Concerns of our uncle watching
[QUOTE=SensitiveGuy82;7364035]Have been to HFS and can't say I've had a bad experience yet. Their massage technique is good and I definitely was relaxed and limber. I can definitely echo the standard routine that they have. Even had the opportunity for a four hand. It was fun, but I think I prefer just one at a time. Great place to visit. Definitely worth the time.[/QUOTE]I have never ventured here, mostly because of distance, but also that lingering concern of past issues with uncle LEO. Everyone feels safe?
In defense of massage parlors
[QUOTE=BravoFox;7366372]And that is why massage shops will always have an expiration date. Running a public business like that offering extras will certainly be more risk for everyone partaking than those operating out of a private residence. Only hurdle will be passing verification, haha. To each their own but if someone is cool with not sending a selfie but they get busted in the middle of a handy who is to blame. For them I say it's a short one day flight to anywhere else.[/QUOTE]I'm aware you listed "more risk" so won't be picky about that choice of words since you aren't implying there is no risk with the other option. But I do want to remind readers that the other option doesn't require you to get caught in the act if they decide they want you. Recall the semi recent Boston incident. It's not even like the action in that city stopped, they're still doing it, but for over 28 unlucky guys, verification was their downfall.
Massage parlor friends don't have to supply anything, often times not even an appointment (location dependent). Once you exit those doors, that's it until next time. Could one get caught up in a massage parlor sting? Absolutely. But that requires a lot more effort than them just busting in, especially due to the Robert Kraft incident. But dealing with what has happened here, no reports of any guy getting any time ever came out.
18 Spa, What a Day Spa, AAC Chinese Therapeutic Massage, Hickory Day Spa, Golden Massage. I wasn't interested in this kind of thing in those days, but every story I know of from this forum with this city, it's the boss, the owner, or the workers that show up in these news reports. Because it is not the action itself that's the trigger, but the exchange of money for said actions. Past actions don't dictate the future of course, but it helps paint a picture.
Stay safe.
[QUOTE=TnFunGuy13;7366851]Getting back into the hobby, I value the information I source from here. The first two pages of post and comments were all about this place, which mean a lot of interest / traffic, apparently again.
As usually thanks for all the insight and reviews.[/QUOTE]I'm equal opportunity. My bias is clear, but I try to direct people to the situation that is appropriate for their risk tolerance. Some can't deal with verification (or are even allowed), some need locations closer to their area, some just want the best risks be damned, some just want an older nice lady giving L1. Granted, I won't tell everyone every location if they are newer, but many people can read between the lines and find them because they all follow the same format. But we can't delude ourselves. On the day of the incident, "A" wasn't bothered and it was literally right down the road getting reviews. If I know this, they know. They just didn't feel like getting them for one reason or another.
We have a recent report of something [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?9059-News-and-Media-Reports&p=7365807&viewfull=1#post7365807]going on in Murfreesboro[/URL] from a location that didn't do anything.
So I'll gladly tell you not to visit HFS or Q due to the risk of them being hot, but that doesn't mean 66 or A won't get hit either. It's more important that you know what to do if you are anywhere when it goes down.
