News and Media Reports

[AsianBlowjob]

Ask Robert Kraft how well things went when he went incognito to get a hand job in Florida. Kraft was among 25 people facing first-degree misdemeanor charges for soliciting prostitution at a day spa in 2019. Kraft's attorney electronically entered a not-guilty plea, and later submitted a court filing where Kraft waived arraignment, plead not guilty to all charges and requested a jury trial. A memo filed by Kraft's attorneys revealed that hidden cameras had been installed when investigators entered the facility under the guise of a bomb threat. A Palm Beach County judge ruled that prosecutors could not use the videos in their case, citing privacy concerns. A Florida appeals court also ruled that Kraft's constitutional rights were violated, and all the charges were dropped. US District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz ordered the videos to be destroyed. That attorney probably cost him $100,000.

Your point is well taken, and pretty accurate, but Bobby K spent WAY more than $100 k on his team.

Also, he was allegedly getting blown on video. Handy was the first visit. Don't need that on TMZ.

His lawyers went to each and Every person arrested and basically said, "Shut up, We your lawyer now. " Every single one. Then they put the plan into action to squash it.

He spent millions.

And when you are worth billions, it's the same as a #1 combo meal from McDonalds.

[BuckeyeGuy2]

US Government sieved their domain, so all client info is in their hands including your verification picture & employer info. I don't want that kind of aggravation. Rich guys can higher expensive attorneys & will eventually get charges dismissed on technicalities. In the mean time they still have to answer to their S. O. & families. No, thanks!

Ask Robert Kraft how well things went when he went incognito to get a hand job in Florida. Kraft was among 25 people facing first-degree misdemeanor charges for soliciting prostitution at a day spa in 2019. Kraft's attorney electronically entered a not-guilty plea, and later submitted a court filing where Kraft waived arraignment, plead not guilty to all charges and requested a jury trial. A memo filed by Kraft's attorneys revealed that hidden cameras had been installed when investigators entered the facility under the guise of a bomb threat. A Palm Beach County judge ruled that prosecutors could not use the videos in their case, citing privacy concerns. A Florida appeals court also ruled that Kraft's constitutional rights were violated, and all the charges were dropped. US District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz ordered the videos to be destroyed. That attorney probably cost him $100,000.

[BearsBuddy]

Funny. In the article there is absolutely not one mention of "Human Trafficking" at all. Those words must be reserved for the lower classes such as the mongers in the Cleveland streets LOL.

Actually, it is.

"were arrested and charged with conspiring to coerce and entice women to travel to engage in illegal sexual activity. ".

[Rafter17]

Two websites advertised appointments with Asian women, and customers underwent a vetting process that included providing their driver's license photos and employers' names, prosecutors said. The USA Government has seized those sites' domains.

Never give out personal information!! USA Govt will come looking for you!!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...ts-2023-11-08/

Those guys are probably getting the actual girls in all the ads we see when paying those amounts.

[BuckeyeGuy2]

US Government sieved their domain, so all client info is in their hands including your verification picture & employer info. I don't want that kind of aggravation. Rich guys can higher expensive attorneys & will eventually get charges dismissed on technicalities. In the mean time they still have to answer to their S. O. & families. No, thanks!

Chances of ever seeing any names of the clientele? Those rich folks going to have their names dragged through the street like us peons?

[DirtMerchant]

Two websites advertised appointments with Asian women, and customers underwent a vetting process that included providing their driver's license photos and employers' names, prosecutors said. The USA Government has seized those sites' domains.

Never give out personal information!! USA Govt will come looking for you!!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...ts-2023-11-08/

Chances of ever seeing any names of the clientele? Those rich folks going to have their names dragged through the street like us peons?

[TooManyLadies8]

Funny. In the article there is absolutely not one mention of "Human Trafficking" at all. Those words must be reserved for the lower classes such as the mongers in the Cleveland streets LOL.

Yes there is.

[Cleveland Report]

Funny. In the article there is absolutely not one mention of "Human Trafficking" at all. Those words must be reserved for the lower classes such as the mongers in the Cleveland streets LOL.

Two websites advertised appointments with Asian women, and customers underwent a vetting process that included providing their driver's license photos and employers' names, prosecutors said. The USA Government has seized those sites' domains.

Never give out personal information!! USA Govt will come looking for you!!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...ts-2023-11-08/

[Boonniee99]

Two websites advertised appointments with Asian women, and customers underwent a vetting process that included providing their driver's license photos and employers' names, prosecutors said. The USA Government has seized those sites' domains.

Never give out personal information!! USA Govt will come looking for you!!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...ts-2023-11-08/

You have to if you want to see high end ones.

[BuckeyeGuy2]

Two websites advertised appointments with Asian women, and customers underwent a vetting process that included providing their driver's license photos and employers' names, prosecutors said. The USA Government has seized those sites' domains.

Never give out personal information!! USA Govt will come looking for you!!

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...ts-2023-11-08/

[Gray Man52]

Do you have the link to Shane? Or have any pics of her?

I saw her about a year ago a couple of times but she didn't act like that.

https://40up.com.listcrawler.eu/post...land/158312206

[Taejin36]

Do you have the link to Shane? Or have any pics of her?

She's on SA and POF.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...c-c180087369d9

https://www.pof.com/viewprofile?profileId=313149010

[SlickMutha]

Thanks for the heads up. Just curious if anyone has an idea of how often an arrested provider's phone and other info is used by police to set up stings. I have always assumed it's pretty rare. But the other day I was trying to set something up with a provider who has been vouched for in the past by members of this forum, (Shane in Bedford) and she acted just like I imagine a cop would--trying to get me to incriminate myself beyond any possibility of reasonable doubt. Lots of explicit talk about what we would be doing, what services I specifically wanted, condom use, asking me for a selfie, etc. Was this just a careless provider, or a cop? Probably a careless provider. But I wasn't going to find out the hard way. So anyway, what do you guys think? Is the use of a former provider's info by cops unusual or common?

Do you have the link to Shane? Or have any pics of her?

[Taejin36]

Thanks for the heads up. Just curious if anyone has an idea of how often an arrested provider's phone and other info is used by police to set up stings. I have always assumed it's pretty rare. But the other day I was trying to set something up with a provider who has been vouched for in the past by members of this forum, (Shane in Bedford) and she acted just like I imagine a cop would--trying to get me to incriminate myself beyond any possibility of reasonable doubt. Lots of explicit talk about what we would be doing, what services I specifically wanted, condom use, asking me for a selfie, etc. Was this just a careless provider, or a cop? Probably a careless provider. But I wasn't going to find out the hard way. So anyway, what do you guys think? Is the use of a former provider's info by cops unusual or common?

Good to know about Shane. I hadn't seen in awhile and was going to get back in touch with her. She was pretty open so not surprising that she would be busted. Too much heat out there now.

[Tp1022]

Thanks for the heads up. Just curious if anyone has an idea of how often an arrested provider's phone and other info is used by police to set up stings. I have always assumed it's pretty rare. But the other day I was trying to set something up with a provider who has been vouched for in the past by members of this forum, (Shane in Bedford) and she acted just like I imagine a cop would--trying to get me to incriminate myself beyond any possibility of reasonable doubt. Lots of explicit talk about what we would be doing, what services I specifically wanted, condom use, asking me for a selfie, etc. Was this just a careless provider, or a cop? Probably a careless provider. But I wasn't going to find out the hard way. So anyway, what do you guys think? Is the use of a former provider's info by cops unusual or common?

Police are using search terms on social media and known escort sites to find the escorts and set up meets. They then use probable cause and search warrants to search their devices with digital forensics. Both the escorts and their johns are incriminated. Seems like the walls are always closing in.