Massage Parlor Reports

[QUOTE=PwHerman;2027259]It's very easy to try to put ourselves into another's shoes in a particular situation and say " I would've...". It is much harder to say with any accuracy what we REALLY would have done. Perhaps you have nerves of steel and would have done what you said. Me on the other hand probably would have followed suit with TBone and been caught so off guard that by the time I thought of something to do or say the moment is passed. While I assume we all prepare in our heads for what to do if LEO stops us coming out of a spa (STFU) I am willing to bet that no one here planned in their head for a bat shit crazy do gooder taking our pictures.

In terms of your action plan I would advise against it. First off, as unsettling as it is she has not broken any laws. Secondly if there is any struggle at all you can bet your ass that it will be viewed as some sort of assault. Lastly, keep in mind that this particular spa has no less than half a dozen businesses with direct sight lines to the front door and where TBone was photographed. How sure are you that none of those had video cameras that may happen to catch views next door or across the street. Huge difference if this women goes to LEO and reports TBone for leaving a spa as opposed to reporting you for accosting her and destroying her personal property.

At the end of the day, some woman took TBones picture I am pretty sure Fox is not waiting with baited breath for pictures of random guys doing nothing wrong to put on TV. The bigger issue is for the Spa itself as they are the ultimate target whether intended or not. We have been down this road before and it usually follows the same script, things are great until someone complains and the LEO is forced to act.

Just my .02 and maybe not worth even that.[/QUOTE]I agree with PW -- It is unlikely that in these circumstances I would have had the presence of mind to react. However, a good response would be to pull out your cell phone camera and take her picture. Sure, she could post spa customer pics online somewhere with a caption saying she noticed a few guys exiting a spa. If we had her picture, we could then reply in kind, posting it online with a caption: "A streetwalker crack *hore seen on our town!

I'm with those who think this is a really bad idea in practice, no matter how appealing it might be in theory. This poor woman apparently has so little to occupy her time that she has convinced herself that she is on a moral crusade that will bring lots of attention and assistance from the media. In fact, the media isn't about to post pictures from someone like her that appear to show someone in a slightly compromising situation. Imagine what the world would be like if they started doing that.

Some of you may remember the recent situation with Jennifer in S-dbury. A local station had film from outside a location where there had been a recent arrest, and they still blurred out the face and license plate of the guy entering / leaving the establishment. I'm no lawyer, but I suspect that for a media outlet to show a private person in a context that suggests lawbreaking (but with no evidence thereof) could verge on libel under the right circumstances. Even if it's not libel, there's a clear possibility that they smeared a guy who's completely innocent. Nobody likes to have to apologize for crap like that.

On the other hand, following the actions mentioned below could easily have generated a 911 call with a plausible accusation of assault, theft, and / or malicious destruction of property. That's clearly newsworthy, especially if there was an arrest to go with it. Unless you managed to leave without letting anyone see your license plate and having completely destroyed the memory card, it's hard to believe that you could avoid such an outcome. The resulting coverage would make a much larger stink than a picture of someone simply visiting a MP.

If this woman thinks her pictures will make the morning paper, she's delusional. If she doesn't really believe it, then she's just yanking your chain. It can be hard to walk away from something like that, but it's really for the best all around.

[QUOTE=DontFailMeNow;2027186]You handled it much differently than I would have. Without a doubt I would have grabbed the camera out of her hands, smashed it on the ground, and walked away, not uttering a single word. What she did wouldn't fly with me. And after everything was said and done, there would have been very little she could have done about it.[/QUOTE]

In recent months I've been taking a weird "bucket list" approach to AMP's west of the city. Although I've made good progress in Woosta and Mahlborough, I've fallen behind a little in F-Ham, and I've even missed a few that are closed now. Anyways, the other day I decided to check FBW off my list. Stopped by mid-afternoon at a dumpy basement facility. I got Maggie. Middle-aged, nothing special. As usual, I only had time for HH, but the rate there is 50. Massage was pretty bad, but I did leave happy, more or less. I was told there's no expanded menu. During the HH, she took two calls and at the end she stepped out to let another monger in. With all the activity she forgot to wipe the oil off my back before the flip. Standard tip. I wouldn't repeat unless in a very serious pinch or if there was better talent. YMMV, of course.

So, for my bucket list, it looks like 400 and Lavender are both closed (missed them) as is Myrtle (got it). I've hit FBW, Pink, 82, and 62 with mixed results. I saw one report that the place on route 9 that never advertised is closed now. Can you guys confirm that? Also, can anyone confirm first-hand that there are real, natural-born, DNA-confirmed, female women to be had at either J or H, also on route 9?

Thanks guys. Stay safe out there!

What's up fellas! I'm visiting a friend in Waltham, any suggestions for a good AMP with extras? I went to Crystal Spa in Lexington, real cute chick but no extras, not even a HJ just a straight massage. The massage was legit though, I may go back before heading home on Monday. Not a lot of parking though.

[URL]http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/thp/4360986838.html[/URL]


Also I saw this ad on BP, anyone checked these ladies out?

[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/BodyRubs/brasilian-and-dominican-late-night-rubs-23/25848327[/URL]

Fellow mongers,

Possibly within the next few weeks, I may try my first AMP(with extras)in the US since the early 1990's (most of my massages were in SE Asia). While that's no big deal, here's the thing, some of you may or may not know, I'm African-American. Aside from that, I severely lack experience and, I just don't know what to expect to the point it would make me nervous. I've heard stories such as black guys don't visit parlors, were this and that and most are not true. I'm looking for some information so if anyone can help me I appreciate it. If there's an AMP that you guys could recommend for me, that would be awesome.

[QUOTE=MeatMan;2027611]Fellow mongers,

Possibly within the next few weeks, I may try my first AMP(with extras)in the US since the early 1990's (most of my massages were in SE Asia). While that's no big deal, here's the thing, some of you may or may not know, I'm African-American. Aside from that, I severely lack experience and, I just don't know what to expect to the point it would make me nervous. I've heard stories such as black guys don't visit parlors, were this and that and most are not true. I'm looking for some information so if anyone can help me I appreciate it. If there's an AMP that you guys could recommend for me, that would be awesome.[/QUOTE]I have tried asking the parlors why they do not service African Americans, and the response I get is that they are scared of ripping their tight clitz and have it loose. My fellow homiez want and like Asians, but for some odd reason, they are scared to even open the door when I am with an OG visiting a parlor...

This is one of the reason why I dislike "donating" my time and money to those type of parlors...

[QUOTE=MrBao;2027655]I have tried asking the parlors why they do not service African Americans, and the response I get is that they are scared of ripping their tight clitz and have it loose. My fellow homiez walike Asians, but for some odd reason, they are scared to even open the door when I am with an OG visiting a parlor...

This is one of the reason why I dislike "donating" my time and money to those type of parlors...[/QUOTE]Well, that's funny because when I was in Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, and a few other countries, I was welcomed with open arms. The women were at LEAST 90-110 stone, petite and here I am some 6 ft bald black dude being coerced, haggled, even PULLED to try them out!. Here in Mass, the game is entirely different. I'm going to research this a bit more.

[QUOTE=Ruggerz66;2027178]I have to agree-I have been to many AMP's where a monger walks in off the street and sets up shop in the waiting room-when this happens to me-I leave, wait in my car and look for the other guy to leave and then go in-Monger courtesy. In other places where one girl is working and there are 2 or more rooms-they can put you in the room to wait-where I have fallen asleep a couple of times.

Of course-this never seemed to be an issue in the old days at Danish Health Club or Olde English Spa where you were in the locker rooms with other mongers and then in the line up room with just a towel on. I guess we are all getting up tight about visibility now rather than in the past. Just kind of funny.[/QUOTE]I remember before the big crackdown in RI when Lily on admiral street was so popular it would have a dozen of us in a waiting room. I also remember at Angel & Amy's waiting in there entry for a monger to leave and having a monger wait while I left. Anyone ever pick up the curtain and look in the other room. .

To those below.

My response was purely based upon being surprised by such an incident and reacting to it instinctually. It's also a response based upon experience, as it wouldn't be the first time I had dealt with someone pulling out a phone to make a call or take a photo (situations unrelated to mongoring). Could there be repercussions for my actions? Sure could. Is it a smart move? Probably not. But it just is what it is. No ones taking a picture of me without my consent. No one's making a phone call about me without my consent (obviously can't do anything about calls or pics being taken that I wasn't aware of). I'm not going to assault a woman over taking my photo, but one way or another, that data card in the camera is either getting snapped in half or it's coming with me. Simple as that.

[QUOTE=NoRush;2027316]I'm with those who think this is a really bad idea in practice, no matter how appealing it might be in theory. This poor woman apparently has so little to occupy her time that she has convinced herself that she is on a moral crusade that will bring lots of attention and assistance from the media. In fact, the media isn't about to post pictures from someone like her that appear to show someone in a slightly compromising situation. Imagine what the world would be like if they started doing that.

Some of you may remember the recent situation with Jennifer in S-dbury. A local station had film from outside a location where there had been a recent arrest, and they still blurred out the face and license plate of the guy entering / leaving the establishment. I'm no lawyer, but I suspect that for a media outlet to show a private person in a context that suggests lawbreaking (but with no evidence thereof) could verge on libel under the right circumstances. Even if it's not libel, there's a clear possibility that they smeared a guy who's completely innocent. Nobody likes to have to apologize for crap like that.

On the other hand, following the actions mentioned below could easily have generated a 911 call with a plausible accusation of assault, theft, and / or malicious destruction of property. That's clearly newsworthy, especially if there was an arrest to go with it. Unless you managed to leave without letting anyone see your license plate and having completely destroyed the memory card, it's hard to believe that you could avoid such an outcome. The resulting coverage would make a much larger stink than a picture of someone simply visiting a MP.

If this woman thinks her pictures will make the morning paper, she's delusional. If she doesn't really believe it, then she's just yanking your chain. It can be hard to walk away from something like that, but it's really for the best all around.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BlamboMcGee;2027275]I agree with PW -- It is unlikely that in these circumstances I would have had the presence of mind to react. However, a good response would be to pull out your cell phone camera and take her picture. Sure, she could post spa customer pics online somewhere with a caption saying she noticed a few guys exiting a spa. If we had her picture, we could then reply in kind, posting it online with a caption: "A streetwalker crack *hore seen on our town![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PwHerman;2027259]It's very easy to try to put ourselves into another's shoes in a particular situation and say " I would've...". It is much harder to say with any accuracy what we REALLY would have done. Perhaps you have nerves of steel and would have done what you said. Me on the other hand probably would have followed suit with TBone and been caught so off guard that by the time I thought of something to do or say the moment is passed. While I assume we all prepare in our heads for what to do if LEO stops us coming out of a spa (STFU) I am willing to bet that no one here planned in their head for a bat shit crazy do gooder taking our pictures.

In terms of your action plan I would advise against it. First off, as unsettling as it is she has not broken any laws. Secondly if there is any struggle at all you can bet your ass that it will be viewed as some sort of assault. Lastly, keep in mind that this particular spa has no less than half a dozen businesses with direct sight lines to the front door and where TBone was photographed. How sure are you that none of those had video cameras that may happen to catch views next door or across the street. Huge difference if this women goes to LEO and reports TBone for leaving a spa as opposed to reporting you for accosting her and destroying her personal property.

At the end of the day, some woman took TBones picture I am pretty sure Fox is not waiting with baited breath for pictures of random guys doing nothing wrong to put on TV. The bigger issue is for the Spa itself as they are the ultimate target whether intended or not. We have been down this road before and it usually follows the same script, things are great until someone complains and the LEO is forced to act.

Just my .02 and maybe not worth even that.[/QUOTE]

You have made your point very clear. There are many of us that might choose not to flame the fire with a calculated understanding of the likely consequences. Now go get a massage and relax! But maybe try a different location.

[QUOTE=DontFailMeNow;2027826]To those below.

My response was purely based upon being surprised by such an incident and reacting to it instinctually. It's also a response based upon experience, as it wouldn't be the first time I had dealt with someone pulling out a phone to make a call or take a photo (situations unrelated to mongoring). Could there be repercussions for my actions? Sure could. Is it a smart move? Probably not. But it just is what it is. No ones taking a picture of me without my consent. No one's making a phone call about me without my consent (obviously can't do anything about calls or pics being taken that I wasn't aware of). I'm not going to assault a woman over taking my photo, but one way or another, that data card in the camera is either getting snapped in half or it's coming with me. Simple as that.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NoRush;2027351]In recent months I've been taking a weird "bucket list" approach to AMP's west of the city. Although I've made good progress in Woosta and Mahlborough, I've fallen behind a little in F-Ham, and I've even missed a few that are closed now. Anyways, the other day I decided to check FBW off my list. Stopped by mid-afternoon at a dumpy basement facility. I got Maggie. Middle-aged, nothing special. As usual, I only had time for HH, but the rate there is 50. Massage was pretty bad, but I did leave happy, more or less. I was told there's no expanded menu. During the HH, she took two calls and at the end she stepped out to let another monger in. With all the activity she forgot to wipe the oil off my back before the flip. Standard tip. I wouldn't repeat unless in a very serious pinch or if there was better talent. YMMV, of course.

So, for my bucket list, it looks like 400 and Lavender are both closed (missed them) as is Myrtle (got it). I've hit FBW, Pink, 82, and 62 with mixed results. I saw one report that the place on route 9 that never advertised is closed now. Can you guys confirm that? Also, can anyone confirm first-hand that there are real, natural-born, DNA-confirmed, female women to be had at either J or H, also on route 9?

Thanks guys. Stay safe out there![/QUOTE]Yes there are a few. (I believe) At H you have Quynh, Lindsay, May and Kristal who are natural girls. You also have Mila (aka Jenny) who is post-op and a knockout from what I hear. And of course you have Natalie who is post but her parts are as good as any generic female out there (personally verified and tried back in the day) There is also Ceyla who was / is there for a while who is a girl. I believe these are correct from my intel. If anyone knows otherwise let us know. Check CL for the ads. If they are TS then it will say so. Natalie branched out from Jolin's and both will say LB or TS if that is the case.

[QUOTE=StressedOut;2027992]Yes there are a few. (I believe) At H you have Quynh, Lindsay, May and Kristal who are natural girls. You also have Mila (aka Jenny) who is post-op and a knockout from what I hear. And of course you have Natalie who is post but her parts are as good as any generic female out there (personally verified and tried back in the day) There is also Ceyla who was / is there for a while who is a girl. I believe these are correct from my intel. If anyone knows otherwise let us know. Check CL for the ads. If they are TS then it will say so. Natalie branched out from Jolin's and both will say LB or TS if that is the case.[/QUOTE]I've wanted to see both May & Krystal for some time now, but just don't want to chance it if either is a LB or TS. I'm sure I couldn't take it lightly if I found out half way through the session, and who needs more trouble. I think having TSs & LBs hurts their business. Just my opinion.

Anyone have experience with 855 in Fram?

[URL]http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/thp/4365913982.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=Ridem;2028096]Anyone have experience with 855 in Fram?

[URL]http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/thp/4365913982.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Stressed just covered this in second post below yours.

[QUOTE=WalterMitty;2014873]It's in Braintree.

I've been there before, about a year ago, just a massage no HE. Nice looking girls too. Good to see it changing.[/QUOTE]Did some mongering and like going to old / new places that see some changes from the board. Went to the place near the rail, and was very happy. I haven't mongered much, last place was 1073, but this is now my go to place. No quincy bait and switch, no old, like really old ladies doing massage. PM 4 more details. You see a lot of disappointing reviews from places but this was a quality massage, nice place, and obviously new staff / owners but same place.