-
[QUOTE=GuysTT2;6793105]Need more details than just young and pretty. Specifically what are you looking for??[/QUOTE]Hello, thank you for replying.
Preferably, white girl, fit, under 24 (younger is better, over 18 of course).
I'm 5'5 so under 5'5 please.
Cost: 700 or less.
NO BBFS.
-
[QUOTE=JollyJohnRoger;6789590]Ace, is Amanda still in the hobby? Does she have a link somewhere?[/QUOTE]Hey Ace, what's Amanda's profile name?
-
Well
[QUOTE=Kentp1191;6797590]Hello, thank you for replying.
Preferably, white girl, fit, under 24 (younger is better, over 18 of course).
I'm 5'5 so under 5'5 please.
Cost: 700 or less.
NO BBFS.[/QUOTE]Do you have a subscription to HX?? The choices are quite large based on your description.
-
Truepassion4.0
True passion looks to be back. I always had good time with her, tastiest pussy I ever had. Has the stamina of a wild jaguar. Is a creamer too my fav!
-
[QUOTE=CouldntBeMe;6793601]She's darker because she's half black and a quarter Native American and a quarter Filipina, but hey knock yourself out while you can. She's going to get herself booted somehow with her shady behavior.[/QUOTE]I was interested in her. She looked hot. But shady behavior? What happened there?
-
[QUOTE=CouldntBeMe;6793601]. She's going to get herself booted somehow with her shady behavior.[/QUOTE]Can you elaborate?
-
MoreWAP
She's back I see. Didn't have the chance to chalice her big booty and snatch before she went on the baby delivery mode. But even for BBBJ she wants current STD test.
She can go into the 160 less category, as she's offering Qv for 120.
Curious how she looks now after post delivery mode, she was already pretty damn stacked. Shall we lie in wait.
-
LoveSouvenir
Had a pleasant time with her. I don't think the posted pics are very accurate but she's nice.
Very hospitable and soft spoken, she offered to let me rinse off before and after seeing her. Didn't rush at all and was accommodating (nothing unusual).
Slightly related- There really should be some push back against the massively edited pics everyone uses, it feels like such false advertising.
-
Diff than pic
[QUOTE=QuikTurtle69;6827413]Had a pleasant time with her. I don't think the posted pics are very accurate but she's nice.
Very hospitable and soft spoken, she offered to let me rinse off before and after seeing her. Didn't rush at all and was accommodating (nothing unusual).
Slightly related- There really should be some push back against the massively edited pics everyone uses, it feels like such false advertising.[/QUOTE]Is she fatter?
-
LoveJanellee
Curious if anyone's got any Intel on Lovejanellee. I see her post once in a while but not much network.
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/lovejanellee[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=QuikTurtle69;6827413]Had a pleasant time with her. I don't think the posted pics are very accurate but she's nice.
Very hospitable and soft spoken, she offered to let me rinse off before and after seeing her. Didn't rush at all and was accommodating (nothing unusual).
Slightly related- There really should be some push back against the massively edited pics everyone uses, it feels like such false advertising.[/QUOTE]LoveSouvenir is much bigger in person. Her pictures are old and 40 pounds ago, at least. Her face is nice. She used to have a good body. Now she's bbw. BBBJ is really good still.
-
Accurate
[QUOTE=GimmeMoreHead;6844333]LoveSouvenir is much bigger in person. Her pictures are old and 40 pounds ago, at least. Her face is nice. She used to have a good body. Now she's bbw. BBBJ is really good still.[/QUOTE]Yeah spot on. Sucks that her pics used to be more accurate, she must have been cute (r). BBW for sure. Head was ok, nothing special.
-
[QUOTE=QuikTurtle69;6827413]Had a pleasant time with her. I don't think the posted pics are very accurate but she's nice.
Very hospitable and soft spoken, she offered to let me rinse off before and after seeing her. Didn't rush at all and was accommodating (nothing unusual).
Slightly related- There really should be some push back against the massively edited pics everyone uses, it feels like such false advertising.[/QUOTE]She's got to be fat as heck. I saw her over three years ago. I'd imagine her pics are out dated now.
-
D. Ayaka
Hi guys.
I might jump on this one below. Anyone ever tried her or have any info?
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/D.Ayaka[/URL]
-
My. 02
[QUOTE=MDK33;6852650]Hi guys.
I might jump on this one below. Anyone ever tried her or have any info?
[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/D.Ayaka[/URL][/QUOTE]Good. Very social, BBJ agressive, sweet-hearted, direct-able, wide ass doggy, full titted, CFS, prostate tickling, fun time.
Bad. Pictures that are her are old, has considerable more belly, no CIM.
Ugly. Late day parking can be difficult, apartment is nearly pitch black. No light bulbs, no sunlight.
She's fun budget time 160/ hhr special too but older, heavier than advertised.
Been a while but if had that particular itch would repeat for the easy scheduling, BBJ service, lax clock on hr, roaming conversation and good vibes.