get a relationship started (but then, at my age, I'm not that hot a property). YMMV.[/QUOTE]JM,

I really appreciate you taking the time in composing this very helpful post. Any ideas on profiles / messages that will pique women's interest?!

[QUOTE=JMonger;3601087]I have had pretty good luck with AM. I'm am currently in my fourth relationship. A couple of which have gone on for multiple years.

What I like is that I get a true GFE experience, we text, we phone, we occasionally meet for lunch, and then every week or so get away for a 3-4 hour session that includes GFE, DATY, MSOG, and anything else we feel like trying (It is the only way I will go bareback). All for the cost of a hotel room (though, my current lady often has her house available, so it is the cost of a trip across town).

All this is under the radar as we both have families. This means it is understood when I'm not available, I don't have to buy gifts, etc. There are a lot of advantages to the situation.

I understand that there used to be a large number of fake profiles, though I that seems to have been reduced since they were caught at it. When I get on, I recognize many of the same profiles I saw a year ago. In a couple cases, ones that I have met. Not sure if it is because I filter to the ones that are active, or because I prefer more mature women, but it is rare that I get a reply that doesn't lead to details that someone in the area would have to write. Sadly, it is even rarer that I get a reply at all. But that is part of the deal.

To my surprise, while the women I have talked to admit to being inundated with emails, they indicate the vast majority are not attractive (for instance, being overtly sexual or sending provocative pictures seems to be an instant fail for the women I have talked with). I have been told that while we have a lot of competition, the competition isn't very competitive when it comes to identifying what most women are looking for..[/QUOTE]Your one of the few that has had any luck with AM. I heard the fake profile thing was worse than before the actual hacking of the website. After that hack I have no idea why anybody would trust them again.

There may be fake profiles. But they don't appear to be in the profiles for women over 40. I carefully track the interesting profiles and all communications and haven't found the evidence yet. I just don't see a pattern of new, TGTBT profiles showing up, attracting traffic, then disappearing (though I do see this for profiles that never get completed as people test the water). One thing I do get is a low reply rate. But that seems to be common for this type of website. I also get frequent 'canned' replies requesting that I invest the $2 to send an introductory message (all subsequent messages are free). When I discussed this with my lover, she said that there are list of them available to women and that the replies can be automated. Sometimes I'll bite (the cost is low) and a couple times this has led to conversations that are clearly a person. The only real 'fake' items I have run into are miss-stated weights, 10 year old pictures, and those that are just testing the water and back out when the rubber meets the road. Same as SA.

Though if you are looking for a women who is 20 years your junior, then SA is the place to go, not AM. The M / F ratio is not on our side at AM and generally women are looking for a guy that is attractive to them, not a SD.

As to their cyber-security, I'm in IT and we are famous for locking the barn door after the cows have fled. I'm confident that the IT security is now top-notch. For a while. But not so confident that I don't use a VPN, unconnected third-party email, a gift-card purchased with cash for payment, and a burner when it comes to personal contact. Same as we should use for any website or service. I'm more concerned now about the web sites that haven't been (publicly) burned yet like 411 and BKS.

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3601328]Your one of the few that has had any luck with AM. I heard the fake profile thing was worse than before the actual hacking of the website. After that hack I have no idea why anybody would trust them again.[/QUOTE]

I find I'm more attracted to ads with pictures, so I put a picture of myself up, somewhat anonymized by blocking out my eyes (which give me away). (One lady I had a two year relationship with, told me she almost didn't contact me because posting a picture showed I wasn't discreet enough. Go figure). The one consistent piece of feedback I have received is that the language in my profile and emails were the most important. I took the time to compose text that reads smoothly, is very polite, describes dating activities ('walks in the park', 'watching a sunset together') and only hints at what we are really there for. I describe how I want to get to know them as a person and friend, and refer to sex rarely and largely through innuendo instead of being salacious. I try not to be grandiose, instead admit failings ('lousy dancer') and poke fun at male stereotypes ('my ego isn't tied to my car') . Remembering that it feels risky to meet with a strange man for sex, I try to describe a ever polite professional who is not at all threatening, but has hidden potential. In emails I focus on them, asking them to expand on material they have presented in their profiles or previous email, and sharing any similar experience I have had.

As I previously mentioned, explicit pictures or text are a turnoff with the women I have met. If you want to show that you are fit, get a picture outdoors, running a 5 K or something.

It can be a delicate dance to reel them in (though, frankly, that is half the fun) - and many get away. If money is no object, SA may be a better choice. But because I like having a relationship as well as sex, for me this can't be beat.

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3601305]JM,

I really appreciate you taking the time in composing this very helpful post. Any ideas on profiles / messages that will pique women's interest?![/QUOTE]

I should probably mention that we are entering the 'dry period' for AM. With Halloween, Thanksgiving, and Christmas, many wives and mothers have a lot on their plate and responses are way down. Another caveat of this type of 'dating' site.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

I texted with her for a day or two after which she asked me to call her during the conversation I could hear a guy talking to her in the background and was told it is her brother. Creepy! She was unhappy that I was using a burner phone and hence was not sure if I was real.

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3607252][URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

I texted with her for a day or two after which she asked me to call her during the conversation I could hear a guy talking to her in the background and was told it is her brother. Creepy! She was unhappy that I was using a burner phone and hence was not sure if I was real.[/QUOTE]I agree. I met with her and she seemed ok at first. But then when I tried to schedule the FC, things got weird quickly. Was originally told she could host and was a hairdresser of sorts. Then was told she couldn't host b / c her mom was in town. Then her mom had to go to the hospital. Then her mom lost consciousness, regained consciousness, and then her mom died. Add in a bizarre text exchange where her name is actually 'Julius' or something.

Be careful!

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3607252][URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

I texted with her for a day or two after which she asked me to call her during the conversation I could hear a guy talking to her in the background and was told it is her brother. Creepy! She was unhappy that I was using a burner phone and hence was not sure if I was real.[/QUOTE]Yeah, looking at her pictures, two were obviously taken in a cheap hotel room. I always check the pictures for clues. When looking for pro's I want to see a hotel room setting, when looking for pots I'm looking for home or dorm-room selfies. At best she's a new to town pro.

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3607252][URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

I texted with her for a day or two after which she asked me to call her during the conversation I could hear a guy talking to her in the background and was told it is her brother. Creepy! She was unhappy that I was using a burner phone and hence was not sure if I was real.[/QUOTE]She seemed a bit off in texts but not too bad, then last week I had a window of opportunity for a M&G. She definitely seemed way off and I immediately cut the meeting short as I had zero interest. Good luck!

Yaya.

So I finally pulled the trigger on SA paid membership, got and email for 33%off for Halloween which was cool. So far I've got one serious pot (adorable 20 year old coed) that will hopefully do a m&g with here soon. Got a couple others just chatting with for now. So I am wondering if any of you brothers out there have talked or met with princessss2322 or candASS? Princess messaged me today to strait up ask if I was free today. Kinda smells like an utr pro, but I may message her for more info. Candass messaged me and in her first message asked me to text her and gave me her number. Number checks out on social media and no hits on the BP type sites so I'm a little interested. Any info would be great brothers.

[QUOTE=ArmyNiceGuy;3608451]So I finally pulled the trigger on SA paid membership, got and email for 33%off for Halloween which was cool. So far I've got one serious pot (adorable 20 year old coed) that will hopefully do a m&g with here soon. Got a couple others just chatting with for now. So I am wondering if any of you brothers out there have talked or met with princessss2322 or candASS? Princess messaged me today to strait up ask if I was free today. Kinda smells like an utr pro, but I may message her for more info. Candass messaged me and in her first message asked me to text her and gave me her number. Number checks out on social media and no hits on the BP type sites so I'm a little interested. Any info would be great brothers.[/QUOTE]I got the same from both. Candass told me xxx to xxxxx for friendship and fun. I replied that I wasn't ready to go there. I responded to princess that I wasn't free but asked for more info.

On another note. I was messaging with arridiva. She was throwing up red flags everywhere. I eventually bailed on the m&g.

Haven't met her, but used the terms host and roses while we chatted. I passed, and continue to get the text me at xxx if interested. As if she has no recall of us talking. Even after I called her out on it once. I think she just does a copy / paste to multiples trying to line up her week.

Be safe.

[QUOTE=Jerry1;3608486]I got the same from both. Candass told me xxx to xxxxx for friendship and fun. I replied that I wasn't ready to go there. I responded to princess that I wasn't free but asked for more info.

On another note. I was messaging with arridiva. She was throwing up red flags everywhere. I eventually bailed on the m&g.[/QUOTE]

Did the M&G and maybe more. LOL.

I'd guess an under the radar semi-pro. Older than pics, imagine that. Stories seem to change as to what she actually does for a living. Certified for both hair styling and masssge, but actually fairly sweet. Tall, and thin body with some belly. Smoker, so be prepared if you are not. Everyone has their own taste, but for me a no repeat.

[QUOTE=PghGuy2005;3607252][URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

I texted with her for a day or two after which she asked me to call her during the conversation I could hear a guy talking to her in the background and was told it is her brother. Creepy! She was unhappy that I was using a burner phone and hence was not sure if I was real.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Gibbs70;3609101]Haven't met her, but used the terms host and roses while we chatted. I passed, and continue to get the text me at xxx if interested. As if she has no recall of us talking. Even after I called her out on it once. I think she just does a copy / paste to multiples trying to line up her week.

Be safe.[/QUOTE]Thanks guys. She looks fun and probably won't delete her message but I'm hoping to concentrate on sugaring for now.

Anyone have experience with this one? [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/39e3f82f-5c62-4e72-ac4f-6779eb2a40f3[/URL].

I'm thinking about starting something ongoing with her and am willing to exchange info on my current I'm thinking about dropping. PM me.

Yaya.

[QUOTE=Gibbs70;3609101]Haven't met her, but used the terms host and roses while we chatted. I passed, and continue to get the text me at xxx if interested. As if she has no recall of us talking. Even after I called her out on it once. I think she just does a copy / paste to multiples trying to line up her week.

Be safe.[/QUOTE]Long time lurker, actually my first post. Hooked up with Candace yesterday, pretty up-front and forward about contacting me. She's looking for a steady, has three kids and is trying to replace a Daddy that moved away.

TOFTT and hooked up with her at a budget place up north (convenient for both as she lives up in Louisburg). No wine-and-dine, straight-up hour romp. Pics are accurate except she's dyed her hair black / brown. Very cute spinner's body, nice nipples and clean kitty. If it doesn't hurt, it's on the menu, except no trips to Greece.

She seriously loves it doggy-style, decent lip service, DATY was good as well. She asks $. 5/ qv $$hr, but talk her down to $$. If she gets a regular, I'm guessing she'd be a nice one. I'd repeat, but I'm not arranging much with work and other trips right now.

Thanks for everything you guys post out here, guys! Figured it's my turn to contribute!

Yaya, nice to PM with you. Just responding a little here just incase others are being played. Been seeing Chase for about a year. Great body, incredible time, and for the best price I've ever had. My problem, is that I now find her to be a coniving little. Let's stat professional. Told I was the only one, she deleted account (actually blocked me which looks the same), and I did things with her that I normally wouldn't. Could care less if there were others, but don't lie avout it so I can properly protect myself. I am big on honesty and trust, and she broke that.

Hope others are not in this same boat. Feel free to see her as she is a great time. Just be careful, go in eyes wide open, and don't believe her crap.

Stay safe all!

Gibbs.

[QUOTE=YayaGogo;3612967]Anyone have experience with this one? [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/39e3f82f-5c62-4e72-ac4f-6779eb2a40f3[/URL].

I'm thinking about starting something ongoing with her and am willing to exchange info on my current I'm thinking about dropping. PM me.

Yaya.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Gibbs70;3614546]Yaya, nice to PM with you. Just responding a little here just incase others are being played. Been seeing Chase for about a year. Great body, incredible time, and for the best price I've ever had. My problem, is that I now find her to be a coniving little. Let's stat professional. Told I was the only one, she deleted account (actually blocked me which looks the same), and I did things with her that I normally wouldn't. Could care less if there were others, but don't lie avout it so I can properly protect myself. I am big on honesty and trust, and she broke that.

Hope others are not in this same boat. Feel free to see her as she is a great time. Just be careful, go in eyes wide open, and don't believe her crap.

Stay safe all!

Gibbs.[/QUOTE]I was chatting with her this week, set up the M&G, and she ghosted.

Long-time lurker. Figured it's time to given something back to the community.

I had a similar experience with Savannah as what has been posted previously. There is something about her look that really appealed to me. She doesn't have model-like looks, but she has a sortof girl-next-door thing going. The pics with her dog seem to make her seem more genuine. After a couple of messages, I politely asked about her 2 profiles.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/91a6c456-ee57-4801-a18c-c6480fe159dc[/URL]

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/7df175d7-8364-47d7-8183-f1869efff787[/URL]

She feigned ignorance of the second profile and asked that I text her info about the second profile. I didn't feel comfortable even giving her my burner number and dropped the conversation.

This 43-year old Katie433 showed up recently and sounded interesting. She claimed to be an IT person so I thought she might have this as more of a hobby than a source of income. After exchanging numbers and texting a few times, she seemed ready to play. She asked for my budget and I proposed $$/ meet. I received a prompt "HaHa Good bye" followed by being blocked. (Sorry I cannot provide a link.).

Anyone try to hook up with either of these two:

Yourdreambby: [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/308499f2-8341-4da8-a1f8-974de80fda20[/URL].

UniqueCreations: [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/48fcc670-0cbb-4c1b-afa9-aeb1d12fa323[/URL].

I messaged the first of these for a couple of days and was about to pull the trigger when she requested a deposit of 20-50. Moved on to others including the second of these. She eventually requested a deposit of 20-50. Of course I passed but I found it interesting that they would ask for the same amount. Perhaps they're working in cahoots or its the same scammer?

UniqueCreations. Waste of time.

[QUOTE=IneptPlayer;3618042]Anyone try to hook up with either of these two:

Yourdreambby: [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/308499f2-8341-4da8-a1f8-974de80fda20[/URL].

UniqueCreations: [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/48fcc670-0cbb-4c1b-afa9-aeb1d12fa323[/URL].

I messaged the first of these for a couple of days and was about to pull the trigger when she requested a deposit of 20-50. Moved on to others including the second of these. She eventually requested a deposit of 20-50. Of course I passed but I found it interesting that they would ask for the same amount. Perhaps they're working in cahoots or its the same scammer?[/QUOTE]

Does anyone know this one, it is like I have seen her pic somewhere else, like she is a pro.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/204aed3b-56f2-90cf-1d91-1b475e6a9142[/URL]

Same experience with uniquecreations. Texted a bit, then wanted a hand out.

Champagnelizze is another odd duck. Mixed girl out of Hillsboro. Texted, set M&G, then she cancels while I am on the way. At least she told me. Then she is away for a week, then I get the one or two word responses and say she seems like she lost interest. Of course she hasn't, but when I replay events, she gets ugly and blocks me.

A few more:

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/b91de603-7559-44fa-8494-4c708af86f4d[/URL]

Another one who went to text, then one or two words before not responding anymore.

*.

[URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/0ee315ad-39fd-44ce-a261-2711489e282e[/URL]

Texted back and forth. * Very limited availability and got the feeling she was trying to get comfortable meeting in person. Then silent.

Is it just me, or did the crazies come out for Halloween? Seems like a load of providers are moving to this site and making it hard to find a real SB.

Stay safe my friends.

Gibbs.

[QUOTE=Raltime;3618440]UniqueCreations. Waste of time.[/QUOTE]