Rants and Raves

He'll just drag you down too.

[QUOTE=Admin2;4005255]English is my primary language, Bunny was sharing his thoughts on other guys and you used that as proof of what the other guy he was talking about is doing something "wrong. ".

Bunny says "don't tell me you care about those girls because you are doing X, why, and Z. " And you're saying that "proves" that guy actually doesn't care.

"I just find it HILARIOUS that while caring so much for these women we still find the time to keep dropping loads in their asshole, mouth, pussy etc. I just get tickled anytime somebody on here has convinced themselves they are "looking out" for anyone but themselves when they do shit like this. More power to you my friends but don't piss on me and call it rain. ".

You think that proves that the other guy isn't looking out for anybody and is only taking care of himself.

You're obsessed and you keep doubling down every time you say some of this crazy shit.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=KingSlayer22;4004570]Clowns will be clowns, read their posts and judge for yourself who your dealing with. Guys that write about pussy or the ones that proclaim their superiority with having to carry on and on beating a dead horse, says a lot about someone when two thirds of their posts are about other dudes and not plowing pussy LOL. Maybe there needs to be a talk only about dudes section for these guys hahaha.[/QUOTE]It's a lot more than two thirds man. If anyone is curious, just click his name and search his posts. I had to go through about a 100 posts of nonsense, paranoia, conspiracy, garbage before finding an actual review where he actually went to visit someone. Even then, in that post he just rambles on about being inappropriately groped at the CAMP.

I'm not kidding about the 100 posts. His last review is at the end of page 4 of his search results. Just shaking my head at this guy.

[QUOTE=Zipper34;4004865]You may not get it A2. Read the last 3 sentences of his post carefully.[/QUOTE]Sometimes you just have to agree to disagree. There's a city full of pussy and you got Twitter fingers. Back to our regularly scheduled program.

[QUOTE=KingSlayer22;4004570]Clowns will be clowns, read their posts and judge for yourself who your dealing with. Guys that write about pussy or the ones that proclaim their superiority with having to carry on and on beating a dead horse, says a lot about someone when two thirds of their posts are about other dudes and not plowing pussy LOL. Maybe there needs to be a talk only about dudes section for these guys hahaha.[/QUOTE]Well said, KS.

[QUOTE=SummaTaco;4005302]He'll just drag you down too.[/QUOTE]I'm about to shut it down. I tried to give him some space because of his post history but as it has been mentioned he posts a lot but none of it has any value beyond entertainment.

A2.

Now that we're done with the previous back and fort rant that went on for a damn month and beyond, I'd like to rant about this Sugar Daddy site. Guys, first off. The Sugar Daddy site is not a prostitution site! Regardless of what some guys say, it's not the 2nd coming of backpage or a replacement for backpage. Not everyone on the site is not for sale. I liken the site as more of a cross between Facebook and Craigslist Casual Encounter. You'll get a wide spectrum of everything on that site, from girls who are selling pics and videos only, others who just want to be platonic friends, chic's who just want you to send them money because they look good, gold diggers, and chic's who just want to get to the point and bang.

You're not going to be going on there, messaging any and every broad with $200 and thinking they're going to come back to your hotel room to fuck for hours. I don't know why you guys keep posting these chic's links and saying things like "She just wants to sell pics and videos", "She just wants to be friends", "She wants me to pay her car note", "She wants $600". Dude, not everyone is selling ass on there. It's not a prostitution site! Most of those chic's on there could only dream about being someone's sugar daddy. So many old washed up chics and sloppy BBW's (like Shelly) know they have no business on a Sugar Daddy site.

They're only on there because they have an internet connection and any moron who knows how to fill in the blanks can post a profile. Most of those chic's on there could never become a Sugar Baby outside of that Sugar Daddy site. They're just trying their hand and seeing what they can catch. Also, you guys need to stop with these bogus outlandish stories, cause that's exactly what they are-stories and very ridiculous fictitious ones at that. You guys are being a detriment to others by writing these bogus ass stories and having other guys trying to replicate the same scenario and end up getting burnt.

Case in point, the guy that came in here last week or so, with some ridiculous tall tale about renting a hotel room and going on the Sugar Daddy site and getting some fresh 18-19 year old Sorority girls to come to his hotel room. Ok guys. Let's not get carried away here. Anyways, this guy was able to hook up with 3 or 4 fresh out of high school 18-19 sorority girls and they all agreed to go to his hotel room and fuck for hours bareback. Right!!

He claimed he fucked one bare for like 2 hours and busted about 3 nuts. Then, as he was leading her out the room, another fresh 18-19 year old sorority girl was coming down the hall and he brought her in the room and was ready to go right away. He fucked her for 2 hours as well and busted 3 more nuts. Right! Then after fucking that sorority girl he was awoken later that night by another fresh young 18-19 year sorority girl knocking on his door and he was ready to go as she came in. He busted an additional 3 more nuts for a total of 9 nuts in one night. Everything bare, came in pussy, ass and everything else under the sun and paid each like $100 or so.

Man, gtfoh out of here with that nonsense!! No ones bussing all these nuts and fucking back to back like an 18 year old jacked up on Viagra. Nice fucking story, because that's all it is, until you woke up, but let's get back to reality here. I can't believe anyone is actually buying that nonsense. Enough with this chest beating bullshit and seeing who's nuts can hang down the lowest. Some of you guys are such good liars, yet you can't even keep your lies straight. How the hell do you see a girl like 4 times and block her because you got tired of her, yet you say she's still checking out your profile.

Dude, if you block someone, as with this site, if you put someone on ignore, they can not see anything you post. Nothing! Please tell me how can you block someone, yet you still see them checking out your profile? You dudes can't even keep your lies straight and getting caught up in your own lies, it's not even funny. Now, you just have a guy who read that fanatical tale about one of you dudes renting a hotel room and going on a fucking binge, that he tried to reenact the same thing.

He got a hotel room, messaged a chic from the Sugar Daddy site, and got her to come to his hotel room. She came, he gave her $200, they did some kissy face for a few minutes, then she told him that she couldn't go through with it. LOL. She walked out with his $200 and left him with blue balls. He naively thought he would re-enact the same tall tale one of you guys wrote about and ended up getting ripped off. Smdh. See what happens when you write bogus stories and silly guys actually believe that nonsense and try to repeat what you did.

First of all, any chic agreeing to go to some anonymous guys hotel room on the first date is a "pro". I don't care how old she is. No "sane" regular chic in her right mind would ever meet some anonymous guy off the internet and agree to go to his hotel room for "fun". She would first question why the hell are you in the hotel room to beging with. Do you stay at this hotel, are you the police, is this some kind of entrapment? Any chic agreeing to meet you at a hotel or suggest you get a hotel on the first date is a "pro" and has done this plenty of times before.

This definitely ain't her first rodeo. If a chic agrees to come to your hotel on the first date, she knows exactly what's expected of her and what's about to go down. No chic is that daft (not even the chic who got "raped" by Mike Tyson in his hotel room at 2 am in the morning. Smh) that they don't know what goes down in a hotel. If a guy invites you to his hotel and you just met him off the internet, you know exactly what's going down. Your not new to this.

If a chic agrees to come to your hotel, gets the money and then play the "shy role", I can't do this, she ripped you off. Straight! She came in there with the intentions of ripping you off as she knew exactly what was expected of her before she got there. You guys can't get blinded by these guys telling tall tales and believing that just because this is not backpage, these girls will not rip me off. These girls can and will rip you off because they know what you're looking for. When you message them telling them that you have $200 and you have a hotel room, they know exactly what your all about.

They know exactly what your looking for and exactly what your doing in that hotel room. Any chic that agrees to meet a total stranger in a hotel room knows exactly what's going down and she's done this plenty of times before. Most of those new chic's on that SA are not really new. They're rebranded and running that same ole con with a different profile. They know that there are desperate guys out there trying to get laid, so they keep some fresh profiles for those desperate guys that love flooding "new girls" with solicitations.

Always keep your head on a swivel. Believe no experiences, but your own. What works for one guy, may not work for others.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;4010809]Guys, first off. The Sugar Daddy site is not a prostitution site! [/QUOTE]If you are talking about seeking, yes it is. 100%. It used to be called seeking arrangements and the arrangement they were seeking was financial. After Fosta / Sesta they tried to rebrand themselves but they didn't. That's the part I think you're wrong about.

The part you're right about is not all the chicks on there are going to fuck you for money. A lot of them are just trying to fuck you out of your money. Some guys are stupid enough to give it to them.

As to the liars, they always reveal themselves, I think writing about sex is a fetish for some guys, it's harmless and considering that we have 400,000 members and probably 3 X that in lurkers, there are a measurable number of guys who have a fetish for reading it.

Highly qualified mongers such as yourself can see it immediately so no harm.

But make no mistake, those chicks on seeking are all hookers, the only question is how honest are they. If they were looking for boyfriends they would be on badoo or eharmony or whatever the fuck the real dating sites are these days.

A2.

A2.

[QUOTE=Admin2;4011010]But make no mistake, those chicks on seeking are all hookers, the only question is how honest are they. If they were looking for boyfriends they would be on badoo or eharmony or whatever the fuck the real dating sites are these days.

A2.

A2.[/QUOTE]Just the act of trading sexual favors for coins is the definition of a prostitute no matter how its worded I. E sugar baby is just a sugar coated term to make it sound nice.

[QUOTE=Admin2;4011010]If you are talking about seeking, yes it is. 100%. It used to be called seeking arrangements and the arrangement they were seeking was financial. After Fosta / Sesta they tried to rebrand themselves but they didn't. That's the part I think you're wrong about.

The part you're right about is not all the chicks on there are going to fuck you for money. A lot of them are just trying to fuck you out of your money. Some guys are stupid enough to give it to them.

But make no mistake, [B]those chicks on seeking are all hookers[/B], the only question is how honest are they. If they were looking for boyfriends they would be on badoo or eharmony or whatever the fuck the real dating sites are these days.

A2.

A2.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=TrillBoi69;4011243]Just the act of trading sexual favors for coins is the definition of a prostitute no matter how its worded I. E sugar baby is just a sugar coated term to make it sound nice.[/QUOTE]An arrangement can mean anything my friends. Just because you give a chic money, that does not mean the arrangement is for sex. There are plenty of chics on there that are exchanging naughty pics and videos for financial compensation. Is that prostitution? I had couple chics wanting me to pay their school tuition in exchange for me going out on a date with them and them being my arm candy. Is that prostitution? I had a couple of chic's give me a massage in exchange for money. Is that prostitution? I had plenty others wanting me to cash app them money to prove that I was serious. Is that prostitution?

An arrangement can be anything you and that person agrees on it to be. It does not mean "Sex" "Hookers" and "Prostitution". An arrangement by definition is 1. A plan for how something will happen. 2. An agreement between 2 people or groups about how something happens or will happen. By definition that has nothing to do with anything sexual or prostitution or hooking. You guys are giving it a sexual meaning for some weird reason or the other. What about the site makes it a hooker / prostitution site? There are no rates posted? No "money for sex" slogans. No sexual activities listed on the site. You couldn't prove it in a court of law, even it still kept the name "[URL]seekingarrangements.com[/URL]", that it is a sex site.

That's exactly why a lot of guys on this site are getting boned, lately. They sign up for the membership, naively thinking that its a sex site. They read the bogus lies of others writing about how they're plowing through sorority girls in a hotel room and they're try to reenact the same thing. Dude, have any of you who said its a sex site ever tried messaging random chic's on the site. Most of the time, your not even going to get a response. If you do manage to get a reply, its a chic wanting you to cash app her money for future promises. Most chics on that site are not selling anything more than a wet dream. Every chic's arrangement on there is not a sexual arrangement.

Where as, backpage was a definite sexual arrangement site. Girls were naked all over the site, had rates, list of do and don't's. It was definitely a hooker site. They were definitely "All Hookers". There is absolutely no way you can prove that those girls on the sugar daddy site are "All Hookers". I challenge you guys who say its a hooker site, to message just 20 random females on there and gauge the responses. Most are selling nothing more than a wet dream. They want you to give them money in exchange for empty promises and a friendly smile.

If that site changed its name to "[URL]hookers.com[/URL]" or "[URL]seekingsex.com[/URL]" about half of the girls on there would most likely delete their profiles. That would be a definite indicator that its a sex site and that would be the only reason guys would message chics for and that would be the only thing chics had to offer. Lastly, the girls on that site are not looking for a boyfriend or someone to date. They are looking for an "arrangement" as the site indicates. I've had chic's who were married or had boyfriends, hit me up wanting an "arrangement" for me, them and their boyfriend. How is that prostitution or hooking? There was going to be no money involved. It was that chic's "arrangement" as the site indicates. That chic wanted a 3 some with no money involved. That was her "arrangement". An arrangement can be anything you want it to be.

[QUOTE=Admin2;4011010]If you are talking about seeking, yes it is. 100%. It used to be called seeking arrangements and the arrangement they were seeking was financial. After Fosta / Sesta they tried to rebrand themselves but they didn't. That's the part I think you're wrong about.

The part you're right about is not all the chicks on there are going to fuck you for money. A lot of them are just trying to fuck you out of your money. Some guys are stupid enough to give it to them.

As to the liars, they always reveal themselves, I think writing about sex is a fetish for some guys, it's harmless and considering that we have 400,000 members and probably 3 X that in lurkers, there are a measurable number of guys who have a fetish for reading it.

Highly qualified mongers such as yourself can see it immediately so no harm.

But make no mistake, those chicks on seeking are all hookers, the only question is how honest are they. If they were looking for boyfriends they would be on badoo or eharmony or whatever the fuck the real dating sites are these days.

A2.

A2.[/QUOTE]You will find hookers, scammers, or ones looking for a relationship. I have met ones looking for a relationship on Seeking Arrangement, or Seeking now.

Johnny,

I do want to say I love your posts! Nothing but respect! I agree with 99% of your post, but there are some crazy situations with these younger girls.

I don't know what the hell is going on with these younger guys, but a lot of these chicks just dig older dudes that have their shit together. I'm 39, in good shape, work IT but not anywhere close to rich. I have to say, the best pussy getting weapon I have with the younger chicks is that I'm empathetic. Not looks. I think I look good enough that they are willing to fuck, but the empathy is the #1 deal closer. It's been a bunch or work, I won't lie. But, I love the game.

No way they are falling in my lap like the others claim. Either embelishing, or I'm missing some magical pussy getting mojo. But, the younger hotties I've banged (two), took a ton of work. Like you said, it wasn't one meet and greet and then off to the hotel. The one 20 year old was seriously like two weeks of texting. I honestly don't really like the time / money vs. Pussy of the chicks under 22. I've found the single or freshly divorced mid-20's to mid-30's chicks to be my sweet spot. I still do a TON of texting, but they want the money a lot more and it's usually for their kids (freshly divorced and need the money badly). The ratio of time / money vs pussy is much better, and just generally a TON less drama!

I don't really share much, but the two Alabama divorcee's I got were 10 x better than the younger ones. Everyone needs to evaluate what amount of time and money they are willing to commit and what type of pussy they are going to get. I love the game almost as much as winning the pussy prize!

And yea, I dunno about the multiple pop thing. I agree with you there! Usually, finally landing one after all the work, I'm so excited, I practically give myself a stroke when I cum. Even a second shot is out of the deal for me. I guess the new has to wear off a while before I can pace myself with multiple pops. I could do two pops every other month or so with the ex-wifey. Maybe twice in 20 years, usually on vacation with no time to worry, did I ever do three pops.

Keep the good stuff coming Johnny!

[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;4010809]Now that we're done with the previous back and fort rant that went on for a damn month and beyond, I'd like to rant about this Sugar Daddy site. Guys, first off. The Sugar Daddy site is not a prostitution site! Regardless of what some guys say, it's not the 2nd coming of backpage or a replacement for backpage. Not everyone on the site is not for sale. I liken the site as more of a cross between Facebook and Craigslist Casual Encounter. You'll get a wide spectrum of everything on that site, from girls who are selling pics and videos only, others who just want to be platonic friends, chic's who just want you to send them money because they look good, gold diggers, and chic's who just want to get to the point and bang.
.....[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;4011340]An arrangement can mean anything my friends. [/QUOTE]You're just fighting to fight because you like that. I know you're not this stupid. Before Fosta / Sesta these banners were representative of their ads, the chicks that are there knew that.

I know guys that hunt there who have serious money, like fly the chicks to where they are money and it's always the same thing. Want a plane ticket? You gotta fuck me. If they run into any GPS it's "NEXT!" The only real shortage on SA, sorry "seeking" are REAL sugar daddies, guys that can support as many chicks as they feel like fucking so they don't have to work. Some of the wanna be sugar daddies who don't have the coin to really play the game have to work through GPS but the guys I know value their time to much to play that shit. I wouldn't.

I'm just curious why you're pretending to be this obtuse.

[QUOTE=JohnnyMapalo;4010809]Now that we're done with the previous back and fort rant that went on for a damn month and beyond, I'd like to rant about this Sugar Daddy site. Guys, first off. The Sugar Daddy site is not a prostitution site! Regardless of what some guys say, it's not the 2nd coming of backpage or a replacement for backpage. Not everyone on the site is not for sale. I liken the site as more of a cross between Facebook and Craigslist Casual Encounter. You'll get a wide spectrum of everything on that site, from girls who are selling pics and videos only, others who just want to be platonic friends, chic's who just want you to send them money because they look good, gold diggers, and chic's who just want to get to the point and bang.

Some of you guys are such good liars, yet you can't even keep your lies straight. How the hell do you see a girl like 4 times and block her because you got tired of her, yet you say she's still checking out your profile.

Dude, if you block someone, as with this site, if you put someone on ignore, they can not see anything you post. Nothing! Please tell me how can you block someone, yet you still see them checking out your profile? You dudes can't even keep your lies straight and getting caught up in your own lies, it's not even funny. Now, you just have a guy who read that fanatical tale about one of you dudes renting a hotel room and going on a fucking binge, that he tried to reenact the same thing.



.[/QUOTE]Johnny,

I appreciate the updates and reports you bring to this forum and I agree with a lot of what you said about SD dating. It's not for everyone and there are all types there, and a some obvious BS stories. I think you are referring to my post there other day on the SA thread. All I wrote was true, I blocked the girl on my burner phone that she would text me on when she wanted to hook up because I didn't want to be tempted, I never blocked her the SA site to clarify.

I'm 58/ I keep in good shape and pass for my monger age of 48 pretty easy I think. Been married the past 20 years and been mongering for a good 35 years, way before the Internet or cell phones and texting. I got no reason to come on here any lie, I just just like to pass on any bad experiences or good experiences with women that some guys might be interested in for the sake of the community and girls.

Been doing the SD thing for a year. Some girls with real daddy issues and freaks for older men, some of the best experiences of my life and everyone is nutting. Yes takes for time and a lot of weeding but worth it IMO.

[QUOTE=Admin2;4011566]You're just fighting to fight because you like that. I know you're not this stupid. Before Fosta / Sesta these banners were representative of their ads, the chicks that are there knew that.

I know guys that hunt there who have serious money, like fly the chicks to where they are money and it's always the same thing. Want a plane ticket? You gotta fuck me. If they run into any GPS it's "NEXT!" The only real shortage on SA, sorry "seeking" are REAL sugar daddies, guys that can support as many chicks as they feel like fucking so they don't have to work. Some of the wanna be sugar daddies who don't have the coin to really play the game have to work through GPS but the guys I know value their time to much to play that shit. I wouldn't.

I'm just curious why you're pretending to be this obtuse.[/QUOTE]Both you and JM are "right".

Although I do think Admin, you are applying the "daddy" term to broadly. It does not mean IMMEDIATE fucking to EVERYBODY. Yes, there are guys with serious bank that won't do anything for the girl without sex as part of deal. And there are others who just want to "make it rain" and be seen with eye candy.

Those ads you posted, while maybe conveying 1 message to you, is actually designed with enough ambiguity to be interpreted differently by the person who sees it.

So Admin, are you saying that you are unaware of women "selling" men other things besides sex? Guys with no game, looks, money or experience fall for it all the time.

Girls dangle the carrot for those guys and get as much as they can. If sex comes up and they don't want to that, they cut that guy off.

Fellas SA is not BP but has its similarities and has its differences. There were scammers on BP and there are scammers on SA, we rave about the good ones and share amongst each other. You have to have a little more game on SA so they feel comfortable and the skilled hunter can sort out the decoy ducks from the real ones and lure the ones in that are truly hungry. Never pay for more than coffee without adult play under any circumstances, never do allowances, always know what thst are ok with and not. Ones that won't talk about money are a sure sign they expect it but willing play for it.

Just a few thoughts but some of my real gems have come from SA like Lacey, Alexis, Kiki, Chelsea, and a few new ones coming up ya'll will be pleasently suprised by and these just aren't doing the deed but on a grand scale.