Blending "civilian" life and the hobby for fun and profit
Over the years I have known many great ladies in the hobby -- and some of these providers have been quite creative (and profitable).
One (now retired) lady in the Chicago area who worked weekends tried to have her incall at a hotel next to a Home Depot. Great location and a perfect cover story.
Another in Denver is a hair stylist who offers a haircut with each session. And she's good as a provider and a stylist. There are a couple of ladies around here who actually could do that if they were smart. Another provider further west has her own salon and some fellow providers now have "day jobs" there.
And I know a couple of ladies out west who have offered -- seriously -- to wash and dry clothes during a session. Takes about 65-70 minutes (a good hour session) and for the traveling guy it's a nice touch. (One pop in the wash. One during the drying cycle. LOL.).
New video glasses from Snapchat
They take a ten second video. I pity the guy who wears them during a session with a provider and is able to video his entire session in in shot.
[URL]http://appleinsider.com/articles/16/09/24/snapchat-announces-spectacles-video-recording-sunglasses-available-this-fall-for-130[/URL]
Guy 'accidentally' marries his grand daughter
Oops.
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-man-accidentally-marries-granddaughter-134404942.html[/URL]
Dream a Little Dream of Me
I always thought this was a song by Mama Cass of the Mamas and the Papas. Turns out a shit load of people did it before her like Ella Fitzgerald and Doris Day (really?) and now Michael Booblay (yes, it's the phonetic spelling of his name). Anyway the reason I'm writing this is that some people start their reports of "I had a dream of. " Destiny, Taritha, Blaze, Coochie's Ass, or whatever. Now maybe it feels like they're providing a layer of plausible deniability for their provider. Or who knows what. For whatever reason, it annoys the hell out of me.
I mean, really, there's nothing wrong with it, but I'd rather read a report that says "I fucked Gloria up the ass in front of her mother, then had Denise (her mom) clean me off. She then felched my cum out of her daughter's stretched out, gaping brown eye, then I kissed both of them deeply", rather than "I had a dream of Gloria and her mother, etc. ".
As our moderator pointed out, no one has ever been busted off this website. Even when pics are used, a provider could say they were taken against her will, or not to her knowledge, and that the poster put them up without permission.
To be fair, some people can't stand my posts either. A few years back, someone adopted the nick "Fluffball" and flamed the shit out of me in PMs. I dreamt the asshole's dick got inflamed with methecillin resistant gonorrhea and it fell off in front of his mother on her deathbed. Ah! But, it was only a dream.
Anyway, Happy New Year to everyone, regardless of your writing style. Keep fucking the Women Hard On Roadsides Everywhere, Safely.
Coochie (WTF, Does he think he's Hemingway for fuck's sake?) Eater.
Happy New Year and God Bless You All.
The importance of being earnest
[QUOTE=OlderFunGuy;3217188][URL]http://milwaukee.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-pics-lovable-gia-let-me-show-you-a-good-time/12013899[/URL]
First off, to be upfront, my rant is motivated by Gia. Her pics drive me absolutely bonkers. I have texted with her and she is only doing incall and I simply do not do incall. Anyhow, on the other review site she has 48 reviews over the past 4 years. On the upside, sure indicates longevity in a business where the shelf life is rather short. On the downside, I can't read the juicy details. And my beef with the other review site is the pain in the ass process of posting a review Over the past few years I have purchased juicy detail time and I used to post reviews. I found the posting process to be rather onerous but the straw that broke the camel's back is when the administrator actually sent back a review I wrote 5 times to rewrite it because he didn't think the juicy details were juicy enough. That is when I said screw it!!
Anyhow, I am wondering how many guys that see a provider actually post a review. One in five? One in ten? If you look at 48 reviews, I can extrapolate from that there is a whole lotta cock slurping going on. Well, that is my rant And Gia is still on my to do list thanks for listening OFG out.[/QUOTE]With few exceptions, I submit a review for every experience to the other site. There are 5 experiences that are too old to review:
* Tara from Spring of 2012.
* Lydia Lee from early 2013.
* A pretty miserable ripoff with 2 girls I picked up off the street and like an idiot took back to my hotel room in California.
* An amazing time with this girl: [URL]https://nightshift.co/listings/carissa-andrews-san-francisco-ca-ca-white-20-24[/URL].
* A girl who was really into motorcycles in California.
And then a backlog of 7 recent experiences I have yet to submit reviews for.
Yes, the other site's policies are idiotic. You can no longer reference an ad on BP. If the ad, in their view, has "no name" (as if any of the names are real and unchanging) they won't publish it.
Some ads don't have phone numbers, like this one:
[URL]http://madison.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/beautiful-young-blue-hair-bomb-shell/16755367[/URL]