Printable View
[QUOTE=RexHughes;5206845]Is the "Micky with the dog" the Thai BBFS Micky, whose donation is 220 hr?
Or is she Micky at KAngels?[/QUOTE]Mickey with the dog is this one [URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?255109-Sweet-Mickey[/URL].
There is another Micky at Kangels.
I'm lucky that I got grandfathered in with the current K-bookers because they don't have a photo of my ID. Some claim to delete it after you send it, but be aware they forward it to the provider's phone so she can match the photo when she peeks through the peephole in the door. I've seen the ID photos on their phone when the booker texts them.
If I were starting from scratch with a K-agency, I'd be in the market for an online fake ID or I'd brush off my PhotoShop skills.
I have been told that Ellie is an older lady, mid-40's through a reliable source. FYI. Relatively good shape (definitely not fat like the north end AMPs) and no ass as usual with most K-girls.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5210801]I'm lucky that I got grandfathered in with the current K-bookers because they don't have a photo of my ID. Some claim to delete it after you send it, but be aware they forward it to the provider's phone so she can match the photo when she peeks through the peephole in the door. I've seen the ID photos on their phone when the booker texts them.
If I were starting from scratch with a K-agency, I'd be in the market for an online fake ID or I'd brush off my PhotoShop skills.[/QUOTE]Thanks, AussieFury. I've always thought their screening process was way too invasive (plus they are so, so expensive). That former place in Tacoma had no such screening process (although I never visited them. Again, rates too high).
True, add 10 years to when any of us last saw her. If you remember former K-Girl Aki (it is said Yumikoo was her real life sister) shows up as a KAngel, please let me know.
Aki wasn't the facially prettiest, but she was hella sexy. Started rimming right after the shower, and did so for an extended time. Had no trouble getting off with Aki.
I see Jo is back, has there been past posts or any reviews about her?
[QUOTE=Treskl;5211605]I see Jo is back, has there been past posts or any reviews about her?[/QUOTE]Many. She's their "top" girl. I've never met her. Reviews I've read have way too much variability from guys who like her to guys who were unimpressed.
At this donation level, nobody should ever leave a session feeling unimpressed.
[QUOTE=DukeOfExeter;5203257]Had asked for Jina who was unavailable. Minus all the glamour and heavy makeup, I do believe she's the girl in the pics. Very very thin, I might even describe her as 'bony'. No more than A cups versus the advertised B. But still very gropable! Nice long preview BBBJ in the shower. Perhaps the tightest pussy I've ever encountered. I'm average length with slightly above average girth. Was unable to get full penetration. Must've totally bottomed out. No place for the jizz to go but OUT! Afterward, in minimal English, she expressed concern for being torn up and unable to work after large cocks. Says she prefers Chinese cocks because "they small and hard, get lost in hair!" Cute. Standard fee, 350/ hr + 100 PSE (BBFS). I would not recommend for bigger cocks. Satisfied but, as with most KAngels, wouldn't actively seek to repeat.[/QUOTE]The pictures for Micky are the same pictures they used for her 2 years ago (Hannah) and they were accurate 2 years ago. Confirmed with Kangels that it's the same girl, although now she provides PSE but before she only used to be GFE.
Met Jina recently and she is very old compared to their website. In their website she looks like 20 year old and in real she is easily 40 plus. Also she doesn't she is the same person as the one they advertise in their website. Is this case with all other girls as well?
[QUOTE=Treskl;5211605]I see Jo is back, has there been past posts or any reviews about her?[/QUOTE]Jo / Angel is one of the facially and bodily prettiest. But, service is minimal. She does kiss, but no rimming. If pretty face, nice body, and young appearance is most important, she could be your choice.
Nikki was the old KAngel I saw. I could see the roots of her gray hair. She had freckles too. But gave great service and had a good attitude. I've read more reports here of older looking KAngels. I'm sharing mine. Do continue to share yours. If any of us are going to spend 450, we should be informed with as much accurate info as possible, right?
[QUOTE=JohnWick2022;5212589]Met Jina recently and she is very old compared to their website. In their website she looks like 20 year old and in real she is easily 40 plus. Also she doesn't she is the same person as the one they advertise in their website. Is this case with all other girls as well?[/QUOTE]Yes. Which is one purpose of this thread: to counteract the Kangels booker fuckery.
[QUOTE=JohnWick2022;5212589]Met Jina recently and she is very old compared to their website. In their website she looks like 20 year old and in real she is easily 40 plus. Also she doesn't she is the same person as the one they advertise in their website. Is this case with all other girls as well?[/QUOTE]Think I dodged a bullet then by cancelling due to the snow storm. But just as easily this could be a bait-and-switch situation.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5213459]Yes. Which is one purpose of this thread: to counteract the Kangels booker fuckery.[/QUOTE]That's what my source said, when he booked Nikki, saw her up close, and saw the gray roots in her dyed black hair:
"Fuck. ".
Maybe, those Highway 9X AMPs like VIP and Kings can pull off 45-55 year old, but it ain't cool when KAngels charges 450 for a Korean granny (literally).
Nobody here wants to date Eartha Kitt in her Boomerang guise yuck. That's Nikki of KAngels, and Buddha knows what other names they rebranded her under.
That's why so many are now afraid to book KAngels: A Korean Eartha Kitt may open the door. Nauseating.
Have any of you guys seen Tia before? Her pictures looks familiar and I think she was here sometime last year.