Clara1823 & blondebabyx06
Both ladies messaged me first. Clara1823 seems into games she wanted me to buy her pics and I refused. She then was willing to meet but wouldn't verify herself plus she kept on asking about money and if I had cash app.
Blondebabyx06 has had several of profiles in the past and you can go back to page 52 and read all about her. She says her name is Kristen. She contacted me first I told her I only do ppm and then she ghosted me LOL.
3 photos
Beware of Quarantine Safe Baby AKA Sarah. Scam alert.
She runs a good scam. Will snapchat verify that she is real, then right before the date says she needs money for gas. Once you send it to her she blocks you. Oh, and she is actually a HE. They are working in coordination for this scam. The pics of "Sarah" are real and she will verify with a verification pic, but the mastermind behind the scam is her BF who was stupid enough to send a pic of himself after I demanded a refund.
516-XXX-7332.
How did she try to blackmail you?
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4788383][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/4c3840bb-399f-47e3-b7c7-a3b57b574c54[/URL]
This is the new profile of a girl that recently tried to blackmail me. I let her know that her attempt to blackmail me was already a very serious crime. She didn't succeed, but be careful.[/QUOTE]What should we be looking out for?
I always get a kick out of the locations
[QUOTE=Lobsid;4792919]Sorry bro, that's why I never sent money 1st anymore, even just for uber. There is a big red flag when their city is the same as the state. Maryland, Maryland or Virginia, Virginia. It's a sign than they don't know the geographical area.[/QUOTE]Like how hard is it for these dumb scammers to look at a map and pick ANY city / town in the state? Also, is "Maryland City" a real place? I haven't found any real SBs "from" there either.
Excellent feature addition!
[QUOTE=Jt1896;4794735]If you have premium and were chosen as a Beta tester, could you please comment on this new feature? I don't have a camera on my monitor and the only one I have is on my work tablet so that's not happening. Just curious to hear about it.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I saw that notice on SA this morning as well! I wasn't chosen as a beta tester, but I'd be very interested to see how it plays out. I think it'll certainly help sort many fakes who claim to look like their pics without having to leave home.
Of course, they could claim not to have a camera hooked up to their PC. But since most of the ones sold since 2017 (or earlier) do have that tech already in place, you could reasonably call bullshit. And if they make a fuss about privacy, well then you also reserve the right to not show your shit either.
On an unrelated side note: if it's listed on the SB's profile, always always always check the last login location. If they're claiming to be in DC while the login location says Slovakia, then that's as obvious as it gets people. Don't even bother giving them the time of day, block them, then move on. Been noticing so much of this lately.
Just use it for verification
I been using Skype and facetime just for verification. Most of the time it just us waving at each other. Remember most of these girls don't want what there doing leaking out as well. Any msg about money, or what's going to happen is on the date is my burner phone. There are $15 prepaid phone plans.
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4797775]SA will need to maintain copies of all video messaging so than can both police and protect themselves from claims that the site is used for prostitution. They will likely have a 6 month retention policy like they do with e-mails. I would not want a video of my talking to a Sugar Baby in the hands of SA for 6 months at a time.
I want to communicate less on SA and not more.
Bad, bad idea![/QUOTE]
What Lobsid said: verification
[QUOTE=Madaboutmax;4797775]I would not want a video of my talking to a Sugar Baby in the hands of SA for 6 months at a time. I want to communicate less on SA and not more. Bad, bad idea![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Lobsid;4797836]Just use it for verification. I been using Skype and facetime just for verification. Most of the time it just us waving at each other. Remember most of these girls don't want what there doing leaking out as well.[/QUOTE]I don't plan on doing anything more than just confirming that they are the ones pictured. Would it be a deal breaker if they claim they can't? Not necessarily, it all depends on the vibe I'm getting, how the convo's moving along and if we're hitting it off nicely, etc. But video capabilities as another means of verification without leaving home? Fuck yeah, so kudos to SA for adding a useful feature!
That said, you're right about the need to move the real juicy discussions off of SA. Hence why Lobsid, myself, and others will likely use that video feature exclusively for legitimacy checks.
How recently did you see these two
[QUOTE=Matt410;4801521]Lots fun, hit me up for digits. CIM, CIP, pretty much anything.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/e2147317-71c2-4eba-a2a3-2ae071b0180e[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/517fbc9f-6002-4b61-ae46-22e44ba03fd6[/URL][/QUOTE]Both of their profiles have been inactive for a while.