KAngels Discussion

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5217576]But directly above that it says:

"Powered by vBulletin Version 4. 1. 4.

Copyright 2021 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved".

Copyright 2021 seems pretty current to me. Actually the KAngels Seattle site also says "Copyright at 2019", and it seems like rate information is no longer available.[/QUOTE]There are two types of text resources: dynamic and static.

An example of a static text resource would be a "hard-coded" date, where a human typed the numbers "2 0 1 9" when editing the footer. Static resources only change when a human manually changes them (in this case, opening the footer file and manually changing the year).

And example of a dynamic text resource would be an automatically updating date field like the one vBulletin uses. Because vBulletin runs on PHP and uses the PHP "date" command to check the full date of the internal clock on the server then print only the year when needed (see [URL]https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.date.php[/URL]). If you load the page at 11:59 PM on Dec 31,2020 (in the server's home timezone) the year will display as "2020. " If you refresh the page 60 seconds later, the year will show as "2021."

So THIS website actually has TWO footers: a dynamic footer with the year generated by PHP's date command and then below that an additional static footer where the admin typed the actual keys to input "2019."

And to keep this thread on-topic, I hear a new GSL girl is on her way on the 24th.

[QUOTE=Bonnaryi;5218356]Mickey sure does like to chat LOL. I like her personality, she reminds me of a previous kgirl that was here 7 years ago.

For Sam Jose do we just contact the bookers recently mentioned in this thread?[/QUOTE]If you have a relationship with the local K-bookers, they can sometimes help you book in the Bay Area or LA by vouching for you. And some of them book in both places.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to [u]discourage members from posting information[/u]. If you have a concern about information posted by another member, then please contact them privately by PM. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue]

Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL]

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]If they offer BBFS, even for an upcharge, please let us know. Hopefully, they don't do Bait and Switch +1, like KAngels.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hmm, interesting. 1/2 hour rate is definitely ridiculous. Hourly rate same as KAngels. Wonder if BBFS is offered, and if so, any up charge?

If photos are accurate, women are gorgeous.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Interesting that this new btownks website and the kangels website use the same favicon (seen on the browser tab).

[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5224889]Interesting that this new btownks website and the kangels website use the same favicon (seen on the browser tab).[/QUOTE]That's the favicon for WordPress which is a popular blogging and website building platform. Anyone that doesn't change the default favicon has that one.

[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5224795]Hmm, interesting. 1/2 hour rate is definitely ridiculous. Hourly rate same as KAngels. Wonder if BBFS is offered, and if so, any up charge?

If photos are accurate, women are gorgeous.[/QUOTE]The agencies price HH like that because they don't want you to do HH visits.

And a quick Google image search reveals, as expected, those photos are re-used on unrelated websites (i.e. They are not real).

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5225571]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.[/QUOTE]Here's one review I found but I don't know how valid this is.

[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/coco-4254658474-357196[/URL]

[QUOTE=AussieFury;5225553]The agencies price HH like that because they don't want you to do HH visits.

And a quick Google image search reveals, as expected, those photos are re-used on unrelated websites (i.e. They are not real).[/QUOTE]So, HH rates are just a rip off? Actually, in doing the math, it costs only $80 more to double the session time.

And as for the pictures of the women, my "hope" statement was just that: a hope that the pictures were real and unique. Thanks for your work, AussieFury.

[QUOTE=MrYoda;5224628]Looks like we got a new agency in town.

[URL]https://btownks.com/our-models/[/URL][/QUOTE]Obviously don't trust the reviews on the site, most likely fake. A whois search just shows "california' and that the domain was just created on the 9th. Yet already one of review talks about visiting multiple times. Possible? Sure. Likely? I'm skeptical. Could be a pig in k-girl clothing.

I see that GSL has a new girl Hera. Anyone seen her? I feel like I've seen those same pics used somewhere. Might've been Kbeautypops or another one of those similar sites. Any intel is appreciated!

[QUOTE=JoeSmith11;5225571]Hesitant to try a new agency without any vouches. Be careful out there.

(as much as I hate tna, one good thing is seeing a provider's reviews mean you know its not a string.). Whoever takes one for the team, be careful, don't request any service over text, etc.[/QUOTE]I can verify they real and the girl (Coco) was very attractive, girl in the pics? Could very well be. I don't want to get into great detail but it is YMMV. She can communicate decently, and worth the trip, at least for me. Would see coco again for sure.