Employees catch on quick.
[QUOTE=Vankleek]OK, I wouldn't have been as calm as you were, so I give you props. Just curious on why you think the cops picked on you and this lady friend. Was she higher volume? What kind of hotel? It would be valuable to know what might have set off the ho-dar of the hotel employees.[/QUOTE]
Back quite a few years ago, I picked up a hot little SW. We went to her room at the motel next to McD's on SOBT & Oak Ridge. This girl had just gotten out of a 90 day stay at 33rd street. I was her first in three months. She was incredible! Tightest, most enthusiastic I've ever had. What a romp; my best ever! She gave me more than an hour of pure energy.
This was early afternoon. I had to have more and called back that evening. I asked the operator for the room #. He gruffly replied, " I threw that wh*re out! Don't call back here again!"
It doesn't take long for the staff to figure things out. They don't have to be SW's, either.
1 photos
Birds eye view of the trail
For the out of towner's, etc. You do realize you can go to google maps or better yet Google Earth and get street views of the trail. Pics are taken from a camera about every 50' or so.
Pic is in intersection of Trail and 18th, looking east up 18th.
Anyone recognize the girl
Damn I think I just saw my vehicle. LOL
STONER v. CALIFORNIA, 376 U.S. 483 (1964)
I suggest you all remember the name of this case, should you be in a hotel and the police come knocking.
[url]http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=376&invol=483[/url]
No less than a tenant of a house, or the occupant of a room in a boarding house, McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , a guest in a hotel room is entitled to constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 . That protection would disappear if it were left to depend upon the unfettered discretion of an employee of the hotel. It follows that this search without a warrant was unlawful. Since evidence obtained through the search was admitted at the trial, the judgment must be reversed. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 . 8
Posted on C/l casuals this morning!! Be careful
Craigslist sex sting nets four arrests in Altamonte Springs
July 22, 2010|By Gary Taylor, Orlando SentinelFour men who answered a Craigslist ad were arrested Wednesday at an Altamonte Springs hotel after the woman they offered to pay for sex turned out to be an undercover police officer.
The men each offered the officer between $80 and $150 before they were arrested, Altamonte Springs police Officer Timothy Hyer said.
[blue][Name(s) deleted by Admin][/blue], 60, of Altamonte Springs, [blue][Name(s) deleted by Admin][/blue], 23, of Longwood, [blue][Name(s) deleted by Admin][/blue], 40, of Winter Springs, and [blue][Name(s) deleted by Admin][/blue], 36, of Orlando, face a charge of assignation to commit prostitution, Hyer said.
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove the names of persons who were arrested[/u] from the report.
I want to say this carefully so no one gets the wrong idea here, but if you think about it, posting the names of people who have been arrested is [u]somewhat heartless[/u] and really just helping the police in their efforts to embarrass these people.
Since this website is all about assisting people in obtaining commercial sex services, we don't want to add to the problems of the unfortunate people who have been arrested by publishing their names and/or photographs.
[i]Thanks![/i][/blue]
Thanks for my monger buddies
I am a little busy in my work and family business. Plus, a little fed up with the sw on OBT, hehehehe.
XX
[QUOTE=Rbw2001]I recieved a pm last night from him. He didn't mention any problems. I think he is laying low, looking for new sws.[/QUOTE]