Printable View
[QUOTE=Baltimonger]Yes. Living on Christian St. now. She looks pretty bad, even though she just got out of jail. I almost lost my lunch at the sight of the blood. I had to get up and leave.
Larry no Ruthie? Never? Wow! They still have her picture in Busy Bees' window.[/QUOTE]
I have never met her.
Larry!
Meeee
If it's the Stephanie that lives on S Parrish. I had the same problem also. She started to complain I went soft twice and then after the the second time. I said fuck this and droped her off. Then she got all nice and said I could repeat for free next time and to call her. Right, That's not going to happen. I paid for full service the first time and if she would have keep her mouth close I could have left happy. She had pierced nipples
[QUOTE=Heavy D]Meeee,
If it's the Stephanie that lives on S Parrish. I had the same problem also. She started to complain I went soft twice and then after the the second time. I said fuck this and droped her off. Then she got all nice and said I could repeat for free next time and to call her. Right, That's not going to happen. I paid for full service the first time and if she would have keep her mouth close I could have left happy. She had pierced nipples[/QUOTE]Yeah that's her. She showed me the nipples but wouldn't take her shirt off.
[QUOTE=Meeeee]Went down to w/w last nigth, was able to pick up Stepahnie between rain storms. Tall thin dancer body, said she was 32 but looked 39. She was very pleasant on the way to my spot. Got there, stantard tutition, ok BBBJ, won't take off her bra, which was the first disappointment, because she had nice tits, probably fake. She showed them to me and said something about them being sore. Move on to fs, wet and tight, and then the complaining starts. 3 times she complains and 3 times I wilt like a flower in a drought. At that point I was thinking we were done and she was walking but she tells me to JO on her. No no no no, I didn't pay for that, so you continues with an attitude and a BBBJ to completion. On the way back, attitude back to pleaseant. She shows me were she leaves and tells me to knock if I want to see her again. I don't think I'll repeat.[/QUOTE]That's her MO. Unless your'e a quick shooter, she starts bitching and keeps it up till you give up and go home. I wouldn't repeat for free.
Mostly 5/10 SWs, about half a dozen, heavy LE action.
Picked up Shelly and headed to her place, for 1/2 and 1/2 for $30. She took the instructions very well, did not say much, did not anything out of the ordinary.
She has roommates, but enough privacy in an A/C'd room.
Deposited the load and left in less than 15 min. All covered actionj, of course.
Looks 7/10, attitude 7/10, performance 7/10.
I rarely repeat, so cannot predict on that.
Been doing some $80/session caramel 19 YO delight on CL, but was int he mood for some creme.
Picked up Katie on WW and some side street around sunset. Went to her place and had some had and half. Good attitude, nice face, disappointing body, but overall OK.
While doing her, she looked exactly like pictures I have seen on her on this site. I mentioned it to her and she got very upset. She said the person who took the pics promised her that he will never show to anyone. She got concerned because she has a teenage son who may see her being poked.
Additionally, the person who took the photos beat her up and the story goes.
Posting private pics without a persons permission is risk and creates a potential for liability by this site and its operator.
[QUOTE=Terra Sancta]Picked up Katie on WW and some side street around sunset. Went to her place and had some had and half. Good attitude, nice face, disappointing body, but overall OK.
While doing her, she looked exactly like pictures I have seen on her on this site. I mentioned it to her and she got very upset. She said the person who took the pics promised her that he will never show to anyone. She got concerned because she has a teenage son who may see her being poked.
Additionally, the person who took the photos beat her up and the story goes.
Posting private pics without a persons permission is risk and creates a potential for liability by this site and its operator.[/QUOTE]I can't find any pic's of a Katie that looks old enough to have a teenage son. The only Katie I could find just posed and didn't actually provide a service (according to the post). This makes me think sh'e let several people take pic's of her. Why are you telling SW's about this site? It's for us not them, to give us an edge over the bad/rip off providers!
[QUOTE=Terra Sancta]Picked up Katie on WW and some side street around sunset. Went to her place and had some had and half. Good attitude, nice face, disappointing body, but overall OK.
While doing her, she looked exactly like pictures I have seen on her on this site. I mentioned it to her and she got very upset. She said the person who took the pics promised her that he will never show to anyone. She got concerned because she has a teenage son who may see her being poked.
Additionally, the person who took the photos beat her up and the story goes.
Posting private pics without a persons permission is risk and creates a potential for liability by this site and its operator.[/QUOTE]I think a pic of a SW on the street fully clothed is good intel. They are doing their own advertising and it's no secret what their occupation is.
Having said that, shots of them performing, paid for or otherwise, should have their verbal consent.
I took some shots of CIA last week (reviewed several times on here) with full intention of posting here on the site but as I was leaving, she asked me to "keep them to yourself, till I get my nerve up". Too bad...had some nice shots with my new camera.
Am I seeing things or has the number of posts to this and the general reports thread diminsihed over the spring?
I am curious if the seeming lack of posts corresponds to the recent increase in gas prices. If there is a connection, I now wonder what that means in terms of the number of SWs; I mean if the mongers aren't going to drive around due to the cost of doing so, where will supply meet demand?
The demand for service hasn't decreased and the supply of providers (or one sort or another) who need drugs or cash doesn't seemed to have changed so I now wonder if $4/gal means mongers will have to find a new way to solve the problem. Surely the SWs would like to figure out how to get some cash to fill their needs but how will this all work out if $4/gal means the customers who used to come to them - and drive aimlessly until the "right" SW is spotted - can't really afford to do so.
I can only imagine that some of the larger mongermobiles must cost $10-15, or perhaps more, just to find the "right" SW. What used to be a $20 or $40 afternoon is now at least a $40 or $60 afternoon. It used to be that one could go out with little cash, get a BJ and be home without having gone through much cash or petrol; the same squirt and dash now seems like a much larger project.
Anyway, just curious. The seemingly lower number of posts could be summer vacation or horney wives and GFs. Who knows?
Happy Hunting
Wow I never though it was because of anything except the fack we like slipping out and slipping into somthing.
[QUOTE=Ebdawgg]Am I seeing things or has the number of posts to this and the general reports thread diminsihed over the spring?
I am curious if the seeming lack of posts corresponds to the recent increase in gas prices. If there is a connection, I now wonder what that means in terms of the number of SWs; I mean if the mongers aren't going to drive around due to the cost of doing so, where will supply meet demand?
Anyway, just curious. The seemingly lower number of posts could be summer vacation or horney wives and GFs. Who knows?
Happy Hunting[/QUOTE]
I can only speak for myself. I do not post for a number of reasons. First and foremost, I was sick and tired of 1 post jerks (AKA LEO) hitting me up for info everytime I posted a report. I still feel a deep hearted obligation to mongering in general, so I still post, not just as frequently.
Next, look at who is posting. Many of the people are way new. Technically I am still new. Most of the frrequent posters either got to senior status posting crap, flaming each other, or outright ling. The established senior members only weigh in once every few weeks, and they rarely post about encounters.
Also, a couple of the great contributors are not around. If you are in the know, you know who they are, why they are not here, and when (god willing) they will be back.
Finnally, take a walk down memory lane. Look at last year's board. RTFF for an hour. The content was just plain better. The discussion was focused, and members were helping each other, not discusing geo-politics on a mongering board.
I do not want to damper things, while we have members using this board as a mental toilet (RTFF to know who) others do contribute. There are and will continue to be a couple of quality new entries to the forum. In all fairness, I should have never posted this comment.
Oriole
[QUOTE=Meeeee]I can't find any pic's of a Katie that looks old enough to have a teenage son. The only Katie I could find just posed and didn't actually provide a service (according to the post). This makes me think sh'e let several people take pic's of her. Why are you telling SW's about this site? It's for us not them, to give us an edge over the bad/rip off providers![/QUOTE]I went through the posts and found that it is PAM, formerly of Hampden, now of WW. I thought she told me her name is Katie -- either she lied or it is my memory.
I believe it is a good thing that SW know about this site, and that we share information about them; this way they know that they cannot just rip off someone and get away with it.
Also remember that most SW do not have internet connection, otherwise they will be on CL.
[QUOTE=Ebdawgg]Am I seeing things or has the number of posts to this and the general reports thread diminished over the spring?[/QUOTE]Gas prices and the economy in general affects mongers and SWs alike. The end result is better selection of SWs and richer mongers in the scene.
I used to drive around until I found a SW I really liked, but now, I cruise the loop a couple of times at most, then use my telephone list after 10 minutes, if I dont see what I like.
I have also noticed same thing on CL. There are so many HH deals for $100, which you can bargain down to $80, or even $60 after you get to know them.
To revive the show, we need to post ads for SWs on CL, to get SW flow and mongers in that direction. Only at that point the supply will be large enough to classify in one of two categories: Crack-Wh0re and Gem-Quality finds. I proposed a price structure of $10/$20 BJ/FS for the earlier, and $30/$40 for the later, with some in between.
The ad will say:
Check me out while I stroll (location) on (street1) between (street2) and (street3), between (time1) and (time2). My cell phone number is such and such. I am (ft) tall and weigh (pounds). Unlike LE, I never refuse to get into your vehicle, and unlike LE, you will not try to make me spill my beans. If y don't find me on the first pass, you will find me on the second, or even enjoy the plentiful selection.
====
Folks, don't focus on the ad, just focus on the concept.
Ebdawgg -- I think you are onto something. The flip side is that since everyone is starting to count pennies more carefully, we are also starting to see some new talent. For example, I picked up a lady who said she was a nurse who had been laid off. She had moved to this new apartment in Pimlico and did a song and dance about me needing to carry out some tools from the house to give the appearance to neighbors that I was doing some handyman work. Whatever. Her service was half-hearted so I'm not going back.
The high price of gas is definitely hurting. Enough from keeping me from cruising aimlessly.
This should be a boon to the few WGs who have a cell phone and don't lose it. Because that's how business is done these days.
[QUOTE=Meeeee]I can't find any pic's of a Katie that looks old enough to have a teenage son. The only Katie I could find just posed and didn't actually provide a service (according to the post). This makes me think sh'e let several people take pic's of her. Why are you telling SW's about this site? It's for us not them, to give us an edge over the bad/rip off providers![/QUOTE]
I think the Katie he's referring to is the Hampden Pam KarlHungus took pictures of:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=649501&postcount=1475[/url]
Then picked up recently by SirDrDunk:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=653832&postcount=1533[/url]
[quote=Terra Sancta]Posting private pics without a persons permission is risk and creates a potential for liability by this site and its operator.[/quote]
No, not in his case. His servers are in Canada and he lives in Argentina. Your greater risk is getting the shit kicked out of you by her bf.
The most famous picture posting monger on this site has his own Wikipedia article: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Servaty[/url]
Oh how I miss Belguel and his coffee table.
My reason for not mongering much: Same old tired ass SW's. My car gets good gas mileage, 30 to 35 MPG, so I can't say it's that.
Of course I found out what Robux has been up to:
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=660280&postcount=770[/url]