Philly Sugar

[QUOTE=Pleck2;6247092]Shit shit shit. I can't believe I did that even though I've walked others through that same problem. I was multi-tasking and dropped the ball. I'll fix.

And thanks for the intel on SLF. I kind of suspected that but she was careful with her photos.[/QUOTE]Preliminary Report.

5. Sports lover. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7df85e51-62e9-4b6b-b6a9-bd494fd664ad[/URL].

I'm skeptical here because it's a bare bones profile with a partial face photo, but I reached out anyway because I liked the partial photo, her metrics and her emphasis on "Discretion". Plus, it wasn't a brand new file. I sent a note and got a timely (not too fast or slow) response that she wanted to start out online. Which is only a red flag to me if that means Facetime-type, Skype stuff (other than for verification purposes) but, if it means "let's correspond for a bit" before we decide to meet, I'll play along. Any experience?

6. SecretLittleFreak. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/afffd44d-aa6d-408f-839a-96a830ebf143[/URL] (I'm just fixing the link because, based on the feedback from Poker Shark and Know One, I'm not even a little interested.).

She's a project because she's looking for help in acting out kinky role-play fantasies but is, admittedly, terrified for the same reason she hasn't brought up the topic with past partners: fear of rejection or, on this forum, fear of going through with it if she gets stage fright. Which is fine. I left the ball in her court and she hasn't been back since but -- if she does return, and this interests you -- be firm but fair and you may hit the jackpot. Because there's lots of repressed stuff dying to come out.

7. SmileLikeTheSunRise. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/30858c90-8ff7-4cd9-9cee-cd54f9fef2c1[/URL].

I think I posted this before. She's a slam-dunk who can host weekdays in NE PHL (favoring Bustleton). It's a "back pocket" situation for me but could be very convenient for those of you in that area.

[QUOTE=Pleck2;6247092]Shit shit shit. I can't believe I did that even though I've walked others through that same problem. I was multi-tasking and dropped the ball. I'll fix.

And thanks for the intel on SLF. I kind of suspected that but she was careful with her photos.[/QUOTE]It's all about the angle of the pic. The hotties almost always have a full body shot. The shame is hidden. I actually have a shirtless pic in my locked photos- shows my ink and the freaks love it.

[QUOTE=DudeOfDelco;6245441]I found this kind of funny.

Suffice it to say, I don't think this is going to go very far.[/QUOTE]When someone has "northeast" "bella vista" or "northwest" it's a red flag. Like 95% a hustle.

[QUOTE=Pleck2;6247100]Preliminary Report.

5. Sports lover. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7df85e51-62e9-4b6b-b6a9-bd494fd664ad[/URL].

I'm skeptical here because it's a bare bones profile with a partial face photo, but I reached out anyway because I liked the partial photo, her metrics and her emphasis on "Discretion". Plus, it wasn't a brand new file. I sent a note and got a timely (not too fast or slow) response that she wanted to start out online. Which is only a red flag to me if that means Facetime-type, Skype stuff (other than for verification purposes) but, if it means "let's correspond for a bit" before we decide to meet, I'll play along. Any experience?

6. SecretLittleFreak. [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/afffd44d-aa6d-408f-839a-96a830ebf143[/URL] (I'm just fixing the link because, based on the feedback from Poker Shark and Know One, I'm not even a little interested.).

She's a project because she's looking for help in acting out kinky role-play fantasies but is, admittedly, terrified for the same reason she hasn't brought up the topic with past partners: fear of rejection or, on this forum, fear of going through with it if she gets stage fright. Which is fine. I left the ball in her court and she hasn't been back since but -- if she does return, and this interests you -- be firm but fair and you may hit the jackpot. Because there's lots of repressed stuff dying to come out.[/QUOTE]7. I chatted with her last week. Nothing bare (including oral). I passed. BBJCIM is a must for me.

Also I didn't find her attractive from the pics she sent. She's more of what you would see on listcrawler.

[QUOTE=PokerShark11;6247926]It's all about the angle of the pic. The hotties almost always have a full body shot. The shame is hidden. I actually have a shirtless pic in my locked photos- shows my ink and the freaks love it.[/QUOTE]I can't believe women think we will fall for it even though, I do all the time. I find myself always hoping that she looks almost as good as the weird angle makes her look!

Has anyone receive an unsolicited message from Sherry1113. I got one but have signed up again yet and I'm wondering if she's worth it. Something about the pictures seems a little off to me. I'm not a big fan of the fake tan or whatever is going on here.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f03b709c-aa00-461a-9ca7-c12c978f5e9f[/URL]

[QUOTE=Mythbuster;6248365]I can't believe women think we will fall for it even though, I do all the time. I find myself always hoping that she looks almost as good as the weird angle makes her look![/QUOTE]I need to listen to my own rule, based on a long time spent on dating apps. On SA if a woman has an extreme angle pic that only shows her face and describes herself as curvy its a Hell NAW!

I only search Slim, Athletic, Average & Curvy. I skip "A Few Extra- Other" Not going to fill my feed up with gals that should be paying me. And if I could stomach it I'd be a male SB for biggies. But I can't.

[QUOTE=Mythbuster;6248384]Has anyone receive an unsolicited message from Sherry1113. I got one but have signed up again yet and I'm wondering if she's worth it. Something about the pictures seems a little off to me. I'm not a big fan of the fake tan or whatever is going on here.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f03b709c-aa00-461a-9ca7-c12c978f5e9f[/URL][/QUOTE]She messaged me about 15 days ago but I never followed up with her.

[QUOTE=PokerShark11;6236266][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a4d9a0e9-deba-4621-9355-c7423480f9a6[/URL]

Pro vibe kind of. Would meet out for a drink and is very DTF. Most likely no rubber needed. Having a planB on hand would be preferred. She cannot host. 5 x $ won't budge. Seems pretty normal though.[/QUOTE]I'm guessing her old profile wasn't working for her! I wonder if she'll come down from the 5 $ price tag?

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1429d97e-db39-4583-8b74-b54c2bc9c576[/URL]

[QUOTE=PiesOnlyPlz;6248603]She messaged me about 15 days ago but I never followed up with her.[/QUOTE]Sherry. I messaged her back. I told her she was alittle far for me. She said she usually gets 5 xx. I said I usually do half of that. She hasn't responded back in 3 days. So I closed my pics on her. So she blocked me. She looks attractive but not for 5 xx. She is probably older than 35. Her pics are very modified. So she maybe 45 and that's not even worth half of 5 xx. Just my 2 cents.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/096ccd49-961b-4be9-aef4-795bb9f67698[/URL]

Was talking to here, I got major pro vibes. Doesn't meet for free, but open to starting something immediately. Was very upfront about price, wanted $$ and no more than 2 hours. I told her $$ was my limit and she didn't respond.

I was talking to this one. We moved to text. She supposedly has a massage studio somewhere in Philly. She wanted to meet ASAP, but to schedule a massage you need to give her a $30 deposit. No bueno.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/149d89a2-e7ae-44b8-b573-c2fb76422c3f[/URL]

[QUOTE=JDRedBull;6249262]Sherry. I messaged her back. I told her she was alittle far for me. She said she usually gets 5 xx. I said I usually do half of that. She hasn't responded back in 3 days. So I closed my pics on her. So she blocked me. She looks attractive but not for 5 xx. She is probably older than 35. Her pics are very modified. So she maybe 45 and that's not even worth half of 5 xx. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]She told me she wanted 5 x, once or twice a week LOL.

Some simps on here reporting back. So based on this I'll no longer be sharing info either good or bad. Why'all will have to waste your time on scam artists and guess about who is worth while.

[QUOTE=PokerShark11;6251877]Some simps on here reporting back. So based on this I'll no longer be sharing info either good or bad. Why'all will have to waste your time on scam artists and guess about who is worth while.[/QUOTE]WTF is wrong with these dudes? Fools.