Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[QUOTE=Undftd88;4611915]Everybody has a different budget and that's the way of life. Pay what you are comfortable in paying and find someone else if it's not to your liking but to some on this board $350 + tip is still a relative bargain. For me personally, I would rather spend more to see a girl that's got less customers at $350-500 than a girl that's getting plowed 10 x a day because she's $250.[/QUOTE]True, those girls will have fewer takers and that is a variable however IMHO, having tried different girls at rates the rate seldom determines the quality of your experience. Do you think there will be a difference between the service you get at the lower rate and the higher rate at 350-400? I don't think so.

[QUOTE=HapaBoy86;4613784]She is managed and comes and goes. Also, doesn't follow through on wether you get a GFE menu pm'd to you. Due, to booker trying to sell false commitments in GFE services![/QUOTE]I passed when, within the same PM, the booker stated she was both 5'2" and 5'7".

Surprisingly, Chloe is full booked today at 350. I suspect rates will all go up in LA by mid-year for our ATF's. Enjoy while you can.

[QUOTE=JohnHada;4614368]Surprisingly, Chloe is full booked today at 350. I suspect rates will all go up in LA by mid-year for our ATF's. Enjoy while you can.[/QUOTE]I don't know where you got that information but I just texted and Chloe was available early afternoon today.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;4614069]Greetings gents,

This is my first post under this name, but I used to have senior status as Opus109. You can check the archive for my previous contributions. I had to handle some stuff in life and regrettably, that led me to delete the old account. This time, I am here to stay, however.

Forgive me in advance for the long post, but I just wanted to address a couple things.

Eros Min (NOT newtopasian Min):

She has been in my rotation for several years. Some members here have stated that they have not received a response from her for screening. The last time I saw her, she mentioned to me that she hasn't really been taking new clients in the wake of the recent legal changes to the industry and some of the effects it has had on things. That could be why some of you are not getting a response. Also, after the last time I saw her, I got a text from her number asking if she could keep me posted about "new friends. " I was surprised because she always told me she was indy and that the booking number was her direct line. This person told me she was a booker named Sue and she sent me a link and a password to a site with some girls. They all look incredibly beautiful. Min's pics are real without doubt, so I am hoping the pics of the other girls are real too. I plan on finding out, but has anyone else taken the plunge?

Roya:

There have been whispering of her being in town for months, but they have been vague. However, due to recent reports from very reliable and senior members, it seems she is indeed back, likely with her old booker at 6683. However, I do not think she is available to everyone. It is frustrating because I saw her about a dozen time though that number. Then, after about six months of not seeing her (this was right before she left town), I tried to book and the booker said "She is only seeing people she knows, and I don't know you. You can't see her. You have to see Erin. " I tried to explain that Roya knows me and would be happy to see me, but it was to no avail. I sense that a different person took over that number a little over a year ago and is only letting people see Roya who booked right when control of the number changed. I have remained in contact with that booker otherwise, but when I inquired about Roya this weekend, there was no response. It is incredibly frustrating because I am certain Roya did not BL me. Best of luck getting an appointment with that beauty.[/QUOTE]Welcome back and thanks for the intel which is always appreciated. With regards to Min's bookers new girls, they won't be available til the end of the month and have been continually been pushed back for a few weeks but I'm looking forward in TOFTTing. In the mean time, you can enjoy some old reliables in Min and Yoco.

That's too bad about Roya new booker. She's been available on and off for quite some time like Moli and it's nice to hear she will be coming back full time.

[QUOTE=JohnHada;4614368]Surprisingly, Chloe is full booked today at 350. I suspect rates will all go up in LA by mid-year for our ATF's. Enjoy while you can.[/QUOTE]Yeah with the her high roller clientele. If rate goes up in LA. Not sustainable. LOL. High rollers can't cover all the kgirls. Up North it's still less than 250. And that's Silicone valley! Meh We'll see what happens. I think couple of girls will still be below 300 price point. High demand girls will be at 350 I guess. But I don't see all the agencies adapting a price increase because it will not sustain their business.

[QUOTE=JohnHada;4614368]Surprisingly, Chloe is full booked today at 350. I suspect rates will all go up in LA by mid-year for our ATF's. Enjoy while you can.[/QUOTE]She got high roller clients.

[QUOTE=JizzedUp;4614016]I thought Chloe retired last year. LOL. Stopped seeing these two providers last year when their service dropped. Plus they getting up their in age. Mid to late 30's. They used to increase price 20 to 30 every year. No chance I'm painting up money this time. Wise up mongers. These two ain't worth it for that price point. There are better and younger kgirls out there. Plus you can go up North for almost half the price with better selection. Got to be logical sometimes when playing this game. Unless those two have high roller clients at their disposal, they won't last and probably start touring. In any case, that's my opinion. Skip these two. Power in numbers. Bros va Goes LOL.[/QUOTE]I am with you in skipping these two.

However, I think they have enough customers to increase their rate and will be fine.

Unfortunately, I think there will eventually be an increase in the rates for some of these other kgirls who are busy and legends.

I think Min is indy but has always had a booker. I recommend the young and cute Rie and the well known Yoco for a water show. Both use real pics with P.S. But Yoco used those pics for couple years now. Also would give Rosie, Lumin, or any other new girl a try.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;4614069]
Eros Min (NOT newtopasian Min):

I got a text from her number asking if she could keep me posted about "new friends. " I was surprised because she always told me she was indy and that the booking number was her direct line. This person told me she was a booker named Sue and she sent me a link and a password to a site with some girls. They all look incredibly beautiful. Min's pics are real without doubt, so I am hoping the pics of the other girls are real too. I plan on finding out, but has anyone else taken the plunge?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4615299]I think Min is indy but has always had a booker. I recommend the young and cute Rie and the well known Yoco for a water show. Both use real pics with P.S. But Yoco used those pics for couple years now. Also would give Rosie and Lumin a try or any other girl booked by this booker. I won't see Misty because I recognized her pics.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the heads up. Rosie and Lumin both look DDG to me. I will probably book Lumin when she is available. Now that you mention it, Misty does look familiar. What's her deal?

They hope to get special treatment or a date. That's why SF guys get BB at 220 while LA guys get BB at 360.

I was kind of ticked off when somebody posted saying some girls complained LA guys are cheap for not tipping. I wanted to know which girls think that. It offended me to hear that when girls never seemed to need tip from me. It's fine if they wanted to protect those girls so I asked which easy girls accept extra for BB but still nobody shared a single name. That was what prompted me to start a list of easy BB girls in the other forum.

[QUOTE=Kent747;4613322]Many guys in LA think it is cool / noble to spend more money than SF guys.[/QUOTE]

If it's Chloe then she may still getting plowed 10 x a day even at $350 LOL.

I will be depressed for LA if the high rollers can't cover both Chloe and Rebecca. Last time I got disappointed in the high rollers I joined this forum to help the other guys. If the other girls decide to raise their rate then I will just start sharing the good girls who don't. I still hobby so I am not going to let it deteriorate.

[QUOTE=Undftd88;4611915]For me personally, I would rather spend more to see a girl that's got less customers at $350-500 than a girl that's getting plowed 10 x a day because she's $250.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JizzedUp;4614016]I thought Chloe retired last year. LOL. Stopped seeing these two providers last year when their service dropped. Plus they getting up their in age. Mid to late 30's. They used to increase price 20 to 30 every year. No chance I'm painting up money this time. Wise up mongers. These two ain't worth it for that price point. There are better and younger kgirls out there. Plus you can go up North for almost half the price with better selection. Got to be logical sometimes when playing this game. Unless those two have high roller clients at their disposal, they won't last and probably start touring. In any case, that's my opinion. Skip these two. Power in numbers. Bros va Goes LOL.[/QUOTE]The statement above "Stopped seeing these two providers last year when their service dropped" is vey TRUE. Chloe was a knockout at Santa Monica but when I saw her at MW, I was somehow disappointed.

[QUOTE=TDLeafs;4614422]I don't know where you got that information but I just texted and Chloe was available early afternoon today.[/QUOTE]Very true. I texed the booker for availability today at 11:00 AM and I was informed that she is open after 4:00 PM. Needless to say, I am playing tomorrow.

[QUOTE=Jack926;4615396]The statement above "Stopped seeing these two providers last year when their service dropped" is vey TRUE. Chloe was a knockout at Santa Monica but when I saw her at MW, I was somehow disappointed.[/QUOTE]I liken the phenomenon to a honeymoon phase for mongers. At first, you're taken by her physical attractiveness, which may blindside your objectivity on her actual service and performance. But as you continue to repeat, you become more familiar and immune to her charms. This ultimately leads to a reevaluation of the reality of the session. On the other hand, the provider could just be giving her best to rope you into a loyal customer in the beginning but gradually diminish service in the long run. I've been at receiving ends of both scenarios, and now try as best I can to separate physical attractiveness and performance / service to better gauge the session. It's frightening how intrinsic and visceral physical attractiveness muddles my perception.

While the butt of many jokes, it's quite an apt exercise in comparative bias to imagine a bag over their face and go through the session from a purely service, performance, connection / interactivity, etc point of view. Once this phase ends though and in the absence of any other attraction, you'll begin to want to see other kgirls. Some guys will feel an obligation to still see her, but once it becomes an obligation, you've reach the point where you should end it. Hopefully you can or have a buddy that can whack some sense into you.

Want to check her our, just out of curiosity with all this talk LOL. I'm on hx and I checked most of the sites for bookers I know, but no Chloe's. Help a brother out?

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;4613769]It doesn't make sense as a customer but it makes sense if I am management. Did she ever reduce her rate? If not then she did the right thing from her POV.

Considering you repeated many times and still repeat at 300 means it was still within their rough calculation. It's the same idea as upsell for MSOG and BBFS. They are counting on guys who still pay to play especially when she is good enough to have you repeated many times.[/QUOTE]You are right, but what the booker and girls aren't taking into account is the frequency of repeat clients. A girl I used to see twice a week at 260, now I pass on and might only go back once a month at 300. Hence, they think "it's slow for some reason". Yeah, because there are 50 girls around at 260, and even more Chinese, Taiwan, Hong Kong girls who are younger at 160.

[QUOTE=Jack926;4615400]Very true. I texed the booker for availability today at 11:00 AM and I was informed that she is open after 4:00 PM. Needless to say, I am playing tomorrow.[/QUOTE]Would you please provide contact info for Chloe? Website, phone or HX?

[QUOTE=Humyiy;4615557]You are right, but what the booker and girls aren't taking into account is the frequency of repeat clients. A girl I used to see twice a week at 260, now I pass on and might only go back once a month at 300. Hence, they think "it's slow for some reason". Yeah, because there are 50 girls around at 260, and even more Chinese, Taiwan, Hong Kong girls who are younger at 160.[/QUOTE]Who, whoa, whoa. Where are the Chinese, Taiwan and Hong Kong girls who are younger at 160?

It is a sad state of market when 40 years old providers can command $350.

[QUOTE=Qzion24;4615463]Want to check her our, just out of curiosity with all this talk LOL. I'm on hx and I checked most of the sites for bookers I know, but no Chloe's. Help a brother out?[/QUOTE]She's an unlisted commodity with ca-kdolls and you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed like Moli and Rebecca unfortunately.

[QUOTE=Mintzpo;4616636]Who, whoa, whoa. Where are the Chinese, Taiwan and Hong Kong girls who are younger at 160?[/QUOTE]The Chinese agencies are Cheaper that Korean agencies but they lots of old ladies working with crappy rushed service.

The Thai ladies provide much better service and are usually $220-240 hr.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Sophialoren[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Sandra99[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/jane_janet[/URL]

[URL]https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/lindia-escort-los-angeles-290824[/URL]

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/CuteMandy[/URL] - independent.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/CuteHannah[/URL] - independent.

Met her when she was at 300. I definitely don't see how she can command 350, when girls like Heri or Ruby can outmatch her in looks and performance. Chloe is hot but looks can be subjective and performance can be critiqued. A full hour session for 350? Pass.

[QUOTE=Jack926;4615400]Very true. I texed the booker for availability today at 11:00 AM and I was informed that she is open after 4:00 PM. Needless to say, I am playing tomorrow.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=CharlieMonger3;4616087]Would you please provide contact info for Chloe? Website, phone or HX?[/QUOTE]If you've never seen her before and never used this booker. You're not getting in! Chloe doesn't advertise except if you know her or have been a previous client of her and currently seeing a few other girls with this booker.

If you somehow got the # and text. Booker will ask you where you got this #. If you say a friend and you give no response or give up the guy who gave it to you. She'll probably never respond to your texts again and will punish by possibly BL the dude who gave the out if its his real I'd or #.

Yes, if you're in goodstanding and a VIP with this booker you can recommend a friend by asking booker first. Than he provides his refs and can get in. But, if you're new just move onto other girls.

[QUOTE=Tomatillo;4616680]She's an unlisted commodity with ca-kdolls and you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed like Moli and Rebecca unfortunately.[/QUOTE]I've given them some pretty solid business, are they really that exclusive? LOL. Not that I'm even particularly interested as I like younger girls, but I had no idea they had some so called "secret" girls.

I haven't seen her yet but when I see pics I get a few things that help me decide if a girl may make me happy. She is just not high on my list right now.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;4615315]Now that you mention it, Misty does look familiar. What's her deal?[/QUOTE]

It's because people don't want to TOFTT or don't share so other guys stick with the well known providers. What's sad to me are fewer mongers and fewer new girls.

[QUOTE=Kent747;4616664]It is a sad state of market when 40 years old providers can command $350.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tomatillo;4616680]She's an unlisted commodity with ca-kdolls and you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed like Moli and Rebecca unfortunately.[/QUOTE]Is Moli with CAKD?

[QUOTE=Jack926;4610249]I am barely interested in Rebecca or Cami at $300. While Cami is good looking, she is HOT and COLD and very unpredictable and Rebecca is way TOO SCRIPTED. CAMI could be crazy great session and shit session the next day.

I used to like Chloe a lot and I saw her many times but the last two times that I saw her in LA in MW, it was not what it used to be when she was in Santa Monica location. I guess everything has its time.

Would I pay $350 for Chloe or Rebecca; Nope.

Would I pay $450 or $500 for Emma from EukGirls? Absolutely YES. I have been depressed since she has been gone. LOL.[/QUOTE]With these rates, how are you fellas tipping. If at all. On top of the base? Assuming of course you enjoyed your time and your expectations were met if not exceeded. 10-20%?

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;4615453]I liken the phenomenon to a honeymoon phase for mongers. At first, you're taken by her physical attractiveness, which may blindside your objectivity on her actual service and performance. But as you continue to repeat, you become more familiar and immune to her charms. This ultimately leads to a reevaluation of the reality of the session. On the other hand, the provider could just be giving her best to rope you into a loyal customer in the beginning but gradually diminish service in the long run. I've been at receiving ends of both scenarios, and now try as best I can to separate physical attractiveness and performance / service to better gauge the session. It's frightening how intrinsic and visceral physical attractiveness muddles my perception.

While the butt of many jokes, it's quite an apt exercise in comparative bias to imagine a bag over their face and go through the session from a purely service, performance, connection / interactivity, etc point of view. Once this phase ends though and in the absence of any other attraction, you'll begin to want to see other kgirls. Some guys will feel an obligation to still see her, but once it becomes an obligation, you've reach the point where you should end it. Hopefully you can or have a buddy that can whack some sense into you.[/QUOTE]Well said. Brings a whole new meaning to YMMV.

[QUOTE=Tomatillo;4616680]you probably wouldn't be allowed to see her and the other girls that aren't listed[/QUOTE]Saids who? I wasn't a veteran client with J, merely months and rarely used her agency when I got to see Rebecca and Chloe after seeing their names pop up.

[QUOTE=FiatVoluptas;4615315]Thanks for the heads up. Rosie and Lumin both look DDG to me. I will probably book Lumin when she is available. Now that you mention it, Misty does look familiar. What's her deal?[/QUOTE]Where are you seeing Rosie and Lumin?

Remember the good ol days when every girl was on CV and there wasnt so much confusion.

Here are some of the sites now. Please copy and add more.

[URL]Thetopgirls.com[/URL]

[URL]Sixshop.com[/URL]

[URL]Ktownescorts.com[/URL]

Ca-kdolls. Ch.

Twentyone. [URL]creatorlink.net[/URL].

[QUOTE=Kent747;4616664]It is a sad state of market when 40 years old providers can command $350.[/QUOTE]They can charge whatever they want. Value is still determined by the highest price someone is willing to pay. I personally value these kgirl services at $260-270. So, while they do their little experiment, I will be over in Brazil where the weather is better and you can get there what is offered here for $50-$100. It's legal and culturally acceptable. For what it's worth, every girl there makes Chanel's ass look small. And when I stop traveling, I intend to reduce my kgirl visits from four times a month, to just once. I will consider this an extra $800 of fun money saved on my end.

I recently saw 2 of the recent top K-booty contestants. Seems to me they both may have had butt implants to gain "Khardashian" proportions. Why? I hope this is not another plastic surgery trend that all these girls are buying into.

They were both in great shape before. With the best butts around among the current crop of beauties.

You know who I am talking about. Anyone else notice this from how they looked two months ago to two week ago?

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4617071]Saids who? I wasn't a veteran client with J, merely months and rarely used her agency when I got to see Rebecca and Chloe after seeing their names pop up.[/QUOTE]I would probably agree. Similar experience with myself. I don't think the booker cares as long as you are booking one of their girls.

[QUOTE=IAmGib1;4617558]I recently saw 2 of the recent top K-booty contestants. Seems to me they both may have had butt implants to gain "Khardashian" proportions. Why? I hope this is not another plastic surgery trend that all these girls are buying into.

They were both in great shape before. With the best butts around among the current crop of beauties.

You know who I am talking about. Anyone else notice this from how they looked two months ago to two week ago?[/QUOTE]I hope it isn't Ruby or Chanel. I was hoping to see them soon!

[QUOTE=Qzion24;4616814]I've given them some pretty solid business, are they really that exclusive? LOL. Not that I'm even particularly interested as I like younger girls, but I had no idea they had some so called "secret" girls.[/QUOTE]If you haven't already, just text who's available today vs singling out a particular girl from the website. I don't know what criteria they use to determine if your offered their availability but when CV was still active all of them had ads. Post SESTA / FOSTA, they just aren't actively promoted. And from the looks of it, they get by well enough without it.

[QUOTE=DarthDiggler;4616965]With these rates, how are you fellas tipping. If at all. On top of the base? Assuming of course you enjoyed your time and your expectations were met if not exceeded. 10-20%?[/QUOTE]What is this 'tipping' you speak of?

If I get bad service, do I get 10-20% off?

All kidding aside, I personally don't tip whether the session was a 6 or 10. I haven't sat down and compared notes for a specific girl with another monger that tipped to see if there were any differences. But based on reviews and the limited feedback I've gathered, I couldn't distinguish any appreciatable change in service. Moreover, with the YMMV aspect of it all, it might just be a fool's errand to try and determine if such a difference even exists.

[QUOTE=DHorn420;4617071]Saids who? I wasn't a veteran client with J, merely months and rarely used her agency when I got to see Rebecca and Chloe after seeing their names pop up.[/QUOTE]The point is you've been vetted and have been seeing her girls. The OP doesn't even have her correct number. Good luck to him or any newbie getting an appointment for Chloe or Rebecca LOL.

[QUOTE=Qzion24;4616814]I've given them some pretty solid business, are they really that exclusive? LOL. Not that I'm even particularly interested as I like younger girls, but I had no idea they had some so called "secret" girls.[/QUOTE]If you've been seeing J's girls, you should be fine. I was referring to the guys who haven't.