Los Angeles County Asian Providers

Greetings,

Just asking to see what you think of them. I thought Nicole was young and attractive. She had a couple of small tattoos. I had great times with her. The first couple sessions were mind blowing. I can't remember much about Lori because she uses different name now and it has been at least a year. I probably enjoyed her if I can remember the pictures.

The Choa I saw was with another booker last year and also used same pictures. She was attractive and may be mid-twenty. I can't remember her appearance now but I was very happy when I left. With the way TER reviewers scored, I would give Choa 8/9 from the impressions I can remember.

For me, FIV or DATY can turn an average time to great or mind blowing. It's my Golden Rule. I wouldn't do that if there was nothing in it for me. It's what make TOFTT enjoyable for me so I TOFTT a lot. I hardly ever saw a less than decent looking Korean girl but I have the benefit of a wide range of girls after I TOFTT a lot, and no aversion to tattoos, fat girls, or enhanced breasts. Never met anyone reeked of cigarette smoke or used the phone during the session.

[QUOTE=Blarharse;4093629]Long-time lurker, first-time poster. I'm another one who's been toiling in the Kgirl B-tier mines; I can't get a reply from M or J.

Choa has been on KTE for a while; I booked her last week. Now, I've been crashing down through the TOFFT tree for the past six months and hitting every branch on the way down, so my expectations have been lowered significantly. Choa, however, was not bad. Here were the important things to me, based upon my recent traumatic bookings: (1) She didn't reek of stale cigarette smoke; (2) She has a decent face; (3) She has a waist measurement smaller than her hip measurement; (4) No tattoos ((5) Natural tits; and (6) She didn't make or take any phone calls during our session.

Pictures are nearly unrecognizable; I searched the apartment for a 20 year-old hentai model with huge luminescent eyes, long curly chestnut hair, skinny legs and a face bathed in a sheet of angelic white light, but the only other person there was Choa, who's decent-looking and probably in her early-to-mid 30's and she has a sweet friendly attitude.

LFK, BBBJ, CFS. No BBFS. I didn't try for FIV or DATY or DATO because. Why would I pay to do that?

In the old TER days, I would've given her a 7. 5/7. 5. Rate: 26.[/QUOTE]

That's why I said may be. I know Lyn is hard to see but she is pretty and good so I was just saying try to see her. I never let thing like that stopped me before. There were some girls people said only see old clients but I got to see them anyway.

[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4092297]Maybe Glow but Lyn is very picky and I saw her last week and she said she only wants to see old clients right now.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Opus109;4091924]I just saw Korean Min from Eros. This was my third time seeing her, and I found myself wondering why I don't see her more often. In my experience, she gives excellent GFE and her BBBJ is second to none. She is also very intelligent and holds a great conversation. I was amazed that she remembered every detail of our last conversation even though it was in June. Also, it was refreshing to know what to expect going into the session. I have had almost nothing but misses with K girls since the internet blackout. So many of them just come and go, have subpar looks and / or service, and there is just no continuity or stability in that scene at this time. At least with Min, I know what to expect: consistently good service from a beautiful girl. I will definitely be seeing her more often.[/QUOTE]That's a great referral for Min (I assume that's the Min on "mid-Wilshire" I've looked at her ad a number of times longingly. My major concern is that I work for myself and don't have usable referrals (mostly AMP experiences) so not sure how I'd clear screening. But she looks like a real daisy, as Doc Holliday would have said.

[QUOTE=Blarharse;4093955]I can confirm that Roya is still with 6683.[/QUOTE]Erin may have had surgery but she is still so fucking hot with a smashing body performance second to none. One of the best asses and tits (enhanced or unenhanced) that I have ever seen.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4095032]Just asking to see what you think of them. I thought Nicole was young and attractive. She had a couple of small tattoos. I had great times with her. The first couple sessions were mind blowing. I can't remember much about Lori because she uses different name now and it has been at least a year. I probably enjoyed her if I can remember the pictures.
[/QUOTE]I haven't booked either Nicole or Lori. Both are listed as 25 and I usually interpret that to mean 35. Not the case with Nicole? I'll give her a spin if by "young," you mean <30 and by "small tattoos," you mean smaller than an iPhone.

I looked at KTE and Ctvb*is and noticed that the lineups just changed; more 90-day Kgirls clocking in for Q1 2019.

[QUOTE=Rocketron1006;4095164]That's a great referral for Min (I assume that's the Min on "mid-Wilshire" I've looked at her ad a number of times longingly. My major concern is that I work for myself and don't have usable referrals (mostly AMP experiences) so not sure how I'd clear screening. But she looks like a real daisy, as Doc Holliday would have said.[/QUOTE]There are two Min now but only one Min on Eros and that's her in the pictures. He is absolutely right about that Min.

It doesn't hurt to text and ask if they would accept AMP references and if not what other information they would accept. I doubt they accept AMP references but the main point is try to get a reply first so you know what to do next.

Korean girls stop aging after 25 so I make the same assumption but I can make exceptions. When I said "young", I think she looks < 30. If she can fool me into thinking she < 30 then I am very happy but I will be somewhat disappointed if I think a girl is 50. Age matters less than how she looks. Elizabeth Hurley is 53 but still hot.

Are we talking about iPhone 4 or iPhone 8? I saw too many girls to remember specifics about their appearance. I said "couple tattoos" but there might be only one somewhere above her butt cheek or near her navel. I believe the tattoo can fit in your hand. I saw girls with almost full body tattoo or even gang tattoo but tattoo is no big deal so I would not remember much. She may be great for me but just decent for you. I am not going to recommend a new girl who does not use accurate pictures unless she looks really good to me. This is why I have only posted about three girls so far with their pictures. There were two other girls I haven't posted yet.

I understand your disappointments if these are the only two bookers you TOFTT. I enjoyed a few of their girls too but there are girls I just don't feel like trying. There was even a young girl at KTE recently that was very cute and very good to me but she was not using her real pictures and only work very briefly. I am always excited when any lineup changes. I TOFTT for a long time so bookers may throw me a bone once in a while. Newbie who TOFTT cannot avoid the minefield.

[QUOTE=Blarharse;4095399]I haven't booked either Nicole or Lori. Both are listed as 25 and I usually interpret that to mean 35. Not the case with Nicole? I'll give her a spin if by "young," you mean <30 and by "small tattoos," you mean smaller than an iPhone.

I looked at KTE and Ctvb*is and noticed that the lineups just changed; more 90-day Kgirls clocking in for Q1 2019.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Blarharse;4093955]I can confirm that Roya is still with 6683.[/QUOTE]Has anyone seen Taylor in the past couple weeks? Been trying to see her but Booker keeps offering Erin, hasn't offered Roya either. Wondering if I'm blacklisted from taylor, or if she's just on Vaca.

[QUOTE=TickingTock;4096178]Has anyone seen Taylor in the past couple weeks? Been trying to see her but Booker keeps offering Erin, hasn't offered Roya either. Wondering if I'm blacklisted from taylor, or if she's just on Vaca.[/QUOTE]I Try book Taylor last week. The 6683 Booker told me she off. Anyone booked Taylor with 3262 number recently?

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4095884]There are two Min now but only one Min on Eros and that's her in the pictures. He is absolutely right about that Min.

It doesn't hurt to text and ask if they would accept AMP references and if not what other information they would accept. I doubt they accept AMP references but the main point is try to get a reply first so you know what to do next.[/QUOTE]She is great, but not BBFS as far as I know (seen her multiple times). So if you require that, you may be disappointed.

Can anyone confirm how Lyn w / sunny booker is lately? Is she still skinny and great service? I know she only works limited hours from M-F only?

PM me and we can exchange info. Thanks.

JAZMINE.

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/jazmine-escort-los-angeles-441066[/URL]

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4097905]JAZMINE.

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/jazmine-escort-los-angeles-441066[/URL][/QUOTE]Wondering if she's the same as the Jazmin with J and in OC?

[QUOTE=Toungsten;4097905]JAZMINE.

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/jazmine-escort-los-angeles-441066[/URL][/QUOTE]Wow she looks tasty. Anyone see her yet?

Looks to be at SweetAsianGem.