General Reports

[QUOTE=Indyguy4614]Think $$$

Amy called me.[/QUOTE]Has she been the subject of reports on here already?

Trying to get more info for us.

[QUOTE=Tryinagain2]Has she been the subject of reports on here already?[/QUOTE]

I was cruising westbound on 10th st, a few min after 4am ,tues may 19,and between lasalle st and temple,there was a least 8 ladies plying. I was moving along having just droped one of my regular bootys off,and did not have the stanima or inclanation to get a real good look.Im not in that area much,and havent seen that type of selection in indy in years[and ive been at this 30plus].

Most of you are familiar with a tavern on ther near southside. Voll. Something a ruther. I met a couple of local women who wanted an opportunity to earn a few dollars, nice place.

I was having a beer at brads and then this guy approached me with some crazy story. He said he picked up a WSW on e wash st while driving eastbound, just a few yards past the autozone. He said the gal looked 5'6", maybe 32 yo, blonde, very clean, well mannered and articulated. He said she was actually very pretty perhaps an 8 on the SW scale. He said the gal told him she used to be an artist, and her artistic name back on the good days was sammy. The dude said she didn't appear to be hooked up on any hard drugs as she didn't look pale, shaky, or jumpy. He said he offered to buy some beer, and she gladly accepted. He got a 6 pack but she only drank one beer and that was it. There were no requests for the rest of the beers, no requests for food, or rides to "my cousins" except for taken her back to her habitual spot. He said she was pretty nervous but once LEO check cleared out dealing went smooth. They settled for FS and head up to an undisclosed hotel. He said he got bbj showing great skills and he finished up with the lady looking south. THe dude said he was impressed with this gal's hygiene. No bad ass smells whatsoever. This guy gave me the digits, but I haven't tried to call her myself. I don't know if it is proper to quid pro quo, but until digits are not confirmed to be working I will not request the quo.

One more thing, a buddy told me about (the 21st) to drive around e. Wash. St and the fountain of youth area as the weather was nice. I did so, but surprisingly the LEO activity was very very low. Was is it just me or did you guys notice the same?

Happy weekend

There was a young blonde overweight WSW with a nice face on 10th near Rural last night about 9:00 pm. She doesn't have much in the way of skills and she isn't very good at following directions. I am trying to forget that I wasted. 2, and I have already forgotten her name. If you are cruising east 10th, remember to avoid the young slightly overweight blonde. In this case, I definitely TOFTT.

(If anyone has info about a young WSW on east 10th named Julie.- dark hair, talks fast.- I would appreciate a PM. She told me how to contact her, but I don't want to make the contact unless someone can tell me that it is probably worth the effort.)

Encountered Jennifer, WSW 35yrs, very casual dressed in jeans,sweatshirt, kinda red-blondish hair, very light complexion. She was very sweet and agreeable to BBJCIM. Effort and talent top notch on that end. Wondered about little bruise marks on her arm though.

Just a few pics from the warmer weather.

If anyone recognizes #2, or #4, I would be interested in a review.

Wallie

I had to go the people's clinic on 10th today as my dad was having a bad toothache. While he was being seen I figured it would take at least an hour so I decided to drive around on recon mission. Drove east on 10th and activity was low but still some, mainly BSW. Turned right on emerson then west on wash st just to see a couple of WSW that were not worth the premium. I drove north on rural and saw LE in the incoming lane. The cop turned his christmas lights on, but he did not pulled anyone over, I think he was just trying to run the red light. Anyway, I continued driving in "rectangles". I was driving west on ny just before the vp I saw the same cop (the one running the red light) pulling into an alley. He was very conspicuous as he I was pulling in really slow. I tried to paralel-follow the police car just to see what gives, but the traffic was heavy so I had to sped up. Evidently the cop was trying to meet his monthly quota.

Also, spotted 2 LEO units conspicuously parked at the very end of the Marsh's parkin lot on e. Wash. St. Be very careful guys because this assholes have full view of you if you are giving rides anywhere in the Marsh's main parking lot or the sidewalk on wash st all the way up to the taco bell, perhaps even a little farther than that. The only way you can spot the pigs is if you're driving westbound on wash st coming from the skyline, as you pass the taco bell and approach the light at the Marshs' parking lot, you need to look deep to your left. Marsh has extra parking lot on the left side of the store, so you need to look carefully in that area. If you're driving eastbound on wast st coming from the gas station (is it a marathon? ) and you see a SW strolling the sidewalk or parking lot, DO NOT offer a ride just yet. Turn back and head westbound on wash st and make sure the you have a clear view of the parking lot on the left side of the marsh (assuming you're facing towards the front side of the marsh). Take a very good look and check the spot is clear 'because there might be decoys strolling or LE might just be simply watching you picking a up one of the old friends.

Also, I have a friend who hooked up with Mona, Monique or whatever, she actually goes by Mo. There's a pic of her in the older pages (looks like 5-9, blue eyes, blond fuzzy hair, maybe 130 lbs). My buddy's opinion is that she looks fairly good for a SW. Funny thing is that she's still a "property manager". She has many properties on the east side but she wasn't carrying the keys of any of those houses LMFAO. He says she goes to school to pursue a web designer carreer, so she's working overtime to get enough funds. From what I've heard she claims to be up to anything but once you want to go to your own room for peace of mind everything is just too far, so you have to settle for something more suitable for a quick car wash or go to her 70 yr old uncle's house. AS far as I could tell, my buddy did said she completed a cbj, and passed the digits for future reference.

BTW, private messages requesting proof of read will be ignored as I smell cop on the other side of the line (you know who I am talking about). Please avoid any questions implying first hand knowledge information such as "how big was she? " or "What did she look like". Any such questions are irrefutable evidence that the person asking them is a fucking asshole cop and the person so asking will be banned from my book, and I will pass the report to other senior members for further evaluation and alert. For the record, anyone receiving such type of questions should also ban the fucker asking the question unless you have personally met this person.

Happy hunting

Saw this lovely young lady infront of the pawn shop at 10th and Tibbs. If I wasn't working at the time, I would have picked her up. I will definitely be keeping an eye out on my trips through there after work.

Wallie

when some body gives a report and doesn't say what she looks like or how big she is? I want to know what she looks like? Is she nasty open sores, dirty, black white, hispanic, is she a bone rack, or a fc%$#ing pig.

So how does wanting to know what you picked up make somebody a cop?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, private messages requesting proof of read will be ignored as I smell cop on the other side of the line (you know who I am talking about). Please avoid any questions implying first hand knowledge information such as "how big was she? " or "What did she look like". Any such questions are irrefutable evidence that the person asking them is a fucking asshole cop and the person so asking will be banned from my book, and I will pass the report to other senior members for further evaluation and alert. For the record, anyone receiving such type of questions should also ban the fucker asking the question unless you have Personally met this person.

I neglected to mention this in my previous posts, but all the pics I have submitted this week were taken in the W 10th Street zone.

A couple of more unknown to me ladies.

The first one I wasn't sure was working, but when I circled the block, and caught her eye, she gave the smile and a little wave. Damn it, I hate having a company vehicle during the day. I won't monger in a company truck, the business doesn't need the publicity if I get caught, and I need the job. Still though, I'll definitely window shop, and take the pics. Nothing wrong with that! (2 images)

The second lady I have seen a number of times, but I have never tried her services. Something about her looks just don't do it for me, although she has great DSLs that are usually bright red. I'll probably end up giving her a shot sometime. The first pic (by the car) was taken during the work day, the second this evening about 8pm. (2 images)

The last pic is another unknown to me (although I think I have a line on her name. We'll see.) She said hi as I drove by, but I was looking for one of the young darker hotties I've seen lately like the one earlier today. (1 pic)

Good luck out there fellas, and be careful.

Wallie

Because asking questions requiring personal knowledge imply that such knowledge was obtained personally, which means that you engaged in solicitation and may be used as LE entrampment for future prosecution.

For example, assume that "A" posts a story that was told to him by "B". In this story, "B" told to "A" what the SW looked like, what they did, and what she charged, and maybe whether digits are available. Then "A" comes to the forum and merely recounts what was told to him by "B". Next, a member PM's "A" with proof of reading, and asking the following question "How tall was she"?

This is a tactic for entrampment IMO. The member who sent the PM (probably a UC leo) seemed to have asked a very simple innocent question. The truth of the matter is that the question was phrased with the intention to extract from "A" an statement that is based on personal knowledge or that at least will more likely persuade a judge or a jury that such statement, if made, was the result of personal knowledge and therefore "A" necessarily must have actively participated in solicitation which will lead to a conviction. Basically, if "A" responded to the PM message with lets say "She was 5'5"", then all the "I dreamed about this gal." or whatever, goes out the window because no reasonable judge nor jury would ever believe that the A's story was a mere recount of events as opposed to a disguised statement of personal facts.

Again, I invite you to read my post completely and carefully. You will notice that the PM involved (1) proof of reading (which is weird considering the nature of the post); (2) a question phrased in a manner intended to extract information that could only have been obtained by personal knowledge. (3) There was no reason to ask such a question because the information sought was in the descriptive post.

You are free to believe whatever you want. Certainly you're free to disagree with me. Certainly, you're free to respond these type of questions if you deem it is proper to do so (at your own peril of course). Bottom line, It is not the info this person is inquiring about what makes him a cop. It Is the way he asked for the info what at least in my book makes him a cop.

Respect to all, but I am not changing my opinion.

[QUOTE=Nells M All]when some body gives a report and doesn't say what she looks like or how big she is? I want to know what she looks like? Is she nasty open sores, dirty, black white, hispanic, is she a bone rack, or a fc%$#ing pig.

So how does wanting to know what you picked up make somebody a cop?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, private messages requesting proof of read will be ignored as I smell cop on the other side of the line (you know who I am talking about). Please avoid any questions implying first hand knowledge information such as "how big was she? " or "What did she look like". Any such questions are irrefutable evidence that the person asking them is a fucking asshole cop and the person so asking will be banned from my book, and I will pass the report to other senior members for further evaluation and alert. For the record, anyone receiving such type of questions should also ban the fucker asking the question unless you have Personally met this person.[/QUOTE]

Is that you, Uncle Leo?

[QUOTE=Factfiction]Because asking questions requiring personal knowledge imply that such knowledge was obtained personally, which means that you engaged in solicitation and may be used as LE entrampment for future prosecution.

For example, assume that "A" posts a story that was told to him by "B". In this story, "B" told to "A" what the SW looked like, what they did, and what she charged, and maybe whether digits are available. Then "A" comes to the forum and merely recounts what was told to him by "B". Next, a member PM's "A" with proof of reading, and asking the following question "How tall was she"?

This is a tactic for entrampment IMO. The member who sent the PM (probably a UC leo) seemed to have asked a very simple innocent question. The truth of the matter is that the question was phrased with the intention to extract from "A" an statement that is based on personal knowledge or that at least will more likely persuade a judge or a jury that such statement, if made, was the result of personal knowledge and therefore "A" necessarily must have actively participated in solicitation which will lead to a conviction. Basically, if "A" responded to the PM message with lets say "She was 5'5"", then all the "I dreamed about this gal." or whatever, goes out the window because no reasonable judge nor jury would ever believe that the A's story was a mere recount of events as opposed to a disguised statement of personal facts.

Again, I invite you to read my post completely and carefully. You will notice that the PM involved (1) proof of reading (which is weird considering the nature of the post); (2) a question phrased in a manner intended to extract information that could only have been obtained by personal knowledge. (3) There was no reason to ask such a question because the information sought was in the descriptive post.

You are free to believe whatever you want. Certainly you're free to disagree with me. Certainly, you're free to respond these type of questions if you deem it is proper to do so (at your own peril of course). Bottom line, It is not the info this person is inquiring about what makes him a cop. It Is the way he asked for the info what at least in my book makes him a cop.

Respect to all, but I am not changing my opinion.[/QUOTE]

1. I believe this board has proof of read turned on by default. I know I've not turned it on and have received confirmation of read.

2. FF has a higher law enforcement paranoia level as all of his posts address LEO, in one way or another.

To each their own but let's not get all attacky with each other. This place is much better when we are all friendly.

By the way I hope this board doesn't believe the I had a dream stuff is protection for a real UC operation you should study the history of the TBD Florida situation a few years ago. If they are interested they know the supposed code words as well as anyone here.

Anyway everybody be careful out there.

[QUOTE=Factfiction]Because asking questions requiring personal knowledge imply that such knowledge was obtained personally, which means that you engaged in solicitation and may be used as LE entrampment for future prosecution.

For example, assume that "A" posts a story that was told to him by "B". In this story, "B" told to "A" what the SW looked like, what they did, and what she charged, and maybe whether digits are available. Then "A" comes to the forum and merely recounts what was told to him by "B". Next, a member PM's "A" with proof of reading, and asking the following question "How tall was she"?

This is a tactic for entrampment IMO. The member who sent the PM (probably a UC leo) seemed to have asked a very simple innocent question. The truth of the matter is that the question was phrased with the intention to extract from "A" an statement that is based on personal knowledge or that at least will more likely persuade a judge or a jury that such statement, if made, was the result of personal knowledge and therefore "A" necessarily must have actively participated in solicitation which will lead to a conviction. Basically, if "A" responded to the PM message with lets say "She was 5'5"", then all the "I dreamed about this gal." or whatever, goes out the window because no reasonable judge nor jury would ever believe that the A's story was a mere recount of events as opposed to a disguised statement of personal facts.

Again, I invite you to read my post completely and carefully. You will notice that the PM involved (1) proof of reading (which is weird considering the nature of the post); (2) a question phrased in a manner intended to extract information that could only have been obtained by personal knowledge. (3) There was no reason to ask such a question because the information sought was in the descriptive post.

You are free to believe whatever you want. Certainly you're free to disagree with me. Certainly, you're free to respond these type of questions if you deem it is proper to do so (at your own peril of course). Bottom line, It is not the info this person is inquiring about what makes him a cop. It Is the way he asked for the info what at least in my book makes him a cop.

Respect to all, but I am not changing my opinion.[/QUOTE]