Escort Reports

[QUOTE=DaddyJ0222;5322828]You do realize most of the girls that are good don't make their own arrangements. Hannah couldn't be the only one making her arrangements. I see her on a regular. She texts back too quick to be doing this all on her own. Regardless Hannah in person is a sweetheart. Her smile is beautiful. And she has a heart of gold.[/QUOTE]Well yeah when she has multiple videos sucking her pimp's I mean "boyfriend's" dick on her ad. Kinda obvious she isn't working on her own.

I honestly didn't have an issue booking. Her shitty attitude started at the door. If your happy with what she provides more power to you. The whole point of this site is to give feedback, so that other mongers can make an informed dicision based on a variety of reports. More feedback the better good and bad.

Most mongers with any experiences know you can't make a dicision off one review, that's why we all have histories we can look up to see what kind of reviews we've left in the past. And most people in this hobby know that YMMV is always a risk that is taken, when meeting a provider.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]: [/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]pointless[/u], [u]unproductive[/u] [u]drama[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [I]Thank You! [/I][/blue]

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]

[QUOTE=DanBrown;5324152]Well yeah when she has multiple videos sucking her pimp's I mean "boyfriend's" dick on her ad. Kinda obvious she isn't working on her own.

I honestly didn't have an issue booking. Her shitty attitude started at the door. If your happy with what she provides more power to you. The whole point of this site is to give feedback, so that other mongers can make an informed dicision based on a variety of reports. More feedback the better good and bad.

Most mongers with any experiences know you can't make a dicision off one review, that's why we all have histories we can look up to see what kind of reviews we've left in the past. And most people in this hobby know that YMMV is always a risk that is taken, when meeting a provider.[/QUOTE]I don't think her boyfriend is in her ads.

[QUOTE=DaddyJ0222;5324243]If you're issue was with her at the door why didn't you just leave? I'm sure if Hannah had an issue with you it's because you're a creepy guy. Which makes sense because you're calling reviewing escorts a "hobby".[/QUOTE]I would suggest taking this argumentative crap to the prickyard, that's what it's for.

Honestly, we're not interested in providers coming on here to bash us for giving bad reviews of your bad performance.

My experience was the same. She was polite and responsive initially. We agree on a time and she sent me the location. While I'm en route I get a text saying "you're canceled. " No response at all, no communication. Very strange.

[QUOTE=XxxMail77;5323900]Same, Hannah or her booker got shitty with me as well, and cancelled for no reason then said I was "too much drama" LOL I still check her pics out, but then when I'm like maybe I open the text see the history and go. Yup not worth the headaches. Sucks because I'd like something to supplement DI and have some weekends, but alas have yet to find it.[/QUOTE]

[URL]https://indianapolis.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/black_caribbean/wet-wet/687577179187[/URL]

I've been texting with her for a while. Very consistent and seems legit. When I search here I don't find anything.

Hoping someone has a report they can share.

KC.

[QUOTE=KittyChaser;5325436][URL]https://indianapolis.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/black_caribbean/wet-wet/687577179187[/URL]

I've been texting with her for a while. Very consistent and seems legit. When I search here I don't find anything.

Hoping someone has a report they can share.

KC.[/QUOTE]I remember her being reviewed last month, and tracked it down #16019.

According to report she was legit but more or less just laid there.

[QUOTE=Jeast72;5324739]I would suggest taking this argumentative crap to the prickyard, that's what it's for.

Honestly, we're not interested in providers coming on here to bash us for giving bad reviews of your bad performance.[/QUOTE]No he's just saying that this is a "hobby". If you've read all the replies, this guy has never saw Hannah.

[QUOTE=KittyChaser;5325436][URL]https://indianapolis.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/black_caribbean/wet-wet/687577179187[/URL]

I've been texting with her for a while. Very consistent and seems legit. When I search here I don't find anything.

Hoping someone has a report they can share.

KC.[/QUOTE]#16019, #16021.

Looking for info on this provider.

I can't find any reviews. Please PM me.

[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/allicakes[/URL]

[QUOTE=RedDog60;5325794]Looking for info on this provider.

I can't find any reviews. Please PM me.

[URL]https://tryst.link/escort/allicakes[/URL][/QUOTE]I'd love to see her but seems risky since she's not reviewed. She also wants a deposit or hotel booking which I'm not doing for someone not reviewed.

[QUOTE=Bigred2006;5326015]I'd love to see her but seems risky since she's not reviewed. She also wants a deposit or hotel booking which I'm not doing for someone not reviewed.[/QUOTE]She was on SA for quite a while. We texted off and on for months, but never met. I'm honestly a little surprised to see ber escorting now.

[QUOTE=HoosierNative;5325444]I remember her being reviewed last month, and tracked it down #16019.

According to report she was legit but more or less just laid there.[/QUOTE]There was another number reported that didn't seem to be her either.

Now. I'm not the best on search. I tried "wet" and "wet wet".

Anyway, appreciate anyone that can steer me to correct posts.

KC.

[QUOTE=KittyChaser;5326396]There was another number reported that didn't seem to be her either.

Now. I'm not the best on search. I tried "wet" and "wet wet".

Anyway, appreciate anyone that can steer me to correct posts.

KC.[/QUOTE]Today they 16030 and 16032.