[QUOTE=SpoofPdx;7155149]Clarification: curvier compared to Maya who is very slim. Itzel is skinner than 95% of k-girls I have met.[/QUOTE]How is her face? And what would you guess her age is?
Printable View
[QUOTE=SpoofPdx;7155149]Clarification: curvier compared to Maya who is very slim. Itzel is skinner than 95% of k-girls I have met.[/QUOTE]How is her face? And what would you guess her age is?
[QUOTE=Burner77;7156000]How is her face? And what would you guess her age is?[/QUOTE]Face is very close to the photos. I looked closely at the hands and around the eyes, I would say mid 20's. I could be wrong of course, she may be upper 20's. You will not be disappointed, she's a looker for sure.
[QUOTE=Burner77;7156000]How is her face? And what would you guess her age is?[/QUOTE]To each their own but will say not drastically different from the pics. Would guess age is mid to late 20's.
Is this the same Maya you guys are talking about? [URL]https://www.poshkroom.com/maya[/URL] TER seems to think so: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/maya-9295585880-401249[/URL].
If so the donations seem way less than the grand mentioned in this thread, especially for NYC. Thanks in advance for any clarification.
[QUOTE=DickHertz1965;7156600]Is this the same Maya you guys are talking about? [URL]https://www.poshkroom.com/maya[/URL] TER seems to think so: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/maya-9295585880-401249[/URL].
If so the donations seem way less than the grand mentioned in this thread, especially for NYC. Thanks in advance for any clarification.[/QUOTE]The TER reports definitely line up with the Maya I saw here last month. I didn't post a review or anything but she was great. I've only seen two k girls here and the other one was pretty lame service wise. Maya was a lot of fun.
[QUOTE=DickHertz1965;7156600]Is this the same Maya you guys are talking about? [URL]https://www.poshkroom.com/maya[/URL] TER seems to think so: [URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/maya-9295585880-401249[/URL].
If so the donations seem way less than the grand mentioned in this thread, especially for NYC. Thanks in advance for any clarification.[/QUOTE]Yes, that is the same Maya. The grand mentioned previously was 4 hand for an hour. Still steep, but to each their own.
Itzel is the rare girl that actually looks better than the photos. Absolute stunner, and very bubbly. Service-wise, I think Maya may still be a tad bit better, but Itzel is the better looking of the two in my opinion. Doesn't do cofcim, which is a bummer for me. Honestly, this girl is ridiculously hot with big fake gummy bear tits. You won't find any better. Couldn't keep my hands off them. Might repeat, which I've never done.
[QUOTE=RedLeader197;7156700]Yes, that is the same Maya. The grand mentioned previously was 4 hand for an hour. Still steep, but to each their own.[/QUOTE]Different topic (for anyone), but out of curiosity, will the k-girls doing BBFS allow cip?
[QUOTE=DickHertz1965;7157772]Different topic (for anyone), but out of curiosity, will the k-girls doing BBFS allow cip?[/QUOTE]Yes, they do.
[QUOTE=BlueDolphin;7149852]The Portland site is back with no login required. A girl named Jessie is the one option right now.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the update. Saw your post & went to their website. They solved their problems. I can visit their website anytime. No need to log in or click "Back to the home page". Very easy.
[QUOTE=Burner77;7157804]Yes, they do.[/QUOTE]Generally 100 on top of the posted rates.
[QUOTE=PoonHound1969;7158421]Generally 100 on top of the posted rates.[/QUOTE]Very interesting.
Saw Itzel. She is definitely a please. I highly recommend BBFS addon.
[QUOTE=InvincibleJohn;7162559]Saw Itzel. She is definitely a please. I highly recommend BBFS addon.[/QUOTE]Maybe a little context. Just a thumbs up isn't much to go on and does everyone a disservice.
Didn't see Maya so cannot compare.
Younger, bubbly, happy, engaging GND with a spinner body, big MM Cs with big nipples and aerola, small butt that does have some shape.
F 6.5-7 Cute gnd who looks cuter at certain angles.
B 7. 5-8 Spinner with natural undone body benefitting from youth. Small ass.
S 8 BBBJ (silky), DATY (enjoys), MSH (Standard), DS (fucks back), CG (great view), RCH (good stamina), CIP (no creampie show), MSOG (initiates herself).
A 9 Totally engaging and genuinely happy to be around customer.
All YMMV. Repeatable and recommended.
Note in looks, I try to be consistently objective. Baby Arin in LA is an 8. 5. KGFE Taeri was a 7.
[QUOTE=HkdigWeed;7163566]Didn't see Maya so cannot compare.
Younger, bubbly, happy, engaging GND with a spinner body, big MM Cs with big nipples and aerola, small butt that does have some shape.
F 6.5-7 Cute gnd who looks cuter at certain angles.
B 7. 5-8 Spinner with natural undone body benefitting from youth. Small ass.
S 8 BBBJ (silky), DATY (enjoys), MSH (Standard), DS (fucks back), CG (great view), RCH (good stamina), CIP (no creampie show), MSOG (initiates herself).
A 9 Totally engaging and genuinely happy to be around customer.
All YMMV. Repeatable and recommended.
Note in looks, I try to be consistently objective. Baby Arin in LA is an 8. 5. KGFE Taeri was a 7.[/QUOTE]
When compared to your overall rating of other two in the last paragraph, what is Itzel's score number?
Nevermind, I think, you are comparing looks or F.
-Marc.
[QUOTE=HkdigWeed;7163566]Didn't see Maya so cannot compare.
Younger, bubbly, happy, engaging GND with a spinner body, big MM Cs with big nipples and aerola, small butt that does have some shape.
F 6.5-7 Cute gnd who looks cuter at certain angles.
B 7. 5-8 Spinner with natural undone body benefitting from youth. Small ass.
S 8 BBBJ (silky), DATY (enjoys), MSH (Standard), DS (fucks back), CG (great view), RCH (good stamina), CIP (no creampie show), MSOG (initiates herself).
A 9 Totally engaging and genuinely happy to be around customer.
All YMMV. Repeatable and recommended.[/QUOTE]I may be in the minority for Itzel. I've seen about 4-5 KGFE gals and she was my worst encounter. My experience mirrored one or two reviews on TER where she just seemed tired or disengaged.
She was bubbly when I got in, but when it came time for the show, she seemed very standoffish. For example, very light lfk, and her oral while enjoyable, was over way too fast. It was like 2 min tops and she wanted to move on. When she got on for cg, she also rode real quick before saying she's tired and wants to switch. When we moved on to mish she started asking if I was close again after like only 2 minutes. My performance really falls off when I feel like the girl and I aren't vibing and that she just wants it to be over, so I just stopped and said if she could finish me off with oral // HJ.
She rejected the oral, saying she already did that, and started giving an uninspired HJ. She kept getting tired when doing that too! After the next series of comments I lost whatever interest I had left and I just stopped the session. She basically reminded me of a bad massage parlor that just wanted to rush you out and complains if you take longer.
I know I may be in the minority based on the comments already here, but just wanted to give a different experience. Face and body I would agree with the poster below. I would take Taeri based on attitude / service any day of the week though.
Sorry that you had a lame session, that definitely wasn't my experience. That said, it sounds like she left town earlier than expected and left today (Saturday the 18th) so there will probably be a gap before someone new arrives.
[QUOTE=RubATubTub;7164051]I may be in the minority for Itzel. I've seen about 4-5 KGFE gals and she was my worst encounter. My experience mirrored one or two reviews on TER where she just seemed tired or disengaged.
She was bubbly when I got in, but when it came time for the show, she seemed very standoffish. For example, very light lfk, and her oral while enjoyable, was over way too fast. It was like 2 min tops and she wanted to move on. When she got on for cg, she also rode real quick before saying she's tired and wants to switch. When we moved on to mish she started asking if I was close again after like only 2 minutes. My performance really falls off when I feel like the girl and I aren't vibing and that she just wants it to be over, so I just stopped and said if she could finish me off with oral // HJ.
She rejected the oral, saying she already did that, and started giving an uninspired HJ. She kept getting tired when doing that too! After the next series of comments I lost whatever interest I had left and I just stopped the session. She basically reminded me of a bad massage parlor that just wanted to rush you out and complains if you take longer.
I know I may be in the minority based on the comments already here, but just wanted to give a different experience. Face and body I would agree with the poster below. I would take Taeri based on attitude / service any day of the week though.[/QUOTE]
Looks like KGFE site has switched Itzel for Gina. Anyone have experience with Gina?
[QUOTE=Claymore142;7168575]Looks like KGFE site has switched Itzel for Gina. Anyone have experience with Gina?[/QUOTE]Decent reviews on TER, but a bit too heavy for me based on stats on website.
Missed out on Maya and Itzel, I heard from others they were legendary. Took the dive with Gina today and she did not disappoint. Very sensual, bubbly personality, BBBJ is her strong point, not a clock watcher. Man I wish we had more Korean girls out here in Portland. Thanks KGFE.
I am suspicious of someone that says they missed out on a provider, yet posted last month they were with this provider.
I'm also suspicious if all of the reviews are glowing positive experiences.
I also find it odd if a person only posts about agencies.
Finally it's not common for someone to be able to travel to all of these different locations.
It's a good idea to read a member's posting history. I do this if someone is sending me a message asking for details, or if I see a post that does not seem realistic.
If anyone has any personal experience with Gina or Meg I would like to hear about it. Send me a message.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7179970]If anyone has any personal experience with Gina or Meg I would like to hear about it. Send me a message.[/QUOTE]I might take one for the team. If I do I'll let you know.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7179970]If anyone has any personal experience with Gina or Meg I would like to hear about it. Send me a message.[/QUOTE]I was able to confirm with the booker that the Meg profile is a duplicate for Gina. They're advertising twice for the same person. Based on Gina's reviews about her weight, she's a pass for me.
[QUOTE=Cascadia210;7180936]I was able to confirm with the booker that the Meg profile is a duplicate for Gina. They're advertising twice for the same person. Based on Gina's reviews about her weight, she's a pass for me.[/QUOTE]Thats absolutely wild that they're doing that. I mean I'm not terribly surprised but still. Business must be slow. I've only seen two girls, one like last April who was a dud, and most recently saw Maya when she was here. Who was freaking awesome. But for that price the quality should not vary like that.
[QUOTE=Cascadia210;7180936]I was able to confirm with the booker that the Meg profile is a duplicate for Gina. They're advertising twice for the same person. Based on Gina's reviews about her weight, she's a pass for me.[/QUOTE]Thanks for doing that. I suspected that might be the case. The booker had previously said there wouldn't be anyone else until Gina left so was wondering why the sudden change.
[QUOTE=DimSumFun;7181146]Thats absolutely wild that they're doing that. I mean I'm not terribly surprised but still. Business must be slow. I've only seen two girls, one like last April who was a dud, and most recently saw Maya when she was here. Who was freaking awesome. But for that price the quality should not vary like that.[/QUOTE]Yeah and it's not the first time they've done it either. Booker said they want to increase business which, I support but told them this isn't the way to do it. More people will catch on- makes them look bad in the long run. Consistently brining in better talent with solid TER reputation is what will drive better business. I hope they succeed but my hit rate with them (attractive girl, awesome service) has been about 50% compared to the previous group which was around 90%.
Gentleman, I invite you to set aside approximately $1,000 the next time you have the opportunity to go to California. While you are there, try three different agencies, then submit a detailed report of your experiences.
What you will find are better quality girls, superior treatment and pampering, much nicer apartments and interiors (not sheets for curtains), and of course, lower prices than we have here.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7181357]Gentleman, I invite you to set aside approximately $1,000 the next time you have the opportunity to go to California. While you are there, try three different agencies, then submit a detailed report of your experiences.
What you will find are better quality girls, superior treatment and pampering, much nicer apartments and interiors (not sheets for curtains), and of course, lower prices than we have here.[/QUOTE]Any specific agency suggestions you think are worth trying? DM if needed. Thanks.
[QUOTE=Cascadia210;7182107]Any specific agency suggestions you think are worth trying? DM if needed. Thanks.[/QUOTE]I don't have a specific agency suggestion.
I do a search on TER using the city name, "agency" and "asian". Then I click on one of the woman's names to see the website listed in the search result, and contact the agency to see if I qualify for their screening process. Each agency has different requirements.
There are agencies in San Diego, LA, San Francisco, Orange County, etc.
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7181357]Gentleman, I invite you to set aside approximately $1,000 the next time you have the opportunity to go to California. While you are there, try three different agencies, then submit a detailed report of your experiences.
What you will find are better quality girls, superior treatment and pampering, much nicer apartments and interiors (not sheets for curtains), and of course, lower prices than we have here.[/QUOTE]Adding two more thoughts. First, I suggest you do at least one session here with the local agency so you have something to compare it to. They usually get decent girls, so you will have a good time. Second, I suggest you get screened before you go to California. Most California agencies will accept a referral from other agencies. Others want you to have a presence on p411, or Humanaplex, or TER, etc.
Anyone have recommendations, or experience with the agencies in the BC area?
[QUOTE=WarpFactor69;7182756]Adding two more thoughts. First, I suggest you do at least one session here with the local agency so you have something to compare it to. They usually get decent girls, so you will have a good time. Second, I suggest you get screened before you go to California. Most California agencies will accept a referral from other agencies. Others want you to have a presence on p411, or Humanaplex, or TER, etc.[/QUOTE]What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.
[QUOTE=Random2020;7186510]What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.[/QUOTE]KGFE is pretty straightforward, especially if you have a TNA account.
[QUOTE=Random2020;7186510]What are the screening requirements typically like for the local agencies? From what I've read on the California ones, doesn't seem like they are too accommodating of newer clients.[/QUOTE]Aside from my post from February 02 and what West Side punter said (thank you), I don't have much more to add.
Whatever agency you want to try, contact them and ask them what they're screening requests are. It helps if you have multiple sources like I mentioned on February 02. If you don't have everything the agency is asking for they may be open to different types of proof to make them comfortable. For example a screenshot of your recent t e are reviews me be sufficient. The best thing is to contact them and start a dialogue.
[QUOTE=Cascadia210;7182107]Any specific agency suggestions you think are worth trying? DM if needed. Thanks.[/QUOTE]I've used [URL]get9irl.com[/URL] and topangels. Ch with pretty good results. There are a lot of others, although their offerings tend to overlap quite a bit, so you don't really need to get setup with all of them. Girls are often listed on 2-4 sites simultaneously, sometimes under different names.
For the typical caliber of girl that KGFE has in Portland, these CA agencies will often advertise them for 320/ hour with BB and MSOG. KGFE charges 500 here for the same. I guess they feel that their regional monopoly warrants a 56% upcharge. This is the main reason why I've only ever used KGFE a few times.
The CA agencies will also have higher caliber girls pretty regularly, but they charge a bit more for them (typical is 400-500/ hr with BB and MSOG, but I've seen up to 600 in rare cases). It's also not uncommon to see multiple girls advertised together for duos and trios. Duos are usually 700-800/ hr, trios can be anywhere from 1000-1500.
Had a date with Diana. She is 5'5" - 5'6" with man made DD's they felt great to squeeze, with sensitive nipples. Small ass flat tummy. Nothing like the girl in the pictures but she was pretty. She loved being sucked on nipples while stroking her clit. Our session began with quick shower then some light kissing and onto her knees for BBBJ. Ok technique continued for about 5-10 minutes then on went the protection and riding at the edge of the bed. Really tight gripping pussy within a few minutes I popped in the cover. We then talked for about 15-20 minutes. Some language barrier but ok to communicate with her. For second session she started with BBBJ and climbed on me with cover on again. I didn't mind the cover I prefer it. The booker quoted me $100 extra for BBFS. $400 for hr with cover. She said she is leaving town tomorrow.
Definitely a repeat with the agency but YMMV.
Will probably pass on new girl Kelly, too. Was already a little skeptical, but this review on TER sealed the deal. Lackluster service, and average appearance except for above average droopy naturals. Hard pass for me.
[URL]https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/kelly-5614928386-403118[/URL]
[QUOTE=FireOnRocks;7196272]Had a date with Diana. She is 5'5" - 5'6" with man made DD's they felt great to squeeze, with sensitive nipples. Small ass flat tummy. Nothing like the girl in the pictures but she was pretty. [/QUOTE]This review and description is accurate for anyone on the fence. She's back for a few days after having left early, and is a definite repeat for me. For those looking to verify they are seeing the same girl, she has a flower tattoo across her lower abdomen. Good luck,
Rl.