Hi Gilson my last post was about this one
[URL]https://boston.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/shy-but-naughty-little-girl-lo/321630021096[/URL]
She's a real pain in the ass to see. Hard to nail down seeing her. Super duper flakey with getting back. Takes forever to respond. I'm lucky was able to finally connect with her last month. And get her to drive over to me, do a outcall. I'm willing to bet she's better at responding, to car date type of dates. Right in her own area. She probably figures her lazy sexy ass, don't feel like driving over. LOL Even though I'm close by. Only a few min drive for her. Last time, I seen her in her vehicle. Greeted her and went in to the passenger seat. And showed her where to park. But yeah now she's back to being hard to reach. She's playing the hard to get game. Haha SmH. I told you about her in a pm last week, remember? Burlington girl.
BTW Gilson my post before that one, was about the girl you had posted about. I told you to ask her, send you her face pic! You may or may not like it?
The pic that she sent me was just a face pic.
From her neck and up. So I couldn't tell if her body was big from that. But. She looked like she was sporting a slight mustache. UGH. She was smiling in the pic. But yeah no thanks. I'm all set. No woman should be having a mustache. Of any kind. That's not very lady like. It's a def pass. LOL.
Two More Cents on Octavia
[QUOTE=Chuchunga;5247489]My issues with Octavia stem not so much from the service quality but from the perspective of consent. Tbh I see it no different that dealing with STDs. Which is something I never agreed with how TER handled either. If I plan on sticking my dick into something I'd like to do it with the most information I can possibly have. Not knowing someone is post op until after the session is the same to me as finding out they have HIV after sex as well too. It could be the best session ever but it's not what I consented to. I did not like the platform removing information people could use to gauge what they wanted. If post op was stated the clients may have changed. And that's the whole point. As the information would have led people to make informed decisions.
Like beyond meat, just because it tastes like beef and looks like beef, doesn't mean it gets to be called beef. Sometimes you want the fake meat, other times you want the real thing and it's MY choice.[/QUOTE]Before I put in my 2 cents, let me preface them by saying that I don't see post-op as anything close to finding out that a provider has HIV. Jesus, it might creep you out, but there's a difference between catching a lifelong virus and inserting yourself into a former fellow. But that's my opinion. Anyone. Everyone - is entitled to their own opinion.
And that's really the point here: I don't have any right to judge anyone for their preferences. Some guy gets creeped out by spending time with a gal who has freckles on her chest? Okay, he's the one shelling out the donation, and if the provider knows that most guys would be repulsed by that, she should either a) cover up those freckles with make-up that won't rub off during the session or b) come clean and tell all her callers that she has freckles on her chest (or a 3rd nipple, or whatever).
Octavia could be the hottest -looking post-op in the history of post-op surgery and hormones, but if she knows that some guys would flip out to discover they've been with a post-op. Even though she may be "all woman" at this point. She really ought to let people know when they contact her. She can share pictures of her vajayjay to prove how indistinguishable her vag is from that of a natural-born lady. Whatever. The point is, is she knows that some guys would be freaked out, and if there is ANY chance that her status as a post-op is known (on this board or anywhere else), then it is unethical to conceal that fact. It's not a matter of consent, not really. It's a matter of, as much as Octavia might lose the chance to meet some new clients, she has no right, ethically, to take away that choice, that decision, when she knows that some guys. A non-negligible percentage of them. Would prefer not to spend time with a post-op woman.
This is a bad analogy, but it's a little like if your friend is a vegetarian and he's coming over for dinner and you serve him a good ol' beef hamburger but tell him that it's made from plants. What he doesn't know won't hurt him, right? Let's say you're right. He'll never know the difference. Now, let's say that there's a decent chance that he's going to find out about it sometime afterwards. . . Not a sure thing, but a real possibility. Would you still serve him the meat-burger? Is that the right thing to do?
I have to repeat this again: This has nothing to do with whether Octavia is now a real woman or not (whatever "real" even means). This has nothing to do with whether someone is oversensitive about spending intimate time with a provider who was born with a dick. What's ethical in this context is to not mess with somebody's head if there is even the slightest chance that they're going to discover that you've concealed a fact that some guys (maybe 5%, maybe 25%) would consider a reason not to proceed with a visit.
To a lot of guys, some guys, this act of concealment isn't a trivial matter. You're disrespecting them if you don't offer them the chance to decide for themselves whether to proceed with the visit.
All this said, Octavia sounds like a terrific provider that other women could learn a lesson or two from. And it's understandable why she would conceal her post-op status if. In her mind and in the minds of most reasonable people. It shouldn't make a difference. But to some guys it really does make a difference, and that's why, IMHO, the decent and ethical thing to do, if her post-op status is out there to any extent, is to be open about it.
Just my 2 cents.
(Now, what was her number again? . . .).
Adobe.
