[QUOTE=MulchMan;2150245]V is back in action and everything is OK. She is in a new location. PM me for details.[/QUOTE]Yes she is and has a new cute out fit she just got it last night.
Printable View
[QUOTE=MulchMan;2150245]V is back in action and everything is OK. She is in a new location. PM me for details.[/QUOTE]Yes she is and has a new cute out fit she just got it last night.
[QUOTE=OldMarine;2150247]Just a note to confirm what others have said. Lorraine is a keeper. Met her last night. Super nice girl, polite, trustworthy, good service. Wish we had more like her in Richmond. She definitely likes to keep low key, which is just fine with me.[/QUOTE]Is she the same Lorraine that 2 fers with Gina? I would like more info about her if she is utr. Thanks!
[QUOTE=AOneFred7734;2150266]Yes she is and has a new cute out fit she just got it last night.[/QUOTE]I concur. All is well with her!
I got a txt from 804-496-3865 - offering massage -- asked who it was and was told Ginger.
Googled the number and found this [URL]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ginger-snap-30/12435617[/URL] an old May BP advert.
Txted back and forwards. Is in Midlo area. Arranged. 8 for hh -- and I tried but just could not make it -- I txted my apologies.
A little while later I got an MMS with this picture. Pretty sure it is Vanessa? Can SMs confirm? Offering doubles.
A asked if it was Vanessa, and got nothing back. My spider sense is telling me this could be a setup. And I am avoiding unless get info otherwise.
Regards.
GW.
Edit : want to make it plain that this is NOT ginger H, who is an UTR massage provider and NOT FS. The above Ginger was very clearly FS and GFE
[QUOTE=GuyWoodson;2151244]I got a txt from 804-496-3865 - offering massage -- asked who it was and was told Ginger.
Googled the number and found this [URL]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ginger-snap-30/12435617[/URL] an old May BP advert.
Txted back and forwards. Is in Midlo area. Arranged. 8 for hh -- and I tried but just could not make it -- I txted my apologies.
A little while later I got an MMS with this picture. Pretty sure it is Vanessa? Can SMs confirm? Offering doubles.
A asked if it was Vanessa, and got nothing back. My spider sense is telling me this could be a setup. And I am avoiding unless get info otherwise.
Regards.
GW.[/QUOTE]Yes it is, and a photo I have yet to see. Be safe out there.
[QUOTE=GuyWoodson;2151244]I got a txt from 804-496-3865 - offering massage -- asked who it was and was told Ginger.
Googled the number and found this [URL]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ginger-snap-30/12435617[/URL] an old May BP advert.
Txted back and forwards. Is in Midlo area. Arranged. 8 for hh -- and I tried but just could not make it -- I txted my apologies.
A little while later I got an MMS with this picture. Pretty sure it is Vanessa? Can SMs confirm? Offering doubles.
A asked if it was Vanessa, and got nothing back. My spider sense is telling me this could be a setup. And I am avoiding unless get info otherwise.
Regards.
GW.
Edit : want to make it plain that this is NOT ginger H, who is an UTR massage provider and NOT FS. The above Ginger was very clearly FS and GFE[/QUOTE]That is a pic of vannessa not her # she has a add up (in pink).
[QUOTE=GuyWoodson;2151244]I got a txt from 804-496-3865 - offering massage -- asked who it was and was told Ginger.
Googled the number and found this [URL]http://richmond.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/ginger-snap-30/12435617[/URL] an old May BP advert.
Txted back and forwards. Is in Midlo area. Arranged. 8 for hh -- and I tried but just could not make it -- I txted my apologies.
A little while later I got an MMS with this picture. Pretty sure it is Vanessa? Can SMs confirm? Offering doubles.
A asked if it was Vanessa, and got nothing back. My spider sense is telling me this could be a setup. And I am avoiding unless get info otherwise.
Regards.
GW.
Edit : want to make it plain that this is NOT ginger H, who is an UTR massage provider and NOT FS. The above Ginger was very clearly FS and GFE[/QUOTE]Ok ginger is actually gina the # is gina (part of gina name is ginger) vannessa will team up with her that's how the pic comes in to play.
I had an interesting chat with Lynn. She said the local police, under approval (or orders) from the governor are writing tickets to ladies and men who are frequenting hotels used by prostitutes. The ticket is for frequenting a bawdy house. Crap, I suppose if you rented a room at the wrong hotel you could get a ticket innocently. Lynn said she received a ticket and is learning what's involved. Apparently you go to traffic court and the prosecuter will try to get it moved to criminal court. Lynn's comment was she was alone in the room and the cop treated her "like a dog. " Apparently men are getting these tickets too for just being in the area. I don't know how they can make these tickets stick without evidence but I suppose you could write one for "probable cause", which could mean whatever the cop thought you might have done or intended to do.
Lynn went on to say the ladies get a card that says if they cooperate (share info on their clients) they will get better treatment. One girl on SS who has been working for 3 years or more, turned over a long time client of hers and Lynn's. This sounds totally illegal but who is going to fight this? It sounds like something the ACLU should get involved in.
Anyway, this is why Lynn is cooling her heels and working outside of Richmond. She will have 2 locations and I'll let her disclose them to whomever she wants to disclose them to. For you dirtbags into S&M she did mention setting up a dungeon at one location. I'm more intrigues with some of her other options. <g She really doesn't want a second ticket.
And yes, I asked if I could pass the word on. She was okay with it. If anyone has more info on these tickets, I think it would be good to share what they are and if writing a check and not contesting them is possible and / or advisable.
Lh.
[QUOTE=Littlehead;2152184]I had an interesting chat with Lynn. She said the local police, under approval (or orders) from the governor are writing tickets to ladies and men who are frequenting hotels used by prostitutes. The ticket is for frequenting a bawdy house. Crap, I suppose if you rented a room at the wrong hotel you could get a ticket innocently. Lynn said she received a ticket and is learning what's involved. Apparently you go to traffic court and the prosecuter will try to get it moved to criminal court. Lynn's comment was she was alone in the room and the cop treated her "like a dog. " Apparently men are getting these tickets too for just being in the area. I don't know how they can make these tickets stick without evidence but I suppose you could write one for "probable cause", which could mean whatever the cop thought you might have done or intended to do.
Lynn went on to say the ladies get a card that says if they cooperate (share info on their clients) they will get better treatment. One girl on SS who has been working for 3 years or more, turned over a long time client of hers and Lynn's. This sounds totally illegal but who is going to fight this? It sounds like something the ACLU should get involved in.
Anyway, this is why Lynn is cooling her heels and working outside of Richmond. She will have 2 locations and I'll let her disclose them to whomever she wants to disclose them to. For you dirtbags into S&M she did mention setting up a dungeon at one location. I'm more intrigues with some of her other options. <g She really doesn't want a second ticket.
And yes, I asked if I could pass the word on. She was okay with it. If anyone has more info on these tickets, I think it would be good to share what they are and if writing a check and not contesting them is possible and / or advisable.
Lh.[/QUOTE]I can confirm everything little has said. Lynn told me the same thing. This why I am going to stay away from hotels and women I haven't seen. Be careful everyone.
[QUOTE=Ltnric;2152209]I can confirm everything little has said. Lynn told me the same thing. This why I am going to stay away from hotels and women I haven't seen. Be careful everyone.[/QUOTE]Just sticking with a trusted provider won't do it. As Ltnric said, you need to avoid hotels (and motels) too. What a royal PITA. Is it legal to fuck on the rocks in the James River? Probably not but if it was I think I'd start taking the show public.
[QUOTE=Ltnric;2152209]I can confirm everything little has said. Lynn told me the same thing. This why I am going to stay away from hotels and women I haven't seen. Be careful everyone.[/QUOTE]What kind of ticket are these and how they can enforce it. Why are they wasting tax payers money on this while violent crime in city is increasing?
Keeping, residing in or frequenting a bawdy place; "bawdy place" defined.
It shall be unlawful for any person to keep any bawdy place, or to reside in or at or visit, for immoral purposes, any such bawdy place. Each and every day such bawdy place shall be kept, resided in or visited, shall constitute a separate offense. In a prosecution under this section the general reputation of the place may be proved.
As used in this Code, "bawdy place" shall mean any place within or without any building or structure which is used or is to be used for lewdness, assignation or prostitution.
Ref: [URL]http://vacode.org/18.2-347/[/URL].
Lewd and lascivious cohabitation.
If any persons, not married to each other, lewdly and lasciviously associate and cohabit together, or, whether married or not, be guilty of open and gross lewdness and lasciviousness, each of them shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor; and upon a repetition of the offense, and conviction thereof, each of them shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
Ref: [URL]http://vacode.org/18.2-345/[/URL].
The code is a joke in places!
The goal here is to eliminate prostitution, which is against the law. No comment about whether it should be illegal. Fact is, it is right now. So with no evidence other than 'I saw you at a seedy hotel where we busted someone for prostitution' you can get a ticket for visiting a bawdy house. You might be there totally innocently, just visiting a friend, helping out someone down on their luck, spending a night in a cheap hotel cause that's where your company puts you up, or you might be looking to monger. Everyone can get a ticket. There's no intent to do the leg work to separate the guilty from the innocent.
I have no doubt that this POS scheme was easy way out for everyone involved. No one really cares if the charge can be dismissed, the fact is you got the ticket, you'll have to pay for a lawyer to get the charge thrown out, and it puts the hurt on mongers. The fact that innocent people get hurt isn't important. The principle that people are innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply here. They're treating it as a civil penalty, like a traffic ticket. Well, except they don't need to bother with probable cause. The traffic ticket requires the officer to see you run a red light, speed, or do something illegal. This just requires you to be some place where a hooker was busted and has a "general reputation" in order for you to be guilty.
My humble prayer is that everyone associated with this pathetic, unamerican attempt to commit an injustice in the name of justice, gets the worst case of hemorrhoids followed by a continual infestation of bed bugs, and transmission failure during rush hour in every new car they own.
[QUOTE=Littlehead;2152538]No one really cares if the charge can be dismissed, the fact is you got the ticket, you'll have to pay for a lawyer to get the charge thrown out, and it puts the hurt on mongers. The fact that innocent people get hurt isn't important. The principle that people are innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply here. They're treating it as a civil penalty, like a traffic ticket. Well, except they don't need to bother with probable cause. The traffic ticket requires the officer to see you run a red light, speed, or do something illegal. This just requires you to be some place where a hooker was busted and has a "general reputation" in order for you to be guilty.[/QUOTE]We need to plaster those statements for all mongers to see. LE doesn't care that innocent people might be incorrectly arrested. LE is going to go facebook then tv to say what a great job they are doing to rid prostitution. Face it that anybody they pickup at the notel motel isn't a high wheeler dealer with moneybags to spend on lawyers. So screw 'them. If they can say in facebook they got the one pimp who was traffiking a 16 year old it don't matter that 30 people were innocently ticketed. This is also why I keep saying you living a pipe dream if you think some wording in BP ads is illegal so it means they can't bust you. Foolish.