Printable View
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5057184]Is Booker Sunny partnering with the Bookergray / Candygirl / KPC group now for this girl? She is also listed with that group and was doing doubles all last week. She has been back and forth with this New KPC / candygirls over the last month or two.[/QUOTE]Seems like it. Maybe with all this overlapping of bookers and agencies we are seeing the beginning of unionism and price fixing in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act. Time to call in the lawyers.
I'm curious. I just got whitelisted with LAvixens. I'm going to see their providers (who offer BBFS) in the coming days. My question is this: as a married guy, what's the actual likelihood of catching something from one of these girls (I'm primarily worried about the lifelong stuff. HSV and HPV, although syphilis would cause some questions too. Most everything else could be explained away as something else until it's dealt with). I keep poking around the internet trying to find reliable info, but it's mostly vague scare tactics with little basis in reality (thanks Uncle Sam). Anyway, I figured those in the scene would have a better idea of the risks in this market. Thanks for any advice. Really into the idea of going bare, just trying to weigh the risk so I don't bring anything home with me.
[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;5057186]That will "never" ever Happen![/QUOTE]"The things you own end up owning you. ".
It's not that we own the agencies, they choose us. So to unionize is would be moral hazard.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5056565]I saw a girl not that long ago, who abruptly stopped our session as we both heard her roomie sobbing uncontrollably. Apparently she got robbed as her client was leaving. And people wonder why these girls count the paper in another room. It's a fkd up world then and especially now.[/QUOTE]This is what newbies need to understand and why it's so hard to get in. If they're not willing to do whatever it takes to get screened then they shouldn't be allowed to book appointments, plain and simple. Everyone else who's already been cleared has already paid their dues and went through the gauntlet of screening and have been long standing customers. Also, it makes no sense to take on additional risk for no reason because most of these established bookers already have a deep rolodex of clients that they can trust and know are for sure safe. Every week we get another "out of towner" who's trying to book an appointment with a top tier K-girl with no references whatsoever, not sure what their expectations are just because other places like the Bay Area don't care much for screening.
Has anyone tried Mina at SAG or recognize her and konw what her previous handle is?
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/minah[/URL]
[QUOTE=TylerDurd;5057140]Its interesting to me that even SF is paying lower prices than we do in LA. That just makes no sense to me. Everything in SF is more expensive than here. So why would mongering be an exception.
Are we paying the highest prices in the world for this stuff? It is a pretty steep price. If you think about it, how many people are frequenters of these agencies that ARENT on this forum? In which case, what can we do to lower the price?
Gentleman, its time to unionize.
No more hobbying at agencies until we reach a price at least on par with SF.
Listen, we can do it, I promise you. Grab some lotion and crank them out for a couple weeks. Its for the greater good.
We will bring these bourgeois scum to their knees and make them beg the proletariats for mercy. Its only together that we find our strength.
I'm only half joking.[/QUOTE]I think the prices are fine. The higher the price, the more seedy dudes are weeded out.
Anyone try out any of the recent girls they have? I got a random text from booker that 5 new girls were available. They look alright, but some of them seem related LOL like they cousins haha. Any who, I had a really bad experience with this booker before when I tried out Angel and she was a complete waste of money, still have bad taste in my mouth.
[QUOTE=HitNQuit805;5057792]Anyone try out any of the recent girls they have? I got a random text from booker that 5 new girls were available. They look alright, but some of them seem related LOL like they cousins haha. Any who, I had a really bad experience with this booker before when I tried out Angel and she was a complete waste of money, still have bad taste in my mouth.[/QUOTE]I'm pretty sure I've seen Irina, when she was in Vegas, she's tiny!! Was Ok service she's young and shy.
[QUOTE=HitNQuit805;5057792]Anyone try out any of the recent girls they have? I got a random text from booker that 5 new girls were available. They look alright, but some of them seem related LOL like they cousins haha. Any who, I had a really bad experience with this booker before when I tried out Angel and she was a complete waste of money, still have bad taste in my mouth.[/QUOTE]See post #15571 for info on Pocket girl.
[QUOTE=GiJeep;5057834]I'm pretty sure I've seen Irina, when she was in Vegas, she's tiny!! Was Ok service she's young and shy.[/QUOTE]The dog comment in ter review confirms to me it's the same Irina from Bay Area and recently Vegas. Girl with the back scars. I'm sure you Bay Area bros remember her from 2018. Mags bros beware I have only heard she might not approve of you.
[QUOTE=LoveAsianGirls;5057866]See post #15571 for info on Pocket girl.[/QUOTE]Heard Pocket is worth a try. Nayeon and Pocket on my list.
[QUOTE=Kakashiz;5057638]Has anyone tried Mina at SAG or recognize her and konw what her previous handle is?
[URL]https://www.sweetasiangem.com/minah[/URL][/QUOTE]Formerly Jasmina of LovelyAngels in San Jose.
Anyone seen Erika from SAG?
M.
Bella.
Sunny.
Glow, Lyn, Sandy.
Sexy Angels.
Jenny.
Newtopasian.
Min, Lauren, SIa.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Viki, Allie.
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5057921]Formerly Jasmina of LovelyAngels in San Jose.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Datyb;4968598]She looks just like her pics. Very sweet, very much a newbie. Young, inexperienced, unsure of herself. Took me to the shower at the 30 minute mark!
DB.[/QUOTE]Per SJ board.