Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=TempletonRat;5179692]When she was brand new, it was kind of cool to creampie a relatively young girl despite her lack of skills. Has she gotten worse since?[/QUOTE]It pretty tough to get worse as far as service goes. It's not really the lack of skills but her not wanting to do anything. Dead fish, tries to avoid BJ, no mutual shower, and asking to cum five seconds after you penetrate.

It's like she thinks she can get by just offering BBFS and cip. And service is worse than corg level. Worse than many a storefront level. I thought she was a ripoff at 220 in the bay, for your prices she's a borderline robbery.

[QUOTE=TempletonRat;5179692]When she was brand new, it was kind of cool to creampie a relatively young girl despite her lack of skills. Has she gotten worse since?[/QUOTE]Can you describe how she looks? Does she have a tattoo around her lower arm? She doesn't look young to me at all. During my session, I can't help but think she looks like a man. So I don't know if they bait and switched sky with me. I ended up doing a hand job myself which is pretty pathetic.

Never booked with them before but are any of those actual photos of the girls? (pocket girl, sarah, amy, fendi)?

[QUOTE=Ramen25;5180715]Never booked with them before but are any of those actual photos of the girls? (pocket girl, sarah, amy, fendi)?[/QUOTE]In my personal experience trying them twice they completely bait and switched me with girls that weren't even close to what was advertised. The fakes pictures were of Korean models and the girls I saw didn't come close the stats that the booker posted. As I understand it, the KTE bookers often haven't even met the girls and have no idea clue what they actually look like or what their body stats really are. So they say stuff like, 90 lbs 5'1 and then you get there it's a women who's 125 lbs and 5'7. According to various reviews on TER, some guys say the the girls they saw look at least "similar" the pictures, others say the pictures are real but extremely photo-shopped, and others say the pictures are outright lies through and through. My guess is, you book with a girl and they just throw you whoever is ready on call, maybe they happen to look like what you want and maybe not. Bottom line, after being burned twice I stay away from them.

[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;5180891]In my personal experience trying them twice they completely bait and switched me with girls that weren't even close to what was advertised. The fakes pictures were of Korean models and the girls I saw didn't come close the stats that the booker posted. As I understand it, the KTE bookers often haven't even met the girls and have no idea clue what they actually look like or what their body stats really are. So they say stuff like, 90 lbs 5'1 and then you get there it's a women who's 125 lbs and 5'7. According to various reviews on TER, some guys say the the girls they saw look at least "similar" the pictures, others say the pictures are real but extremely photo-shopped, and others say the pictures are outright lies through and through. My guess is, you book with a girl and they just throw you whoever is ready on call, maybe they happen to look like what you want and maybe not. Bottom line, after being burned twice I stay away from them.[/QUOTE]Seconding this statement. I try to avoid KTE because I have never seen a provider from them where the picture is even close to accurate, and they are extremely hit or miss, but for some reason, they manage to have an endless rotating supply of "new" girls, and my desire for variety gets the best of me. I've had way more misses than hits, but when they hit, they really hit.

[QUOTE=Ramen25;5180715]Never booked with them before but are any of those actual photos of the girls? (pocket girl, sarah, amy, fendi)?[/QUOTE]I can tell these pics are not representative, so I wouldn't try them. Rarely, they get gems who have somewhat genuine pics. The 2 x I went with them, I chose Silver and Danbi. Both delivered on looks and advertised height.

[QUOTE=Goglo69;5180337]You know she switched agency's because M don't up charge the extra $ for bb.

That is the truth.[/QUOTE]Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?

M. Hana, Annie, Chanel.

Sunny. Joy, Niya.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Hami, Sophia, Helen, Erica, Taylor.

SFK. Viki, Emily.

PKL. Ara, Hazel.

[QUOTE=Frala;5180968]Seconding this statement. I try to avoid KTE because I have never seen a provider from them where the picture is even close to accurate, and they are extremely hit or miss, but for some reason, they manage to have an endless rotating supply of "new" girls, and my desire for variety gets the best of me. I've had way more misses than hits, but when they hit, they really hit.[/QUOTE]Exactly my experience-Never a true Photo (s) but I do get the warning before hand. However Ktown booker is a very nice.

[QUOTE=PlutoKiller;5181092]Which brings us the the million $ question. How much longer can M sustain her present rate structure?[/QUOTE]You kidding? M has so much business that you can hardly get to her if your not a veteran regular (and even then she's constantly stacked up). She can sustain that rate indefinitely if she wants to because she's cornering the market right now by having the only stable of hot girls in LA who aren't up charging. Other bookers maybe getting that extra henny, but not half the demand. Truth is if M starts doing the 100 $ upcharge, there would be little reason to go with her stable as a pose to any other.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5178889]I don't believe so. I saw Peach. It's unlikely I couldn't get BB if a girl gone with upcharge. I knew of Peach3 before I saw CandyGirl Peach. I pegged Peach3 as easy BB.

There are some girls who have one profile as GFE and a different profile as BB. I don't think CandyGirl Peach is one of those.[/QUOTE]Peach3 / bookergray has different pics and description than Peach of candygirls although both offer BBFS for an upcharge. I have seen Peach from candygirls not Peach3. I have been able to book any girl on bookergray via candygirls. BA have you seen both girls? I just got confirmation from the booker that they are both the same girl.

[QUOTE=GoodBoy88;5181139]You kidding? M has so much business that you can hardly get to her if your not a veteran regular (and even then she's constantly stacked up). She can sustain that rate indefinitely if she wants to because she's cornering the market right now by having the only stable of hot girls in LA who aren't up charging. Other bookers maybe getting that extra henny, but not half the demand. Truth is if M starts doing the 100 $ up charge, there would be little reason to go with her stable as a pose to any other.[/QUOTE]I guess the point of the topic is: "Can "M" recruit new talent or retain existing talent when the girl know that they can do this for $100 more?" The free market economy favor bookers that charge extra for BB unless all mongers decide to boycott those bookers and those girls. I personally don't cough up $100 unless if I really like the girl and it has been only one girl (Emily from EUK Girl) that I have paid the extra $ because she well worth it: I saw her 12 times in two months.

[QUOTE=Jack926;5181114]Exactly my experience-Never a true Photo (s) but I do get the warning before hand. However Ktown booker is a very nice.[/QUOTE]Hmm interesting guys, appreciate the feedback. I guess every once in a while we got to play K-Girl Roulette to try and hit the jackpot LOL. But if we keep losing with a particular agency, just got to know when to fold / walk away like Kenny Rogers.

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5181094]M. Hana, Annie, Chanel.

Sunny. Joy, Niya.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Hami, Sophia, Helen, Erica, Taylor.

SFK. Viki, Emily.

PKL. Ara, Hazel.[/QUOTE]I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?

[QUOTE=Veni1;5181622]I see another blank as far as Newtopasian is concerned. Also no current reviews on that other site. Do you know if they are on a hiatus?[/QUOTE]Yes, all the girls are not available now. Sia is in the BA.