The Good Ones

[Pappa54]

Gentleman. I believe it is time to separate the wheat from the chaff here in Columbia. I am proposing that two new threads be populated by us adventurers that give clear information on the better quality providers in the area. There would be two threads of postings. "The Good Ones" and a different threads of "The Bad Ones". Would anyone care to comment?

Pappa54.

[Keen Observer]

Gentleman. I believe it is time to separate the wheat from the chaff here in Columbia. I am proposing that two new threads be populated by us adventurers that give clear information on the better quality providers in the area. There would be two threads of postings. "The Good Ones" and a different threads of "The Bad Ones". Would anyone care to comment?

Pappa54.The only problem I see is when YMMV situations occur. The same person would then be in both groups.

Of course, we can try it and see.

[Pappa54]

KO,

I agree completely with that statement. And YMMV probably should be a standard sign off at post closing. The premise though is to post the "Board" verified "Good Ones" and on the "Bad Ones" the rip off, completely false advertising, or nut cases. The posts would serve as a "Cliff Notes" version of the provider. Simply a sentence or two. It is not intended to replace a forum report, but to serve as a "quick" reference. Frankly, I am more interested in the "Bad Ones" being populated. Making sure the "Bad Providers" are fully and constantly exposed is good for our brother USASG members and reduces the number of opportunities these types have to profit.

Pappa54.


The only problem I see is when YMMV situations occur. The same person would then be in both groups.

Of course, we can try it and see.