Rants, Raves & Opinions

[PNWPlay]

You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.

There was no white knighting and TNA was about reviews and not just.

Another board for ladies to advertise on? Well it's time for that board to return to it's roots!

[Lurker9]

You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.

So. Who exactly am I white knighting? And how?

And IDGAF to who / what you're sick of.

[Dexxzy]

LOLOL I did not defend any hobbyist. OP writes an alert, Jake attacks the guy without considering that despite OP being new, the alert might still be valid. I CONCUR with PriceIsRight's comment about white knighting the white knights. Where's "blindly defending other hobbyists" here?

You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.

[PoontangChaser]

So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.

LOLOL I did not defend any hobbyist. OP writes an alert, Jake attacks the guy without considering that despite OP being new, the alert might still be valid. I CONCUR with PriceIsRight's comment about white knighting the white knights. Where's "blindly defending other hobbyists" here?

However, I do appreciate the passion with which YOU, sir, are defending Jake. Bravo! What was the term again? Ah, "hobbyist WK!"

Or is that you, Jake? SMFH.

[GrandIllusions]

So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.

Ya the dude also said he never needed to be part of any forum as well. And he decided to post there to help others from the lady.

This thread is starting to sound like it on the board, maybe we should just send it over to TNA what happened to the girls man.

[GrandIllusions]

So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.

Ya the dude also said he never needed to be part of any forum as well. And he decided to post there to help others from the lady.

This thread is starting to sound like it on the board, maybe we should just send it over to TNA what happened to the girls man.

[Dexxzy]

There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)

Jake4 X challenged and cast suspicion on the OP right out of the gate without even enquiring about the details of what transpired. Basically, you're an alt so you're not to be believed and thus the lady must be right.

Yeah, white knight for sure.

So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.

[PoontangChaser]

Skepticism isn't a bad word its a good word and skepticism don't make a wk a wk has no skepticism he always believes the woman even when faced with the facts.

There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)

Jake4 X challenged and cast suspicion on the OP right out of the gate without even enquiring about the details of what transpired. Basically, you're an alt so you're not to be believed and thus the lady must be right.

Yeah, white knight for sure.

[ShootingBlanks]

Skepticism isn't a bad word its a good word and skepticism don't make a wk a wk has no skepticism he always believes the woman even when faced with the facts.

I'll take Blackmail for 1000 Alex.

Good looking out Cowboy! This is a chilling report. Of course the first White Knight already posted his skeptical response.

[PoontangChaser]

White knighting the white knights! LOL.

Hahaha nice! True though.

[PriceIsRight39]

I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.

White knighting the white knights! LOL.

[John Chemistry]

I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.

Isn't he the guy who had his garage burned down by Jessie (Cinder)? Because if he is, fuck you for sticking up for him!

[EoCowbooy 1]

I don't know why this guy has so many guys questioning him as he spelled it out pretty well in his first statement. Interesting that no women have posted in this alert. More interesting is his comments on the back channel statements by other guys. One guy asked what she could possibly gain by accessing his phone? OMG what a dolt.

I'm with you in that I thought TNA would have nuked this thread by now. I can't personally vouch for any men on TNA so I'm going with the eyeball test on Jake. You may be right but.

I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.

[Boomer14]

If you are referring to Jake, I find him to be far from a WK. I've personally met him as well. I'll peek over as I'm sure more have answered. I didn't expect it to be up this long actually.

I don't know why this guy has so many guys questioning him as he spelled it out pretty well in his first statement. Interesting that no women have posted in this alert. More interesting is his comments on the back channel statements by other guys. One guy asked what she could possibly gain by accessing his phone? OMG what a dolt.

I'm with you in that I thought TNA would have nuked this thread by now. I can't personally vouch for any men on TNA so I'm going with the eyeball test on Jake. You may be right but.

[EoCowbooy 1]

I'll take Blackmail for 1000 Alex.

Good looking out Cowboy! This is a chilling report. Of course the first White Knight already posted his skeptical response.

If you are referring to Jake, I find him to be far from a WK. I've personally met him as well. I'll peek over as I'm sure more have answered. I didn't expect it to be up this long actually.