BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[JayRodz84]

Any info on this one?

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...3888;/23638802

[Pappa54]

This kid is harmless. Never have I seen her ask for party favors, but I have seen her a couple of times. She is a trailer country girl. "0" Polish but respectful. I will not recommend because she is not my style. But she is harmless and tries to do the right thing for a hobbyist. She is not very well educated, but she is smart. Because she has a hood / country persona guys probably think she is simple. Not true. She told me one guy wanted to pay her to let his dog hump her, in which she got creeped out.

She gives a fair performance and she needs to work on her game. But she is no addict. I don't care if anyone sees her or not, but she is harmless, so don't slander the girl unless you provide reasonable explanation. . How do I know this. "Her clit and labia could also be used as a "pup tent" it's so big. They look like "fruit bat" wings. It's like a $. 75 poncho at W_almart." So I have seen her and talked to her and have never seen any proof that she should be blacklisted.

Acurate reports along with opinion is preferable. Over simple opinion.

Peace.

P54.

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...il-23/23672407

Above is her new profile.

[Rucky]

http://columbia.skipthegames.com/fem...u/795366821567

Any review for this ad.

I set up an appointment with her for the next day. She said she would be available starting at 4 am, so I set an appointment time for 6:30 am. I told her I would text her around 6 am for the address. All seemed good. Next morning, I text asking for address shortly after 6 am, and started heading across town to the general area her ad listed. She responded approximately 45 minutes later acting clueless. Said she wasn't home yet. I asked for an eta she would be back. Nothing, crickets.

Waste of time.

[Five Starrs]

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...s-ask/23654637

Party favors meaning she will exchange service for drugs as I stated before avoid this chic.

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...il-23/23672407

Above is her new profile.

[Five Starrs]

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...s-ask/23654637

Party favors meaning she will exchange service for drugs as I stated before avoid this chic.

[Five Starrs]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive white knight drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[Pappa54]

RE-ACTIVATED.

On a brighter note, the new BP system seems to be cleaning up the riff raff. Target opportunities are thinning. We may need a new "generic" forum in the future. Just my thoughts.

Peace.

Pappa54.

[LiquidStep]

http://columbia.skipthegames.com/fem...u/795366821567

Any review for this ad.

She's real. But an absolute nightmare to get in contact with.

I've tried to see her multiple times over the past 3 months, she responds once or twice then falls off the map. Drove to her location four times and she went radio silent on me every time. I gave up with her and do not recommend, though if you can actually manage to deal with the fucking hell that is contacting her, and actually meet her, then she is great, but because she's such a nightmare to see I will not repeat.

[Arun2013]

http://columbia.skipthegames.com/fem...u/795366821567

Any review for this ad.

[OiledUpTits]

I don't understand why it was redacted.

I'll take a swing at this one.

Maybe, just maybe it happened because you seem to be obsessed with another member to the point of me having to place him on your admin ignore list and yet you continue to comment about him (the guy) on a thread that is for people to review Backpage Advertisers.

Yes I know, one whole sentence of your post was thanking a guy for a review, but the other 95% was calling out another member.

You don't seem to understand that we review hookers here, it's not a site for you to troll men because your life apparently is so pathetic that you have nothing better to do.

Maybe that's what happened.

A2

[OiledUpTits]

I saw this girl quite a while ago. Long enough ago that I don't recall all the details. She's a white girl who sounds black, especially on the phone. I remember that well. She was OK. Pleasant amd friendly enough. Prettier than her pictures. Not particularly memorable, though.

Thanks LKG for the review. It's good to see a thorough report that included the good and the bad instead of being one sided. I know that it's accurate too and not made up.

[Love Kgirls]

Any real reviews on this girl?

http://columbia.backpage.com/WomenSe...ction/16077373

I saw this girl quite a while ago. Long enough ago that I don't recall all the details. She's a white girl who sounds black, especially on the phone. I remember that well. She was OK. Pleasant amd friendly enough. Prettier than her pictures. Not particularly memorable, though.

[OiledUpTits]

For those who have a hard time comprehending my post about caramel states that my review wasn't based on pics it was based on personql one on one contact which should override any pics you may have or may have not received and I believe the latter only pic that doesn't have a tattoo is on one side of her booty I'm hoping as adults we can distinguish the left booty cheek from the right lastly only one booty cheek has a tattoo it is counter productive to the accurately review someone who you have never seen in person and have no intentions on eveR seeing I only review providers based on sight and experience not fantasy bottom line nothing my fake about her if your into thick providers YMMV based on your behavior.

Thanks Nupedog [Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

You may want to pay attention to what's I left in and what got redacted.

A2

[Five Starrs]

For those who have a hard time comprehending my post about caramel states that my review wasn't based on pics it was based on personql one on one contact which should override any pics you may have or may have not received and I believe the latter only pic that doesn't have a tattoo is on one side of her booty I'm hoping as adults we can distinguish the left booty cheek from the right lastly only one booty cheek has a tattoo it is counter productive to the accurately review someone who you have never seen in person and have no intentions on eveR seeing I only review providers based on sight and experience not fantasy bottom line nothing my fake about her if your into thick providers YMMV based on your behavior.

For those who are confused about my original post the pic in question I'm referring to isn't posted and it's not posted for good reason. I ask my fellow partners if you see an ad with certain distinct features but is sent a pic which is tottaly different wouldn't you question the person in the ad? I think any reasonable person with common sense would question the person. Also, I think most people on here know the difference between right and left when comes down to looking at pictures online. Let me repeat myself the picture in question isn't posted online it was sent to me. I think maybe I should post the pic in question and let the members here decide for themselves. I'm sure you have told her about these post but I find it interesting she hasn't posted the pic in question to proove me wrong.

Furthermore, reviews just arent just about service it's about how a provider acts or does when contacted and I'm going my contact with this chic. For example, a girl posted an ad with a Facebook link but the girl on Facebook was white and the girl in the ad was black. So I should not question why she posted a pic of this other woman? I'm just saying if it works for you then it's you.

[NupeDog]

For those who have a hard time comprehending my post about caramel states that my review wasn't based on pics it was based on personql one on one contact which should override any pics you may have or may have not received and I believe the latter only pic that doesn't have a tattoo is on one side of her booty I'm hoping as adults we can distinguish the left booty cheek from the right lastly only one booty cheek has a tattoo it is counter productive to the accurately review someone who you have never seen in person and have no intentions on eveR seeing I only review providers based on sight and experience not fantasy bottom line nothing my fake about her if your into thick providers YMMV based on your behavior.