You took the words out of my mouth
[QUOTE=DynoJr;3320571]I like what I saw, but I didn't like that 90% of your posts have been about her on forums in Chicago, St. Louis, Nashville and Memphis. Do you not have anything else to discuss?[/QUOTE]I was put off by these posts even if she is sort of my type. Also, while pricing is at the normal range of higher end, her reviews on TER doesn't suggest a full GFE menu. Can't remember if she is CBJ and if dfk or cim are excluded as well.
I also agree with Ron as I feel like it's more like self promotion of adverstisement by a loyal regular. The forum does allow providers to join. Kimmy (RD's share over CL section) responded to guys from time to time. Providers just cannot advertise here, they should use the classified AD site by USASG.
I am not being critical about Kat nor what you all are saying
[QUOTE=BigBoiTerry;3321081][URL]https://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=290933[/URL]
I understand some guys that may have a reservation, BUT, Kat does indeed have a stellar reputation. None of you guys from Chi-town know who I am, but take a look at the Memphis forum, or you can just research my post, I'm not a BS type of guy, and I would HIGHLY recommend Kat to any hobbyist. I don't know what it's like in your town, but I've grown very weary of wasting both my time and money on subpar ladies. Kat will give you cause to leave her and not give a 2nd thought about anything, other than the great time that you just had.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Mike1701;3321054]I have been knowing Kat for a long time. She takes GFE to the next level.
You will not find a safer provider any where you travel. I trust her 1000%.
Why'all need to experience a real southern beauty. With zero drama.[/QUOTE]Kat is on my radar since Memphis folks posted supportive posts here last year ahead of her Chicago visit. I did check ECCIC and TER to learn about her. I updated my intel gathering again this time.
Note that I understand completely that YMMV is the best expectation for any encounter with an escort in spite of how stellar her services were reviewed and reported. Many things at both ends can impact the outcome of the meet. I like her looks, so I'm not going into her appearance for the rest of my post.
On TER, 4 reviews scored her service at 6 or lower. You can say Chicago reviewers are harsh since the one with 3 is from Chicago. But 2 of them are from Memphis too, one in 2015 and one in last year.
On ECCIE, her reviews are consistently positive with one "not-recommend" from a guy in Nashville.
From what I read of these reviews, I only see Kat may be more of a YMMV encounter, I see your posts as more on the positive side, an good indicator that if she and I are clicked, then I'll have a good time like you had. I do not consider those posts as a deal breaker to me, given what you guys said.
The one review carries the most weight is the latest one, posted by a prolific Chicago reviewer, whose reviews are pretty fair and would tell readers why he come to the score he gave. He reviewed several girls that I also met, so I can understand how he score beyond the constraints from TER policy. For Kat, he said he enjoyed the experience but he could only score 7 for her service per TER policy. This point is pretty much saying he didn't get a lot of service items that can allow him score Kat higher in spite of the availability suggested by previous reviews. So, again, more of a YMMV situation, right?
For me, I'd spend $300 to $600 per hour to meet a escort with a pretty open menu. A next-level GFE should have a menu short of Greek. I consider CIM as required if I want to categorize a provider as next-level. You guys described her as non-rush and suggested that she is likely to spend more than an hour during a 60-minute meeting. I do consider this as a next-level GFE service, but I don't believe she would do that to everybody since it makes little business sense. It's nice to get more than I pay for, but I believe she would do that only when the 'connection' is there. Also, sometimes guys cannot enjoy that because they are also have a tight schedule. CIM, on the other hand, is something more concrete that hobbyists are looking for and will love to enjoy. So, in order to be called next level, CIM should not be a YMMV item that only happen when the stars align. At least this is my humble opinion. She is definitely GFE to me with DFK, FIV, BBBJ on the table.
You guys can check out the Texas girls that I posted recently in this section. All of them have listed a very open menu in the style that providing a decent base rate ($330 per hour like Kat) including BBBJ, fiv, dfk, daty, cim, with defined up-charges for additional items like Greek, photo, and videos. This is what I mean by consistency. As long as you order and pay, the odds of YMMV is very low, and if they decline services during meeting, such as not letting you fuck her ass because yours is too big, they do not ask for the up-charge. These girls all have stellar reviews on ECCIE and TER. With much more reviews and higher scoring, it is fair for me to believe these girls' service are pretty consistent, whatever you want to call it as GFE or PSE.
It is still a good sign to me that Kat has folks backing her reputation up. I see the tad over-the-top sentiment as an effort of counter-balancing the TER reviews. I hope you guys can confirm whether CIM/COF is on Kat's menu, and if so, I'd agree with your assessment of Kat more.
Not many visiting spinners next week
[QUOTE=NewCleve;3321359]I wish those girls from Texas would visit more often. I have some free time next week and I'm craving a real spinner.[/QUOTE]From P411, there are not true spinners in town this week. Rosalyn Small and Jane Smith are leaving on 3/29. So you might be able to meet them on Monday or Tuesday. Kat from Memphis is actually the next best thing you can find recent TER ad if she could stay here next week.
Chloe Tao doesn't allow CIM, so as long as that's not a deal-breaker for you to spend $350/ hr, she would be the local independent spinner worth checking out. [URL]http://www.chloetao.com[/URL].
Spinners and Petite Latinas
I've had amazing luck lately with [URL]touringgirls.com[/URL] and the great girls they have been sending to Chicago the last few weeks. They regularly charge $300 but many of their girls have a $50 off review special. I've seen Bruna, Camila, and Jenny from them and all three were top-notch full GFE and beautiful. The pictures are real, and the girls are pleasers with great skills. Full GFE, MSOG, kissing, and they give you the full hour. Jenny is downtown for a few more days. She is a fun lady. (No I'm not receiving compensation for this report).
Isn't she with Sandra's before?
[QUOTE=Whooptedoo;3321554]For those that like to plan ahead and also like and enthusiastic partner without a lot of rules, I can highly recommend this lady who will be visiting in April.
[URL]http://www.preferred411.com/p243781[/URL]
Whooptedoo.[/QUOTE]5'4" 125 lbs is slender, but not spinner like 4'9"-5'2" and under 105 lbs. 5'3" and 5'4" is a bit of a stretch IMHO, I can agree with a spinner mention as a marketing description in the ad for girls of 5'4" and under 115 lbs; or 5'3" and under 110 lbs. Because the body appears tall but skinny enough when the numbers are correct.
Rosalyn is the only true spinner among the Texas girls visiting Chicago in March, KK and JS are both under the stretch definition.
As for Anastazja Rose, she should be a great time as I remember she offer fully open menu when she was with Sandra's. $350 is her tag on P411, which is a nice deal given her menu even if she is a tad older than those Texas girls. But even her own P411 profile says Athletic about herself. Similarly, I'd call Linda Muse thin or skinny, but not a true spinner since she is also about 5'3" or 5'4"
A spinner should be, by definition, of a short and skinny girl and able to let almost every hobbyist to 'spin' them when she is sitting/riding his dick in a stand-up mish position. Obviously if you are 6 feet tall and 300lbs and a gym rat, you can probably carry and spin a curvy BBW. This is why I'd want to draw a clear line and suggest that Ms Rose is not really a spinner.
The most important thing is
[QUOTE=EricLex;3320750]Gentleman, Thank you.
A few days ago, I posted how I was on the hunt for a latina provider, and many of you provided me with a lot of useful information. I truly appreciate all of the info you guys provided me with, and for that I owe you all a solid.
I didn't get a chance to see anyone at Redtease nor anyone of Sandras' girls. I instead decided to give Mia Bella a try. I am so glad I did. She was an amazing time, and I very much enjoyed my stay with her. The persistence in research paid off.
It does not matter that she's not GFE, but I wish she was. Out of all of the non-GFE experiences I've had in the 5 years in the hobby, she is the damn best experience I've had, and I'd rather see her than my current GFE lineup. I'll be sure to report more as I try out different providers--only now I will have higher standards for services due to my experience with this amazing lady.[/QUOTE]That you had a great time with your date! Research is indeed crucial. I'm glad that the feedback you got from here helped you decide to take the risk with new options. Feel free to share intel with others at here in the future.
Advanced booking will help
[QUOTE=Rackster;3322923]That is good deal but her girls are almost never DT. Also they are mostly mid 30's girls.[/QUOTE]Linda who will be retired at the end of April actually loves downtown meetings. If you schedule with Sandra in advance for a day or two, she would try facilitate that if the girl doesn't insist hosting in Ohare area only. She would then take DT appointments for the girl you want to see in DT for the day of your appointment. But if you don't reach out in advance, then Sandra is likely to book Ohare area hotels for her girls.
Wrong place to ask this question
[QUOTE=ElVerder13;3326018]By Armitage and Kostner.[/QUOTE]From what you are asking, I suspect you are interested in seeing a provider hosting around that intersection. I doubt the higher-end girls we discuss here are hosting there since no good hotels are located there. You should direct your question to BP section and include an URL of the girl's ad.
They advertised on TER at times
[QUOTE=Ephermal12;3335628]Anyone ever use this service?
[URL]http://www.chicagosugarbabyescorts.com[/URL]
Did a search found nothing; they seem pretty new.
Thanks![/QUOTE]They seem new. But I'd contact Sandra (elite-secret companion) and book Bella Kay / Kimmy Kay if I want to see Jenna Gold. [URL]http://elite-secret.companionfiles.com/models/40632[/URL].
The problem with Explicit Escorts
I have been lucky enough over the past few months to spend time with three different providers from Explicit Escorts, and had an amazing time with each of them, well worth the very high fee. But there is a problem with that agency, and it lies with the person who runs their phone/texting and email booking.
Every time I have booked, or tried to book (because I've tried a few times and failed), I've had to deal with a person who is on the customer service level of an angry drive-through cashier who is sick of working fast food, and treats customers like garbage. Impolite (sometimes downright rude), poor follow-through on emails and texts, and on giving location information, a couple times I was given the wrong address, once it was a completely different girl at the location I was given.
I'm guessing the women who work for this agency have nothing to do with this, they're just touring girls who go from city to city, and this is just who they deal with in Chicago. And I'm not even telling you not to use this agency, just be prepared to deal with a very rude person who doesn't seem to give a crap about you or your business. At the price point they're charging, they should be a bit more aware of how they're presenting themselves to their customers.
