BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[GuyLookinFun]

I want to thank all of you for being kind to me. Its time for me to move on and leave this business. I have had a good Clean & Long run. Thanks to you here, I will be disconnecting my number and deleting email accounts in 2 weeks. I wish you all the very best, Love & Hugs.

Nicole Legend.

Nicole you will be sorely missed. Ty for your many visits and recommended friends. Please enjoy and never look back.

[TampaBay11]

Last ad said close to gulf to bay and Hercules. Seen her several times but crickets as of late.

[Brother123]

https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-t...scorts/gallery

Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.

The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.

It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.

Monger safe and on.

Mahalo.

Man that page is full of spammers.

[Asiaticus]

Yeah, it's possible but I think it's doubtful. Again, prostitution is just not serious enough to warrant this kind of constant attention. There are always exceptions, but in most cases it's just not worth the government's time.

I take reasonable precautions against the cops, but I think most guys are way too paranoid. Street mongers should always be very paranoid. If you see escorts, especially when you take one of the team, you should be paranoid, but in that case more about getting robbed than about being busted. Guys who go to spas have nothing to worry about.

As for a burner phone, they need a subpoena first. They're not usually going to waste their time.

My opinion? Anything's possible. But the real question is: What is likely? For a petty crime like prostitution, not much.

Yeah, anything's possible. When I was in the army in the 70's I was nailed in a hotel prostitution sting out in California. I was married at the time. Talk about a clusterfuck. It's made me extra cautious ever since. That's why I mostly stick to the AMPs and well-reviewed escorts. Speaking of that, let's get back to talking about pussy.

[FlavorFul1]

She didn't change the sheets either.

Not saying she did, just that she should have.

[Tampa Monger]

Agree these sites aren't traps, just full of scammers. See a chick using just an e-mail address you can bet it's stolen pics and someone trying to get you to jump at a pay site or trying to get live e-mails to use for phishing.

What is concerning about Fosta / Sesta is the law is worded so broadly an overzealous District Attorney in the Grady Judd mold could start trying to bring local prosecutions against people who they conclude individually "aid in the promotion of prostitution". What would be juicier around election time than a bust of 50 guys involved in "trafficking". I think the law eventually will be revised as being overly broad, probably has several 1st and 4th amendment problems which may get it tossed altogether, but that will be a long process and who wants to be the test case.

With all the data mining capabilities that exist today it's not inconceivable that there's a main frame chugging away somewhere with an algorithm attempting to match screen names to email to cell phone to credit card to drivers license.

Ever use a credit card to recharge a burner phone or pay for a hotel to meet someone you'd been texting with who advertised on a site? And yes, Feds just made what amounted to prostitution busts in Maryland.

Conspiratorial? Maybe, but we live in a brand new world which is why all these sites had to scramble to move farther offshore and reinvent themselves and we haven't even begun to see how the power brokers will use this law for their advantage. But I forgot, they're from the government, and they're just here to help.

Yeah, it's possible but I think it's doubtful. Again, prostitution is just not serious enough to warrant this kind of constant attention. There are always exceptions, but in most cases it's just not worth the government's time.

I take reasonable precautions against the cops, but I think most guys are way too paranoid. Street mongers should always be very paranoid. If you see escorts, especially when you take one of the team, you should be paranoid, but in that case more about getting robbed than about being busted. Guys who go to spas have nothing to worry about.

As for a burner phone, they need a subpoena first. They're not usually going to waste their time.

My opinion? Anything's possible. But the real question is: What is likely? For a petty crime like prostitution, not much.

[Asiaticus]

Why do they all look TGTBT? Ajdal out

That's very simple to explain. Let's say you want to be the new Backpage. You spend a shit ton of money and time on developers to write a site, integrate payment collection, membership, servers, etc. Only problem? No ads. None. Mongers go to your site and see a blank page. The mongers' reaction? Leave and don't come back. Nothing to see here. Let's say you're an advertiser. You go to the site and also see nothing. Will you post an ad here? Probably not.

Now what do you do? Well, if you're honest like the USAAC guys, you know that the relationship between USASG and USAAC gives you a ready-made audience so you don't have to do anything. Let it build up over time. Maybe at first there aren't many ads, but all are high quality and have a built-in audience. But if you're not USASG / USAAC, what do you do? You throw more money at your developers to create fake ads, most likely by scraping ads from other escort sites, randomizing some shit, etc. Then when the girls come in, they see there are already lots of ads so maybe they'll post one. And so on.

So, why do they all look TGTBT? Simple: They are trying to solve the chicken and egg problem of how to drive traffic to their site. Has nothing at all to do with the cops.

[Nicole75]

Nicole def A1+++ great stuff!

I will be moving away and starting over. I just want to thank you all for several years of returning to me as a client and ultimately friends. I have 2 weeks left here so if youd like to see me. Please call oor txt. HUGS & KISSES.

NICOLE 'LEGEND'.

[Nicole75]

Another great time with Nicole last night. This girl is ridiculous. She is freaking hot for an older woman. Great body and attitude. Couldn't get in touch with her on sat, she says she didn't have a room but did on Sunday. She is in a safe hotel location. Set up appt. Got to place and the door open. She was in sexy outfit. Got in and had heavy petting and DFK with alot of tongue. Took clothes off and she laid on the bed while I was standing she gave me a very awesome BBBJ with ball licking. Great time. After a few minutes I jumped into bed and she continued with BBBJ and also paid attention to both nuggets. She then asked if I was ready and offered BBIP but didn't go for it. I sucked on those big tata's and she got the cover and placed it on. Did multiple positions and finished in cover. She is definitely sexy freak in bed. Highly recommended if you have not been with her. Gave donation at end before leaving. She never asked for it. Great attitude, personality and action. Happy mongering.

J.

I want to thank all of you for being kind to me. Its time for me to move on and leave this business. I have had a good Clean & Long run. Thanks to you here, I will be disconnecting my number and deleting email accounts in 2 weeks. I wish you all the very best, Love & Hugs.

Nicole Legend.

[Jay Twogo]

But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.

Agree these sites aren't traps, just full of scammers. See a chick using just an e-mail address you can bet it's stolen pics and someone trying to get you to jump at a pay site or trying to get live e-mails to use for phishing.

What is concerning about Fosta / Sesta is the law is worded so broadly an overzealous District Attorney in the Grady Judd mold could start trying to bring local prosecutions against people who they conclude individually "aid in the promotion of prostitution". What would be juicier around election time than a bust of 50 guys involved in "trafficking". I think the law eventually will be revised as being overly broad, probably has several 1st and 4th amendment problems which may get it tossed altogether, but that will be a long process and who wants to be the test case.

With all the data mining capabilities that exist today it's not inconceivable that there's a main frame chugging away somewhere with an algorithm attempting to match screen names to email to cell phone to credit card to drivers license.

Ever use a credit card to recharge a burner phone or pay for a hotel to meet someone you'd been texting with who advertised on a site? And yes, Feds just made what amounted to prostitution busts in Maryland.

Conspiratorial? Maybe, but we live in a brand new world which is why all these sites had to scramble to move farther offshore and reinvent themselves and we haven't even begun to see how the power brokers will use this law for their advantage. But I forgot, they're from the government, and they're just here to help.

[Ajdal]

Why do they all look TGTBT? Ajdal out

Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.

But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope..

[Admin2]

Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.

But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.

Guys, prostitution is not a very serious crime. It's serious enough that the local cops are going to spend some limited resources on it. They may spend time to bust something very high-profile (like the Eliot Spitzer thing) or something that's too obvious and will attract the attention of "concerned citizens" (like Backpage or Discreet Meets). But the cops generally aren't going to spend gobs of cash, get fancy warrants, tap phones, and all the rest, just to arrest you for a petty crime like this one. Every once in a while they do some kind of big sting operation for political purposes, but that's usually limited in time, scope, and location. It's usually done by a county sherriff to get his name in the papers for electoral purposes. And of course they monitor street prostitution because otherwise the neighbors complain.

You're 100% on the money but they want to feel like they are serious criminals like Tony Montana. I think it ads to their thrill.

A2.

[Tampa Monger]

Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.

Whatever this is, it's not the Feds fishing. None of these sites are the Feds fishing. If it is, it would be the dumbest boondoggle of an operation in law enforcement history. First, it's expensive and time-consuming to get a web site up and running properly. You don't just pop one out in a New York minute. Second, let's say it is the Feds. What's the plan? Set up expensive hotel stings for potentially thousands of people for a crime that in most jurisdictions is a second degree misdemeanor, about the same as driving on a suspended license? (And it's not a Federal crime. It's a local one handled by local laws.) Or maybe they get your phone number and email address and try to bust you for talking about paying for sex that way. Then they show up and arrest you. Doesn't seem worth it. And of course, as soon as everyone puts two and two together, we'd all steer clear of that site and it would be a useless waste. Not to mention that without legit girls and reviews, it wouldn't last very long.

But what makes it even more unlikely is that there is no specific Federal law I know of against prostitution. (There's some stuff about minors and foreign nationals, but no general prohibition. That's left to the states.) Prostitution is legislated at the state and local level. It is not a Federal crime as far as I know. (If it was, it would have been outlawed in Nevada long ago.) When people do get busted for prostitution, who does the busting? Not the FBI. It's local police. Are the Feds going to set up a sting for something that isn't even a Federal crime and then hand the perps over to the local police where it actually is a crime? Nope.

Guys, prostitution is not a very serious crime. It's serious enough that the local cops are going to spend some limited resources on it. They may spend time to bust something very high-profile (like the Eliot Spitzer thing) or something that's too obvious and will attract the attention of "concerned citizens" (like Backpage or Discreet Meets). But the cops generally aren't going to spend gobs of cash, get fancy warrants, tap phones, and all the rest, just to arrest you for a petty crime like this one. Every once in a while they do some kind of big sting operation for political purposes, but that's usually limited in time, scope, and location. It's usually done by a county sherriff to get his name in the papers for electoral purposes. And of course they monitor street prostitution because otherwise the neighbors complain.

[Just Some Fun]

Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.

I didn't see one familiar face.

[JarOfRoses]

https://www.ibackpage.com/backpage-t...scorts/gallery

Checkout the new and improved BP, LOL.

The pictures seem to professional for me and could be fake posts til they get the girls back posting again.

It is GREAT having that resource back again. The other pages don't seem to compare IMHO.

Monger safe and on.

Mahalo.

Reviewed that page and I'm going to wait awhile. Could be Feds fishing.