Kbliss Monday lineup.
Jamie Remi Tami.
Gangnam Dana.
Printable View
Kbliss Monday lineup.
Jamie Remi Tami.
Gangnam Dana.
[QUOTE=AsianAssEater;6897104]Welcome back Phazze thanks for tofft and due to this I will be canceling my prebook with her thanks.[/QUOTE]Bro, no canceling allowed, mamasan will blacklist you. LOL.
[QUOTE=RonStefou32;6897608]I saw Jamie the other day right after 3rd time seeing Tami.
Tami is still atf not even by a close margin. I actually didn't pop with Tami. I usually hold off with her until last moment but today because I knew I was seeing Jamie right after I was fine with it and she actually thought I did pop so I went with it.
From opening the door, Jamie is attractive.
She is not hot by Ina standards but she is at the very least a pretty girl.
Best way to describe her body is she looks like a fertile Korean woman in her late 20's.
Full natural tits, full ass, great skin.
BBBJ was nice and deep and sensual. Not the best but pretty good.
After which she rode me on edge of bed to start.
Missionary was great.
Reverse cowgirl she is one of the better girls for this. Doesn't go crazy aggressive but finds the perfect tempo.
Great at cowgirl too. I preferred when she grinded on me vs hopping on her knees so that I can maintain cum control.
Her pussy feels nice, but is not particularly grippy or tight.
Definitely felt the difference after just coming from seeing Tami.
Popped 1st time with missionary.
2nd and 3rd time with spooning.
Overall great session but not repeatable for me.
I have very high standards for repeating. The only girls I'd ever repeat with are.
Tami. Best overall tightness looks service sensuality novelty BBBJ.
Ina. Best looking with great service.
Sunny. Tight and service.
JiYoung. Tight and service.
One thing to mention on the negative side for Jamie.
She seemed less enthused with kissing as the session passed the half hour mark.
Also she seemed disappointed that I wanted to go for multiple pops and her facial expression changed and it didn't seem like she was enjoying herself anymore.
Also to note at one point I had her masturbate for me while I was watching her and that was a nice little highlight. She looked very sexy doing it.
I think if her pussy was tight she could be a repeat but without the super tight twat, one shot is all she's got.[/QUOTE]I forgot to mention pics are real with some face photoshopping. Picture of her with pool table is most accurate.
[QUOTE=PounderMC;6897803]Bro, no canceling allowed, mamasan will blacklist you. LOL.[/QUOTE]Lmaoo thanks the lord not all bosses are like sessan.
Took a hiatus, but heard Erica is back so I had to make a come back.
Booked an evening appointment and went to a familiar location. (no longer on the westside, but I like it here because its closer to me). Coded and went up.
Still looking hot as ever. I think she has one of the best faces in the game right now. Still pretty as ever, with classic beauty and a great body.
Her English speaking abilities are still impressive, if anything, it got better.
I saw her a ton of times last year, so she remembers me and the rest was a blur. Wanted the maximum experience so I paid the upcharge which is now pretty much the new LA standard. I don't mind it and def didn't regret it. DFK, BBBJ, passionate and fun. Rode me a like a champ and took it like a champ. She'll be here for some time so she's moved up to the top of my list for now. Go see her so she so she stays in LA boys!
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/erica[/URL]
[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6897589]Here's the truth of the matter. I have seen all 3 girls you are referring to here. Shani, Tulip and Minji. You said Minji looked like TOAS = Tits on a stick? You must have seen a different girl. All 3 of those you referred to are curvy cuties. None are in any way TOAS. Minji doesn't speak any English, but who cares? I sure don't. I am not seeing these girls for conversation. I can use a translation app on my phone to chat if I desire. She is new to the USA and just getting used to the market. She is superior in looks to many. Needs training to get to where others are. If you have to have a girl in her 20's vs. 30's to get up, then you will be looking at a very, very narrow segment of those available. I think it has already been established that most of the girls are in their 30's, but many look younger and stay that way for a longer time than other ethnicities. Minji is fobby, has a pretty face, a nice body, sweet personality, is younger, laughs easily, takes direction, and tries to please. If you want a **** experience that will ravage you upon entry, choose a girl that will do that. Many of the experienced ones will but they are not in their 20's and have more mileage. It's about prioritization and tradeoffs.
Minji is PSE and Shani is GFE only for the same price.
It's funny how there has been a big push here to advertise for Shani recently since she went GFE instead of PSE. Has anyone had Shani PSE undercover recently?[/QUOTE]Agreed, Minji is good value comparatively. Obviously younger girl with a solid price for what you get. Overall, I think the only thing she could work on if I'm being critical is her service not being of the vet status I associate with Ina, Chu, JY, and recently Celine. Got to wait until the hype dies down since all the times I like to go are booked and I hate pre-booking if I can avoid it.
As for Shani, I sincerely wish she would. Kinda makes me wonder how many girls who are GFE only give it up bare if you flash the right amount of cash. I'd bareback Moby dick myself if someone got my price right.
[QUOTE=WaffleEater;6898131]Agreed, Minji is good value comparatively. Obviously younger girl with a solid price for what you get. Overall, I think the only thing she could work on if I'm being critical is her service not being of the vet status I associate with Ina, Chu, JY, and recently Celine. Got to wait until the hype dies down since all the times I like to go are booked and I hate pre-booking if I can avoid it.
As for Shani, I sincerely wish she would. Kinda makes me wonder how many girls who are GFE only give it up bare if you flash the right amount of cash. I'd bareback Moby dick myself if someone got my price right.[/QUOTE]Minji def busy. Even though I prebooked 1 day in advance, I barely got in and not the time I wanted.
But considering the initial hype & the fact that she's listed on like every single agency, I doubt you'll be able to get in without prebooking.
Anyone know who her roommate is? Curious which MILF she got paired up with lmao.
If Shani offered BB, I'd be going much more frequently.
[QUOTE=PounderMC;6897803]Bro, no canceling allowed, mamasan will blacklist you. LOL.[/QUOTE]Depends where you book from LOL. Some policies are different.
So gents, after all these reviews about Jamie and Minji, who do you think comes up on top?
They are practically a carbon copy of each other on stats, both 5'2", 32-34 C and 99 lbs.
Both are young-ish and both doesn't seem newb to the game with some service to back it up.
What do you guys think I should pick?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jamie[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/minji[/URL]
If you could, please answer below, appreciated.
Service, Minji or Jamie?
Face, Minji or Jamie?
Body, Minji or Jamie?
Attitude / communication, Minji or Jamie?
Happy mongering!!
P.S., i had enough Ajumah, lol
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6898523]So gents, after all these reviews about Jamie and Minji, who do you think comes up on top?
They are practically a carbon copy of each other on stats, both 5'2", 32-34 C and 99 lbs.
Both are young-ish and both doesn't seem newb to the game with some service to back it up.
What do you guys think I should pick?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jamie[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/minji[/URL]
If you could, please answer below, appreciated.
Service, Minji or Jamie?
Face, Minji or Jamie?
Body, Minji or Jamie?
Attitude / communication, Minji or Jamie?
Happy mongering!!
P.S., i had enough Ajumah, lol[/QUOTE]I haven't seen Jamie, but I would assume service wise. Jamie will take the cake considering she's got near 200 TER reviews.
Her sister is Baby Yena who is god knows where.
Knowing you Vulcan. I'd go for Baby Arin over Minji if I were you.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6898523]So gents, after all these reviews about Jamie and Minji, who do you think comes up on top?
They are practically a carbon copy of each other on stats, both 5'2", 32-34 C and 99 lbs.
Both are young-ish and both doesn't seem newb to the game with some service to back it up.
What do you guys think I should pick?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jamie[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/minji[/URL]
If you could, please answer below, appreciated.
Service, Minji or Jamie?
Face, Minji or Jamie?
Body, Minji or Jamie?
Attitude / communication, Minji or Jamie?
Happy mongering!!
P.S., i had enough Ajumah, lol[/QUOTE]Consider there's a ton of previous intel on Jamie compared to newcomer Minji. Now if someone says the latter looks like THE Minji from New Jeans it's a wrap.
[QUOTE=Phazze93;6898485]Minji def busy. Even though I prebooked 1 day in advance, I barely got in and not the time I wanted.
But considering the initial hype & the fact that she's listed on like every single agency, I doubt you'll be able to get in without prebooking.
Anyone know who her roommate is? Curious which MILF she got paired up with lmao.
If Shani offered BB, I'd be going much more frequently.[/QUOTE]Yep, I didn't get preferred time even with a 1 day early prebook so she def busy. Hopefully y'all are teaching her the ropes!! Maybe I'll go see her after a couple months and hopefully she's learned by then.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i]
Before you write me and complain, yes it was argumentative. Then second, I am just as concerned as making sure the forum is shill free as you are that's why there is a Report Post button on every post. In the future I suggest you use it.
A2[/blue]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5375825]Ditto. If anyone thinks (Priva is) one double-double animal-style away from being fat, then we can't be friends.[/QUOTE]If you're like me and can't wait for McDonald's to put the McRib back on the menu, or, maybe you just like them rail thin, see Priva (formerly Nadia MKC) in WLA. Fwiw, I don't recall her rates ever this low. She's currently 340 all-in, whereas 3 years ago she was 280+100 bb in OC.
Haters will say boycotts are baloney. So correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't recall the last time we've seen this many all-in options, not just in WLA, but OC and now even SD wants a piece of the (cream) pie.
Visiting from Portland and our kgirl scene leaves a little to be desired and I've only dabbled with kgirls in Vegas and never in la before. My plan an and b was all booked for the day and scrambling to find a plan c with the help of this forum I settled on Erica. I'm jealous that your selection is so good here that you are able to nitpick the little things. I usually don't have a problem with finishing early but this girl got me busting two very quick nuts on mostly just above average but nothing memorable service. Something about her vibe and tight holes just did it for me. What was remarkable was after I nutted the 2nd time she kept on grinding on me in cg and I stayed hard and she got a 3rd pop out of me in just a few minutes later. I sometimes struggle with 2 x but to get 3 x out of me was pretty impressive. I was a little embarrassed at my performance but I chalk that up to her being good more than anything.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6898523]So gents, after all these reviews about Jamie and Minji, who do you think comes up on top?
They are practically a carbon copy of each other on stats, both 5'2", 32-34 C and 99 lbs.
Both are young-ish and both doesn't seem newb to the game with some service to back it up.
What do you guys think I should pick?
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/jamie[/URL]
[URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/minji[/URL]
If you could, please answer below, appreciated.[/QUOTE]Saw Jamie last week and she's definitely in her mid 30's. She's like the hot aunt you always wanted to bang.
Someone commented on Baby Yena, and Jamie said she was in ktown. They visit each other often.
[QUOTE=SunsetMando;6898490]Depends where you book from LOL. Some policies are different.[/QUOTE]If you request to change girl, it's OK. If you just straight out cancel, you'll most likely be blocked. You won't get a reply next time you try to book.
There seem to be two Celines. One at GKS in MW [URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine31/[/URL] and the other at Jane's girls in WLA. Are they two different girls? Any info on the MW Celine?
I agree with most of this review as well. She leans toward hot for me. Her entire look is totally right up my ally. English is pretty good and had a great session.
F: 7.5-8 - She is very cute / hot, but leans more toward hot. Not sexy hot, but "pretty" hot. Large eyes.
B: 9 - if she was in slightly better shape, she would be a perfect 10 for me. Great size boobs (Big C, small D), hourglass shape, a decent sized butt. Height 5'2-5'3 ish.
A: 9 - Converses well, pretty upbeat and willing to do everything. Not a sex fiend but more GFE and calm.
S: 8 - Probably sorta new to the game, but knows how to please. Great BBBJ. She went on for a while and DT and kept entertaining Jr with her tongue. DFK was sensual and very available. She is a sight to see in every position. Mish was plenty of DFK, K9 the ass was awesome, her on top CG was wild, she is very pretty and those tits are perfect. CG grind 8.5/10, she can do it, but she's fairly shallow and my slightly above average member may have caused some discomfort, so Magnums may not do well with her. She came hard multiple times on top, and gets very wet. We went at it for 40 minutes, she kept up. She also kept me up, which is amazing.
E: very good. Not quite full on English speaker but she understands a lot.
Repeat: Absolutely, probably ATF now.
[QUOTE=JoyTraveller;6896358]Had a solid couple sessions with Arin. Definitely worth a visit. Could be considered HYA or CYA, depending on one's taste.
Photos: are certainly her with a bit of P.S. She's in her 20's, I have no doubt. Post sex she shared she was a university student prior to coming to WLA and I would have no reason to think otherwise.
Service: pretty solid; bbj was good but a bit on the brief side. She could improve the effort there but skills were decent enough. Very sensitive in a positive way to dfk, daty, etc. She is tight and gets very wet. Made me pop when riding me (shame on me for not resisting that urge more LOL).
Post sex: some nice gf time chat afterwards- she has decent enough English for conversation.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BuildingGuy;6899037]There seem to be two Celines. One at GKS in MW [URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine31/[/URL] and the other at Jane's girls in WLA. Are they two different girls? Any info on the MW Celine?[/QUOTE]Two different girls. MW Celine is GFE no msog kgirl, was very popular and hard to book during her last tour. Top tier in youth and looks compared to currently available kgirls in LA. Not a service queen but good times with a HYA.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6898737]If you're like me and can't wait for McDonald's to put the McRib back on the menu, or, maybe you just like them rail thin, see Priva (formerly Nadia MKC) in WLA. Fwiw, I don't recall her rates ever this low. She's currently 340 all-in, whereas 3 years ago she was 280+100 bb in OC.
Haters will say boycotts are baloney. So correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't recall the last time we've seen this many all-in options, not just in WLA, but OC and now even SD wants a piece of the (cream) pie.[/QUOTE]Everywhere is slow because people's savings have been eaten up, credit is at all time highs, white collar workers are being downsized, Workers can't easily relocate because of mortgage rates, Hollywood is in the process of leaving, the list goes on. Might be the boycott too.
[QUOTE=Phazze93;6898538]Jamie will take the cake considering she's got near 200 TER reviews.
Her sister is Baby Yena who is god knows where.[/QUOTE]Per SG's site, "Baby Yena Returns Soon."
I didn't find her beautiful. Pretty yes beautiful no, but her technique made me come fairly quickly too.
[QUOTE=Samadams17;6898739]Visiting from Portland and our kgirl scene leaves a little to be desired and I've only dabbled with kgirls in Vegas and never in la before. My plan an and b was all booked for the day and scrambling to find a plan c with the help of this forum I settled on Erica. I'm jealous that your selection is so good here that you are able to nitpick the little things. I usually don't have a problem with finishing early but this girl got me busting two very quick nuts on mostly just above average but nothing memorable service. Something about her vibe and tight holes just did it for me. What was remarkable was after I nutted the 2nd time she kept on grinding on me in cg and I stayed hard and she got a 3rd pop out of me in just a few minutes later. I sometimes struggle with 2 x but to get 3 x out of me was pretty impressive. I was a little embarrassed at my performance but I chalk that up to her being good more than anything.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TypicalJohn;6899000]Saw Jamie last week and she's definitely in her mid 30's. She's like the hot aunt you always wanted to bang.
Someone commented on Baby Yena, and Jamie said she was in ktown. They visit each other often.[/QUOTE]God damn it, I always fall for the hot ajumah aunty, LOL.
Her tits nice? Big hand full? Service wise?
As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
We should band together like band of brothers in only visiting 340 BBFS all-in girls, AND we do have pretty good selection now days.
Looking into many bookers have bunch of girls that upcharge (way more then all in girls), I doubt any of them busy at these economy and the laid off just getting started at corporate level.
A few month to last year back, it was the low end workers like front line and factories, now that's not enough, it's cutting upper level workers too.
So let's use this chance to level our donation and draw them upcharge girls to the dark side of 340 all in BBFS.
At the end of the day, SF / SJ still BBFS all in cost way lower then we are for the same girl in just different location.
Starting now as you reading it up till the end of May, that's about two week and see if our forum impacts any of their upcharge girl's traffic.
WE CAN DO IT! WHO IS IN?
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899711]As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
We should band together like band of brothers in only visiting 340 BBFS all-in girls, AND we do have pretty good selection now days.
Looking into many bookers have bunch of girls that upcharge (way more then all in girls), I doubt any of them busy at these economy and the laid off just getting started at corporate level.
A few month to last year back, it was the low end workers like front line and factories, now that's not enough, it's cutting upper level workers too.
So let's use this chance to level our donation and draw them upcharge girls to the dark side of 340 all in BBFS.
At the end of the day, SF / SJ still BBFS all in cost way lower then we are for the same girl in just different location.
Starting now as you reading it up till the end of May, that's about two week and see if our forum impacts any of their upcharge girl's traffic.[/QUOTE]I for one do not like how common it has become for the younger providers to be $350 base + $100 bb + $50 msog.
Absolutely Ridiculous.
Meanwhile bay area is still at $280 for the most part.
Insane discrepancy.
It still makes no sense why LA is more expensive than San Jose.
[QUOTE=HiKeke;6899070]Two different girls. MW Celine is GFE no msog kgirl, was very popular and hard to book during her last tour. Top tier in youth and looks compared to currently available kgirls in LA. Not a service queen but good times with a HYA.[/QUOTE]As my housekeeper says - "te veres. " MW Celine is booked for the month! You snooze. Etc.
Semi new.
Yuha: 5'1", 90 lbs, 34 D but upcharge, looks too good to be true in pictures. Or just use another IG model's, eh.
New Arrival none BBFS.
Ziny: 5'2", 95 lbs, 34 D, looks too good to be true in pictures. But if she offer BBFS and 340 all in, I would be sucking and fondling them tits week after week, LOL.
Seven: 5'1", 99 lbs, D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Ivy: 5'1", 95 lbs, 34 D, Seem like just a random person's photo or an IG model or random JAV star, who knows.
Baby Soo: GFE, 5'5", 34 DD, 100 lbs, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS, LOL.
Estee: 5'6", 102 lbs, 34 D, seem like a Niya type of body but only GFE, eh, and look like an IG model.
New Arrival BBFS upcharge.
Anna: 5'4", 105 lbs, 34 DD, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Kamela: 5'3", 101 lbs, D or C, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off. Seem Young. Upcharge.
Sia: 5'3", 32 D, 98 lbs, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Baby Sol: 5'1", 88 lbs, 32 D, seem to be a super spinner that's TOAS, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS.
Baby Sugar: 5'5", 95 lbs, 34 D, upcharge and look way too good to be true, just leave it at that.
All in BBFS special.
Seti: 5'1", 92 lbs, 32 DD: seem like a super spinner with big giant tits but for whatever it is, she seem rebrand.
Yoji: 5', 95 lbs, 34 D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Girls are either in KGLA / CGLA / M, you know where to look, LOL.
Big tit lovers, any feedback?
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899763]Semi new.
Yuha: 5'1", 90 lbs, 34 D but upcharge, looks too good to be true in pictures. Or just use another IG model's, eh.
New Arrival none BBFS.
Ziny: 5'2", 95 lbs, 34 D, looks too good to be true in pictures. But if she offer BBFS and 340 all in, I would be sucking and fondling them tits week after week, LOL.
Seven: 5'1", 99 lbs, D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Ivy: 5'1", 95 lbs, 34 D, Seem like just a random person's photo or an IG model or random JAV star, who knows.
Baby Soo: GFE, 5'5", 34 DD, 100 lbs, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS, LOL.
Estee: 5'6", 102 lbs, 34 D, seem like a Niya type of body but only GFE, eh, and look like an IG model.
New Arrival BBFS upcharge.
Anna: 5'4", 105 lbs, 34 DD, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Kamela: 5'3", 101 lbs, D or C, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off. Seem Young. Upcharge.
Sia: 5'3", 32 D, 98 lbs, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Baby Sol: 5'1", 88 lbs, 32 D, seem to be a super spinner that's TOAS, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS.
Baby Sugar: 5'5", 95 lbs, 34 D, upcharge and look way too good to be true, just leave it at that.
All in BBFS special.
Seti: 5'1", 92 lbs, 32 DD: seem like a super spinner with big giant tits but for whatever it is, she seem rebrand.
Yoji: 5', 95 lbs, 34 D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Girls are either in KGLA / CGLA / M, you know where to look, LOL.
Big tit lovers, any feedback?[/QUOTE]Baby Soo for big tits and plastic pretty face, Estee for pretty face, Baby Sol if you like spinners. Go see Soo if you like nice big fake tits but she's not BB so I know you won't see her LOL.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899711]As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
[/QUOTE]Just because there's more 340 BBFS all in selection doesn't mean (1) that overall prices have gone done nor (2) the 2 week "boycott" from last year had anything to do with this.
Prices have not gone down, on the average, and probably even went up. There's still many whose prices have crept up $10-$20, and there are still many who are busy at those prices. Attributing anecdotal price changes to a 2 week boycott from last year is an unsupported conclusion and lacks any common sense.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899763]Semi new.
Yuha: 5'1", 90 lbs, 34 D but upcharge, looks too good to be true in pictures. Or just use another IG model's, eh.
New Arrival none BBFS.
Ziny: 5'2", 95 lbs, 34 D, looks too good to be true in pictures. But if she offer BBFS and 340 all in, I would be sucking and fondling them tits week after week, LOL.
Seven: 5'1", 99 lbs, D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Ivy: 5'1", 95 lbs, 34 D, Seem like just a random person's photo or an IG model or random JAV star, who knows.
Baby Soo: GFE, 5'5", 34 DD, 100 lbs, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS, LOL.
Estee: 5'6", 102 lbs, 34 D, seem like a Niya type of body but only GFE, eh, and look like an IG model.
New Arrival BBFS upcharge.
Anna: 5'4", 105 lbs, 34 DD, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Kamela: 5'3", 101 lbs, D or C, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off. Seem Young. Upcharge.
Sia: 5'3", 32 D, 98 lbs, picture looks to be only photo shopped but not far off, upcharge.
Baby Sol: 5'1", 88 lbs, 32 D, seem to be a super spinner that's TOAS, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS.
Baby Sugar: 5'5", 95 lbs, 34 D, upcharge and look way too good to be true, just leave it at that.
All in BBFS special.
Seti: 5'1", 92 lbs, 32 DD: seem like a super spinner with big giant tits but for whatever it is, she seem rebrand.
Yoji: 5', 95 lbs, 34 D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Girls are either in KGLA / CGLA / M, you know where to look, LOL.
Big tit lovers, any feedback?[/QUOTE]Seti is rebrand of Kira. All her reviews are meh for service.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899763]Semi new.
Yuha: 5'1", 90 lbs, 34 D but upcharge, looks too good to be true in pictures. Or just use another IG model's, eh.
New Arrival none BBFS.
Ziny: 5'2", 95 lbs, 34 D, looks too good to be true in pictures. But if she offer BBFS and 340 all in, I would be sucking and fondling them tits week after week, LOL.
Seven: 5'1", 99 lbs, D, picture looks heavily photoshopped to look young. She got that Ajumah feature look.
Ivy: 5'1", 95 lbs, 34 D, Seem like just a random person's photo or an IG model or random JAV star, who knows.
Baby Soo: GFE, 5'5", 34 DD, 100 lbs, pictures had that AI look or IG model edit, hopefully she goes 340 all in BBFS, LOL.
Estee: 5'6", 102 lbs, 34 D, seem like a Niya type of body but only GFE, eh, and look like an IG model.
New Arrival BBFS upcharge.[/QUOTE]Seti is Kira even using same pics. I wouldn't see her even at bb special don't know why she still upcharging all these years later she's easily over 50.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899695]God damn it, I always fall for the hot ajumah aunty, LOL.
Her tits nice? Big hand full? Service wise?[/QUOTE]For some reason, she reminds me of like an older sister of Baby Arin in terms of hair length and looks to some extent.
Both good looks and service to me.
Were one of you getting some duo action this week? Could of swore I got rushed out of my ending session and as I exited, they both went to the same room afterwards to a monger.
[QUOTE=BuildingGuy;6899037]There seem to be two Celines. One at GKS in MW [URL]https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/celine31/[/URL] and the other at Jane's girls in WLA. Are they two different girls? Any info on the MW Celine?[/QUOTE]They are different, and the reviews on TER seem to be getting the girls mixed up.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6899147]Per SG's site, "Baby Yena Returns Soon."[/QUOTE]I think the sisters will be in the same WLA apartment, I hear Jamie is going to try to convince Yena to duo.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899711]As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
We should band together like band of brothers in only visiting 340 BBFS all-in girls, AND we do have pretty good selection now days.
Looking into many bookers have bunch of girls that upcharge (way more then all in girls), I doubt any of them busy at these economy and the laid off just getting started at corporate level.
A few month to last year back, it was the low end workers like front line and factories, now that's not enough, it's cutting upper level workers too.
So let's use this chance to level our donation and draw them upcharge girls to the dark side of 340 all in BBFS.
At the end of the day, SF / SJ still BBFS all in cost way lower then we are for the same girl in just different location.
Starting now as you reading it up till the end of May, that's about two week and see if our forum impacts any of their upcharge girl's traffic.
WE CAN DO IT! WHO IS IN?[/QUOTE]I've already been on my own one-man boycott, so. . . I'm WITH YOU!
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899711]As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
We should band together like band of brothers in only visiting 340 BBFS all-in girls, AND we do have pretty good selection now days.
Looking into many bookers have bunch of girls that upcharge (way more then all in girls), I doubt any of them busy at these economy and the laid off just getting started at corporate level.
A few month to last year back, it was the low end workers like front line and factories, now that's not enough, it's cutting upper level workers too.
So let's use this chance to level our donation and draw them upcharge girls to the dark side of 340 all in BBFS.
At the end of the day, SF / SJ still BBFS all in cost way lower then we are for the same girl in just different location.
Starting now as you reading it up till the end of May, that's about two week and see if our forum impacts any of their upcharge girl's traffic.
WE CAN DO IT! WHO IS IN?[/QUOTE]I had a meeting with my dick last night and I can't do it. I'm sorry.
I'm just too dam horny and have no self control.
[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6899711]As some mentioned about boycott, some mentioned that 340 BBFS all in selection is more then ever.
And think back there was a "k-pussy thanks giving two week boycott" that I felt worked well, we should try this time with economy / inflation as our chip.
We should band together like band of brothers in only visiting 340 BBFS all-in girls, AND we do have pretty good selection now days.
Looking into many bookers have bunch of girls that upcharge (way more then all in girls), I doubt any of them busy at these economy and the laid off just getting started at corporate level.
A few month to last year back, it was the low end workers like front line and factories, now that's not enough, it's cutting upper level workers too.
So let's use this chance to level our donation and draw them upcharge girls to the dark side of 340 all in BBFS.
At the end of the day, SF / SJ still BBFS all in cost way lower then we are for the same girl in just different location.
Starting now as you reading it up till the end of May, that's about two week and see if our forum impacts any of their upcharge girl's traffic.
WE CAN DO IT! WHO IS IN?[/QUOTE]Going to pass on this and continue to see the upcharge hotties.
Kbliss humpday harlot availability.
Jamie Remi Tami.
Gangnam Dana.