Possible risk for anyone with a security clearance
[QUOTE=Almel89;6671583]How fucked are any of us if the client list is revealed, say you're one of those clients who was never "interviewed" by the agents but still on the list. Would we be getting an agent coming to visit, a call, anything? Would it end up on our records as a charge?
I'm pretty sure as long as you don't say anything or get busted in the act you're fine, but I'm not too sure about the rest.[/QUOTE]I'm not saying it will definitely happen, but anyone who's ever had a clearance knows it can be put at risk over non-criminal issues. If the list is (oops, my bad!) leaked, or if it's shared with other govt agencies using "national security" as the justification, that could be a problem.
It's all about the T word!
[QUOTE=Tadalagash;6671865]Forgive my naivety and simpleton mind. .
But what is the difference between Drug Dealers / drug users and Agency Owners / Johns?
Since when did the Feds or LEO's go after drug users?? Johns don't make money from these ' shady' activities just like the poor drug users. Unless their is an ulterior motive to go after the Johns since they are affluent people (given the expense) and being Whites from upper middle class.[/QUOTE]Things that used to be classified as garden variety prostitution or pimping have gained new life, and been elevated in status, using the trafficking label. That's not to say that real trafficking doesn't exist, only that the label is now being used as a pretext to turn what would previously have been shrugged over into an "OMG, this is horrible" kind of thing.
There is a shitload of state and federal dollars sloshing around and directed at task forces and other so-called anti-trafficking efforts. Prosecutions like this one get lots of publicity and ensure the flow of public money never dries up.
Your tax dollars at work! (sarc off).
No guarantees, but. . . .
[QUOTE=Almel89;6672158]So basically as long as you don't have a clearance or aren't high up in any organization / company there's a good chance they won't come for you as they're looking to punish people up the totem pole?
That and given the precedent of the DC madam scandal where that lost was never leaked there's a good chance that won't happen either?[/QUOTE]The smaller the fish, the higher the likelihood it will escape the shark!
The light bulb finally came on
One good thing that might come out of this is that we all collectively wake up and refuse to comply with these unreasonable screening requirements. If we refuse to hand over our PII to these agencies, they will stop requiring it. They have no legitimate need for our PII. But yet they do need our business, and will adapt to more reasonable screening like in years past.
Another observation. The affidavit says that surveillance has gone on for months and that they've interviewed 20 mongers. But yet no intel on this was reported. Makes me wonder how many investigations are currently going on against agencies, and how many guys are being flipped by the feds right now on agencies that are still operating. If you see something, say something!
Also, have you noticed that sometimes these agencies bring it on themselves. One agency has papasan in the hallway directing mongers. As I just said, the residents of that building might see something and also say something.
It's the handful that ruin it for everyone
[QUOTE=Finitts;6672235]Hope everyone that just gave away their PII stops freaking out. You already gave it up, can't get it back from those people. Learn your lesson and move on.
P.S.-if you really think the agencies "erased" your PII after the verification. Hahahahaha sure they did.[/QUOTE]I recently tied to screen with DS and they asked me for numerous pieces of PII and I declined. The only reason I can think why they ask for so much personal info is that it gives them a level of power over you because you cannot tell how a guy is going to behave when he's alone with a girl based on his DL, his job, etc. The best way to screen to see if he's well behaved is via other ladies he's seen. Co-sign on the comment that if we collectively refuse to give up PII they'll be forced to stop asking for it or they'll go out of business; but unfortunately there will also be a few weak links in the hobby chain that will cave and send it thus ruining it for everyone.
People on the client list not yet out of the woods
[QUOTE=BobORama;6672675]Only a matter of time before this all blows over. The owners will likely not face any jail time, at least not for prostitution or human trafficking. Just look at Wikipedia on Prostitution in the US: "Prostitution is illegal in the vast majority of the United States as a result of state laws rather than federal laws". There's no reason for federal agencies, like the DOJ and DHS, to get involved with suspected prostitution, as that's relegated to the state level. So now all they've got is human trafficking. But good luck getting those Korean women to testify. It should be noted that not a single news article mentioned that the authorities took these Asian women in for questioning. When you don't even have your main source of evidence in human trafficking cases (in this case, the women), what else have you got? Not much, so the cases will likely be tossed.
At best, they can probably hit the owners with money laundering or racketeering. So, some jail time is possible. But not much.
New agencies will pop up using different names. Probably run by the same people.
People on the so-called client list are safe. Having your name on a list is not evidence of a crime committed. Even sending text messages discussing payment for sex is not sufficient. They would need to catch you in the act to prove you engaged in prostitution. The agencies are not sting operations. There are no cameras set up inside the apartments.[/QUOTE]As I posted earlier, while it's unlikely that clients will get caught up in the criminal case, anyone who has a security clearance may still have cause for concern. That means govt employees and contractors, of which I'm sure some are on the client list, are potentially at risk.
Two things could happen: A willful or "accidental" release of client info, or a behind the scenes sharing of info with security clearance adjudication agencies. At this point there's no way to know if either of those would happen, but any client who tried to dispute or challenge might have to go public to do so, which carries its own set of problems. This is likely more of a concern in the VA and DC area than it is in MA, but still too early to sound the "all clear" signal.
About the defendants, I've only skimmed the publicly released info, but I've seen charges related to trafficking, money laundering, and identity theft. Activity that might ordinarily fall under state laws gets bumped up to the federal level once it crosses state / intl borders, or otherwise involves interstate commerce (which includes a wide range of things). Hard to say what kind of sentences they're facing as a lot will depend on how much money they're alleged to have laundered. And, while I haven't seen specifics, I wouldn't be surprised to see a denial of bail, or a really high bail amount, based on the possibility of flight risk.
About the alleged "trafficking" victims, the feds will likely roll out a whole host of carrot-and-stick incentives. For example, if any of the women acted as on-site mamasans (holding $, or any kind of management activity), they could be charged as a co-conspirator. Someone like that would be a good target to flip in exchange for a plea deal. For other women, allowing them to remain in the US (carrot) vs deportation (stick) is a likely tactic. Hard to say what any individual woman will do, but it only takes one or two for the "trafficking" charges to stick. And it's also normal practice to not put all of your evidence into a publicly available affidavit. I'm guessing that interviews of clients and providers have already taken place, but that info is not required to be disclosed unless the case goes to trial AND a specific individual is on the witness list.
Lots of stuff yet to unfold. Stay tuned!
P.S. Will new agencies pop up? Absolutely! The world's oldest profession is resilient in the extreme. Run by the same people? Highly risky for them unless they run things from outside the US, in a country where extradition is unlikely. Repeat offenders in the federal system tend to get slammed pretty hard.
I agree and am thinking positive thoughts
[QUOTE=BobORama;6672675]Only a matter of time before this all blows over. The owners will likely not face any jail time, at least not for prostitution or human trafficking. Just look at Wikipedia on Prostitution in the US: "Prostitution is illegal in the vast majority of the United States as a result of state laws rather than federal laws". There's no reason for federal agencies, like the DOJ and DHS, to get involved with suspected prostitution, as that's relegated to the state level. So now all they've got is human trafficking. But good luck getting those Korean women to testify. It should be noted that not a single news article mentioned that the authorities took these Asian women in for questioning. When you don't even have your main source of evidence in human trafficking cases (in this case, the women), what else have you got? Not much, so the cases will likely be tossed.
At best, they can probably hit the owners with money laundering or racketeering. So, some jail time is possible. But not much.
New agencies will pop up using different names. Probably run by the same people.
People on the so-called client list are safe. Having your name on a list is not evidence of a crime committed. Even sending text messages discussing payment for sex is not sufficient. They would need to catch you in the act to prove you engaged in prostitution. The agencies are not sting operations. There are no cameras set up inside the apartments.[/QUOTE]Rebrands, new crews, websites and locations should do the trick. No way human trafficking sticks. All the girls I have seen took this as a job like any other, but this one pays a lot more. Thinking this has to do with Politics and elections right now. By next year it's going to be all about Fentanyl crisis.