Printable View
[QUOTE=Bob0324;3320137]Is there still Sizzlers' in business? I liked the Malibu Chicken, yum.[/QUOTE]My recollection is the Sizzler Malibu Chicken consisted of a Tyson breaded chicken puck with a slice of lunch meat and melted cheese on top. Everyone has their own tastes I guess.
You can't find 5 Mmgegs on the shelf at Walmart. You probably CAN find 5 cans of lice spray. Good service ain't cheap. Cheap service ain't typically good.
[QUOTE=Mmgeg;3316012]It seems that the " negotiating " term has been used more frequently than before. I don't know if it's because of what has happened to BP and some of the people that use BP are coming over to this site or not. I have not had to deal with this issue until recently. I look at it as a disrespect factor. If you want to see a provider bad enough then the rates should not be a issue and you would have no issue being screened. (another topic but won't discuss at this time) .
When I have someone that wants to " negotiate ' rates or tell me he's used to paying this amount or tell me he contacted someone else and they are willing to see him for this amount. Ummmm. Then go ahead and see them then. Should be that easy right?
I Recently had someone that asked if I would match another providers rates. Ummm last time I checked this is NOT Walmart. That was probably most insulting thing that anyone could do.
It seems more regular members (couple seniors out there) think this practice is going to work and it may on some but it surely will bite you in the ass one day.
I do understand that having a positive review is wonderful and great marketing to have but surely I can't be the only one out there that thinks if you do a good job regardless of your rates someone is going to give you a positive review anyways.[/QUOTE]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]white knight[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I]
FF you know I consider you to be a great and valuable resource here but when your posts drive members to ask me to delete their posts and further to ask to be removed from the forum you have gone too far.
You're enough of a monger to know that YMMV is always in effect and ALL of your experience may or may not be his. Chicks are allowed to address guys on threads like this. By allowing her to manipulate you into doing this you bring your cred and not hers to the argument.
The simple fact is, and I'm every bit the monger you are, is you have no fucking idea what happened when he was there. None, zero, nada. I often tell the story of the Anita Ocean lookalike that used to work down here that had years of shitty reviews on the forum down here but I wanted to go fuck her anyway because she looked just like one of my favorite pornstars. I don't know why but for some reason she took a shine to me and always, without exception gave me pornstar sex. I saw her for a couple years and during that time she continued to get absolutely shitty reviews. I'll never know why but that's what happened.
This guy said she gave him a discount, maybe she did maybe she didn't. He said he thought she might be high then he said after she seemed normal. It wasn't a bad review and one that would tend to make me want to see her.
I don't care that she doesn't like it and I don't care that she got your nuts all twisted about it. What I do care is that guys feel like they can post their experiences here without getting their cocks chopped off by a guy with a zillion posts.
I know you're not going to like this but this is serious shit and effects the way people use the forum so I had to say something. I'm not taking his side, I don't know him. I'm taking the forum's side and doing what needs doing so that people feel comfortable sharing here.
You're more than welcomed to call me an asshole or write me about this if you want.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=RonBurgIndy;3322717]You can't find 5 Mmgegs on the shelf at Walmart. You probably CAN find 5 cans of lice spray. Good service ain't cheap. Cheap service ain't typically good.[/QUOTE]Would have to work from home, would be drained and too weak to leave if Mmgood was my s / o.
Thank you A2.
Intimidation tactics seem to be a running theme with a few members. I, for one, still hope they get banned for it eventually. They do more harm then good.
As was expected, the obligitory posting by someone in order to get under people's skin and start another shit storm of back and forth posts just to get his rocks off. This time I suggest everyone to just ignore.
Sincerely Signed,
The Biggest Prick in the Yard.
[QUOTE=IndyGuy123;3323928]As was expected, the obligitory posting by someone in order to get under people's skin and start another shit storm of back and forth posts just to get his rocks off. This time I suggest everyone to just ignore.
Sincerely Signed,
The Biggest Prick in the Yard.[/QUOTE]Best strategy.
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3322749][blue](Deleted by Admin)
FF you know I consider you to be a great and valuable resource here but when your posts drive members to ask me to delete their posts and further to ask to be removed from the forum you have gone too far.
You're enough of a monger to know that YMMV is always in effect and ALL of your experience may or may not be his. Chicks are allowed to address guys on threads like this. By allowing her to manipulate you into doing this you bring your cred and not hers to the argument.
The simple fact is, and I'm every bit the monger you are, is you have no fucking idea what happened when he was there. None, zero, nada. I often tell the story of the Anita Ocean lookalike that used to work down here that had years of shitty reviews on the forum down here but I wanted to go fuck her anyway because she looked just like one of my favorite pornstars. I don't know why but for some reason she took a shine to me and always, without exception gave me pornstar sex. I saw her for a couple years and during that time she continued to get absolutely shitty reviews. I'll never know why but that's what happened.
This guy said she gave him a discount, maybe she did maybe she didn't. He said he thought she might be high then he said after she seemed normal. It wasn't a bad review and one that would tend to make me want to see her.
I don't care that she doesn't like it and I don't care that she got your nuts all twisted about it. What I do care is that guys feel like they can post their experiences here without getting their cocks chopped off by a guy with a zillion posts.
I know you're not going to like this but this is serious shit and effects the way people use the forum so I had to say something. I'm not taking his side, I don't know him. I'm taking the forum's side and doing what needs doing so that people feel comfortable sharing here.
You're more than welcomed to call me an asshole or write me about this if you want.
A2[/blue][/QUOTE]I read this before A2 got to it, then read the original review. Now I get the third perspective.
In the original review the poster did 2 things wrong. He mentioned the possible existence of a discount and the possibility of getting a provider's private number.
If a provider gives you a discount, keep your mouth shut about it. Because every monger from that point on will feel they deserve the same discount. If a provider gives you her private number, keep your mouth shut about it. Because, the same thing will happen.
You want the provider to be happy she saw you. That way she will see you again.
In his reply FF did something wrong, he made privileged information public.
I accept that a provider may discuss my shortcomings with others. Hopefully she has more good than bad things to talk about. If there is a problem with my behavior, I expect her to share it with her escort friends. This gives me incentive to behave appropriately.
However, any problems with my behavior, or my performance, are not for public display. If someone takes up for a provider, it should be handled privately. Sit down with the offending party and explain the problem.
By taking it public you've harmed the provider's reputation. What monger wants to risk being outed?
I understand the urge. I'm always quick to defend my friends, but often, when rushing to battle, I make things worse.
Things I've learned:
1) Everyone has a different perspective.
2) Let others fight their own battles.
3) Discretion, in all things.
4) No review tells the whole story.
5) Don't do anything to distract A2 from his mongering.
[QUOTE=Jjbee62;3323991]I read this before A2 got to it, then read the original review. Now I get the third perspective.
In the original review the poster did 2 things wrong. He mentioned the possible existence of a discount and the possibility of getting a provider's private number.
If a provider gives you a discount, keep your mouth shut about it. Because every monger from that point on will feel they deserve the same discount. If a provider gives you her private number, keep your mouth shut about it. Because, the same thing will happen.
You want the provider to be happy she saw you. That way she will see you again.
In his reply FF did something wrong, he made privileged information public.
I accept that a provider may discuss my shortcomings with others. Hopefully she has more good than bad things to talk about. If there is a problem with my behavior, I expect her to share it with her escort friends. This gives me incentive to behave appropriately.
However, any problems with my behavior, or my performance, are not for public display. If someone takes up for a provider, it should be handled privately. Sit down with the offending party and explain the problem.
By taking it public you've harmed the provider's reputation. What monger wants to risk being outed?
I understand the urge. I'm always quick to defend my friends, but often, when rushing to battle, I make things worse.
Things I've learned:
1) Everyone has a different perspective.
2) Let others fight their own battles.
3) Discretion, in all things.
4) No review tells the whole story.
5) Don't do anything to distract A2 from his mongering.[/QUOTE]Excellent points provided in a logical and coherent manner with the perfect added touch of a little humor at the end. I learned something today and I thank you.
Especially with Assholes like me. I understand your points. I didn't ask him to delete his post only to modify it to reflect what I understood to be a totally different portion of the story and what you see as a YMMV situation. He has been a good resource to the board and I went too far in my condemnation of his experience. Jjbee shed a more pragmatic view, as he always does, on the situation. I may have to hire him as my editor for future posts. The one thing I try to do is admit when I am wrong, so keep up the good work A2. Sorry I ruined your day.
I appreciate the PM's and I apologize for the slam on the board. I should have handled it in a different way. Also Erica appreciates the clarification post in the Backpage Reviews thread.
Provider A and B are friends. Provider A sees Monger X and tells provider B she was concerned but not to the point to warn Provider B of Monger X. Provider B is contacted by Monger X and sets up an appointment. However she has some concerns so she has a Monger friend come over and hide in the closet during the session to ensure her safety during the session. What if Provider B hid a tape recorder in the room to tape her session for either safety reasons or so her SO can hear all the dirty details? What if Provider A had a hidden Go-Pro or left her laptop running on Skype or on record? What if texts are exchanged after a session has ended clarifying any conversations during the session? Based on these scenarios if a review is posted and some things are said in the review that don't coincide with what the monger friend heard, what is on tape, on Skype, video taped or texted is it a YMMV situation?
Some providers don't wish to show their presence on the board for many reasons. So if the above situation occurs and someone has information that is factual is it "White Knighting" to clarify the experience? Is this just true if posted on open forums and not through PM's?
If you see something you think is true at first and realize it's not true then why say anything at all. Example: I was with a provider and headed towards some tasty DATY. I noticed bumps around the ladies dining area. At first I thought, Herpes! However after closer inspection I noticed it was just razor burn. So should I even mention what I first thought to be true when I realized it wasn't?
When someone posts a provider does BBFS during a session, whether it's true or not, then it has many consequences. One it drives those that want that service towards her and if she doesn't do it she has to be extra careful with new and some old clients that may want that type of service. It drives current clients that have no interest in that type of behavior away from her. It causes her phone to blow up with all kinds of questions about did she really do it, why don't you do it with me, how much more do you charge for that type of service, etc. So be careful about what you say about your experience. It can hurt the reputation of a good provider and it can hurt your future experiences with providers that don't allow it and now know you do it.
All the things above are worth pondering. Integrity in a business that society views with distaste is important.
[QUOTE=IndyAnon;3323868]Thank you A2.
Intimidation tactics seem to be a running theme with a few members. I, for one, still hope they get banned for it eventually. They do more harm then good.[/QUOTE]I love you so much that I wish I was a provider so I could suck your dick! But I'm not and I don't swing that way. Be safe my friend.
[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;3324807]Provider A and B are friends. Provider A sees Monger X and tells provider B she was concerned but not to the point to warn Provider B of Monger X. Provider B is contacted by Monger X and sets up an appointment. However she has some concerns so she has a Monger friend come over and hide in the closet during the session to ensure her safety during the session. What if Provider B hid a tape recorder in the room to tape her session for either safety reasons or so her SO can hear all the dirty details? What if Provider A had a hidden Go-Pro or left her laptop running on Skype or on record? What if texts are exchanged after a session has ended clarifying any conversations during the session? Based on these scenarios if a review is posted and some things are said in the review that don't coincide with what the monger friend heard, what is on tape, on Skype, video taped or texted is it a YMMV situation?
Some providers don't wish to show their presence on the board for many reasons. So if the above situation occurs and someone has information that is factual is it "White Knighting" to clarify the experience? Is this just true if posted on open forums and not through PM's?
If you see something you think is true at first and realize it's not true then why say anything at all. Example: I was with a provider and headed towards some tasty DATY. I noticed bumps around the ladies dining area. At first I thought, Herpes! However after closer inspection I noticed it was just razor burn. So should I even mention what I first thought to be true when I realized it wasn't?
When someone posts a provider does BBFS during a session, whether it's true or not, then it has many consequences. One it drives those that want that service towards her and if she doesn't do it she has to be extra careful with new and some old clients that may want that type of service. It drives current clients that have no interest in that type of behavior away from her. It causes her phone to blow up with all kinds of questions about did she really do it, why don't you do it with me, how much more do you charge for that type of service, etc. So be careful about what you say about your experience. It can hurt the reputation of a good provider and it can hurt your future experiences with providers that don't allow it and now know you do it.
All the things above are worth pondering. Integrity in a business that society views with distaste is important.[/QUOTE]I see no integrity in recording or broadcasting someone without their permission or with people hiding and spying on a session. If any of that were to happen to me then I would raise holy hell and give the people involved something to truly be concerned about.
[QUOTE=StonesRoller69;3324840]I see no integrity in recording or broadcasting someone without their permission or with people hiding and spying on a session. If any of that were to happen to me then I would raise holy hell and give the people involved something to truly be concerned about.[/QUOTE]I am sorry to say that all of us are being recorded without our permission by multiple sources on a daily basis. Do we like it? I certainly don't. But unfortunately it is now a part of our modern society. So just keep in mind everyone, that the possibility of it always exists. Even modern home security systems can video record inside the home. Mine does.
As always, stay safe. Kyussfan.