Escort Reviews

Found this one on CallEscort. Seems TGTBT especially for 100/200.

Did a picture search on Google without hits, has anyone hit it yet?

[URL]https://callescort.org/513-438-2234[/URL]

[QUOTE=BTBear;4951970]Found this one on CallEscort. Seems TGTBT especially for 100/200.

Did a picture search on Google without hits, has anyone hit it yet?

[URL]https://callescort.org/513-438-2234[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://datingscammer.info/en/gallery/woman/hannah-brooks-9903.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;4951887]I wouldn't exactly call her new. She's been on Listcrawler for about a year.

She's not the red head that required the pic for verification though.[/QUOTE]I found her. Has anyone seen her?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/ohio/cincinnati/53639972/[/URL]

She's in town the rest of the day, not having much business. She is a solid provider and we want her to keep coming back!

This is her Columbus Tryst ad, phone number is good.

[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/ashley-fiirefantasy[/URL]

The good dr.

With that list of rules, I have no interest.

Not to mention, she was paired up with Kiley at one point (she's the other girl in the pictures on Alligator) and she doesn't have many (if any) positive reports from my memory.

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4952113]I found her. Has anyone seen her?

[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/ohio/cincinnati/53639972/[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4951736]That is a different, new Hannah. To the best of my knowledge, the Hannah on Tryst is brand new to the scene. I agree that she would be worth checking out. She's cute.

Tryst seems to be making an effort to establish a platform more reputable than the old CL / BP alternatives, which were rife with scammers. My hope is that Tryst might develop into an escort version of Seeking. At any rate, the site seems less scammy. But that's just my impression.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info. For some reason I thought this was the same Hannah. It does seem that Tryst is more trustworthy than other places out there, but everyone still has to be careful and do the proper vetting on our ends when even when trying someone on Tryst. This girl is beautiful, but not being GFE friendly (according to her alligator profile) is a big no for me. For that reason I probably won't bother.

[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;4952146]With that list of rules, I have no interest.

Not to mention, she was paired up with Kiley at one point (she's the other girl in the pictures on Alligator) and she doesn't have many (if any) positive reports from my memory.[/QUOTE]Yes, I noticed too. The Alligator profile tells more than the Tryst profile. When there is a long list of no's like you and HB said I'm out and won't bother. The last thing I want to do is see a provider with GPS lay like a dead horse and do nothing, especially when others can be found that offer so much more.

[QUOTE=RomanBlack69;4952152]Thanks for the info. For some reason I thought this was the same Hannah. It does seem that Tryst is more trustworthy than other places out there, but everyone still has to be careful and do the proper vetting on our ends when even when trying someone on Tryst. This girl is beautiful, but not being GFE friendly (according to her alligator profile) is a big no for me. For that reason I probably won't bother.[/QUOTE]She's been around. Use the name above. Check EB. Lots of good reports. Tried twice. Once I had to cancel other she did then lost touch.

[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;4952146]With that list of rules, I have no interest.

Not to mention, she was paired up with Kiley at one point (she's the other girl in the pictures on Alligator) and she doesn't have many (if any) positive reports from my memory.[/QUOTE]I thought the girl that used to be paird up with Kylie was Chloe James. Did Kylie pair up with Hannah as well? Chloe that a large shoulder cap tattoo that isn't seen on any of Hannah's pics so they are two different girls.

And bad ones get deleted?

[QUOTE=DrPaulRx;4952250]She's been around. Use the name above. Check EB. Lots of good reports. Tried twice. Once I had to cancel other she did then lost touch.[/QUOTE]

Truth Vinnie, has one got to her place. She said she needed 5-7 min to finish getting rdy. 45 min later with nothing but crickets I went home. Here name is CiCi in Covington. How come they are allowed to be time wasters?? EB wouldn't even post my review

[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;4952322]And bad ones get deleted?[/QUOTE].

Damned pleased that both you fine gentlemen, ages 72 and 78, are active with the ladies and contributing to the USG board; well done! Gives me hope that - at age 59 - I might still be rocking it out for years to come.) Kudos!

[QUOTE=Cincyman513;4949821]I'm about 7 months from 79 and she's exactly what I need.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=VinnieKramer;4952322]And bad ones get deleted?[/QUOTE]The site seems not to let negative comments, but negative reviews are allowed.

Had a visit from Kitty this week. Cute girl, but extremely thin with very small breast. She does not have a bubbly personality, but she is a nice girl. Communication was outstanding. BBBJ and CFS was good. She really started to get into it toward the end. Not a clock watcher and not into small talk. I would see her again when I'm in the mood for a provider with a super thin body.

[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view/53653264/5135250431[/URL]

JJ.

She is gorgeous, but I cannot find any reviews. I thought it is strange that her EB ad list pictures of several other girls.

JJ.

[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view/53619155/5138803058[/URL]