Arrangement Reports

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c1dbed-46bc-471b-8663-76ef8fdd0ba2[/URL]

Was chatting with this one, open minded. Cannot host. Asking min of 500. I passed.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87b8c5da-b241-427d-9aee-a72a8de4bbea[/URL]

Texting was going great. Then out of the blue on day of our meeting she said, I'm just not mentally ready for an arrangement again.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/eefa2663-4de3-495a-9c30-979477732c06[/URL]

Terrible communications. She will leave you on read and then respond a week or two later.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f69f3f0-8f6d-4c45-9c5d-31972bc0c003[/URL]

This one is a pro. Multiple adds out there.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/868dfa5e-73d0-4aaf-bbec-56189c45f332[/URL]

Asking 400. Cannot host. I did not pursue.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e96c457b-6cf6-4318-9a29-db40e38ad812[/URL]

Asking 500. Got her down to 350. Cannot host, fun time, small and petite. Voice like a man. But she can suck a mean cock. Said she liked anal but wasn't game for it during our date. Open to BBFS, but I covered up.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/91082e32-613c-4994-9915-4c4f7bf34292[/URL]

Asking 700. I didn't try to negotiate at all. She said she would be open to BBFS, just no cip. I did not set anything up with her.

[QUOTE=BillyBobDilly;7426063]Does Jenae have a birthmark on her face? I blocked this girl and the link won't show up so I assume its the same girl. If so, she has a sister on multiple SD sites and they are both rinsers. They will ask you if you will sugar them on a platonic date to get to know you and that will be their thing until you cut it off. They have no sugar for you. Her sister's name on the site was Ashley. Not their real names, of course.[/QUOTE]Yes, that is a birthmark.

1. "Mandy" the good: DTF the bad wants 9 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6d10a510-d810-471c-805f-1a3211a80737[/URL].

2. "Brittany" DTF for 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/edd996a0-4b83-4e6c-8e7b-7612818e6747[/URL].

3. "Jazzy" DTF wants 4. Not unreasonable [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5221a8e5-2223-4936-94ce-c0d2d15e380c[/URL].

4. Another "Brittany" DTF wants 6 can't host seems like a pro. Let me know guys. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e31bc578-5a52-438c-a2ce-6d4dc65e5dbe[/URL].

5. "skinny chick" wants 6 (seems to be the union rate) DTF [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a7cd3662-dd82-4916-acbe-e493b31abe94[/URL].

6. "Alexa" DTF also has pro vibes DTF 5 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c67565-a5b9-49af-9423-48721312ff51[/URL].

7. "Jennifer" DTF 4 but not my type [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7907c5f1-dae6-43c5-9c3c-30450e61c35c[/URL].

8. "Heather" DTF union rate of 6 [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e46755f7-1631-403c-9984-863b685ea7fa[/URL].

9. I need help or info on this woman. I am chatting her but she is slow to respond. Any input from guys that met her would help. PM is fine. I am making it a goal to see her. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9a93bd06-db5f-4a76-80be-2f18dd54b4b2[/URL].

[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7426889]Yes, that is a birthmark.[/QUOTE]Definitely avoid then. Scammers.

[QUOTE=CrewMan7;7426863][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c8c1dbed-46bc-471b-8663-76ef8fdd0ba2[/URL]

Was chatting with this one, open minded. Cannot host. Asking min of 500. I passed.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/87b8c5da-b241-427d-9aee-a72a8de4bbea[/URL]

Texting was going great. Then out of the blue on day of our meeting she said, I'm just not mentally ready for an arrangement again.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/eefa2663-4de3-495a-9c30-979477732c06[/URL]

Terrible communications. She will leave you on read and then respond a week or two later.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/2f69f3f0-8f6d-4c45-9c5d-31972bc0c003[/URL]

This one is a pro. Multiple adds out there.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/868dfa5e-73d0-4aaf-bbec-56189c45f332[/URL]

Asking 400. Cannot host. I did not pursue.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e96c457b-6cf6-4318-9a29-db40e38ad812[/URL]

Asking 500. Got her down to 350. Cannot host, fun time, small and petite. Voice like a man. But she can suck a mean cock. Said she liked anal but wasn't game for it during our date. Open to BBFS, but I covered up.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/91082e32-613c-4994-9915-4c4f7bf34292[/URL]

Asking 700. I didn't try to negotiate at all. She said she would be open to BBFS, just no cip. I did not set anything up with her.[/QUOTE]Funny how many of these either I blocked or blocked me. I feel like I have talked to 60% of the girls on the site that might have been my type but passed once I realized they asked for too much, were rinsers or didn't like me for some reason.

After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?

TIA.

Sam.

Hey all,

Not sure where to post this but hoping someone can help.

I recently lined up a female for a fuck buddy type situation.

She's from the suburbs and attached and only willing to meet in Chicago.

I'm married so I definitely can't host.

Where can we fuck?! Are there any cheap hotels / motels left in downtown / River North / West or South Loop where we can meet for a couple of hours or so?

I work evenings downtown so that area is preferred. And I have to get in and out, because, you know.

Any tips would be greatly appreciated!

[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?

TIA.

Sam.[/QUOTE]It happened last week. I too am interested in a work around or other suggestions. I hope someone has suggestions.

Thank you.

[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?

TIA.

Sam.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I posted about this like 2 weeks ago in here. It took a couple tries, but just keep resetting all your pictures to private and refreshing and eventually it just gave me the generic SA silhouette as my profile pic and the rest are hidden.

[QUOTE=HardChris09;7428454]Hey all,

Not sure where to post this but hoping someone can help.

I recently lined up a female for a fuck buddy type situation.

She's from the suburbs and attached and only willing to meet in Chicago.

I'm married so I definitely can't host.

Where can we fuck?! Are there any cheap hotels / motels left in downtown / River North / West or South Loop where we can meet for a couple of hours or so?

I work evenings downtown so that area is preferred. And I have to get in and out, because, you know.

Any tips would be greatly appreciated![/QUOTE]Try Dayuse app.

[QUOTE=SamFlood123;7428313]After having the same photo in my profile for about 1 year (has a smiley face sticker covering my real face), in the past week SA wrote that it is not an acceptable profile photo. And now the computer silhouette is my profile photo. Did this happen to others? Is there a workaround, other than revealing my handsome good looks to the SA world?

TIA.

Sam.[/QUOTE]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.

As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting.

Trying to be discreet used to be a lot easier than this.

[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7429082]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.

As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting..[/QUOTE]This isn't a problem for me and my situation, but just a suggestion to the group. Go to an AI image generator and upload a few pictures of yourself. Ask it to make an AI version of yourself that is close but not exact. Get a couple of pics and use those. That way you can always say its not you, its AI and if you do it close enough to your actual picture, then the women won't think you are a catfish. Just an idea in theory.

[QUOTE=BillyBobDilly;7429299]This isn't a problem for me and my situation, but just a suggestion to the group. Go to an AI image generator and upload a few pictures of yourself. Ask it to make an AI version of yourself that is close but not exact. Get a couple of pics and use those. That way you can always say its not you, its AI and if you do it close enough to your actual picture, then the women won't think you are a catfish. Just an idea in theory.[/QUOTE]That's a great idea! Thanks for the suggestion. Just another great use for AI. And once AI can suck our c*cks. Who will need Seeking anymore? (And that is coming. Pun intended.).

[QUOTE=Meddic80;7428999]Try Dayuse app.[/QUOTE]An ex sugarbaby told me about it. I can get a room at a three star place, pro-rated for 8 or 9 hours. Usually morning to late afternoon. Very convenient.

[QUOTE=CreativeEros;7429082]So I've been on SA, on and off, for a couple years. Things have certainly changed a lot with their system, most recently screen names and photos. You used to be able to use made up screen names, no longer. Now they're asking for an actual name.

As for photos, you used to be able to post either a partially cropped face or even a blurred face as your primary photo. Again, no longer. Being fairly adept at Photoshop, I tried a myriad of primary photo versions. The safest, most discreet that I found Seeking would accept is this. My primary photo is me wearing sunglasses and I cropped my face super tight, basically just above the sunglasses, not showing any ears and just above the chin. With that type of cropping and the sunglasses, I feel fairly safe and discreet with my primary posting.

Trying to be discreet used to be a lot easier than this.[/QUOTE]Would you be so kind as to send me the photo that seeking accepted so I can see what you did. Thanks.