"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;7135344]Need advise on getting a burner phone, that I do not have to use my real information.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]I use google voice for texting. For a burner just went to walmart and got a cheap phone on a monthly plan.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/6d36acf4-6014-4bc4-b2be-46b09f613027[/URL]

I used to see her under a different name. She was a lovely time. I don't have her number anymore she used to be in mabelton. If anyone can DM me her contact OR if anyone just wants details. I would love to share.

Naturalcurlsandcurve.

[QUOTE=ReffingMan94;7135745]I use google voice for texting. For a burner just went to walmart and got a cheap phone on a monthly plan.[/QUOTE]I posted on that thread about my new TracFone I got at Walmart (for cash).

[QUOTE=MadDog1746;7132516]Has anyone seen this one? She is talking nice but seems a little too eager LOL.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=73388775[/URL][/QUOTE]I always wonder what they mean by "Self Employed / Entrepreneur" - does that mean IG influencer or UTR? If I had to guess, I'd say she will probably be down for fun in the bedroom (or car?) but maybe a bit rushed. Does she talk like a pro?

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;7135482]Any info on this baby, have a meet next week.

[URL]https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userProfile?tid=af100011222-m&userId=71883509[/URL][/QUOTE]Sounds like a good find, she's one of those "NO married men" though, so that (and her age) maybe looking for something more long-term? If you read under Moments, sounds like she might be too.

The only yellow flag for me is no full-body shots, but she looks cute.

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7136584]I always wonder what they mean by "Self Employed / Entrepreneur" - does that mean IG influencer or UTR? If I had to guess, I'd say she will probably be down for fun in the bedroom (or car?) but maybe a bit rushed. Does she talk like a pro?[/QUOTE]It can mean a lot of things, but if they are posting on SBs sites, I'd wager "Self employed / Entrepreneur" often means Stripper or Pro, or maybe "lifestyle coach" and as you mentioned, a wannabe "influencer".

With GVoice you can call as well as text.

[QUOTE=ReffingMan94;7135745]I use google voice for texting. For a burner just went to walmart and got a cheap phone on a monthly plan.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BerolLoz;7136592]Sounds like a good find, she's one of those "NO married men" though, so that (and her age) maybe looking for something more long-term? If you read under Moments, sounds like she might be too.

The only yellow flag for me is no full-body shots, but she looks cute.[/QUOTE]Appreciate the feedback.

[URL]https://blog.seeking.com/leading-with-love-brandon-wade-back-seeking-ceo?utm_source=seeking-caro&utm_medium=site-caro&utm_campaign=seeking-caro-bwback[/URL]

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;7135344]Need advise on getting a burner phone, that I do not have to use my real information.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]Use the Signal Messenger app if you want real privacy.

Google Voice is generally just regular SMS. Your messages can be vacuumed up by the NSA, cellular provider, and whoever else. But if you send the girls your pics, and you don't mind those being in the same conversation as ppm and everything else, that can be accessed and/or subpoenaed then by all means use it.

It doesn't matter what phone you buy. Pay with cash, buy refill cards with cash if you want to go that far.

[QUOTE=LovePunnany;7135344]Need advise on getting a burner phone, that I do not have to use my real information.

Thanks.[/QUOTE]This really depends on what you are worried about. I would argue that if you are trying to keep your information safe from the likes of the NSA, and most other law enforcement, then that's fairly futile. Yes there are encrypted messaging apps, but plenty of women on there aren't going to want to use them. For me personally, my primary goal is that a woman can't figure out who I am and for that, it doesn't really matter how I pay for the phone. It just can't be associated with my name online. I bought a cheap SIM on Amazon with a recurring monthly prepaid plan and put that in an old phone. I also mainly use Google Voice for messaging. The NSA and the FBI aren't policing sugar babies or prostitution unless you start trafficking women or dealing in other illegal activities way more serious than this.

[QUOTE=2me4Looking2;7137223]This really depends on what you are worried about. I would argue that if you are trying to keep your information safe from the likes of the NSA, and most other law enforcement, then that's fairly futile. Yes there are encrypted messaging apps, but plenty of women on there aren't going to want to use them. .[/QUOTE]For me, it's not just about my "information" (my identity). It is about keeping the conversation private, and safe, from other parties, and of course encrypted messaging apps do this 10x better than SMS, especially using disappearing messages.

But yes there are quite a lot of women who get spooked, so you do lose some prospects. But I've got more DTF Seeking girls than I have the money or time to deal with, so that's ok. Plus it screens out some of the cunty ones if they won't use a more private messaging app, considering this sugar dating is a gray area of questionable legality. It also screen out some of the extra fearful and skiddish ones, as well as lower IQ (although that is the majority of these girls).

I really don't totally blame them for being concerned some guy could kidnap them, but whatever, and I like to speak freely on Signal, and knowing I'm having a genuinely private conversation, with no one else listening in to my business.

It's not perfect, it's not close to perfect, but it is 10x closer to perfect than SMS/GoogleVoice/Sudo is.

[QUOTE=PussyChatGPT;7136986][URL]https://blog.seeking.com/leading-with-love-brandon-wade-back-seeking-ceo?utm_source=seeking-caro&utm_medium=site-caro&utm_campaign=seeking-caro-bwback[/URL][/QUOTE]Interesting, as well as their "Experience Hypergamy" campaign.

[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f8524037-e8c7-4122-a70f-e0ef346ab5c0[/URL]

[QUOTE=PeterJohnson;7137966]Interesting, as well as their "Experience Hypergamy" campaign.[/QUOTE]Yeah saw this a few months ago. I thought "Hypergamy" was a made-up marketing word, but no, it's an old one that used to mean "marrying up" .

I guess that's always what Seeking has tried to sell, but it sounds like they want to get away from the casual fun that Seeking and the other sugar sites seem to be about. This could well be a partly legal move to stay in the clear from accusations that it's facilitating paid hook-ups.

[URL]https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypergamy[/URL] (from the 1800's).