Massage Parlor Reports

Ok

I must admit I have not been in RI that much since the "rule" change. I must agree with alot of the information posted on here. The Cops know what goes on and play the game accordingly. I have a few friends that work in the field, and the access to information they have is pretty in depth. The hobby we all enjoy has its risks and rewards. Using code words is not going to help and although the desire to keep certain establishments "Under the Radar" is admirable in my personal opinion your not going to save the place from the bust if its coming all you can really do is hope your not there when it goes down. From reading the posts on the board it seems another trip to RI might in order with a report to follow.

Thanks

(your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J




[QUOTE=HappyDave]My point is.

Fact one, cops want the place they have it, advertising is not illegal but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertizing for paid sex. Craigslist alone was very highly profiled in a prostitution murder and is still up and running with adds. Theise establishments put themselfs on the radar with there adds.

Fact two, saying saw Jane left happy is just as bad because the cops know what is implied.

Fact three saw Jane left happy does us little good because we do not know the quality of the service offered. A shitty hand job for $200.00 does us no good but is still enough to get Jane busted anyways.

Fact four we are such a small fish in such a big ocean of illegal activity that our little forum is of very little impact. Our posts are total hear say, I could be a member with 600 posts just by re typing what is in here. There is no way it can be used in court.

I myself have been involved with groups of questionable activity to the general public. Our meetings "are" in undisclosed locations to the general public. But, the cops know exactly who and were we are, we located with there suggestion to stay out of view. We mind our own business and they leave us alone.

And O ya some of the group are cops.

I believe in post something of value or why post. Your statement of it being boasting, well saying I had a grate time but wont tell you were is boasting because it says you had a great time but wont tell me where I can have a great time.[/QUOTE]

Let me put this simply and we will ignore all the outside advertising places that sex for money is highly implied and believed to be.

Just to your post, once you have posted on "USA SEX GUIDE" (saw Jane and had a good time). No more is Needed, we all know what this site is for and what a "good time" is.

There are about three or four spas near me, one is simply mentioned on the Boston site all the time as extras can be had or were had. The others are ether never mentioned or it has been mentioned as no extras, with no more than that who will be raided.

One town has had an amp since the 70's and has been on this site many times and never touched. Others come and go often due to raids.

The other town had two, one of them just barely mentioned on the site and gone in less than a year the other never mentioned at all and still going. Both had been checked by leo, one was legit the other was not.

You have to understand that the only UTR is not to be mentioned at all, do not advertise and word of mouth only.

High traffic of johns in noticeable areas drawing complaints is the biggest draw for uncle leo. No complaint, no publicity no action needed.

[QUOTE=Jhonny8770](your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]

Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth!


[QUOTE=Jhonny8770](your fact one):
Nothing any of these businesses advertise/mention in their ads is illegal, period.
Yes, they do appear on LEo's radar once advertised, but do not come under severe scrutiny of LEO/other f*ckers until someone (continually) posts 'illegal' activities occuring at their place of business in a public forum for all to see.
Where they advertise/how many times/what's happened to other people who've advertised with said media outlet is irrelevant/moot.

"but they are advertising an illegal activity in a place known for advertising for paid sex" - completely inaccurate/false

(your fact two):
Implied activities mean nothing; to quote you, "There is no way it can be used in court".

(your fact three):
I agree that 10 word/lack of details posts do no one any good.
If you research my posts, I've stated this many times.
However, with a small amount of 'creative writing', posts can be informative without mention of anything illegal.

(your fact four):
We are far from a small fish; have you been paying attention for the past year?!?
OUR ACTIVITIES, SPECIFICALLY MENTIONING USASG, WERE READ ON THE RI STATEHOUSE FLOOR IN FRONT OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA!!!
While they might be heresay legally, our posts/reviews were instrumental in this process and that is a fact.

I don't give 2 sh*its what your doing illegaly with your buddies; no relevance to this forum.
(That is boasting/bragging, BTW)
And I'm truly shocked to find out that cops are corrupt.
Projo went so far as to tell us that these (future) stings will more than likely be forced to use out-of-state 'officials' because................well, you do the math.

Again, look at my posting history (post LH-closing) which you obviously have not done.
My contributions to this forum (and others) are nothing like what you've accused me of posting.
I've placed a large amount of info on RI/MA AMPs and will continue to do so with the caviot of not mentioning anything 'illegal'.

You/others who share your opinion will continue do what what you want regardless of what I/others say.
However, keep this in mind:
You are, in fact, placing someone in jeopardy while hiding behind anonymity.
If it was your business/freedom on the line, my guess is you would have a different attitude.

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]

Sunday afternoon I had to drive to Lake George NY for a week of work. (Yes I know Lake George is closed for the winter). So I took a small detour to 1021 to check on the latest version of relaxation. When I arrived I was met by BeeBee, a cute 28 year old small girl who told me she has only been there 1 week and everyone else is busy. We had the last room on the left, which I hate.. too small and street noise.

She looked nice, and seemed to know her way around. Right to the TS which was just a little quick but covered all the basics. I tried to talk to her about the slide, but got nowhere. Language problem...The Sauna was not working??, so right back to the room. I passed on the massage and went right to the good stuff.

She really enjoyed my little vibrators. First time for her. On the way out I met the new Yung. She asked when I was coming to see her?? Overall a good visit.

Have fun!!

Tony

Very well worded post Muff I would love James Earl Jones to read the post since the voice would be a killer.

BTW "as requested by him" I have read several of Jh's posts and some are very descriptive both Boston and RI have to say his first person posts (not the comments on others we all make) are very descriptive as to services rendered and almost penthouse forum level. Very well done to a point of hypocrisy of what he wants to protect by not having others say almost the same. I hope he keeps posting I like his style.

All for fun.

Happy D

[QUOTE=Muffythediver]Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth![/QUOTE]

While I am concerned for the girls protection, I'm more concerned with its (the RI AMP industry's) survival for my own selfish reasons.
I want to be able to utilize their services in the future, but eventually the constant barrage of the finger-pointers rhetoric, fueled in part by us, will force LEo to act (again).

Again, like HD, you accuse me of 10 word/no info posts when, in fact, I post exactly the opposite of that and frown on it (even with the alphabet quoted).
Did you even search my reviews prior to your accusation?

And as far as the girls choice to work in a high risk job: Yes, you're right; they do assume the risk freely.
But more arrests will cause these girls to rethink their willingness to come here and we'll end up like MA with desperate, 50 yo ladies who offer no xtras.
You'll pine/wax/j*rk-off for the excellent choice of 20 something, PYT's we currently have in the stables.
Is this what you want?
Why would you want to heap additional risk/stress upon all that currently exists?
Because you can?
Just to help out some noob who doesn't want to do a simple search or RTFF?

I read on the escort side some 1 post guy asked for info and was reponded to with 3 numbers and a 'password', WTF?!?
Is this what we've come to?
"I want to help someone out to get a piece of tail; that's what this site was created for".
That could not be further from the truth.

Jackson and other forward thinkers like him (her?), created these sites/forums to aid us in our ability to hobby SAFELY (LEo, drugs addicts, ripoffs, poor service are weeded out through posting).
That safety also extends to the SP's (SW's, AMP's, escorts).
We keep them safe through discretionary posting.
Is posting the illegal activity of a stagnant-address provider being discrete?!?
I think not, no matter what spin is put on it.

Think about it.


[QUOTE=Muffythediver]Well I commend your concern for these girls at the Spa's and there protection and privacy! One thing you don't understand is these girls have chosen this line of work knowing fully what the risks are. They know there is a risk of being dragged out in the public eye and being persecuted. They do what they do anyways for the huge payoffs. The more risk the better the pay! So these girls take the chance and overlook what the downside of the chosen profession is.

This website has only one purpose and that is to share information about providers and Spa's with each other. "She made me happy" is sharing nothing! I can go see my hair stylist and she can make me happy, I can go see a massage therapist and she will make me happy, I can go and see a girl at an unfamiliar AMP thinking I can get FS and she did not make me happy cause I wanted FS and all they offer was HJ...How was I to know by a review that said she made another guy happy?? This site is for the purpose of sharing good useful information. Not "She made me happy" posts!

Now one thing I agree with is treating these working girls with respect on here. There is a way to cetainly write about an experience and give details that can be deemed useful and still being respectful of the lady.

I could go on and on with this but clearly there are two different factions here who disagree so enough said. You post how you like and I will post how I like, the great thing about this site is we are all free to post how we wish within the rules Jackson has set forth![/QUOTE]

First, thanks for the compliment, HD.
I do put a lot of 'me' into my posts, but then again why wouldn't I.
And like most of you, I'm here to gather/share information and have been very forward/detailed with my reviews.
(On another board, my original OS post has 25,000+ hits)
Hope all got the info they were looking for and made everyones visit a little smoother/less awkward (especially for the girls).
Some may not appreciate the long-version review of a visit.
Me, I think it's the only way to pass on what you've learned.
If it's not to your taste/liking, ignore me/the post and move on.

That being said, what you failed to learn from reading my posts is all my reports (save 1) after the loophole closed have no mention of anything illegal for stagnant addresses (RI AMPs) other than that I was there; no hypocrisy.
After posting my visit w/ Yoyo, I realized my error and my next post (same night - Kitty) was discrete.

BTW - I will continue to post (when I have the green!).

More to follow,
J


[QUOTE=HappyDave]Very well worded post Muff I would love James Earl Jones to read the post since the voice would be a killer.

BTW "as requested by him" I have read several of Jh's posts and some are very descriptive both Boston and RI have to say his first person posts (not the comments on others we all make) are very descriptive as to services rendered and almost penthouse forum level. Very well done to a point of hypocrisy of what he wants to protect by not having others say almost the same. I hope he keeps posting I like his style.

All for fun.

Happy D[/QUOTE]

Looks like Donna Hughes is at it again. She must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. Today's Projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/columnists/content/CL_achorn23_03-23-10_9KHNJGH_v12.4059bc7.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor[/url]

Not to toss the tennis ball back and forth since I think the whole board is sick of us now but Boston I believe you posted very descriptive of Geisha Girls and some others. Prostitution has always been illegal on the northern side of the boarder.

For the record this is my last post on the topic of posting as started by me.

[QUOTE=Jhonny8770]First, thanks for the compliment, HD.
I do put a lot of 'me' into my posts, but then again why wouldn't I.
And like most of you, I'm here to gather/share information and have been very forward/detailed with my reviews.
(On another board, my original OS post has 25,000+ hits)
Hope all got the info they were looking for and made everyones visit a little smoother/less awkward (especially for the girls).
Some may not appreciate the long-version review of a visit.
Me, I think it's the only way to pass on what you've learned.
If it's not to your taste/liking, ignore me/the post and move on.

That being said, what you failed to learn from reading my posts is all my reports (save 1) after the loophole closed have no mention of anything illegal for stagnant addresses (RI AMPs) other than that I was there; no hypocrisy.
After posting my visit w/ Yoyo, I realized my error and my next post (same night - Kitty) was discrete.

BTW - I will continue to post (when I have the green!).

More to follow,
J[/QUOTE]

But, you are and continue to do so without doing the necessary homework to prepare your argument properly.
While EGG does have a stagnant address, it is NEVER advertised (or reported in reviews) and screening/references are required prior to admittance.

"and some others" - not true

EOM


[QUOTE=HappyDave]Not to toss the tennis ball back and forth since I think the whole board is sick of us now but Boston I believe you posted very descriptive of Geisha Girls and some others. Prostitution has always been illegal on the northern side of the boarder.

For the record this is my last post on the topic of posting as started by me.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jhonny8770]But, you are and continue to do so without doing the necessary homework to prepare your argument properly.
While EGG does have a stagnant address, it is NEVER advertised (or reported in reviews) and screening/references are required prior to admittance.

"and some others" - not true

EOM[/QUOTE]

While EGG does have a stagnant address, you need a code to enter building. Once in the building you have you pick of a hundred doors!That is in addition to the screening process.
VASTLY different that a stagnant , advertised Spa!!!

Just curious if you guys are almost done??

[QUOTE=Pw Herman]While EGG does have a stagnant address, you need a code to enter building. Once in the building you have you pick of a hundred doors!That is in addition to the screening process.
VASTLY different that a stagnant , advertised Spa!!!

Just curious if you guys are almost done??[/QUOTE]

To directly answer Pw's question, as per last post I will make no further comment on the post started by me.

I had that same room un my last visit also! I hate that room with a passion, you can actually here all the people down on the street talking as they walk by.

[QUOTE=Little Tony II]Sunday afternoon I had to drive to Lake George NY for a week of work. (Yes I know Lake George is closed for the winter). So I took a small detour to 1021 to check on the latest version of relaxation. When I arrived I was met by BeeBee, a cute 28 year old small girl who told me she has only been there 1 week and everyone else is busy. We had the last room on the left, which I hate.. too small and street noise.

She looked nice, and seemed to know her way around. Right to the TS which was just a little quick but covered all the basics. I tried to talk to her about the slide, but got nowhere. Language problem...The Sauna was not working??, so right back to the room. I passed on the massage and went right to the good stuff.

She really enjoyed my little vibrators. First time for her. On the way out I met the new Yung. She asked when I was coming to see her?? Overall a good visit.

Have fun!!

Tony[/QUOTE]

you guys don't start posting and Jhonny 8770 and I will start a debate over the mating habits of migrating waterfowl.

What is the flight velocity of a european swallow??



[QUOTE=HappyDave]you guys don't start posting and Jhonny 8770 and I will start a debate over the mating habits of migrating waterfowl.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Muffythediver]What is the flight velocity of a european swallow??[/QUOTE]
It all depends on the rocket launcher of the male counterpart?

[QUOTE=Muffythediver]What is the flight velocity of a european swallow??[/QUOTE]

Good question. I've seen an American swallow, but I've only seen Europeans spit.

[QUOTE=VilunyaChert]Good question. I've seen an American swallow, but I've only seen Europeans spit.[/QUOTE]



Hahaha!
Thats funny!


"European Swallow"
Monty Python Holy Grail quote...funniest movie ever!

[QUOTE=Muffythediver]Hahaha!
Thats funny!


"European Swallow"
Monty Python Holy Grail quote...funniest movie ever![/QUOTE]

To cross the bridge into amp land you must correctly answer the question of the old man at the entrance.

Beware the killer rabbit.

[QUOTE=Donna Hughes]Looks like Donna Hughes is at it again. She must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. Today's Projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/columnists/content/CL_achorn23_03-23-10_9KHNJGH_v12.4059bc7.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor[/url][/QUOTE]


"On one prostitution forum, some low-life has chosen the screen name of 'Donna Hughes' and pretends to be the professor."

Oh man that's rich! Edward Achorn has got it out for you. LOL

[QUOTE=HappyDave]To cross the bridge into amp land you must correctly answer the question of the old man at the entrance.

Beware the killer rabbit.[/QUOTE]Bring out the Holy Hand Grenade!

[QUOTE=Donna Hughes]
Looks like Donna Hughes is at it again. She must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. Today's Projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/column...comments_anchor[/url][/QUOTE]

Yet a number of folks here don't think what is said has any impact... (please don't start up again).

I read the article, seems like it is personal attacks on her directly. Then they cross reference to the person on a board, using her name to post.

She is apparently under threat for her involvement in the new laws and they feel the people making the threat are people that post on this site or similar sites.

I googled an amp not far from my house and a usa sex guide post came right up. I do not doubt if she is getting threats they are looking for people wrighting about her. Searching the Internet for a post and this one is close to home for her.

I myself have to be on record that no matter what involvement in the making of the law that I do not believe in violence or threat of it.

We should change the law the way it was originally done in a court of law.

[QUOTE=HappyDave]
We should change the law the way it was originally done in a court of law.[/QUOTE]

I'll vote for that.

1st: that ain't right and is just downright nasty!!!!
2nd: you don't wear panties, you wear 'boxers' as any self-respecting, free-ballin' male does.


more bs rhetoric about '****/traffiking', yet all their grandstanding/law-changing has resulted in what?
squat!!!!!

if ed is so worried about violence in our society, why doesn't he write something about the 'teabaggers' death threats to members of congress/senate and the (obviously conservative) lance corporal who threatened the president?
(and why this lunatic isn't locked up?!?!?)
plain and simple: because sex sells!
there are things that need attention, but his choice is yet another example of a writer who does not do their homework and spouts publicly a single-sided, incorrect version of a situation.

ms hughes/ ms shapiro are angry lesbians who's (disguised) self-loathing, man-hating agenda grants them the 15 minutes of fame they are so deperately seeking.
if either cared anything for these victimized women they so vocally (pretend to) protect, why is it they didn't bail out these 3 'victims' upon their arrest and care for their well-being?
because they don't care!!!!

i'm sure if you took a poll of amp employees who they thought 'cared' more for them (their customers or donna hughes/ri gov), the results would be seriously one-sided.
another guess i would be pretty sure in putting forth is ea did his research and chose to ignore all but the donna hughes/melanie shapiro agenda.

more to follow,
j



[quote=donna hughes]looks like donna hughes is at it again. she must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. today's projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/columnists/content/cl_achorn23_03-23-10_9khnjgh_v12.4059bc7.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor[/url][/quote]

[QUOTE=Donna Hughes]Looks like Donna Hughes is at it again. She must have her panties in a bunch because the prostitution cases aren't going anywhere. Today's Projo even mentions the conversations of this board.

[url]http://www.projo.com/opinion/columnists/content/CL_achorn23_03-23-10_9KHNJGH_v12.4059bc7.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor[/url][/QUOTE]



What happen to sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me?????

I do wonder one thing, when signing into this forum it says that the posts of this forum can not be reproduced without permission. Then Eddie says he has permission from "Donna Hughes" to reproduce "my" posts. I think it would be great to have the owner of this board go after the Journal for publishing with out permission.

Stay Safe

The Professor

[QUOTE=Bigrig28]Bring out the Holy Hand Grenade![/QUOTE]



Hahahaha, I see we have many Python lovers here! Now I am going to have to rent this movie again just to get a refresher...LOL

We wish to have three shrubbery!

Bring out your dead!

It's just a flesh wound you pansy!


At least this is a better conversation then clogging up this site with the Donna Hughes crap!

[QUOTE=Donna Hughes]I do wonder one thing, when signing into this forum it says that the posts of this forum can not be reproduced without permission. Then Eddie says he has permission from "Donna Hughes" to reproduce "my" posts. I think it would be great to have the owner of this board go after the Journal for publishing with out permission.

Stay Safe

The Professor[/QUOTE]

As well as all the posts Melanie Shapiro lifted for her poorly and inaccurately researched research project. I was quoted as evidence of "sex tourism" for driving down from mass. LOL

[QUOTE=Tuglover1]As well as all the posts Melanie Shapiro lifted for her poorly and inaccurately researched research project. I was quoted as evidence of "sex tourism" for driving down from mass. LOL[/QUOTE]

Well, to be fair, whenever someone (usually someone who wants to sell you a bridge) explains why RI or the city of Providence should spend money to build or subsidize this, that, or the other big construction project, they tout all the "tourist dollars" that will pour in (for instance, they were talking about all the March Madness "tourist dollars" week before last), and don't believe for a minute that they aren't including "tourists" from Mass. Like you and I would never, ever come down 146 or 95 if it wasn't for "tourism".

What bugged me about Melanie Shapiro's report was how she assumed that one guy's report of "golden showers" available somewhere or other (Shanghai, IIRC) meant the *customer* was going to get to piss on the *masseuse*. Idiot. (Hey, Mr. ProJo Man, why don't you get out and do some research of your own, about the quality of the "research" in that half-baked report? You could start with the non-existence of any "trafficking" or "under-aged" employees at the AMPS...the closest to "under-aged" employees anywhere has been at one of the very, VERY non-Asian strip clubs, if you recall. Idiot #2.)

Have to say I have never seen even close to under age. The Majority of girls are in there thirties and trying to look younger. A bunch in there 40's and the very few at Lilly in there 20's. I may be a tough guess at age but would assume I can tell a 30 yo from someone under 18.

As to trafficking in all the conversations over all the years I have never had one occasion to think anyone was there against there will. Lily's in particular the gals have practicaly walked me out to my car, a pat on the but and come back soon and see me is about it. They often talk well of there home state and let me know of the rotation. All seem very happy and sober.

Now the gals at cheaters are another story, drunks and drug addicts but not slaves or under age. Cadillac one of the gals on stage was so hammered my wife I thought she was going to toss lunch at us.

A bunch of people from the same culture working and sticking together should not imply human trafficking.

I have worked in the past at homes of owners of Chinese food restaurants. The owners often lived in a large and nice house. The workers lived next door in an equally large and very nice house, not as nice but not a pit. In the morning all the workers clime into one of those van buses. They basically all live and work together it is there culture and the amp seen is not much different.

The way the economy and housing is going I am sure we will be more communal in our living soon.


[QUOTE=VilunyaChert]Well, to be fair, whenever someone (usually someone who wants to sell you a bridge) explains why RI or the city of Providence should spend money to build or subsidize this, that, or the other big construction project, they tout all the "tourist dollars" that will pour in (for instance, they were talking about all the March Madness "tourist dollars" week before last), and don't believe for a minute that they aren't including "tourists" from Mass. Like you and I would never, ever come down 146 or 95 if it wasn't for "tourism".

What bugged me about Melanie Shapiro's report was how she assumed that one guy's report of "golden showers" available somewhere or other (Shanghai, IIRC) meant the *customer* was going to get to piss on the *masseuse*. Idiot. (Hey, Mr. ProJo Man, why don't you get out and do some research of your own, about the quality of the "research" in that half-baked report? You could start with the non-existence of any "trafficking" or "under-aged" employees at the AMPS...the closest to "under-aged" employees anywhere has been at one of the very, VERY non-Asian strip clubs, if you recall. Idiot #2.)[/QUOTE]

I am usually a Boston and north kind of guy but I had occassion to have to drive to the Big Apple for the week and stopped in Providence on the way.

Just dropped in Pleasant after RTF here and reading good things and when mamasan asked if I had been before, I said not here but other places like Lilly's(white lie). Not that I wouldn't like to get down there more often but 2 hours down and 2 hours back and a 1 hour session pretty much blows the whole day.

Drew CeCe and she is a spinner type who gave a great table shower with lots of appropriate cleaning, a 5 min stop in the sauna and a very good massage and I left smiling.

Total damage 70 plus 40

I need to get to RI more often in spite of the "changes"

Was up in Prov recently, and decided to pop my AMP cherry. Decided to go to OneSpa. Why? I've been looking at BP for AMPs for a while, and Onespa is the one that advertises the most and stuck out.

Went up stairwell, Mamasan was there at top, someone was vacuuming hallway. She had me sit in a chair for a few mins, then after a bit, asked me to come in. Didn't know at the time there was a lineup possibility, so I didn't ask. She just matched me up with a very beautiful girl, probably 34C, who took me back to the room. We started talking a little, had trouble understanding her. Found out she was half Japanese, half Korean. I totally forget her name. She took house fee. 6, then asked me to get undressed. Took me to table shower (first time in a table shower), and gave me a nice warm shower. Not too hot, not too cold. Gave me a towel, took me back to room, was too cold (dam this colder weather!) She turned on heater, took me to the sauna, and closed me in there for 5 mins. Tried to get me out, then put me back in for about 10 seconds. Guess they don't want guests to see each other.

We got back to her room, and she gave me a "massage". Wasn't so much rubbing as it was lightly gliding fingers on my back, then turned me over for same on my chest. After about 5 mins, she looked at me with that beautiful face and asked "more? ". How could I resist. I gave her 1. 4, she upsold me to 1. 6 (yes, you guys will kill me. I know I overpaid, lets just leave it at that.) I laid her on the table, ate her pussy out and played and licked her tits. She produced condom, put it on and gave me a very good CBJ, then I laid her back, and we started doing missionary. Was good, not the best I've had, but still pretty good. She was only a little vocal. Finished off, she brought me back a warm towel and water. Got dressed, and she tried to take me to front desk. Got almost there, and she turned me around and went back to room, new guest coming. After a min, we went back to front desk. Mamasan told me to ask for lineup next time, and wished me good evening.

All in all, was a good first trip to a AMP for me. Not sure if I'll do AMPs or escorts more. Escorts are good for personalized service, if you can make the appointments. AMPs are good for quick in and out. I just wish there were some AMPs closer to the CT border, the ones in Prov are slightly over an hour drive for me.

Damage: 0. 6 house+ 1. 6

Finally broke down and headed to Providence.
Decided that if I was going down I was going to do two things: Hit One Spa and try something not reviewed frequently. Decided on Far East ( if my OS visit did not go well may have changed my mind but it did so........)

Arrive at OS and make the trip upstairs and am not greeted by mama but my date, Samy ( Amy with an s. Same-e) Possibly the prettiest girl I have seen at One. 5'-6" tall , model type face , perfect body except for tiny paunch and apendectomy scar. Very thin with c's.
Brought to room and pay house fee.Off to shower and Samy turns out to be fun with a nice sense of humor. She is Korean and here from LA for a month.

For some reason suana is not offered but I am ok with that so back to the room.
Samy starts a massage and it is actually pretty good and lasts about 15 minutes. She climbs off the table and then removes the bikini. Absolutly stunning. I try to sit up and she playfully scolds me " not yet honey" so I lay back down. She then climbs on top as I am still face down and starts rubbing the c's all over my back side, pretty awesome.
Some light teaseing and informs me that I can now play.
Went thru a full alphabit and left a happy man.
Tip was never discussed in any way ( new policy?) but was the normal OS price points. I highly recommend seeing Samy while she is here.

On my way out , mama walked me out and said " Where you been honey?" Told her I had been afraid and she told me not to be. I somehow believe her.



Like I said earlier, if One went well I would try something else and head to Far East.
Mama greets me and leads me to room.
Greeted by Pepsi, older korean ( 30-40yo) ok in the looks dept but nowhere near my ONE companion. House fee is .6 and off to the TS. TS was the best and most thorough I have ever received. Off to the sauna and back to the room.
Decent massage and am asked what I would like. I inquire about the menu and the respective costs. Am informed that the menu items are at the same price point as ONE and am a little disappointed. The thought in my head was that I would never pay Red Sox ticket prices to see the Paw Sox play.
Opt to not take a full couse and select from the appetizer menu. Not all that talented.

Would not repeat mostly due to pricing structure in comparison to OS>

It wasn't too long ago that FE talent was almost as good in the looks department as OS, and I found the services were a bit better. I am willing to pay the same price, the looks are less important to me than the touch, etc.

But reports ( may have been from another review site) are that the new business model there is to shrink the hour down to 40-45 minutes or so, therefore I am no longer going to make the long drive there to help them stay in business.

Did you get close to 60 minute hour or no ?

[QUOTE=SMS 54]It wasn't too long ago that FE talent was almost as good in the looks department as OS, and I found the services were a bit better. I am willing to pay the same price, the looks are less important to me than the touch, etc.

But reports ( may have been from another review site) are that the new business model there is to shrink the hour down to 40-45 minutes or so, therefore I am no longer going to make the long drive there to help them stay in business.

Did you get close to 60 minute hour or no ?[/QUOTE]

Actually, clocked both visits ; OS was around 50 mins and FE was 45 with at least 10 min in sauna.
Was hopeful about FE due to ease of access and closer to MA. Too bad.
Did see a hot spinner in hall at FE while I was leaving.

I know I read a report that Angie and her bf split.

I have been watching for postings, anyone know where she is?

[QUOTE=Pw Herman] I would never pay Red Sox ticket prices to see the Paw Sox play.

Would not repeat mostly due to pricing structure in comparison to OS>[/QUOTE]
That's a great (& funny) quote. But I agree 100%, that's why I stick with 1 spa.

I finally stopped by 1021. It's located in a seedy ghetto. I went in took a look around and saw a bunch of 40+ year old Koreans. Phoebe is gone Young was busy, the one I saw looked eh? and the mamasan practically pulled my arm off to make me stay. I said I needed to head to the ATM, and never returned. LOL you guys shill the crap out of that place, must be on the payroll ;). Thank goodness I was passing it on 95 I'll never make a trip there again you can keep it.