Printable View
[QUOTE=Exec Talent;1431998]Jethrow. When you see Kim could you ask her about updating her pictures. They are at least 10 years old and not representative of her current appearance. Some people spending their time to make the trip, might feel they have been deceived.[/QUOTE]I have offered and agree with you.
Both Kim and JinaHugs need to update their pics!
[QUOTE=Exec Talent;1431998]Jethrow. When you see Kim could you ask her about updating her pictures. They are at least 10 years old and not representative of her current appearance. Some people spending their time to make the trip, might feel they have been deceived.[/QUOTE]
Kim Willis outdated pics seem to be a consistent topic on this forum, going back literally a couple of years. She also gets her share of positive reviews. As she is on my "possibles" list, I'm curious; how far off are the pics from current reality? The outdated pics seem attractive. Is it just that she has gained weight? Or has she aged significantly in looks, also. Is she still "Attractive" despite the additional years & weight gain? Or is she now sloppy & unattractive? There are many attractive BBWs. Would KW now belong in that category or is she now a full blown unattractive provider who can still deliver good service for budget donations? Just curious.
Montana.
[QUOTE=Ricky James1;1432941]Both Kim and JinaHugs need to update their pics![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Montana77; 1434105]Kim Willis outdated pics seem to be a consistent topic on this forum, going back literally a couple of years. She also gets her share of positive reviews. As she is on my "possibles" list, I'm curious; how far off are the pics from current reality? The outdated pics seem attractive. Is it just that she has gained weight? Or has she aged significantly in looks, also. Is she still "Attractive" despite the additional years & weight gain? Or is she now sloppy & unattractive? There are many attractive BBWs. Would KW now belong in that category or is she now a full blown unattractive provider who can still deliver good service for budget donations? Just curious.
Montana.[/QUOTE]I've known Kim for a long time, back when she looked like her pics, she was very hot looking then and for providers in that period (10-15 yrs. Ago) she was among the very best in looks and performance.
The last time I saw her was several yrs. Ago and she had gained weight and no longer looked remotely like her pics. Having said that I would much rather go to her in a safe private in-call for $60 a half than troll the trail with all it's risks for a few bucks less. I'm sure her skillls are the same or better than they were yrs. Ago, she has a nice face and you may love her body or hate it but go based on her skills and price not on the old pics.
She also has a nice personality and is pleasant to be around and I've never known her to be a druggie, she was working to supplement her income last time I saw her as she was in the restaurant business and times were tough. When she has a good paying job she drops out of the business when things get tough she comes back to it.
I'm sure you'll have a pleasant time, just don't compare her to some young hottie and concentrate on the performance and you will be fine.
I specifically didn't pick her apart because she is a nice woman and doesn't deserve it any more than we would want to be totally picked apart, if I had to describe her based on a couple of years ago I would say she is a small BBW with perky's, not at all like some of the BBW's on Backpage. And for the price I wouldn't pick her apart, you won't get arrested or have a pimp confrontation of that I'm sure.
VS
Thank you for your insights. A thorough, respectful overview and exactly what I was seeking to find out.
Montana.
[QUOTE=VerySlowly; 1434309]I've known Kim for a long time, back when she looked like her pics, she was very hot looking then and for providers in that period (10-15 yrs. Ago) she was among the very best in looks and performance.
The last time I saw her was several yrs. Ago and she had gained weight and no longer looked remotely like her pics. Having said that I would much rather go to her in a safe private in-call for $60 a half than troll the trail with all it's risks for a few bucks less. I'm sure her skillls are the same or better than they were yrs. Ago, she has a nice face and you may love her body or hate it but go based on her skills and price not on the old pics.
She also has a nice personality and is pleasant to be around and I've never known her to be a druggie, she was working to supplement her income last time I saw her as she was in the restaurant business and times were tough. When she has a good paying job she drops out of the business when things get tough she comes back to it.
I'm sure you'll have a pleasant time, just don't compare her to some young hottie and concentrate on the performance and you will be fine.
I specifically didn't pick her apart because she is a nice woman and doesn't deserve it any more than we would want to be totally picked apart, if I had to describe her based on a couple of years ago I would say she is a small BBW with perky's, not at all like some of the BBW's on Backpage. And for the price I wouldn't pick her apart, you won't get arrested or have a pimp confrontation of that I'm sure.
VS[/QUOTE]
I had some spare time this week and tried again to get a hold of Joan with no luck LOL.
So I went ahead and called up another option I have been eyeballing for a while. It was a bit of a drive for me but proved to be worth while. Merlot's ads have been one of those I've always to part take in because of her beauty and face to face she was even better. A very soothing and service oriented personality. Made me comfortable very quickly. Easily the best looking body rub girl I've seen yet. And the personality was top notch.
You can roam, but no fingers in seemed the theme, and no full service offered. The body to body was definitely well worth it and surely something to experience at least once. Location was safe, clean, no smell of smoke, and some of you might not appreciate it she's somewhat of a germophobe. I like it. Keeps both parties safe as possible. Way better than AMPs. Easily top notch compared to MBS with regards to a rub and personality.
If I could find a girl like merlot that offered full service I'd never seek another provider.
[QUOTE=Gruglok;1434654]If I could find a girl like merlot that offered full service I'd never seek another provider.[/QUOTE]I agree completely with Mr. Gruglok's review of Merlot. If she did full service, she would be a very wealthy young woman in a couple of years or less.
I made a comment about the old photos a not so young anymore lady has been posting. VerySlowly made a post that some might call in her defense and guess what? VS and I are still on speaking terms.
I made my point. He made his and neither of us felt the need to malign each other in the process.
Hopefully, some other posters took note.
[QUOTE=VerySlowly; 1434309]I've known Kim for a long time, back when she looked like her pics, she was very hot looking then and for providers in that period (10-15 yrs. Ago) she was among the very best in looks and performance.
The last time I saw her was several yrs. Ago and she had gained weight and no longer looked remotely like her pics. Having said that I would much rather go to her in a safe private in-call for $60 a half than troll the trail with all it's risks for a few bucks less. I'm sure her skillls are the same or better than they were yrs. Ago, she has a nice face and you may love her body or hate it but go based on her skills and price not on the old pics.
She also has a nice personality and is pleasant to be around and I've never known her to be a druggie, she was working to supplement her income last time I saw her as she was in the restaurant business and times were tough. When she has a good paying job she drops out of the business when things get tough she comes back to it.
I'm sure you'll have a pleasant time, just don't compare her to some young hottie and concentrate on the performance and you will be fine.
I specifically didn't pick her apart because she is a nice woman and doesn't deserve it any more than we would want to be totally picked apart, if I had to describe her based on a couple of years ago I would say she is a small BBW with perky's, not at all like some of the BBW's on Backpage. And for the price I wouldn't pick her apart, you won't get arrested or have a pimp confrontation of that I'm sure.
VS[/QUOTE]While I totally agree with your statement, fact is, she uses her old pics to represent herself. I agree that no provider big or small should ever be judged by anyone here, this however, is about misrepresentation. Post your real and recent pics and let us decide if we want to partake in the endeavor. I for one have not seen her before, but if I would've gone to see her and she looks nothing like her old pics, I would be very disappointed, I would most likely leave. There are providers in here and BP (sometimes) that advertise with their real and recent pics, whether they're big or small, and they have no qualms about it. It should always be that way. We certainly do not give other providers any slack for using old outdated pics or fake ones do we? Kim is no exception. We report it accordingly so all of us will know what is up and we are aware of what we are walking into if we decide to go. There's no reason for any provider to misrepresent themselves. After all, we are going to see them face to face and there is no other lousy feeling of a major let down than when you go there EXPECTING to see the same person that is pictured and she is not the one in the pics, or at least the same as the pics. It's no more different than a bait and switch. She may have great reviews, but this is about trust and trust in this business is more valuable than the dollar.
Now as far as not getting arrested (LOL) , well, that is not a guarantee! We all know there is always risks when we go hunting. The incident at the Luvsgfe shack is certainly a reality check for everyone!
Just my 2 cents. Be safe!
OS
[QUOTE=Exec Talent; 1434727]I made a comment about the old photos a not so young anymore lady has been posting. VerySlowly made a post that some might call in her defense and guess what? VS and I are still on speaking terms.
I made my point. He made his and neither of us felt the need to malign each other in the process.
Hopefully, some other posters took note.[/QUOTE]Adult discussions happen frequently on this board. ET, I would suggest you take your own advice though, like not calling people idiots when they don't all go see the same provider. BTW, did you ever go visit the provider in question? I have not seen the review you said would be coming.
I do agree with you that Kim Willis needs new pics. I sent her a PM asking about her pics and she said she had none, but had lots of regulars. I responded that it is nice that she has regulars, but the reason for advertising is to get new clients and for that she should post more up to date pics. I have not heard back from her.
[QUOTE=OriginalSin; 1434874]While I totally agree with your statement, fact is, she uses her old pics to represent herself. I agree that no provider big or small should ever be judged by anyone here, this however, is about misrepresentation. Post your real and recent pics and let us decide if we want to partake in the endeavor. I for one have not seen her before, but if I would've gone to see her and she looks nothing like her old pics, I would be very disappointed, I would most likely leave. There are providers in here and BP (sometimes) that advertise with their real and recent pics, whether they're big or small, and they have no qualms about it. It should always be that way. We certainly do not give other providers any slack for using old outdated pics or fake ones do we? Kim is no exception. We report it accordingly so all of us will know what is up and we are aware of what we are walking into if we decide to go. There's no reason for any provider to misrepresent themselves. After all, we are going to see them face to face and there is no other lousy feeling of a major let down than when you go there EXPECTING to see the same person that is pictured and she is not the one in the pics, or at least the same as the pics. It's no more different than a bait and switch. She may have great reviews, but this is about trust and trust in this business is more valuable than the dollar.
Now as far as not getting arrested (LOL) , well, that is not a guarantee! We all know there is always risks when we go hunting. The incident at the Luvsgfe shack is certainly a reality check for everyone!
Just my 2 cents. Be safe!
OS[/QUOTE]I responded to another mongers inquiry and he complimented me on my response.
It is absolutely no secret to anyone who reads this board that Kim Willis has not used recent photos for many, many, years.
I'm not defending her actions, those actions are hers not mine. I merely stated what I knew her to be in the past and believe her to be in the present.
I don't know anyone on here (or anywhere) that has been arrested while visiting a known provider with a good rep. For providing good service in her home, regardless of what she looks like. I haven't seen her in many years but I would bet she doesn't look as bad as many women who post their own pics on B / P. She just does not look like the pics on her website, is it deceptive? Of course. Should you go see her knowing the pics are deceptive, probably not. But I repeat it has been posted here many times.
So let me state it again, she used to be hotter than a three peckered billy-goat, last I knew she was chubby, a monger on here who saw her recently said you couldn't beat the bang for the buck. That was his opinion in a PM.
It seems many girls lately are not using their own pics, rather pics of other girls, Kim posts very old pics of herself. I give her a little for that at least.
It's true Executive Talent and VerySlowly are looking at real estate and will probably run off to Cape Cod and open up a combination Tea Room and Antique store.
The Luvshack raid was predictable, it has been coming for a long time, it is called being a sitting duck. Note the M. O. Of the 415 girls operation, new girls in different locations constantly. Nosittee duckee, hard for LE san to track down and arrange big time raidee on moving target. Is it really sideways? I love egg rolls mmmm good.
I commented about that dude and his camera a while back, I guess most thought I was blowing smoke. The smartest thing the pimpster did was not to rebut my comments on this board of which he is a member, he forgot one thing, nothing lasts forever.
All fun aside I agree with ET and we do communicate privately in a very civil and informative way,"Luv ya ET".
VS
[QUOTE=VerySlowly; 1434938]I responded to another mongers inquiry and he complimented me on my response.
It is absolutely no secret to anyone who reads this board that Kim Willis has not used recent photos for many, many, years.
I'm not defending her actions, those actions are hers not mine. I merely stated what I knew her to be in the past and believe her to be in the present.
I don't know anyone on here (or anywhere) that has been arrested while visiting a known provider with a good rep. For providing good service in her home, regardless of what she looks like. I haven't seen her in many years but I would bet she doesn't look as bad as many women who post their own pics on B / P. She just does not look like the pics on her website, is it deceptive? Of course. Should you go see her knowing the pics are deceptive, probably not. But I repeat it has been posted here many times.
So let me state it again, she used to be hotter than a three peckered billy-goat, last I knew she was chubby, a monger on here who saw her recently said you couldn't beat the bang for the buck. That was his opinion in a PM.
It seems many girls lately are not using their own pics, rather pics of other girls, Kim posts very old pics of herself. I give her a little for that at least.
It's true Executive Talent and VerySlowly are looking at real estate and will probably run off to Cape Cod and open up a combination Tea Room and Antique store.
The Luvshack raid was predictable, it has been coming for a long time, it is called being a sitting duck. Note the M. O. Of the 415 girls operation, new girls in different locations constantly. Nosittee duckee, hard for LE san to track down and arrange big time raidee on moving target. Is it really sideways? I love egg rolls mmmm good.
I commented about that dude and his camera a while back, I guess most thought I was blowing smoke. The smartest thing the pimpster did was not to rebut my comments on this board of which he is a member, he forgot one thing, nothing lasts forever.
All fun aside I agree with ET and we do communicate privately in a very civil and informative way,"Luv ya ET".
VS[/QUOTE]VS,
Not trying to get into a debate. I am in agreement that no provider should be juged by anyone here, but lets face it, we all have our preferences. I was not challenging your description of her from days past. I'm sure she was "hotter than a three peckered billy-goat" (I never knew that a billy goat with 3 peckers was hot) at sometime point in time. But the key point is, that was a long time ago. From your words,"many years" ago. That's all I'm pointing out. I mean, why does she not just post her recent pics? Whats the big deal? She offered it to me, a full body shot of her most recent look and never sent it. That makes it even more sketchy for me because I was expecting her to send it. It's been about a month now and nothing yet. I wrote her back and got no response. What does that say about her character? Trust is thee most valuable commodity in this game, it is paramount. And it starts with how the provider represents herself through her pics. I'm sure blukem could attest to that.
If I said to you, I had your favorite car for sale and it is in immaculate condition for dirt cheap, you would be intrested right? So then you'll probably ask for pics because you want to get a better idea of what I was selling and see it, so you could make an educated decision before you make the trek over to me. (I'm assuming) So I send you pics of the exact same car, but in it's best condition inside and out, knowing full well that I actually don't have that car. It's the same exact car, but mine is not in that great of shape. So you see it, you love it, you love the price and you hurry on over with excitement, cash in hand, ready to go home with your dream ride and then.
I'm sure you can connect the dots from here.
The "luvshack" getting busted couldn't have been that predictable. If it was, then it wouldn't have been busted. Right? According to reports and my knowledge of it, it's been around for more than 2 years. Everyone swore by it. And then all of a sudden, BUSTED! I'm sure Kim is "safe," but let's be real here, in time, all good things come to an end. Getting busted in this game is inevitable. It may not happen for years, but eventually, you'll be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Pop goes the weasel! I hope none of us get busted!
Just keeping this friendly.
Be Safe!
OS
[QUOTE=OriginalSin; 1435376]VS,
Not trying to get into a debate. I am in agreement that no provider should be juged by anyone here, but lets face it, we all have our preferences. I was not challenging your description of her from days past. I'm sure she was "hotter than a three peckered billy-goat" (I never knew that a billy goat with 3 peckers was hot) at sometime point in time. But the key point is, that was a long time ago. From your words,"many years" ago. That's all I'm pointing out. I mean, why does she not just post her recent pics? Whats the big deal? She offered it to me, a full body shot of her most recent look and never sent it. That makes it even more sketchy for me because I was expecting her to send it. It's been about a month now and nothing yet. I wrote her back and got no response. What does that say about her character? Trust is thee most valuable commodity in this game, it is paramount. And it starts with how the provider represents herself through her pics. I'm sure blukem could attest to that.
If I said to you, I had your favorite car for sale and it is in immaculate condition for dirt cheap, you would be intrested right? So then you'll probably ask for pics because you want to get a better idea of what I was selling and see it, so you could make an educated decision before you make the trek over to me. (I'm assuming) So I send you pics of the exact same car, but in it's best condition inside and out, knowing full well that I actually don't have that car. It's the same exact car, but mine is not in that great of shape. So you see it, you love it, you love the price and you hurry on over with excitement, cash in hand, ready to go home with your dream ride and then.
I'm sure you can connect the dots from here.
The "luvshack" getting busted couldn't have been that predictable. If it was, then it wouldn't have been busted. Right? According to reports and my knowledge of it, it's been around for more than 2 years. Everyone swore by it. And then all of a sudden, BUSTED! I'm sure Kim is "safe," but let's be real here, in time, all good things come to an end. Getting busted in this game is inevitable. It may not happen for years, but eventually, you'll be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Pop goes the weasel! I hope none of us get busted!
Just keeping this friendly.
Be Safe!
OS[/QUOTE]VS, I am sorry but I don't understand why you feel the need to defend Kim. If she chooses to advertise herself with pics that are 10 years old that is her business. I am glad that you have had good times with her but for me, one who has never seen her? It feels, smells, looks deceptive when a provider dose not post current, accurate pics. If they can not at least do that, then I will not see them. I don't care how stellar her reviews are. That tells me she wants to deceive me on some level and I wonder when the deception stops. Why would I trust her? You are saying your buddy thought she gave him a tremendous fuck? Well that is good for him. I am glad he had a great time. My preference is to deal with providers who are willing to be as honest as they can when advertising and dealing with us. If you love Kim then more power to you. But, for those of us who don't know her we won't get to know her until she decides to be honest and post herself. When she does I am certain she will get more regulars, if she is as good as you and your friend say. And, she won't get calls from guys who will never be her regular. Which, I would think is what she would ultimately want.
See honey munroe she does have talent for sure. My personal atf in this department
[QUOTE=OriginalSin; 1435376]VS,
Not trying to get into a debate. I am in agreement that no provider should be juged by anyone here, but lets face it, we all have our preferences. I was not challenging your description of her from days past. I'm sure she was "hotter than a three peckered billy-goat" (I never knew that a billy goat with 3 peckers was hot) at sometime point in time. But the key point is, that was a long time ago. From your words,"many years" ago. That's all I'm pointing out. I mean, why does she not just post her recent pics? Whats the big deal? She offered it to me, a full body shot of her most recent look and never sent it. That makes it even more sketchy for me because I was expecting her to send it. It's been about a month now and nothing yet. I wrote her back and got no response. What does that say about her character? Trust is thee most valuable commodity in this game, it is paramount. And it starts with how the provider represents herself through her pics. I'm sure blukem could attest to that.
If I said to you, I had your favorite car for sale and it is in immaculate condition for dirt cheap, you would be intrested right? So then you'll probably ask for pics because you want to get a better idea of what I was selling and see it, so you could make an educated decision before you make the trek over to me. (I'm assuming) So I send you pics of the exact same car, but in it's best condition inside and out, knowing full well that I actually don't have that car. It's the same exact car, but mine is not in that great of shape. So you see it, you love it, you love the price and you hurry on over with excitement, cash in hand, ready to go home with your dream ride and then.
I'm sure you can connect the dots from here.
The "luvshack" getting busted couldn't have been that predictable. If it was, then it wouldn't have been busted. Right? According to reports and my knowledge of it, it's been around for more than 2 years. Everyone swore by it. And then all of a sudden, BUSTED! I'm sure Kim is "safe," but let's be real here, in time, all good things come to an end. Getting busted in this game is inevitable. It may not happen for years, but eventually, you'll be at the wrong place at the wrong time. Pop goes the weasel! I hope none of us get busted!
Just keeping this friendly.
Be Safe!
OS[/QUOTE]Please don't try to educate me using buying a car analogies. You say you hope none of us gets busted but you also say getting busted is inevitable. What your trying to say is you cannot beat the law of averages, please no more, just go see Kim or don't.
VS