Agency Girls Report REVIEWS OF GIRLS ONLY

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5342194]Saw Estelle from MA. Damn, how is this girl not a model? Perfect body and looks and super hot. She could be Instagram model in a heartbeat. Absolutely my type and she is so sweet and nice. Seems submissive so being with her was easy. BBBJ was fanstastic and did what I liked. Tastes so sweet and everything is clean and smells good. Main act was good for me also, I'm not a porn star but I got everything I liked and then some. I mean just looking at her while doing it is enough to blow a load. Absolutely worth the fee compared to other places that charge ridiculous fees. For the average guy, paying the insane rates at some agencies for a girl is ridiculous. I'm glad MA can still deliver.

Anyway, I liked Estelle and I know she only visits on weekend. She prob has a normal life in WI and this side hustle pays the bills. Totally worth it.[/QUOTE]That sounds like a great meeting. I have somehow never booked with MA. Don't see Estelle available anytime soon- who else you or others would recommend from their roster. I think Chloe Chi has had some great reviews.

[QUOTE=HalfChi;5347304]Long time since I've been to Chicago but going next week. The city channel thread on telegram has a new girl and she looks pretty hot. I think that city channel was EEC / Angellis but not sure anymore. It says to DM them for more info but that thread has no way of messaging for me. Anyone know how to contact them? If I see Kesey next week I'll be sure to write a review.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]What's the channel? Never heard of it. Interesting if it's the old EEC since they disappeared. Share or DM.

[QUOTE=Ppete8231;5348251]That sounds like a great meeting. I have somehow never booked with MA. Don't see Estelle available anytime soon- who else you or others would recommend from their roster. I think Chloe Chi has had some great reviews.[/QUOTE]Estelle usually only weekends. Can't go too wrong with MA. Reliable, fair, good girls. Chloe Chi is a legend, but she's not my type. She's been around a long time with a long list of reviews so it's a sure thing. Katherina has mixed reviews but her BBBJ skills are awesome and the new boobs are good if you like man mades. Waiting to try the new Scarlett. MA does at times understate age, and some photos are either outdated or fakes like with the recent Yevgenia, but they are usually pretty close to reality if they are not real. It's a good agency and trusted.

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5348589]Estelle usually only weekends. Can't go too wrong with MA. Reliable, fair, good girls. Chloe Chi is a legend, but she's not my type. She's been around a long time with a long list of reviews so it's a sure thing. Katherina has mixed reviews but her BBBJ skills are awesome and the new boobs are good if you like man mades. Waiting to try the new Scarlett. MA does at times understate age, and some photos are either outdated or fakes like with the recent Yevgenia, but they are usually pretty close to reality if they are not real. It's a good agency and trusted.[/QUOTE]Modeling Agency and Chicago Cover Girls have been the most reliable agencies in the Chicago area the past dozen years, period. Sandra and Bob are both the best at what they do. Book with confidence!

[QUOTE=Tela1980;5349660]Modeling Agency and Chicago Cover Girls have been the most reliable agencies in the Chicago area the past dozen years, period. Sandra and Bob are both the best at what they do. Book with confidence![/QUOTE]Chicago cover girls has been nothing but annoying for me to even book. Don't have a guess as to why.

[QUOTE=HalfChi;5347304]Long time since I've been to Chicago but going next week. The city channel thread on telegram has a new girl and she looks pretty hot. I think that city channel was EEC / Angellis but not sure anymore. It says to DM them for more info but that thread has no way of messaging for me. Anyone know how to contact them? If I see Kesey next week I'll be sure to write a review.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]You can communicate with them at: HappyDays 4 you.

On Telegram. Would love to hear about Kesey, she looks awesome. I see Milena through this agency and always have a great time!

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5348589]Estelle usually only weekends. Can't go too wrong with MA. Reliable, fair, good girls. Chloe Chi is a legend, but she's not my type. She's been around a long time with a long list of reviews so it's a sure thing. Katherina has mixed reviews but her BBBJ skills are awesome and the new boobs are good if you like man mades. Waiting to try the new Scarlett. MA does at times understate age, and some photos are either outdated or fakes like with the recent Yevgenia, but they are usually pretty close to reality if they are not real. It's a good agency and trusted.[/QUOTE]I've met Scarlett. Young, beautiful face, attractive curvy body with very nice boobs and ass, good attitude. However, she doesn't look like her pictures. The real person has wider shoulder and more weight. Her body is not that slim as in the pictures. Her body type is close to that of Alex Dunphy from Modern Family, or Aria Winter from GOT. Athletic build body is true, strong with tight muscle. Short black hair. Since the pictures show a girl with a slim slender body (such as Estelle and Inna, from this agency), I was disappointed when I saw Scarlett in person. Don't get me wrong. She is young, beautiful and attractive and has good attitude. It's just not what I expected.

[QUOTE=Alias7883;5267383]I had an appointment with Gabby a while back. She's nice and she gives good service. Personally, I won't repeat. But that's because of my own preferences and other available opportunities, not because she does a bad job.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ChitownGuy321;4164317]I saw her a couple of years ago. She is as skinny as she looks in her photos. She hardly talked and basically just laid there. I can't recommend her unless she has changed, which I hope she has.[/QUOTE]Recently saw Gabby, my experience was also along these lines. Nice girl but essentially no DFK, no FIV, way more of a pro-vibe than I would've liked.

[QUOTE=Flipper12;4507624]I BBFS'd 'gabby'. Saw her a couple times but lost interest. I thought she was ok the first time but won't really repeat even though it's really easy.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FeldSpot;4164473]I saw her twice a few months ago. Picked her up at home since she didn't have a car, had coffee, readily agreed to what I offered, and spent like three hours together, BBFS, anal on the table, but didn't partake. She's quiet but not non-responsive.[/QUOTE]BBFS may have been on the table with Gabby a few years ago / when she was on SA but 100% not available now.

CCG- Cheyanne- Petite Latina, nice booty, great attitude, DFK, BBBJ, DATY, CG, K9.

Had a great time with her. Will repeat.

[QUOTE=RealHenry4044;5352696] Since the pictures show a girl with a slim slender.[/QUOTE]Sandra's photos are highly photoshopped. She might as well use fakes.

[QUOTE=RealHenry4044;5352696]I've met Scarlett. Young, beautiful face, attractive curvy body with very nice boobs and ass, good attitude. However, she doesn't look like her pictures. The real person has wider shoulder and more weight. Her body is not that slim as in the pictures. Her body type is close to that of Alex Dunphy from Modern Family, or Aria Winter from GOT. Athletic build body is true, strong with tight muscle. Short black hair. Since the pictures show a girl with a slim slender body (such as Estelle and Inna, from this agency), I was disappointed when I saw Scarlett in person. Don't get me wrong. She is young, beautiful and attractive and has good attitude. It's just not what I expected.[/QUOTE]It's a shame MA is using fake pics now. That's another one.

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5353324]It's a shame MA is using fake pics now. That's another one.[/QUOTE]So today MA is pissed apparently because of either this review of fake pics or another elsewhere. So you say she is more athletic etc. What's your idea of that? The new pics MA is using shows a slim girl, nice curvy body but not athletic and not skinny petite. More slim. IMO that's a slim body and a very nice figure that is attractive and yet has some feel to it. I like the new photos they used so may try to schedule.

Was she nice? Pretty face? Services?

Anyone know of agencies that have girls on the north side of the city (e. G. , Lincoln Square, Lakeview, etc.)? I am aware of CLM but seems a little hit and miss and wondering what else is out there? Also looking more for escort than massage setting.

[QUOTE=dbones;5355030]Anyone know of agencies that have girls on the north side of the city (e. G. , Lincoln Square, Lakeview, etc.)? I am aware of CLM but seems a little hit and miss and wondering what else is out there? Also looking more for escort than massage setting.[/QUOTE]Chloe Love with modelingaveDOTescortbookDOTcom works out of Lakeview. Most of the rest are out at O'hare area.

2 kghubDOTcom is near north close to Division Street.

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5354770]So today MA is pissed apparently because of either this review of fake pics or another elsewhere. So you say she is more athletic etc. What's your idea of that? The new pics MA is using shows a slim girl, nice curvy body but not athletic and not skinny petite. More slim. IMO that's a slim body and a very nice figure that is attractive and yet has some feel to it. I like the new photos they used so may try to schedule.

Was she nice? Pretty face? Services?[/QUOTE]In the pictures, there is a girl wearing yellow floral lingerie set; in another picture, the same girl is wearing white sports lingerie set; and in some other pictures, she is sitting on a bed. I was totally attracted and thought Scarlett should look like this girl, that is slim, slender and with a long neck. However, the real person isn't as slim as the girl in the pictures. Scarlett is very hot, but in a different way comparing with the girl in the pictures.

Yes, she is nice, pretty face, curvy body, nice tits and ass, good service.

[QUOTE=RealHenry4044;5352696]I've met Scarlett. Young, beautiful face, attractive curvy body with very nice boobs and ass, good attitude. However, she doesn't look like her pictures. The real person has wider shoulder and more weight. Her body is not that slim as in the pictures. Her body type is close to that of Alex Dunphy from Modern Family, or Aria Winter from GOT. Athletic build body is true, strong with tight muscle. Short black hair. Since the pictures show a girl with a slim slender body (such as Estelle and Inna, from this agency), I was disappointed when I saw Scarlett in person. Don't get me wrong. She is young, beautiful and attractive and has good attitude. It's just not what I expected.[/QUOTE]Were you or anyone else able to figure out if Scarlett is really Audrey?

[QUOTE=dbones;5355030]Anyone know of agencies that have girls on the north side of the city (e. G. , Lincoln Square, Lakeview, etc.)? I am aware of CLM but seems a little hit and miss and wondering what else is out there? Also looking more for escort than massage setting.[/QUOTE]Also look up Ivy with City Escapes Body Rubs.

Fun, petite, cool little latina.

[QUOTE=BillStuart;5356357]Also look up Ivy with City Escapes Body Rubs.

Fun, petite, cool little latina.[/QUOTE]Also. Ivy is near Kedzie and Armitage if I recall correctly.

[QUOTE=BillStuart;5356357]

Also look up Ivy with City Escapes Body Rubs.

Fun, petite, cool little latina.[/QUOTE]Also. Ivy is near Kedzie and Armitage if I recall correctly.

That simple but must be:

Ebony / mixed / Latina ok too.

BBBJ friendly is a must.

In shape, preferably petite to athletic, just not BBW.

Cool, fun, hopefully looking for regulars.

OK with older guys, 50+.

Reply on forum or PM me. And yes, I will share.

Thanks in advance.

[QUOTE=BillStuart;5356377]That simple but must be:

Ebony / mixed / Latina ok too.
BBBJ friendly is a must.
In shape, preferably petite to athletic, just not BBW.
Cool, fun, hopefully looking for regulars.
OK with older guys, 50+.
Reply on forum or PM me. And yes, I will share.

Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]Sounds like Macie. [URL]https://tryst.link/escort/macie-17[/URL].

CCG- Tiana. Very slim-petite. BBBJ was spit and hand job. Very tight CG and K9. Will not repeat we didn't have a connection.

[QUOTE=BillStuart;5356357]Also look up Ivy with City Escapes Body Rubs.

Fun, petite, cool little latina.[/QUOTE]Is there a link for her? I can't seem to find it.

[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5353324]It's a shame MA is using fake pics now. That's another one.[/QUOTE]What's the saying?

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. ".

We can collectively not support this practice. I contemplated putting this in the bullshit thread, but it does have to do with pussy.

Fake pics shouldn't be tolerated at all. There can be pics that stretch actual representation (and that is OK to an extent), but if the reverse search shows someone else, that's digital bait-and-switch.

[QUOTE=Hater;5357468]CCG- Tiana. Very slim-petite. BBBJ was spit and hand job. Very tight CG and K9. Will not repeat we didn't have a connection.[/QUOTE]Was she a Latina? And how would you rate her face. Also was there any language barriers?

[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5355551]Were you or anyone else able to figure out if Scarlett is really Audrey?[/QUOTE]I miss Audrey, she was my girl at CML. She's far and away the best provider I've ever had, and the folks at MA haven't been to responsive to my new client submission thus far, so if anyone can find out you're a hero. I want to visit MA but unfamiliar with where their incall is too.

[URL]http://www.chicagocovergirls.com/profile_lolita.html[/URL]

First time using this agency and had to get verified. Called them up and gave them my name and where I work and they did a linkedin and Facebook search and then they called me back approving me. Maybe a 15 min process. I then dreamt with Lolita in a nice hotel in Schaumburg. She's about a 25 year old skinny pretty Mexican with nice big puppies. She has multiple tattoos. My session included light kissing, daty and sucking on those nice puppies. In return I got 2 rounds of a solid BBBJ and multiple positions till I popped in the bag. $$$ .5 for an hour session. Would repeat.

[QUOTE=Kabs3714;5358363]I miss Audrey, she was my girl at CML. She's far and away the best provider I've ever had, and the folks at MA haven't been to responsive to my new client submission thus far, so if anyone can find out you're a hero. I want to visit MA but unfamiliar with where their incall is too.[/QUOTE]Not her, I think she has retired unfortunately.

[QUOTE=Kabs3714;5358363]I miss Audrey, she was my girl at CML. She's far and away the best provider I've ever had, and the folks at MA haven't been to responsive to my new client submission thus far, so if anyone can find out you're a hero. I want to visit MA but unfamiliar with where their incall is too.[/QUOTE]I've also been waiting more than a week to get verified. I don't know who's running their email communications but it's very poor; at this point I've done everything they've asked me to do and still no cigar. It's a shame I would be a very dedicated customer but it seems they must be so busy that they are not in a hurry to get new customers.

Agencies with black girls? Aka ebony?

I really like the chocolate, but I'm getting fed up with the LC girls.

I did track down an agency with a couple of black girls, but I read here that place was notorious for the chicks not measuring up to the pics.

I've been with Macie, and will probably repeat, but she's pretty light and I'm not a fan of bolt-ons.

I like young, lean, nice ass, tits optional, perky itty-bitties ideal. GFE, BBBJ, DATY, DATO, responsiveness highly desired. (Yeah, I don't ask for much, LOL!.) As an example, From what I've read and seen, Mya Michelle before the bolt-ons would be great, but she also wants 5/ hr.

Actually, just not fat with a *good* attitude and responsiveness would probably be plenty. Thanks to "black don't crack", they don't even have to be particularly young. I've very happily been with one in her late 40s, though she may have been exceptional and a lot of her thing was projecting a great attitude and being pretty orgasmic.

I am so fed up with the biatches on listcrawler. The ones that aren't straight up assholes are literally crazy.

Check out EEC they have a cute 18 year old girl named Jai who fits the description your looking for almost exactly. I've seen her 3 times and each was great. She's pretty smart too especially for her age.

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5358821]Agencies with black girls? Aka ebony?

I really like the chocolate, but I'm getting fed up with the LC girls.

I did track down an agency with a couple of black girls, but I read here that place was notorious for the chicks not measuring up to the pics.

I've been with Macie, and will probably repeat, but she's pretty light and I'm not a fan of bolt-ons.

I like young, lean, nice ass, tits optional, perky itty-bitties ideal. GFE, BBBJ, DATY, DATO, responsiveness highly desired. (Yeah, I don't ask for much, LOL!.) As an example, From what I've read and seen, Mya Michelle before the bolt-ons would be great, but she also wants 5/ hr.

Actually, just not fat with a *good* attitude and responsiveness would probably be plenty. Thanks to "black don't crack", they don't even have to be particularly young. I've very happily been with one in her late 40s, though she may have been exceptional and a lot of her thing was projecting a great attitude and being pretty orgasmic.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=AngelBravo;5358300]Was she a Latina? And how would you rate her face. Also was there any language barriers?[/QUOTE]Latina, 95 lbs, face I say about 7 she's cute. No language barrier. The thing that caught my eye that she needs braces teeth are off.

[QUOTE=Ixmeofne;5358180]What's the saying?

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. ".

We can collectively not support this practice. I contemplated putting this in the bullshit thread, but it does have to do with pussy.

Fake pics shouldn't be tolerated at all. There can be pics that stretch actual representation (and that is OK to an extent), but if the reverse search shows someone else, that's digital bait-and-switch.[/QUOTE]I'm sick of being fooled even once. Now I take fake bills with me. Your pics are fake, fine my money is fake.

[QUOTE=AngelBravo;5358790]I've also been waiting more than a week to get verified. I don't know who's running their email communications but it's very poor; at this point I've done everything they've asked me to do and still no cigar. It's a shame I would be a very dedicated customer but it seems they must be so busy that they are not in a hurry to get new customers.[/QUOTE]MA lit up their twitter feed, confirming: Scarlett=Audrey (making me think Chiadv is Audrey).

No response=not approved.

When applying thru website GIVE info requested.

Full name, rs2 k, p411 is what they want but admit to being picky.

Thanks so much. Do you have contact info for EEC? There's a twitter page that hasn't been updated in 3 years, which points to a website whose domain name is for sale. Thanks again.

[QUOTE=RiondaGreat;5358876]Check out EEC they have a cute 18 year old girl named Jai who fits the description your looking for almost exactly. I've seen her 3 times and each was great. She's pretty smart too especially for her age.[/QUOTE]

HappyDays for you on telegram.

[QUOTE=GeorgeStark;5360219]Thanks so much. Do you have contact info for EEC? There's a twitter page that hasn't been updated in 3 years, which points to a website whose domain name is for sale. Thanks again.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Flipper12;5359729]I'm sick of being fooled even once. Now I take fake bills with me. Your pics are fake, fine my money is fake.[/QUOTE]This sounds like the perfect remedy. Three pics and only one of them is real? Take three bills and only one of them is real.

Next we'll see girls equipped with those fraud pens LOL.

USA Customs at O'Hare Airport has been finding fake money from China trying to get through.

Imagine paying a hooker with fake money printed in China. Pull out a grand in front of her. The look on her face would be Priceless.

[QUOTE=AngelBravo;5358790]I've also been waiting more than a week to get verified. I don't know who's running their email communications but it's very poor; at this point I've done everything they've asked me to do and still no cigar. It's a shame I would be a very dedicated customer but it seems they must be so busy that they are not in a hurry to get new customers.[/QUOTE]I have a long post but worth the read for anyone that wants to get verified from MA.

So when I wrote the above comment, I want to be clear. MA did respond to my initial E-mail, (Kudos for them on that) however what proceeded was some misunderstandings on verification that just made the situation worse. This ended up me being almost blacklisted which is what took them even longer to respond. Let me explain.

MA has some pretty strict and rightfully so to protect their ladies, background checks on their customers. Even though I've been with Chicagoland Massage, ClassyLadiesofChicago, other small agencies and the reference blessing from our Mod TJGeek. They still wouldn't take that as a valid verification. They do honor verification from Chicago Cover Girls and this is where I made the mistake.

I told them that I was indeed verified with CCG, which was true. However I had not officially met any of their providers. So even though I provided CCG with all my personal info including some of my work info, because exactly that; the fact that they wanted my work info it kind of spooked me and I never actually booked anyone. I was upfront about this with MA via E-mail but that got lost in translation and I didn't make that clear on the first E-mail that I sent. I don't think they even saw my 2nd response to that email but when they called CCG to verify me it was clear I had not seen any of the girls and this immediately threw RED flags for them as it should.

Although this made our conversations more tense, and understandably so, the booker was nice enough to still give me another chance.

In the end, I did eventually book through CCG last Friday and met with Belle. Lovely girl maybe I'll post a review in the future; I then reached back out to MA and told them that I was now fully verified and a client so please verify me on their end. It was at this point that I wrote the comment above; but given the issues I caused for myself they did not get my emails and luckily the booker decided to give me a second chance and reached back out to me today. I think I'm in their good graces now and hoping to book with them soon.

So in summary, if you want to get verified with MA; I suggest you simply get some solid references or get rs2 k or p411 membership verification.

I would like to apologize to MA if I painted them in a bad light as someone that takes too long to verify people. I know English is a 2nd language to them and it's clear my confusion with CCG really made things worse.

I haven't met any of their providers yet but from the reviews and pictures I've seen, the girls look fantastic, (Looking at you Estelle and Veronica). I'm hoping to see these girls soon, I've jumped around between agencies; not because I've had bad experiences but mostly because I like to meet different girls. I'm hoping I can make MA my new home for a while.

Thanks for listening and hoping this helps someone out; to avoid any booking issues.

Good night and take care.

[QUOTE=RiondaGreat;5360535]HappyDays for you on telegram.[/QUOTE]I thought EEC closed up shop on 2018.