Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=Toungsten;5021339]I don't want to be an I told you so but I told you so.[/QUOTE]Which is why I posted her pic and asked if anyone recognised her as to confirm whether she was legit or trying to scam. C'Mon. Man use a bit of common.

[QUOTE=TDLeafs;5020885]Man where do I start on Sarah?


Also not too crazy regarding house's donation, she kept saying " oh you have to pay more for that".

Extra for bb and more for 2nd rd.

Sadly I won't be returning.[/QUOTE]Sorry you had to go through that, after seeing her so many times, she didn't cut you some slack.

Spread the word and cut her business. That's all you can do.

Did you go through M?

[QUOTE=TheRealCost;5021470]Which is why I posted her pic and asked if anyone recognised her as to confirm whether she was legit or trying to scam. C'Mon. Man use a bit of common.[/QUOTE]No link + no contact = no girl. Even scammers have contact info. Let's keep it real here. This is a Korean agency BB board.

[QUOTE=TheRealCost;5021142]If you would've held your comment, you would've seen my recent post explaining that I lost her link yet still have her number, which I've already given to several mongers via PM[/QUOTE]I'm sure we all would like to hear what they have to say.

People have been posting for awhile now about prices slowly going up. I booked Chanel recently and her price went from the usual $260 to $280 and now it's $300. I sure as hell know that service hasn't gotten better. I'm not a fan of up charging so I don't see any of those $360 girls. You can say it's the sign of the times. M, and I forgot what other agency are the last pockets of normal pricing without upcharging. I wish guys would stop paying these idiotic prices, but guys are horny and think with their dick.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5021722]People have been posting for awhile now about prices slowly going up. I booked Chanel recently and her price went from the usual $260 to $280 and now it's $300. I sure as hell know that service hasn't gotten better. I'm not a fan of up charging so I don't see any of those $360 girls. You can say it's the sign of the times. M, and I forgot what other agency are the last pockets of normal pricing without upcharging. I wish guys would stop paying these idiotic prices, but guys are horny and think with their dick[/QUOTE]Which Chanel are we talking about here.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5021722]People have been posting for awhile now about prices slowly going up. I booked Chanel recently and her price went from the usual $260 to $280 and now it's $300. I sure as hell know that service hasn't gotten better. I'm not a fan of up charging so I don't see any of those $360 girls. You can say it's the sign of the times. M, and I forgot what other agency are the last pockets of normal pricing without upcharging. I wish guys would stop paying these idiotic prices, but guys are horny and think with their dick.[/QUOTE]Seems like the Bay may be experiencing upcharges too, they're rational / excuse is to attract / keep talent, since other areas charge more. I guess it may be true that their girls (Sweet angels) are going to OC / LA, I see them on ads down here, but I don't think those girls are high quality anyways as they seem to hop around agency to agency.

Seems like it's just upping the price for the same girls. Granted it's a lot easier to say no to upcharges from mediocre talent that your lukewarm before the upcharge. As the talent in 2020 is pretty meh.

[QUOTE=GregAllenFilms;5020844]Does anyone know if Wynnie at CKD is the same as Red at Booker Gray? Pics look similar, but they are different pics entirely. Might also be Susan from OC? Just curious if anyone can confirm.[/QUOTE]Wynnie with CA K Dolls LA was named Susan in OC. Red with Booker Gray is a different girl, used to go by different names before but I can't remember them off the top. Both are BBFS for tip, always pay ahead so the girl knows what service you expect. Red's ad disappeared from the website but Sky looks like her new name. She has been reviewed under previous names, some mongers say she's a TS, others disagree, I don't think she is, she might have a deep voice but is not manly, YMMV CIA, if your cock is too big NO GO ANAL. It's the opposite of the roller coaster line: You must Not be this big, to get on this ride!

[QUOTE=TDLeafs;5020885]Man where do I start on Sarah?

I've seen her many times under SA and she was fantastic, young pretty face with sexy body and fantastic attitude.

Then she didn't like the booker so she moved to different agencies over past few months.

She came back to la with increased $ which I didn't mind.

But her attitude has changed since last time I saw her, seem almost too lazy.

Also not too crazy regarding house's donation, she kept saying " oh you have to pay more for that".

Extra for bb and more for 2nd rd.

Sadly I won't be returning.[/QUOTE]If you're talking about Jiwoo with Jewelry then I stand corrected. She declined BB with me but neither did I offer extra for it.

I mean, guys think with their dick, but there's always a line. If there wasn't, you'd have them charging 1 k a pop or something. And I think for many, this line will be 500 eventually.

But imo you can't have current practices coupled with your current prices. I'm a bay guy, so we have it a lot cheaper all included, but I know LA peeps also have these many quite misleading pics and volatile service of ToFTTs.

I'd say if you're paying 400 or more for a kgirl, you better know exactly what you're getting and a set bar of services. Not a rebrand who looks nothing like the pics and delivers uneven service.

Just my two cents.

[QUOTE=TheAbc;5021722]People have been posting for awhile now about prices slowly going up. I booked Chanel recently and her price went from the usual $260 to $280 and now it's $300. I sure as hell know that service hasn't gotten better. I'm not a fan of up charging so I don't see any of those $360 girls. You can say it's the sign of the times. M, and I forgot what other agency are the last pockets of normal pricing without upcharging. I wish guys would stop paying these idiotic prices, but guys are horny and think with their dick[/QUOTE]

There is a different Spring that is cycling between DC and Philly. With BBFS normally offered in Las Vegas now, I just wish it would make it to the east coast.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;5013220]BastardChorum said she looks like pics. Those girls didn't look like Hana.

I am pretty sure she was not Tessa and Shine because I know both were in LA before. Boston IU was also in LA. I saw pics of Spring somewhere else too.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RocketManP;5021857]I mean, guys think with their dick, but there's always a line. If there wasn't, you'd have them charging 1 k a pop or something. And I think for many, this line will be 500 eventually.

But imo you can't have current practices coupled with your current prices. I'm a bay guy, so we have it a lot cheaper all included, but I know LA peeps also have these many quite misleading pics and volatile service of ToFTTs.

I'd say if you're paying 400 or more for a kgirl, you better know exactly what you're getting and a set bar of services. Not a rebrand who looks nothing like the pics and delivers uneven service.

Just my two cents.[/QUOTE]There's a very simple reason. INFLATION. Costs to the agencies go up. Rent and other expenses. I had been paying 250 K-girls for so long regardless of the service. Some of the Asian girls like Mimi Lax, Joanna and Ling were 300 back in the day. This was bound to happen.

Some BBFS girls do make it to the East coast. I wouldn't know if they stop offering by choice or by agency's rule.

[QUOTE=Ghao13;5022071]There is a different Spring that is cycling between DC and Philly. With BBFS normally offered in Las Vegas now, I just wish it would make it to the east coast.[/QUOTE]

He was talking about Sarah at M / Chanel at SA, not Jiwoo at Jewelry / Sarah at SFK.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;5021830]If you're talking about Jiwoo with Jewelry then I stand corrected. She declined BB with me but neither did I offer extra for it.[/QUOTE]

He was talking about Chanel at M. You guys make them too busy by repeating so not surprising they will increase the rate. That's why it's my policy to spread the load.

[QUOTE=Slim129;5021748]Which Chanel are we talking about here.[/QUOTE]